Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
We continue the study of fkg-dominating functions in graphs (or integer domination as we shall also say) started by Domke, Hedet- niemi, Laskar, and Fricke (5). For k ‚ 1 an integer, a function f : V (G) ! f0;1;:::;kg defined on the vertices of a graph G is called a fkg-dominating function if the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least k. The weight of a fkg-dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The fkg-domination number of G is the minimum weight of a fkg-dominating function of G. We study the fkg-domination number on the Cartesian product of graphs, mostly on problems related to the famous Vizing's conjecture. A connection be- tween the fkg-domination number and other domination type parameters is also studied.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2012
Given a graph G, a dominating set D is a set of vertices such that any vertex in G has at least one neighbor (or possibly itself) in D. A {k}-dominating multiset D k is a multiset of vertices such that any vertex in G has at least k vertices from its closed neighborhood in D k when counted with multiplicity. In this paper, we utilize the approach developed by and properties of binary matrices to prove a "Vizing-like" inequality on minimum {k}-dominating multisets of graphs G, H and the Cartesian product graph G H. Specifically, denoting the size of a minimum {k}-dominating multiset as γ {k} (G), we demonstrate that γ {k} (G)γ {k} (H) ≤ 2k γ {k} (G H) .
Discrete Mathematics, 2015
Given a graph G, a dominating set D is a set of vertices such that any vertex not in D has at least one neighbor in D. A {k}-dominating multiset D k is a multiset of vertices such that any vertex in G has at least k vertices from its closed neighborhood in D k when counted with multiplicity. In this paper, we utilize the approach developed by to prove a ''Vizing-like'' inequality on minimum {k}-dominating multisets of graphs G, H and the Cartesian product graph G H. Specifically, denoting the size of a minimum {k}-dominating multiset as γ {k} (G), we demonstrate that γ {k} (G)γ {k} (H) ≤ 2k γ {k} (G H).
Graphs and Combinatorics, 2005
The most famous open problem involving domination in graphs is Vizing's conjecture which states the domination number of the Cartesian product of any two graphs is at least as large as the product of their domination numbers. In this paper, we investigate a similar problem for total domination. In particular, we prove that the product of the total domination numbers of any nontrivial tree and any graph without isolated vertices is at most twice the total domination number of their Cartesian product, and we characterize the extremal graphs.
2008
Let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. A set S ⊆ V is a dominating set of graph G, if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. It is well known that if e ∈ E(G), then γ(G−e)−1 ≤ γ(G) ≤ γ(G−e). In this paper, as an application of this inequality, we obtain the domination number of some certain graphs.
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 2021
A vertex subset S of a graph G = (V,E) is called a (1,2)-dominating set if S is having the property that for every vertex v in V- S there is atleast one vertex in S of distance 1 from v and a vertex in S at a distance atmost 2 from v. The minimum cardinality of a (1, 2)-dominating set of G, denoted by ϒ (1, 2)(G), is called the (1, 2)-domination number of G. In this paper we discuss about the (1, 2)-dominating set of Shell graph C(n,n-3,), Jewel graph Jn and Comb graph Pn ʘ K1.
2010
The domination polynomial of a graph G of order n is the polynomial D(G, x) = P n i=γ(G) d(G, i)x i , where d(G, i) is the number of dominating sets of G of size i, and γ(G) is the domination number of G. In this paper, we obtain some properties of the coefficients of D(G, x). Also, by study of the dominating sets and the domination polynomials of specific graphs denoted by G ′ (m), we obtain a relationship between the domination polynomial of graphs containing an induced path of length at least three, and the domination polynomial of related graphs obtained by replacing the path by shorter path. As examples of graphs G ′ (m), we study the dominating sets and domination polynomials of cycles and generalized theta graphs. Finally, we show that, if n ≡ 0, 2(mod 3) and D(G, x) = D(Cn, x), then G = Cn.
Australas. J Comb., 2019
For a graph G, the k-total dominating graph D_{k}^{t}(G) is the graph whose vertices correspond to the total dominating sets of G that have cardinality at most k; two vertices of D_{k}^{t}(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding total dominating sets of G differ by either adding or deleting a single vertex. The graph D_{k}^{t}(G) is used to study the reconfiguration problem for total dominating sets: a total dominating set can be reconfigured to another by a sequence of single vertex additions and deletions, such that the intermediate sets of vertices at each step are total dominating sets, if and only if they are in the same component of D_{k}^{t}(G). Let d_{0}(G) be the smallest integer r such that D_{k}^{t}(G) is connected for all k greater than or equal to r. We investigate the realizability of graphs as total dominating graphs. For k the upper total domination number {\Gamma}_{t}(G), we show that any graph without isolated vertices is an induced subgraph of a graph G s...
