Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009, Discrete Mathematics
Let γ ′ s (G) be the signed edge domination number of G. In 2006, Xu conjectured that: for any 2-connected graph G of order n(n ≥ 2), γ ′ s (G) ≥ 1. In this article we show that this conjecture is not true. More precisely, we show that for any positive integer m, there exists an m-connected graph G such that γ ′ s (G) ≤ − m 6 |V (G)|. Also for every two natural numbers m and n, we determine γ ′ s (K m,n ), where K m,n is the complete bipartite graph with part sizes m and n. *
2020
A signed edge domination function (or SEDF) of a simple graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f: E\rightarrow \{1,-1\}$ such that $\sum_{e'\in N[e]}f(e')\ge 1$ holds for each edge $e\in E$, where $N[e]$ is the set of edges in $G$ which have at least one common end with $e$. Let $\gamma_s'(G)$ denote the minimum value of $f(G)$ among all SEDFs $f$, where $f(G)=\sum_{e\in E}f(e)$. In 2005, Xu conjectured that $\gamma_s'(G)\le n-1$. This conjecture has been proved for the two cases $v_{odd}(G)=0$ and $v_{even}(G)=0$, where $v_{odd}(G)$ (resp. $v_{even}(G)$) is the number of odd (resp. even) vertices in $G$. This article proves Xu's conjecture for $v_{even}(G)\in \{1, 2\}$. We also show that for any simple graph $G$ of order $n$, $\gamma_s'(G)\le n+v_{odd}(G)/2$ and $\gamma_s'(G)\le n-2+v_{even}(G)$ when $v_{even}(G)>0$, and thus $\gamma_s'(G)\le (4n-2)/3$. Our result improves the known results $\gamma_s'(G)\le 11n/6-1$ and $\gamma_s'(G)\le \lceil 3n/...
Graphs and Combinatorics, 2008
The closed neighborhood N G [e] of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of e and of all edges having an end-vertex in common with e. Let f be a function on E(G), the edge set of G, into the set {−1, 1}. If $\sum_{x\in N[e]}f(x) \geq 1$ for each e ∈ E(G), then f is called a signed edge dominating function of G. The signed edge domination number γ s ′(G) of G is defined as $\gamma_s^\prime(G) = {\text{min}}\{\sum_{e\in E(G)}f(e)\mid f \,\text{is an SEDF of} G\}$ . Recently, Xu proved that γ s ′(G) ≥ |V(G)| − |E(G)| for all graphs G without isolated vertices. In this paper we first characterize all simple connected graphs G for which γ s ′(G) = |V(G)| − |E(G)|. This answers Problem 4.2 of [4]. Then we classify all simple connected graphs G with precisely k cycles and γ s ′(G) = 1 − k, 2 − k.
International Journal of Computing Algorithm, 2014
A signed graph based on F is an ordinary graph F with each edge marked as positive or negative. Such a graph is called balanced if each of its cycles includes an even number of negative edges. We find the domination set on the vertices, on bipartite graphs and show that graphs has domination Number on signed graphs, such that a signed graph G may be converted into a balanced graph by changing the signs of d edges. We investigate the number D(F) defined as the largest d(G) such that G is a signed graph based on F. If F is the completebipartite graph with t vertices in each part, then D(f)≤ ½ t²-for some positive constant c.
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 2008
The open neighborhood N G (e) of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of all edges having a common end-vertex with e.
Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applications, 2016
A nonnegative signed dominating function (NNSDF) of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V (G) to the set {−1, 1} such that u∈N [v] f (u) ≥ 0 for every vertex v ∈ V (G). The nonnegative signed domination number of G, denoted by γ N N s (G), is the minimum weight of a nonnegative signed dominating function on G. In this paper, we establish some sharp lower bounds on the nonnegative signed domination number of graphs in terms of their order, size and maximum and minimum degree.
