Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, Critical Collaborations: Indigeneity, Diaspora, and Ecology in Canadian Literary Studies
…
10 pages
1 file
This paper uses Larissa Lai’s 2002 novel Salt Fish Girl and the Unregulated Zone it describes as a companion for thinking through what science studies has to offer ecocriticism and environmental politics. In the speculative fantasies of Salt Fish Girl, the Unregulated Zone lies outside the secured boundaries of the corporate strongholds that have replaced nation-states in the mid-twenty-first century Pacific Northwest. Populated by sweatshops, unidentified viruses, barter networks of the unemployed, human clones, and genetically modified organisms mutating in a changing climate, the Unregulated Zone riffs on the popular tradition of environmental dystopia and the neo-liberal erosion of welfare-state protections. But Salt Fish Girl is also a novel of hope. Structurally, the Unregulated Zone is a place without recourse to a transcendent authority—not to the laws of a state, not to a corporate contract, not even to predictable laws of nature—and this is what makes it a contested space of both nightmares and political possibility. Like the science studies approach that partially inspires it, the novel presents the Unregulated Zone as a political opening—a place from which we might reconfigure ecological relations. Although many environmental critics pull back in horror from such premises, I turn to science studies, particularly the work of Donna Haraway and Bruno Latour, to find a more robust mode of environmental criticism and politics that can take them into account. Beyond the “nature-endorsing” or realist and “nature-skeptic” or social constructionist positions within social theory lies a more nuanced path that grapples with dynamic assemblages of human and nonhuman actors (Soper 23).
2000
This work examines the ways in which the relationship between society and nature is problematic for social theory. The Frankfurt School’s notion of the dialectic of enlightenment is considered, as are the attempts by Jurgen Habermas to defend an ‘emancipatory’ theory of modernity against this. The marginalising effect Habermas’ defence of reason has had on the place of nature in his critical social theory is examined, as is the work of theorists such as Ulrich Beck and Klaus Eder. For these latter authors, unlike Habermas, the social relation to nature is at the centre of contemporary society, giving rise to new forms of modernisation and politics. ¶ Michel Foucault’s work on biopolitics and governmentality is examined against the background of his philosophical debate with Habermas on power and rationality. The growth of scientific ecology is shown to have both problematised the social relation to nature and provided the political technology for new forms of regulatory intervention in the management of the population and resources. These new forms of intervention constitute a form of ecological governmentality along the lines discussed by Foucault and others in relation to the human sciences.
■ Abstract Twenty years ago, two environmental sociologists made a bold call for a paradigmatic shift in the discipline of sociology—namely, one that would bring nature into the center of sociological inquiry and recognize the inseparability of nature and society. In this essay, we review recent scholarship that seeks to meet this challenge. The respective strands of this literature come from the margins of environmental sociology and border on other arenas of social theory production, including neo-Marxism, political ecology, materialist feminism, and social studies of science. Bringing together scholars from sociology, anthropology, geography, and history, each of these strands offers what we consider the most innovative new work trying to move sociology beyond the nature/society divide.
2023
With our planet having entered a new geological epoch- “Anthropocene”- defined by the unprecedented material effects of human activity, human and non-human lives and futures are now deeply entangled, and endangered. The ensuing environmental crises have brought engagements with the non-human world to the center of public and political debates. As a discipline that explores various thresholds of difference, anthropology has long been concerned with the figure of the non-human (trees, totems, storms, animals) and the relation between human and non-human worlds. In this course, we consider what critical tools anthropology may offer for rethinking ethics and politics beyond the human. This includes the politics of marking distinctions between the human and the non-human, as well as engaging themes of access, equity and justice with an emphasis on colonialism, race and political economy. We will explore diverse ideas relating to the themes of nature, wilderness, natural resources, animalities, the environment and the state, and ecological justice in a cross-cultural and comparative perspective. Guided by ethnographic analysis, our studies will be in conversation with explorations of nature and the non-human in neighboring disciplines like philosophy, cultural studies, literature, psychology and feminist science and technology studies (STS). The course emphasizes the political dimension of engaging non-human worlds with an aim to historicize and pluralize environmental thought, within Europe and elsewhere. The first part of the course attends to how different epistemologies (ways of knowing) and cosmologies (world-making) produce concepts and methods for studying nature and the non-human world. The second part of the course examines how these different ways of knowing and thinking about the non-human world shape political and public debates about the environment. The course will emphasize making connections between theoretical ideas and debates and current issues. An individual research paper will provide an opportunity to apply insights from the course and make concrete and creative connections between academic theory and lived social reality. By focusing on the long disciplinary engagement with non-human worlds and entities in anthropology, we hope to better equip students to devise independent research projects on themes in environmental anthropology.
Journal of Political Ecology, 2013
Territories, Environments, Politics edited by Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2022
This thoughtful and rich volume is edited by two of today's foremost scholars of territoriality and the city. It offers a novel re-visioning of issues of territorial complexity and a wide range of urban examples of spatialised social life across different scales and cultural contexts. A very timely and highly original publication that will be a source of inspiration both for researchers and practitioners across disciplines." Albena Yaneva, University of Manchester, UK "As evinced by the scope and depth of the contributions to this volume, Kärrholm and Brighenti's program for a 'non-reductive territoriology' offers a nuanced and sophisticated understanding of territories which promises to provide inspiration and creative openings for groundbreaking research on the nature and implications of territorialization process and practices for many years to come." Jonathan Metzger, KTH Stockholm, Sweden "In times of dramatic planetary changes, it is all the more urgent to reflect on the ontological grounds that orient thinking, sensing, and acting in the world. This volume is a convincing move in this direction. Against the grain of decades of reductionist and politically ambiguous interpretations, Brighenti and Kärrholm prompt us to rethink what territories are, how are they made and by whom, by drawing the lineaments of an original Science of Territory that is transversal to hard and soft science, art, politics, and the everyday. This transdisciplinary ambition is reflected on the impressive theoretical, empirical, and methodological diversity of the original contributions that compose the publication, making it an invaluable tool for conjuring new ways of speculating, researching and imagining the material complexity of socio-natural life."
International Handbook of Political Ecology, 2015
eds., New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 251 pp. 978-0230241039 (Hardback), 978-0230241046 (Paperback).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Denaturalizing Ecological Politics, 2005
Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003
Progress in Human Geography, 2002
Communalism: International Journal for a Rational Society, 2002
Edinburgh University Press eBooks, 2020
The AAG Review of Books, 2017
Anti-Creep Climate Initiative Comics, 2022
Contemporary Political Theory, 2016
Connotations - A Journal for Critical Debate, 2019