Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This study describes a tool for identifying the prevailing rhetorical tones in electoral speeches (here the 2014 presidential campaign in Romania), especially from the print press. The application, abbreviated PDA, allows for a rapid and robust interpretation of the electoral language, requiring an interdisciplinary approach. By emphasizing the rhetoric component at the level of speech, electors identify with the candidate, who becomes the personification of their common expectations. Rhetoric diversity is an important problem for receiving message, due to the heterogeneity of auditors. This investigation is intended to give support to specialists in political sciences, to political analysts, sociologists and election's staff, being helpful mainly in their interpretation of the electoral campaigns, as well as to the media, in their intend to evaluate reactions with respect to the developments in the political scene.
This paper presents a computational method, AnaDiP-2011, based on natural language processing (NLP) techniques for the interpretation of the political discourse in the print media. The application considers the 2009 presidential campaign in Romania. The concept behind this method is that the manner in which individuals speak and write, with the aim to deliver a certain image to the public, is an opened window towards their emotional and cognitive worlds. By emphasizing the emotional component at the level of discourse, voters identify with the speaker, who becomes the personification of their common ideals. Our investigation is intended to give support to researchers, specialists in political sciences, political analysts and election's staff, being helpful mainly in their social exploration of the electoral campaigns in their intend to measure reactions with respect to the developments in the political scene.
Javnost - The Public, 1997
Political rhetoric may be regarded as unchanging, following ancient and universal rules of persuasion. However, scholars sometimes argue that political language has changed substantially over the last decades, due to its adaptation to media logic or to new modes of electoral competition. In this article I propose a model for empirical research of party propaganda in different election campaign channels. Rather than to offer a comprehensive view of political rhetoric, this model is designed to provide more knowledge of what media changes may have meant for the language of political parties. Does election rhetoric vary systematically? If so, does rhetoric change over time, adopting qualities associated with media logic? Or, do we find a non-changing pattern which can better be explained by party competition factors? Three rhetorical dimensions are identified in the model: message concreteness, direction, and identity construction. These correspond to hypothesised media effects, as well as being relevant to parties making strategic campaign choices.
As the title suggests, the topic of this study is political rhetoric. It is an attempt to apply rhetorical theory on political speeches. Politics is an area where politicians spend much of their time speaking to others. In broadcast political speeches, using radio and TV channels, the message reaches a large number of audiences.
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AT THE TIME OF ELECTIONS CAMPAIGNS : FROM STRATEGICRHETORICTO POLARIZATION / Call for participation, 2019
To participate in the IPSI symposium, each participant is invited to submit a summary of his or her speech on 31 January 2020; until midnight. This summary must include the introduction of the research object, the problem, the insight and the methodology mobilized in detail. Participants whose text has been selected will be informed by the end of February 2020. The symposium will take place on April, 2nd and 3rd, 2020 in Tunis. The final texts of the symposium can be sent until the end of June 2020. Thus, the proposals will be published after the symposium in a collective work. Double-blind selection will favor empirical approaches. The study of the phenomena of political communication and propaganda during election campaigns is the most relevant criterion of our selection. Also, the originality of the proposal and its use of new research techniques will be an important acceptance criteria. Indeed, this conference is intended to be really international. To participate, please send, at the same time, your intervention to the following two addresses: [email protected] [email protected]
Land Forces Academy Review, 2023
The impact of communication upon political activities is inevitable, regardless whether we refer to socialization, participation, the establishment of an agenda, mobilization or negotiation. Every political activity is influenced by communication inasmuch as almost all such manifestations involve the use of a form of communication. The assertion of a moral and professional authority's competence and credibility is increasingly rivaled by media credibility or by the charisma, whose importance is admitted by journalists and image counselors. Thus, it is by means of their aggressive discourse that most of the Romanian political leaders have built up this 'charisma'. In a period of crisis and shortcomings, who could wish to see faded characters, deprived of personality, on television? In Romania, not revolting against 'someone' and not opposing them are equivalent to being unaware of the people's sufferance and, therefore, one cannot be a good leader.