Discrete Mathematics, 2000
A dominating set for a graph G = (V; E) is a subset of vertices V ⊆ V such that for all v ∈ V − V there exists some u ∈ V adjacent to v. The domination number of G, denoted by (G), is the size of its smallest dominating set(s). When G is connected, we say V is a connected dominating set if the subgraph of G induced by V is connected. The connected domination number of G is the size of its smallest connected dominating set, and is denoted by c(G). In this paper we determine the maximum number of edges that a connected graph with a given number of vertices and a given connected domination number can have. We also characterize the extremal graphs achieving the bound.
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 2021
A vertex subset S of a graph G = (V,E) is called a (1,2)-dominating set if S is having the property that for every vertex v in V- S there is atleast one vertex in S of distance 1 from v and a vertex in S at a distance atmost 2 from v. The minimum cardinality of a (1, 2)-dominating set of G, denoted by ϒ (1, 2)(G), is called the (1, 2)-domination number of G. In this paper we discuss about the (1, 2)-dominating set of Shell graph C(n,n-3,), Jewel graph Jn and Comb graph Pn ʘ K1.
2011
v∈V f(v). The complementary signed domination number of G is defined as γcs(G) = min {w(f) : f is a minimal complementary signed dominating function of G}. In this paper, we determine the value of complementary signed domination number for some special class of graphs. We also determine bounds for this parameter and exhibit the sharpness of the bounds. We also characterize graphs attaining the bounds in some special classes.
Mathematics
A vertex v of a graph G = ( V , E ) , ve-dominates every edge incident to v, as well as every edge adjacent to these incident edges. A set S ⊆ V is a double vertex-edge dominating set if every edge of E is ve-dominated by at least two vertices of S. The double vertex-edge domination number γ d v e ( G ) is the minimum cardinality of a double vertex-edge dominating set in G. A subset S ⊆ V is a total dominating set (respectively, a 2-dominating set) if every vertex in V has a neighbor in S (respectively, every vertex in V - S has at least two neighbors in S). The total domination number γ t ( G ) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G, and the 2-domination number γ 2 ( G ) is the minimum cardinality of a 2-dominating set of G . Krishnakumari et al. (2017) showed that for every triangle-free graph G , γ d v e ( G ) ≤ γ 2 ( G ) , and in addition, if G has no isolated vertices, then γ d v e ( G ) ≤ γ t ( G ) . Moreover, they posed the problem of characterizing those g...
2021
Let G = (V (G), E(G)) be a connected graph. A set D ⊆ V (G) is a weakly connected 2-dominating set of G if every vertex of V (G)\D is adjacent to at least two vertices in D and the subgraph 〈D〉w weakly induced by D is connected. The weakly connected 2-domination number ofG, denoted by γ2w(G), is the smallest cardinality of a weakly connected 2-dominating set of G. In this work, we study the weakly connected 2-domination number of some known families of graphs. In particular, we obtain closed formulas for the weakly connected 2-domination number of the path, cycle, bi-star graph , complete bipartite graph, helm graph, crown graph, banana tree graph, firecracker and centipede tree graph. Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C69
2011
In this paper, we determine the value of complementary signed domination number for some special class of graphs. We also determine bounds for this parameter and exhibit the sharpness of the bounds. We also characterize graphs attaining the bounds in some special classes.
2017
A b s t r ac t. Let D = (V, A) be a finite simple directed graph (shortly digraph). A function f : V −→ {−1, 1} is called a twin signed dominating function (TSDF) if f (N − [v]) 1 and f (N + [v]) 1 for each vertex v ∈ V. The twin signed domination number of D is γ * s (D) = min{ω(f) | f is a TSDF of D}. In this paper, we initiate the study of twin signed domination in digraphs and we present sharp lower bounds for γ * s (D) in terms of the order, size and maximum and minimum indegrees and outdegrees. Some of our results are extensions of well-known lower bounds of the classical signed domination numbers of graphs.
