Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
AI
The paper discusses the role and placement of clause-internal complementizers within the context of the Ossetic and Pamiri languages, challenging prevailing assumptions about their obligatory positioning within clauses. By analyzing examples demonstrating complementizer use in these languages, the study highlights variations that suggest a need for a broader understanding of clause structure in East Iranian languages, particularly regarding the behavior of wh-words and the implications for complementizer positioning.
Typological Studies in Language, 2017
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries (NMCCLE) is a volume in the Typological Studies in Languages series (series editors: Spike Gilda and Fernando Zúñiga) edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie, and Peter Sells, three renowned linguists whose collective expertise spans broad aspects of cross-linguistic research. NMCCLE is a product of their nearly decade-long collaborative project that involved numerous contributors who are experts in various Eurasian languages and have different theoretical backgrounds. It offers a rich array of in-depth studies on the varied properties of noun-modifying clause constructions (NMCCs) in the languages under consideration, based on the general noun-modifying clause construction (GNMCC) proposed as a new category of language property. Their investigation is also unique in that the Japanese GNMCC serves as a "yardstick" for examining NMCCs in other languages. Clausal noun-modifying constructions, which are commonly observed across various languages, have attracted wide attention in linguistic research. Over the last four decades at least three major proposals on the examination of clausal noun modification have been put forward: Keenan and Comrie's (1977) noun phrase accessibility hierarchy (NPAH), Matsumoto's (1997) frame-semantic approach to analyzing Japanese noun-modifying constructions, and the crosslinguistic investigation of clausal noun modification using the category of GNMCC proposed in NMCCLE. Among the different types of noun modification, relative clauses are a wellresearched area. Based on their typological investigation of over 50 different languages, Keenan and Comrie (1977) proposed the NPAH, which suggests that there is a markedness order of different relative clause types that applies to all languages in the world. The NPAH predicts the availability of relativization in a language based on the syntactic role of the head noun modified by the relative clause: on the
The purpose of this paper is to show that the notion of what is not a Phase is equally important as the notion of what constitutes a Phase. Since the notion of a Phase is one particular (albeit an emphatic) instance of the notion of constituency, a non-Phase or an incomplete Phase is predicted to be a nonconstituent. This paper looks at a curious geometrical puzzle involving clauses with internal Comps in Bangla (=Bengali) and show that such clauses are incomplete phases. In particular, it is shown that the C and its complement are not merged in sequence, nor can they be spelled out as a Phase during the course of the derivation. The claim that the C and its complement do not form a constituent challenges the familiar notion of constituency by showing that an internal C has a non-linear relation to what has been traditionally considered to be its complement. This challenge is inspired by Kayne's ( ,b, 1999 demonstration that P-Comps do not form constituents with their complements. Although Kayne's algorithm accounts for a set of unresolved problems involving P-Comps in Romance, it has not yet been tested for Cs in general. This algorithm, if followed verbatim, is shown to derive the unmarked order of constituents but fails to derive the puzzling C -internal order in Bangla. Another goal of this paper therefore is to present a revised Kaynean algorithm, which, by way of solving the puzzle, is shown to provide crucial evidence for derivation by Phase , Chomsky 1999. This is a particularly welcome result as it brings two different research strands together.
Journal of Linguistics, 1999
Recent developments in syntactic theory suggest that phrase structure is cross-linguistically more uniform than assumed so far, and that the order spec-head-complement may be the only permissible one. The present article takes issue with this view, showing that the derivation of final complementizers from initial ones by means of IP-raising faces serious difficulties. The discussion focuses on Bengali and similar languages which may be called ‘hybrid’ because both orders, IP-C as well as C-IP, are attested. Five arguments are raised which indicate that these orders are not derivationally connected. The discussion bears results which may also be of interest for linguistic typology, language change and acquisition.
Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT, 2001
This dissertation asks two main questions for Turkish: (i) what is the interaction between verbal morphology and the structure?, and (ii) what is the interaction between word order and interpretation? Following Kornfilt (1996) I argue that there are two verbal forms in finite structures: one consists of a participle and a copula, which is inflected for tense and agreement, and the other is a fully inflected verbal form. I propose that the former is formed by a derivation in which the verb moves as far as a functional head such Aspect or Modal, creating a participle. A verbal feature (copula) is inserted at T o satisfying its verbal requirement. In the latter case the verb moves all the way up to T o. No copula is inserted. The rest of the dissertation focuses on the interaction between structure and quantificational elements. One question addressed is why indefinites marked overtly for accusative case violate scope rigidity, and are interpreted as having wide scope over quantificational elements c-commanding them. It is argued that they do not violate scope rigidity, but rather the unexpected wide scope interpretation is the result of a special interpretative mechanism. Accusative-marked indefinites are interpreted as choice functions. Structures with various quantifiers, indefinites and negative polarity items are discussed, and it is argued that the interpretation of both choice function variables and negative polarity items are subject to intervention effects. Finally, structures with clausal possessives are analyzed. The discussion focuses on one type of clausal possessive in which the possessor is in the genitive case and the possessee agrees with the possessor. It is shown that this construction is subject to a constraint similar to the there-sentences in English in that the possessee cannot be presuppositional. It is argued that the possessor is generated in a constituent within VP with the possessee, but raises to the [Spec, TP]. The possessee remains within VP, and is interpreted non-presuppositionally.
Clausal complements of certain nominalizations in Bulgarian: Relevant parameters. In B. Wiemer, B. Sonnenhauser (eds.). Complementation in South Slavic. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 160-210., 2021
In this paper, the distribution of complement clauses with some nominalizations (deverbal and deadjectival nouns) in Bulgarian is considered. The central question is which factors influence the (in)ability of the derived noun to host a complement clause with which the base verb was compatible. Although the behavior of complement clauses is predicted by some semantic parameters, their distribution cannot be reduced to syntactic or actional classes, as in Grimshaw's (1990) account. In fact, the distribution of complement clauses with nouns in Bulgarian is regulated by several features: (i) real (non-prospective) vs. irreal (prospective) semantics of the embedded clause; (ii) the modifier / argument status of the 'complement' clause; (iii) semantic role characteristics; (iv) the opposition of generalized names of situations (generic situations) vs. names of single occurrences; (v) Grimshaw's nominalization types (actional classes). The main parameter seems to be the opposition of generic situation vs. occurrence, which takes into account both actional classes and semantic roles. I also consider two other parameters that can also be relevant for the (im)possibility of complement clauses but are not elaborated on in detail, since their relevance is questionable: namely, (vi) the syntactic position of the complement clause and (vii) the opposition of the complementizers da vs. če. An additional problem considered in the article is the distribution of the indefinite vs. definite forms of head nouns in constructions with complement clauses. The general conclusion is that the distribution of noun complement clauses is highly affected by semantic and lexical factors and that it cannot be accounted for by a single factor.
Oblique subjects in Pamiri languages, 2023
This thesis explores ergative subjects in Pamiri languages and their interactions with clitic agreement. The Pamiri-specific diagnostics for unergative and unaccusative subjects are discussed. The thesis also makes an attempt of describing gender agreement in Shughni and Rushani. The subsequent analysis shows that the agreement is directly linked to the ergative case, and a DCT-based account is proposed. Another option of analysis explains the same data via the competition-based approach, treating the clitics as pronominal arguments.
In: Kluck, M. E., Ott, D. & M. de Vries (eds.) Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Cross-Linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter.
De Vries' (2006 et seq.) addition of 'par-Merge' to the extant Merger operations utilized by the narrow syntax provides a means by which to model parataxis and yet maintain that paratactic constituents (i.e. parentheticals) are concatenated with their host in the narrow syntax in the structural position in which they are observed. A principal ingredient of the par-Merge approach to parataxis is the functional head Par, which triggers par-Merge. While Par is often morphologically realized as a coordinator in English, in certain parentheticals it is never realized. Its absence lends credence to par-Merge's alternatives, which demand that parataxis be modelled semantically rather than syntactically. In this paper, we provide indirect support for the par-Merge approach by demonstrating that, in the Turkish counterparts to those English parentheticals that never realize Par, Par is realized as the lexeme ki. If ki is indeed Par's realization in Turkish, one may stipulate that Par's morphological absence in certain English constructions does not indicate that par-Merge must be discarded or even that its universality for modelling parataxis must be diminishedits absence indicates only that some language-specific constraint prevents Par's realization in certain English parentheticals.
