Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: A reexamination

Trends in Neurosciences, 1997

There is increasing evidence that, in addition to its major functional role in the regulation of fine motor control, the cerebellum is involved in other important functions, such as sensory–motor learning and memory. Classical conditioning of the eyeblink or nictitating membrane response (and other discrete behavioral responses) is a form of sensory–motor learning that depends crucially upon the cerebellum. Within the cerebellum, however, the relative importance of the cerebellar cortex and the deep cerebellar nuclei in eyeblink conditioning is unclear and disputed. Recent studies employing various mutant mice provide an effective approach to resolving this controversy. Eyeblink conditioning in spontaneous mutant mice deficient in Purkinje cells, the exclusive output neurons of the cerebellar cortex, indicate that both the cerebellar cortex and the interpositus nucleus are important. Furthermore, studies involving gene knockout mice suggest that long-term depression, a process of synaptic plasticity occurring in Purkinje cells, might be involved in eyeblink conditioning.

Behavioral Neuroscience, 2009

Eyeblink conditioning using a conditioned stimulus (CS) from one sensory modality (e.g., an auditory CS) is greatly enhanced when the subject is previously trained with a CS from a different sensory modality (e.g., a visual CS). The enhanced acquisition to the second modality CS results from cross modal savings. The current study was designed to examine the role of the cerebellum in establishing cross modal savings in eyeblink conditioning with rats. In the first experiment rats were given paired or unpaired presentations with a CS (tone or light) and an unconditioned stimulus (US). All rats were then given paired training with a different modality CS. Only rats given paired training showed cross modal savings to the second modality CS. Experiment 2 showed that cerebellar inactivation during initial acquisition to the first modality CS completely prevented savings when training was switched to the second modality CS. Experiment 3 showed that cerebellar inactivation during initial cross modal training also prevented savings to the second modality stimulus. These results indicate that the cerebellum plays an essential role in establishing cross modal savings of eyeblink conditioning.

The Journal of Physiology, 1996

The cerebellum and brainstem constitute the essential neural circuit responsible for the acquisition and expression of the classically conditioned eyeblink response in numerous mammalian species, including humans. In this simple form of motor learning, a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) overlaps and coterminates with a mildly aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), resulting, eventually, in the production of an eyeblink conditioned response (CR) to the CS alone. The forebrain is engaged when this basic delay procedure is made more difficult – for instance, if the CS and US are separated by a brief stimulus-free gap of time. In either case, it is generally accepted that the critical memory trace is formed and stored in the cerebellar interpositus nucleus (IP). The cerebellar cortex also plays a key role in normal acquisition by modulating the amplitude and/or timing characteristics of the eyeblink CR. Owing to the well-defined nature of the neural circuit, and the close correspondence between animal and human studies, eyeblink conditioning has been successfully used to investigate cerebellar dysfunction across a variety of human populations. Herein, research related to three representative disorders is discussed: fetal

Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 2002

The cerebellum is considered a brain structure in which memories for learned motor responses (e.g., conditioned eyeblink responses) are stored. Within the cerebellum, however, the relative importance of the cortex and the deep nuclei in motor learning͞memory is not entirely clear. In this study, we show that the cerebellar cortex exerts both basal and stimulus-activated inhibition to the deep nuclei. Sequential application of a ␥-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) agonist and a noncompetitive GABAAR antagonist allows selective blockade of stimulus-activated inhibition. By using the same sequential agonist and antagonist methods in behaving animals, we demonstrate that the conditioned response (CR) expression and timing are completely dissociable and involve different inhibitory inputs; although the basal inhibition modulates CR expression, the conditioned stimulus-activated inhibition is required for the proper timing of the CR. In addition, complete blockade of cerebellar deep nuclear GABAARs prevents CR acquisition. Together, these results suggest that different aspects of the memories for eyeblink CRs are encoded in the cerebellar cortex and the cerebellar deep nuclei.