2012
Let k be a positive integer and let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. The k-tuple domination number γ×k(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a k-tuple dominating set S, a set that for every vertex v ∈ V, |NG[v]∩S | ≥ k. Also the total k-domination number γ×k,t(G) of G is the minimum cardi-nality of a total k-dominating set S, a set that for every vertex v ∈ V, |NG(v)∩S | ≥ k. The k-transversal number τk(H) of a hypergraph H is the minimum size of a subset S ⊆ V (H) such that |S ∩ e | ≥ k for every edge e ∈ E(H). We know that for any graph G of order n with minimum degree at least k, γ×k(G) ≤ γ×k,t(G) ≤ n. Obviously for every k-regular graph, the upper bound n is sharp. Here, we give a sufficient condition for γ×k,t(G) < n. Then we characterize complete multipartite graphs G with γ×k(G) = γ×k,t(G). We also state that the total k-domination number of a graph is the k-transversal number of its open neighborhood hypergraph, and also the domination number of a graph is the transversal num...
Journal of Ultra Scientist of Physical Sciences Section A
In11, Kulli and Janakiram initiate the concept of maximal domination in graphs. In this paper, we obtained some bounds and characterizations. Also, we estimate the value of the maximal domination number of some graph products such as join of graphs, corona product, cartesian product and strong product.
Opuscula Mathematica, 2012
In a graph G = (V, E) a vertex is said to dominate itself and all its neighbors.
A domination in graphs is part of graph theory which has many applications. Its application includes the morphological analysis, computer network communication, social network theory, CCTV installation, and many others. A set D of vertices of a simple graph G, that is a graph without loops and multiple edges, is called a dominating set if every vertex u ∈ V (G) − D is adjacent to some vertex v ∈ D. The domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ(G), is the order of a smallest dominating set of G. A dominating set D with |D| = γ(G) is called a minimum dominating set, see Haynes and Henning [5]. This research aims to find the domination number of some families of special graphs, namely Spider Web graph W b n , Helmet graph H n,m , Parachute graph P c n , and any regular graph. The results shows that the resulting domination numbers meet the lower bound of an obtained lower bound γ(G) of any graphs.
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 2013
A dominating set $D$ for a graph $G$ is a subset of $V(G)$ such that any vertex not in $D$ has at least one neighbor in $D$. The domination number $\gamma(G)$ is the size of a minimum dominating set in G. Vizing's conjecture from 1968 states that for the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$, $\gamma(G)\gamma(H) \leq \gamma(G \Box H)$, and Clark and Suen (2000) proved that $\gamma(G)\gamma(H) \leq 2 \gamma(G \Box H)$. In this paper, we modify the approach of Clark and Suen to prove a variety of similar bounds related to total and paired domination, and also extend these bounds to the $n$-Cartesian product of graphs $A^1$ through $A^n$.
Discrete Mathematics, 2008
dominating function of minimum weight for a graph. In this paper, we study the variations of Ydomination such as {k}-domination, k-tuple domination, signed domination, and minus domination for some classes of graphs. We present a unified approach to these four domination problems on strongly chordal graphs. Notice that trees, block graphs, interval graphs, and directed path graphs are subclasses of strongly chordal graphs. This paper also gives complexity results for these four domination problems on doubly chordal graphs, dually chordal graphs, chordal bipartite graphs, and planar graphs. Remark 1. A graph G has a k-tuple dominating set if and only if δ(G)+1 ≥ k. A k-tuple dominating set of a graph G = (V, E) can be viewed as a k-tuple dominating function f : V → {0, 1} such that f (N G [v]) ≥ k for all vertices v ∈ V . Then, the k-tuple domination number of G is equal to the minimum weight of a k-tuple dominating function of G. Definition 2. A signed dominating function of ã 131T he 23rd Workshop on Combinatorial Mathematics and Computation Theory 132T he 23rd Workshop on Combinatorial Mathematics and Computation Theory 133T he 23rd Workshop on Combinatorial Mathematics and Computation Theory
2018
Let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. For any integer k ≥ 1, a subset of V is called a k-tuple total dominating set of G if every vertex in V has at least k neighbors in the set. The minimum cardinality of a minimal k-tuple total dominating set of G is called the k-tuple total domination number of G. In this paper, we introduce the concept of upper k-tuple total domination number of G as the maximum cardinality of a minimal k-tuple total dominating set of G, and study the problem of finding a minimal k-tuple total dominating set of maximum cardinality on several classes of graphs, as well as finding general bounds and characterizations. Also, we find some results on the upper k-tuple total domination number of the Cartesian and cross product graphs.