"The purpose of this work is to illustrate an extremely rare linguistic feature, namely the overt present of a root complementizer in assertive/indicative (i.e. unmarked) matrix clauses, of the Sogdian language, an Eastern Middle Iranian Language once spoken in a region located in the valley of rivers Zaravshan and Kashkadarya (roughly corresponding to the territory of modern day Uzbekistan and Tajikistan). This linguistic fact is very interesting because it represents an overt evidence of the principle of endocentricity inferred in the Generative tradition since the early 80s. In comparative perspective, this uncommon feature of the Sogdian language may be associated to the mechanism of para-hypotaxis, previously studied in many different Romance languages (e.g. Old French, Old Italian, Old Catalan) and recently discovered in other genetically unrelated languages (e.g. Swahili, Zamucoan languages)."
Lingua, 2020
This paper presents a discussion of the syntax and typology of finite relative clauses in Armenian, based on data from a corpus of colloquial spoken language from the Republic of Armenia. In literary Armenian, the preferred strategy involves embedded postnominal relative clauses with relative pronouns. However, the spoken corpus data show a much wider usage of adjoined constructions, including left-adjoined RCs introduced by an indeclinable complementizer, a strategy which is paralleled in several other languages of the Araxes-Iran area. We also find 'inverse attraction' structures, where the relativized element precedes RP in RC case. Previous syntactic analyses of these constructions have concluded that, if the relativized element has a determiner other than RP, it must be outside RC, leaving the case-marking unexplained. However, all the languages in which they occur have undergone a change from RP > indeclinable complementizer, and it is proposed that the uncertain status of this element holds the key to understanding this construction, either in terms of contamination/hypercorrection, or, possibly, an intermediate 'agreeing complementizer' stage in the diachronic development. This interpretation can also be applied to Classical Armenian constructions where RPs can co-occur with resumptive pronouns, violating a proposed universal of relativization.
Studia Linguistica, 2001
Kayne develop a unique analysis for the relative clau e con truction ba d on the Linear Correspondence Axiom (L C ). ccording to Kayne 1994 outside the relative P relative clau e do not have a nominal head. For him the determiner directly selects the relative CP. Borsely (1997) and Platzack (1997/2 argue that thi kind of analy i ha many drawback . However. their arguments come from -initial relative clause con truction . Thi paper examine ho Kayne' approach handles -final relative clau con truction . V e will immediate! note that Kayne (1994) propo e the empirically erroneou genera1i ation that -final relative clau e lack an o ert complementizer. Contrary to Kayne. language uch a Amharic clearl have a complementizer.
Between analytical mood and clause-initial particles – on the diagnostics of subordination for (emergent) complementizers
The article addresses empirical and methodological issues that are of central concern for an assessment of uninflected function words doing services in clause-combining and/or in indicating the speaker's stance toward illocutionary force or propositional content. Such units have been variably treated: either just as 'particles', as subordinating conjunctions or complementizers, or as auxiliaries of 'analytic moods' (marking directive or optative illocutionary force). Whatever they are called, all these units scope over clauses and manipulate their reality status. A discrimination of these types of units is difficult or hardly possible, first of all, because core notions (especially '(analytic) mood' and 'complementizer') are ill-defined and their consequent cross-linguistic application suggests an almost arbitrary exchangeability: since the notional contrasts behind them are basically identical, clear criteria based on form and paradigmatic organization are warranted. Jointly, one needs to specify the format of the relevant units in terms of clines between morphemes and words, and between words and constructions, first of all for North Slavic by and South Slavic da. Concomitantly, the delimitation of discourse coherence from syntactic subordination poses notorious problems. First, embedding is a property on a gradient, mainly because symptomatic shifts of egocentricals need not (and often do not) occur simultaneously. Second, there is an enormous grey zone of clausal complements vs adjuncts leaving ample space for indeterminacy. Both intensional and extensional approaches to determining clausal complements have their inherent and empirical weaknesses, and one wonders whether these might be recompensated by combining both types of approaches. The article gives a complex account of general theoretical and empirical pitfalls, with illustrations from a comprehensive body of data across Slavic on a typological
2009
Introduction Uzbek is a Turkic language spoken in Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, and surrounding regions. The phenomena discussed in this paper are based on the standard dialect of Uzbek based on the dialect of Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan. For the sake of readability, standard Uzbek Latin orthography has been employed. The title of this paper is perhaps misleading, as the phenomena to be discussed are not so easily defined as being 'complementizers' or 'clauses'. A more appropriate pair of terms might be 'small clause' and 'complementizer-like head of a small clause'. Nevertheless, it is the difficulty in distinguishing these various categories that makes this topic worth studying, and we will keep this in mind as we examine Uzbek examples of the following type: (1) Ular they she'r-ni poem-ACC ilohiy sacred deb COMP bil-a-di. know-sc pres-3 'They know the poem to be sacred.'