Communication & Society, 2022
The unquestionable predominance of slogans in political communication versus their declining relevance in the commercial kind underpins the objective of this study, which is to gain further insight into the strategies and creative discourses employed by political parties in their campaigning before the general, regional and local elections held in Spain in 2019, whereby the results are compared with those obtained in previous research. The aim is thus to determine the attributes of electoral slogans regarding such aspects as their semantic density, complexity, use of rhetorical devices, core focus or communication efficiency. Accordingly, this study is framed in the field of research on political advertising, employing content analysis. To this end, an analysis was performed on an extensive corpus of 197 slogans, selected according to the criteria of comprehensiveness, relevance and representativeness. In short, it can be claimed that the tendencies noted in previous studies have stabilized, albeit with some new developments in relation to briefness, the use of double or triple slogans, expressive focus, bilingualism, the use of visual resources (such as emoticons) or digital language (contractions), the presence of rhetorical devices, and the relevance of voters and candidates versus political parties, among other factors. Besides the specific evolution of their formal and content-related aspects, we argue that the relevance of political slogans still prevails, and rather than undermining their essence and uses, the advent of social media has instead enhanced them.
Res Rhetorica, 2021
Aggressive rhetoric in Croatian political discourse became particularly prominent during the parliamentary election in 2015. A deep polarization of society yielded a new political option, one of the strongest since the beginning of Croatian independence in 1990. After the great election success, MOST got the opportunity to form the new Croatian Government either with HDZ or SDP, the two most influential parties in Croatia. This situation caused enormous tension in the post-election period and consequently intensified the politicians' aggressive rhetoric. The aim of this study is to describe, interpret and explicate linguistic and rhetorical devices which contributed to the aggressiveness, and ultimately conclude which of the political options listed above is the most aggressive.
International Journal of Linguistics, 2020
Political discourse involves particular lexical choices, grammatical features, rhetorical devices, and nonverbal signals. Politicians often capitalize on them in order to influence recipients’ state of mind and persuade them to share their world image. Particular persuasive strategies are used as tools to deliberately manufacture mass consent. On their part, the addressees of political discourse are not often aware of the effects of these particular discourse features in terms of audience control.This paper aims at discussing discourse analysis as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of power relations and the transmission of ideological beliefs. In the spirit of Critical Discourse Analysis and in particular Fairclough’s (1989) ten-question model, the paper proposes a multimodal analysis of Barack Obama’s Victory Speech. The study reveals that the detection of political messages (in this case, the importance of national unity) is triggered by the presence of ideologically significan...
2013
From a discourse analysis standpoint, the contemporary administrativist approach and the discursive perspectives on the concept of "public interest" were brought together by Jacques , as the deconstruction of discourse provides the researcher with the opportunity to identify the meaning or the purpose of discourse, having as starting point the meanings assigned by society to specific words or concepts. Consequently, the priority axis of our analysis revolves around the intentionality of political discourse, based on the assumption that the three basic elements (cf. Derrida) of discourse are intention, method and ideology, with public interest being a prerequisite for the democratic public sphere. The issue of discourse intentionality is the subject of pragmatic approach, as intentionality essentially defines the manner in which a discourse agent represents a specific matter (cf. ; it is thus understood in the context that the force of representation is intrinsic to the intentionality process of speech acts. The second core dimension specific to our study encompasses the social conditions which characterise the use of words/concepts, and the role played by the latter in determining discourse effectiveness, starting from the paradigm of illocutionary force (cf. J.-P. Austin, 1969Austin, , 1975 as well as from the significance of discourse context in relation with the paradigmatic competences of "the language of institution" or "authorized language" (cf. P. Bourdieu, 1975Bourdieu, /2001. In practical terms, our study is concerned with the occurrences and manners of (re)presentation which are specific to the syntagm "public interest" in the context of deliberative discourse; thus, our study comprises an analysis of the political debates in the joint meetings of the Parliament of Romania between January-December 2012 -i.e. 24 meetings -and seeks to identify operational definitions for the syntagm concerned.
Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio vol. 7, nr. 1, 2013, 2013
The development of new technologies, implicitly that of Internet contributed to the reconfiguration of the political communication field. In this respect, politicians report themselves to an electorate that is more detached from institutionalized politics and political ideologies, electorate that has the possibility to participate to debating alternative forms of the political, through some social movements and through online forums. Generally, new media created the possibility that journalists and media production agencies imagine more dynamic media formats from the point of view of interaction with citizens and visual strategies. Within the new context coming from the relation between politician, media and electorate, the Internet, through its functions, generates a special kind of political communication management
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2016
In this paper authors analyse figurativeness in speeches of presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in Croatia in 2009/2010. This paper explores how the usage of rhetorical tropes in speeches of presidential candidates influenced the election results and number of votes of each candidate. In contrast to the other figures of speech, tropes are more closely related to content than to form or structure. Rhetorical tropes fulfil many different purposes in political discourse, especially in regard to positive political self-presentation and negative political other-presentation. Rhetorical tropes analysed in this paper are divided according to the Burke's (1969) classification: metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche and irony. The metaphor is analysed and outlined as one of the master tropes. In Croatian political discourse metaphor is most commonly drawn from the sports and military terminology, for example, the expressions "political competition", "presidential race", "leading the political battle". Authors compare usage of rhetorical tropes with the success of presidential candidates in the above mentioned presidential campaign
The media has always been a tool of hegemony for political leaders in the arena of politics from the past until today. The formation of politics over media, its role in determining the social opinions, its having the potential of influencing social reliability attributed to institutions and similar other factors may be given among the reasons of the media holding this power in its hands. For this reason, political actors use the media effectively in forming the public opinion and try to impose their policies to the society by using it. In the election periods, which are extraordinary periods especially for democratic countries, politicians try to form their own public opinions. In this context, the political speeches are considered in the propaganda concept, and thus propaganda, as a one-way communication method, becomes important in terms of manipulating the masses. In this study, the discourse of the candidates' propaganda speeches was solved in the presidential election held in Turkey for the first time in 2014. As a conclusion, when the propaganda speeches of the candidates are examined (although the name is propaganda) it becomes obvious that the leaders did not use all of the propaganda methods completely.
2012
Rhetorical scholars have long been interested in studying the internal dynamics of political speech − not summarizing what is said, but rather describing how a speech works as a rhetorical appeal.1 In so doing, of course, one naturally examines the content of the discourse (its goals and strategies) in order to understand how the speaker seeks to influence an audience and to evaluate both the effectiveness of the speech as a rhetorical appeal and its ethical and political implications. In contemporary pluralistic societies such as Germany, Great Britain, and the United States—where political voices have access to multiple forms of communication, including television, radio, newspapers, scholarly journals, and Internet driven social media—it is expected that any national level political event will be commented upon and analyzed by both adherents and opponents. Never is this more true than when the leader of a nation, or a candidate to become that leader, speaks in any public forum. S...
2015
This study examines the specific features of Bulgarian political rhetoric and the subject area of particular interest for this research is the election campaign (2014) in Bulgaria for Members of the National Assembly (MPs). Bulgarian candidates for MPs send and broadcast messages, appeals and slogans where they proclaim both new programs and traditional ideological principles of governance. The investigation focuses on specific verbal and visual elements of political party websites, political blogs and linked spaces throughout social networks, especially featuring their public presentations during the election campaign. The paper displays the summarized results of the research aspect focusing on the arguments of virtual and media political communication during the election campaign which has diverse ramifications.
When we think of politics, we think of it mainly in terms of the struggle for power in order to secure specific ideas and interests and put them into practice. This process of manifesting a political will and transforming it into concrete social action is realised first of all between political parties. In this process, language plays an important role. In fact, any political action is prepared, accompanied, controlled and influenced by language. We could easily add other verbs to this list, such as guided, explained, justified, evaluated, criticised, . . . The study of language has recently become more central to those academic disciplines concerned with politics. However, political scientists on the one hand, and linguists, or discourse analysts, on the other hand, focus on different aspects when they discuss the relationship between language and politics, and they also apply different theories and methods in doing so. Political scientists are mainly concerned with the consequences of political decisions and actions for (the history of) a society, and they may be interested in the political realities which are constructed in and through discourse.