Behavioral Neuroscience, 2009

Theories of cerebellar learning propose that alterations in synaptic plasticity resulting in decreases in cerebellar cortical inhibition and increases in sensory activation of interpositus nuclei underlie the development of adaptively timed conditioned motor responses. The authors found that with concurrent pharmacological disconnection of the cerebellar cortex and intense sensory stimulation in the untrained rabbit, eyeblink responses were generated. Neither sensory stimulation nor disconnection alone generated significant eyeblink responses. These results are consistent with dual plasticity models of cerebellar learning and strongly support the general hypothesis that conditioned responses are the result of strengthening of preexisting connections in the nervous system.

Journal of Neuroscience, 2004

Eyeblink conditioning has been hypothesized to engage two successive stages of nonspecific emotional (fear) and specific musculature (eyelid) learning, during which the nonspecific component influences the acquisition of the specific component. Here we test this notion by investigating the relative contributions of the cerebellum, the amygdala, and the hippocampus to the emergence of conditioned eyelid and fear responses during delay eyeblink conditioning in freely moving rats. Periorbital electromyography (EMG) and 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalization (USV) activities were measured concurrently from the same subjects and served as indices of conditioned eyeblink and fear responses, respectively. In control animals, conditioned EMG responses increased across training sessions, whereas USV responses were initially robust but decreased across training sessions. Animals with electrolytic lesions to their cerebellum (targeting the interpositus nucleus) were completely unable to acquire conditioned EMG responses but exhibited normal USV behavior, whereas animals with lesions to the amygdala showed decelerated acquisition of conditioned EMG responses and displayed practically no USV behavior. In contrast, hippocampal lesioned rats demonstrated facilitated acquisition of conditioned EMG responses, whereas the USV behavior was unaffected. The amygdalar involvement in eyeblink conditioning was examined further by applying the GABA A agonist muscimol directly into the amygdala either before or immediately after training sessions. Although pretraining muscimol infusions impaired conditioned EMG responses, post-training infusions did not. Together, these results suggest that, even during a simple delay eyeblink conditioning, animals learn about different aspects associated with the behavioral task that are subserved by multiple brain-memory systems that interact to produce the overall behavior.

Behavioral Neuroscience, 1993

We explored classical conditioning in human subjects who had lesions in their cerebellar circuitry. Seven patients with damage to cerebellar structures and matched control subjects underwent simple delay tone-airpuff conditioning. Eyelid conditioned response (CR) acquisition was severely disrupted in the patient group, whereas autonomic CRs and slow cortical potentials developing between conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) were unaffected. Results are consistent with animal studies and earlier case reports indicating that intact cerebellar structures are necessary for the acquisition of classically conditioned motor responses.

Learning & Memory, 2009

The role of the cerebellum in eyeblink conditioning is well established. Less work has been done to identify the necessary conditioned stimulus (CS) pathways that project sensory information to the cerebellum. A possible visual CS pathway has been hypothesized that consists of parallel inputs to the pontine nuclei from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), superior colliculus (SC), pretectal nuclei, and visual cortex (VCTX) as reported by Koutalidis and colleagues in an earlier paper. The following experiments examined whether electrical stimulation of neural structures in the putative visual CS pathway can serve as a sufficient CS for eyeblink conditioning in rats. Unilateral stimulation of the ventral LGN (Experiment 1), SC (Experiment 2), or VCTX (Experiment 3) was used as a CS paired with a periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus. Stimulation was delivered to the hemisphere contralateral to the conditioned eye. Rats in all experiments were given five 100-trial sessions of paire...

Behavioural Brain Research, 2006

Nictitating membrane movement and multiple-unit activity in the somatosensory cortex were recorded from rabbits during paired (N = 6) and unpaired (N = 5) presentations of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and an airpuff unconditioned stimulus (US). A behavioural conditioned response (CR) to the CS and an accompanying neural response in the somatosensory cortex developed only in the paired group. Inactivation of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus abolished both the acquired CR and the accompanying neural response. However, the CS facilitated both behavioural and neural responses to the US during the inactivation. Thus, the absence of the CR could not be accounted for by the general inability of the CS to alter the behaviour constituting the CR or the activity of the somatosensory cortex. These findings suggest that the efferent copy of the signal related to the eyeblink CR is projected from the cerebellum to the cerebral cortical areas of the US modality.