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2009
Let γ t {k}(G) denote the total {k}-domination number of graph G, and let $G\mathbin{\square}H$ denote the Cartesian product of graphs G and H. In this paper, we show that for any graphs G and H without isolated vertices, $\gamma _{t}^{\{k\}}(G)\gamma _{t}^{\{k\}}(H)\le k(k+1)\gamma _{t}^{\{k\}}(G\mathbin{\square}H)$ . As a corollary of this result, we have $\gamma _{t}(G)\gamma _{t}(H)\le 2\gamma _{t}(G\mathbin{\square}H)$ for all graphs G and H without isolated vertices, which is given by Pak Tung Ho (Util. Math., 2008, to appear) and first appeared as a conjecture proposed by Henning and Rall (Graph. Comb. 21:63–69, 2005).
arXiv: Combinatorics, 2017
Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. The total dominating set of $G$ is a subset $D$ of $V$ that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to some vertices of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is equal to minimum cardinality of total dominating set in $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=\sum_{i=\gamma_t(G)}^n d_t(G,i)x^i$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the number of total dominating sets of $G$ of size $i$. A root of $D_t(G,x)$ is called a total domination root of $G$. An irrelevant edge of $D_t(G,x)$ is an edge $e \in E$, such that $D_t(G, x) = D_t(G\setminus e, x)$. In this paper, we characterize edges possessing this property. Also we obtain some results for the number of total dominating sets of a regular graph. Finally, we study graphs with exactly two total domination roots $\{-3,0\}$, $\{-2,0\}$ and $\{-1,0\}$.
Given a graph G, a set D ⊂ V (G) is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in D is adjacent to at least one vertex of D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. If moreover, every vertex not in D is adjacent to exactly one vertex of D, then D is called a perfect dominating set of G. The perfect domination number γ 11 (G) is the minimum cardinality of a perfect dominating set of G. In general, for every integer k ≥ 1, a dominating set D is called a k-quasiperfect dominating set if every vertex not in D is adjacent to at most k vertices of D. The k-quasiperfect domination number γ 1k (G) is the minimum cardinality of a k-quasiperfect dominating set of G. These parameters are related in the following general way (Δ the maximum degree of G and by n the number of vertices): γ(G) = γ 1Δ (G) ≤ • • • ≤ γ 12 (G) ≤ γ 11 (G) ≤ n. In this work we study the perfect domination number, with the help of this decreasing chain of domination parameters, in the following graph families: graphs with extremal maximum degree, that is, graphs with Δ ≥ n − 3 or Δ = 3, and also in cographs, claw-free graphs and trees. We also study the behavior of these parameters under some usual product operations.
arXiv: Combinatorics, 2017
The open neighbourhood of a vertex $v$ of a graph $G$ is the set $N(v)$ consisting of all vertices adjacent to $v$ in $G$. For $D\subseteq V(G)$, we define $\overline{D}=V(G)\setminus D$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is called a super dominating set of $G$ if for every vertex $u\in \overline{D}$, there exists $v\in D$ such that $N(v)\cap \overline{D}=\{u\}$. The super domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality among all super dominating sets in $G$. In this article, we obtain closed formulas and tight bounds for the super domination number of $G$ in terms of several invariants of $G$. Furthermore, the particular cases of corona product graphs and Cartesian product graphs are considered.
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2008
In this paper we continue the investigation of total domination in Cartesian products of graphs first studied in (Henning, M.A., Rall, D.F. in Graphs Comb. 21:63-69, 2005). A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex in G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The maximum cardinality of a minimal total dominating set of G is the upper total domination number of G, denoted by Γ t (G). We prove that the product of the upper total domination numbers of any graphs G and H without isolated vertices is at most twice the upper total domination number of their Cartesian product; that is, Γ t (G)Γ t (H ) ≤ 2Γ t (G H ).
European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2021
Let G = (V (G), E(G)) be a simple non-empty graph. For an integer k ≥ 1, a k-fairtotal dominating set (kf td-set) is a total dominating set S ⊆ V (G) such that |NG(u) ∩ S| = k for every u ∈ V (G)\S. The k-fair total domination number of G, denoted by γkf td(G), is the minimum cardinality of a kf td-set. A k-fair total dominating set of cardinality γkf td(G) is called a minimum k-fair total dominating set or a γkf td-set. We investigate the notion of k-fair total domination in this paper. We also characterize the k-fair total dominating sets in the join, corona, lexicographic product and Cartesian product of graphs and determine the exact values or sharpbounds of their corresponding k-fair total domination number.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.