Journal of Mathematics
Let G = V , E be a graph. A function f : E ⟶ − 1 , + 1 is said to be a signed clique dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑ e ∈ E K f e ≥ 1 holds for every nontrivial clique K in G . The signed clique domination number of G is defined as γ scl ′ G = min ∑ e ∈ E G f e | f is an SCDF of G . In this paper, we investigate the signed clique domination numbers of join of graphs. We correct two wrong results reported by Ao et al. (2014) and Ao et al. (2015) and determine the exact values of the signed clique domination numbers of P m ∨ K n ¯ and C m ∨ K n .
2008
Let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. A set S ⊆ V is a dominating set of graph G, if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. It is well known that if e ∈ E(G), then γ(G−e)−1 ≤ γ(G) ≤ γ(G−e). In this paper, as an application of this inequality, we obtain the domination number of some certain graphs.
Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 2002
Let G = (V , E) be a simple graph on vertex set V and define a function f : V → {−1, 1}. The function f is a signed dominating function if for every vertex x ∈ V , the closed neighborhood of x contains more vertices with function value 1 than with −1. The signed domination number of G, γ s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed dominating function on G. We give a sharp lower bound on the signed domination number of a general graph with a given minimum and maximum degree, generalizing a number of previously known results. Using similar techniques we give upper and lower bounds for the signed domination number of some simple graph products: the grid P j × P k , C j × P k and C j × C k . For fixed width, these bounds differ by only a constant.
Algebra and discrete mathematics, 2017
Let D = (V, A) be a finite simple directed graph (digraph). A function f : V −→ {−1, 1} is called a twin signed k-dominating function (TSkDF) if f (N − [v]) ≥ k and f (N + [v]) ≥ k for each vertex v ∈ V. The twin signed k-domination number of D is γ * sk (D) = min{ω(f) | f is a TSkDF of D}. In this paper, we initiate the study of twin signed k-domination in digraphs and present some bounds on γ * sk (D) in terms of the order, size and maximum and minimum indegrees and outdegrees, generalising some of the existing bounds for the twin signed domination numbers in digraphs and the signed k-domination numbers in graphs. In addition, we determine the twin signed k-domination numbers of some classes of digraphs.
Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2009
a b s t r a c t Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A function f : V → {−1, +1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function
Discrete Mathematics, 2009
A numerical invariant of directed graphs concerning domination which is named signed domination number γ S is studied in this paper. We present some sharp lower bounds for γ S in terms of the order, the maximum degree and the chromatic number of a directed graph.
Discrete Mathematics, 2004
Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph on vertex set V and define a function f : V → {−1, 1}. The function f is a signed dominating function if for every vertex x ∈ V , the closed neighborhood of x contains more vertices with function value 1 than with −1. The signed domination number of G, γ s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed dominating function on G.
Discrete Mathematics, 2009
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex of V (G)\S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G is the domination number of G, denoted as γ (G). Let P n and C n denote a path and a cycle, respectively, on n vertices. Let k 1 (F) and k 2 (F) denote the number of components of a graph F that are isomorphic to a graph in the family {P 3 , P 4 , P 5 , C 5 } and {P 1 , P 2 }, respectively. Let L be the set of vertices of G of degree more than 2, and let G − L be the graph obtained from G by deleting the vertices in L and all edges incident with L. McCuaig and Shepherd [W. McCuaig, B. Shepherd, Domination in graphs with minimum degree two, J. Graph Theory 13 (1989) 749-762] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 8 with δ(G) ≥ 2, then γ (G) ≤ 2n/5, while Reed [B.A. Reed, Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996) 277-295] showed that if G is a graph of order n with δ(G) ≥ 3, then γ (G) ≤ 3n/8. As an application of Reed's result, we show that if G is a graph of order n ≥ 14 with δ(G) ≥ 2, then γ (G) ≤ 3 8 n + 1 8 k 1 (G − L) + 1 4 k 2 (G − L).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.