Languages
Data-Driven Approaches to Cross-Clausal Syntax, 2012
1. Introduction * Our contribution is part of a series of more comprehensive studies that investigate the nature and diachronic development of subordinate clauses in the history of Greek (cf. Fykias & Katsikadeli 2013, Karantzola & Sampanis 2016). This paper deals with the phenomenon of multiple complementation markers that introduce complement clauses. The commitment of taking into serious consideration and exploiting the methodology of contrastive linguistics constitutes an essential characteristic of our analysis. We explore the co-occurrence of multiple complement clause particles, which can either be currently observed in contemporary colloquial usage or –alternatively– have been attested during specific diachronic phases or in specific dialectal varieties of three different languages (Greek, Albanian and German). We develop a framework of contrastive analysis, which, on the one hand, aims at providing a detailed and accurate description of both similarities and differences among the grammatical systems of the languages under examination and, on the other hand, sets out to offer at least a sketch of an explanatory account. Our analysis will focus on the details of possible combinations of complementation markers. These specifics encompass such formal aspects as the linear word order of the elements involved, the matter of optional vs. obligatory status of these combinations in their respective contexts, the issue of selectional conditions in this concrete context (i.e. what counts as an eligible partner of the combination, such as the type of indirect questions that are combinable with the complementizer se in Albanian), and possible deviations from a more general pattern that has been established so far in the linguistic literature –especially in connection with Germanic languages (such as German and English) that have been studied more extensively. A further issue that is addressed concerns the question whether the subordinate/embedded clauses under investigation display main (root) sentence characteristics or not, along the lines of the distinctions that were first introduced by Emonds (e.g. 2004).
Ethiopian Journal of Languages and Literature, 2018
ː This paper examines the semantic features of complement clause types in Xɨmt'aŋa. Specifically, it describes, (1) the semantic relationship between the complement types and their complementizers, (2) the semantics of complement clause types based on their degree of reduction of information, (3) the manner of syntactic relation of complements to the matrix clauses in complement relation, and (4) the grammatical status of the complement predicates, in the language. The necessary data were collected from the native speakers using the elicitation technique. Then, the data have been analyzed qualitatively following the functional-typological approach. In this paper, based on mood distinctions, the indicative and subjunctive complement clause types are identified. The meaning of the complement clause type in Xɨmt'aŋa is characterized by the choice of complementizer. The complement clause types of Xɨmt'aŋa also differ in their degree of reduction of information. The manner of syntactic relation of the notional complements to the matrix clause in complement relation of the language is hypotaxis in which both the main and the complement clause involve a single assertion, but not paratactic construction in which two separate assertions are involved with main and complement clauses. Depending on the function of the complement type, the grammatical status of the indicative and subjunctive complement predicates are coded as verbs; whereas, the participle complement predicates are coded as adjectives, and the nominalized complement predicates as nouns. 1 This manuscript is part of the author's MA thesis (Andualem 2010) which is entitled as, "The Description of Complement Relations in Xɨmt'aŋa: Based on Functional-Typological Approach". It is taken with modification with respect to the journal format, language editing and assessing some works on the language which have been done after the completion of the MA thesis.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.