In the present chapter, I argue that the tradition of rhetoric includes certain perspectives that can be employed in the ‘cultural tradition and reception analysis’ – especially if one’s area of inquiry is different forms of political communication. As originally practiced, reception analysis had a certain tendency to draw inspiration from the tradition of rhetoric. Consequently, there are certain shared perspectives, preconditions and conceptions between the two traditions. In the following, I argue that one should further examine how rhetoric can strengthen contemporary reception analysis. I present two approaches, or concepts, that I maintain are useful in this regard: a) a view of communication as intentional and b) a rhetorical view of argumentation. Integrating these tools into reception analysis will enable a further understanding on how traditional and emerging forms of intentional, political communication are perceived and interpreted by audiences. It will also encourage those practicing reception analysis to pay greater attention to the production of media texts, as well as engaging with the texts themselves. Keywords: Rhetoric, reception analysis, political communication, argumentation.
Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2016
Populism has been vastly present in Croatian media discourse as a common point of reference but it has been almost completely left out from scientific inquiry. Building on the premise that populism is reflected in communication practices of politicians, parties and movements, this paper uses content analysis to examine interviews of the four presidential candidates during election campaign in Croatia in 2014 (first round) and 2015 (second round). We apply a two-level approach to measure populism on two distinct but related levels - as a thin-centered political ideology and as a political communication style. Populism as ideology is examined through the presence of positive references to the people, relationship to political elites and references to ‘dangerous others’. The analysis of populism as political communication style is primarily set to determine efforts of the candidates to use populist cues to resonate with the voters. The presence of populist style is here examined throug...
The article discusses three dimensions of political rhetoric in Poland. The language used by politicians is the first one. Social and historic factors which conditioned contemporary styles of political communication result in the fact that political rhetoric in Poland is typical of countries which experienced authoritarian or totalitarian regimes. The second dimension of political rhetoric is found in media discourse. Mediatization of politics, technological changes in the media created a new rhetorical situation, new strategies of the persuasion used by politicians and journalists. The third dimension of political rhetoric is found in the rhetorical research concerning the ways of expression of both politicians and journalists. The article discusses major tendencies in research: propaganda language analysis, research on the new media, visual persuasion as well as use of rhetoric as a tool of civic education.
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2012
This paper presents a method for the valuation of discourses from different linguistic perspectives: lexical, syntactic and semantic. We describe a platform (Discourse Analysis Tool -DAT) which integrates a range of language processing tools with the intent to build complex characterisations of the political discourse. The idea behind this construction is that the vocabulary and the clause structure of the sentence betray the speaker's level of culture, while the semantic classes mentioned in a speech characterises the speaker's orientation. When the object of study is the political discourse, an investigation on these dimensions could put in evidence features influencing the electing public. The method is intended to help both political speakers to improve their discourse abilities, by comparing their speeches with those of personalities of the public life in the past, and the public at large by evidencing hidden aspects of the linguistic and intellectual abilities of their candidates.
Respectus Philologicus, 2020
In political cultures of a number of countries, the creation of a politician’s media image is based on the fundamental principle of his/her work being formulated as the achievement of the goal of ensuring a nation’s well-being and a country’s development. The present article demonstrates concrete similarities and differences discernible in the construction of a politician’s media image in the Russian, Lithuanian and Serbian media discourses from a rhetorical perspective. The methodological basis of the investigation is provided by the ideas of the new rhetoric and Ch. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca’s assumption concerning the fact that the speaker’s ideas are accepted (or not accepted) by the audience not depending on the degree of the strictness of logical propositions and conclusions, but rather on the fact of whether the hearers have adhered to the grounds given by the speaker. Consequently, a researcher analysing the ways text influences the consciousness of those receiving it...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.