Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2006, Physical Review Letters
…
4 pages
1 file
We consider the problem of discriminating between states of a specified set with maximum confidence. For a set of linearly independent states unambiguous discrimination is possible if we allow for the possibility of an inconclusive result. For linearly dependent sets an analogous measurement is one which allows us to be as confident as possible that when a given state is identified on the basis of the measurement result, it is indeed the correct state.
Physical Review A, 2002
Physical Review A
In quantum state discrimination, one aims to identify unknown states from a given ensemble by performing measurements. Different strategies such as minimum-error discrimination or unambiguous state identification find different optimal measurements. Maximum-confidence measurements (MCMs) maximise the confidence with which inputs can be identified given the measurement outcomes. This unifies a range of discrimination strategies including minimum-error and unambiguous state identification, which can be understood as limiting cases of MCM. In this work, we investigate MCMs for general ensembles of qubit states. We present a method for finding MCMs for qubitstate ensembles by exploiting their geometry, and apply it to several interesting cases, including ensembles two and four mixed states and ensembles of an arbitrary number of pure states. We also compare MCMs to minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination for qubits. Our results provide interpretations of various qubit measurements in terms of MCM and can be used to devise qubit protocols.
Physical Review A, 2012
We present the solution to the problem of optimally discriminating among quantum states, i.e., identifying the states with maximum probability of success when a certain fixed rate of inconclusive answers is allowed. By varying the inconclusive rate, the scheme optimally interpolates between unambiguous and minimum error discrimination, the two standard approaches to quantum state discrimination. We introduce a very general method that enables us to obtain the solution in a wide range of cases and give a complete characterization of the minimum discrimination error as a function of the rate of inconclusive answers. A critical value of this rate is identified that coincides with the minimum failure probability in the cases where unambiguous discrimination is possible and provides a natural generalization of it when states cannot be unambiguously discriminated. The method is illustrated on two explicit examples: discrimination of two pure states with arbitrary prior probabilities and discrimination of trine states.
Physical Review A, 2005
We investigate generalized measurements, based on positive-operator-valued measures, and von Neumann measurements for the unambiguous discrimination of two mixed quantum states that occur with given prior probabilities. In particular, we derive the conditions under which the failure probability of the measurement can reach its absolute lower bound, proportional to the fidelity of the states. The optimum measurement strategy yielding the fidelity bound of the failure probability is explicitly determined for a number of cases. One example involves two density operators of rank d that jointly span a 2d-dimensional Hilbert space and are related in a special way. We also present an application of the results to the problem of unambiguous quantum state comparison, generalizing the optimum strategy for arbitrary prior probabilities of the states.
Physical Review A, 2004
2012
We show a geometric formulation for minimum-error discrimination of qubit states, that can be applied to arbitrary sets of qubit states given with arbitrary a priori probabilities. In particular, when qubit states are given with equal a priori probabilities, we provide a systematic way of finding optimal discrimination and the complete solution in a closed form. This generally gives a bound to cases when prior probabilities are unequal. Then, it is shown that the guessing probability does not depend on detailed relations among given states, such as angles between them, but on a property that can be assigned by the set of given states itself. This also shows how a set of quantum states can be modified such that the guessing probability remains the same. Optimal measurements are also characterized accordingly, and a general method of finding them is provided.
Physical Review A, 2013
We show a geometric formulation for minimum-error discrimination of qubit states, that can be applied to arbitrary sets of qubit states given with arbitrary a priori probabilities. In particular, when qubit states are given with equal a priori probabilities, we provide a systematic way of finding optimal discrimination and the complete solution in a closed form. This generally gives a bound to cases when prior probabilities are unequal. Then, it is shown that the guessing probability does not depend on detailed relations among given states, such as angles between them, but on a property that can be assigned by the set of given states itself. This also shows how a set of quantum states can be modified such that the guessing probability remains the same. Optimal measurements are also characterized accordingly, and a general method of finding them is provided.
Physical Review A, 2001
One strategy to the discrimination problem is to identify the state with certainty, leaving a possibility of undecidability. This paper gives an upper bound for the maximal success probability of unambiguous discrimination among n states. This bound coincides with the known IDP limit when two states are considered.
Journal of Modern Optics, 2010
The problem of discriminating among given nonorthogonal quantum states is underlying many of the schemes that have been suggested for quantum communication and quantum computing. However, quantum mechanics puts severe limitations on our ability to determine the state of a quantum system. In particular, nonorthogonal states cannot be discriminated perfectly, even if they are known, and various strategies for optimum discrimination with respect to some appropriately chosen criteria have been developed. In this article we review recent theoretical progress regarding the two most important optimum discrimination strategies. We also give a detailed introduction with emphasis on the relevant concepts of the quantum theory of measurement. After a brief introduction into the field, the second chapter deals with optimum unambiguous, i. e error-free, discrimination. Ambiguous discrimination with minimum error is the subject of the third chapter. The fourth chapter is devoted to an overview of the recently emerging subfield of discriminating multiparticle states. We conclude with a brief outlook where we attempt to outline directions of research for the immediate future.
Physical Review A, 2010
We present a generic study of unambiguous discrimination between two mixed quantum states. We derive operational optimality conditions and show that the optimal measurements can be classified according to their rank. In Hilbert space dimensions smaller or equal to five this leads to the complete optimal solution. We demonstrate our method with a physical example, namely the unambiguous comparison of n quantum states, and find the optimal success probability.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Physical Review A, 2018
Physical review letters, 2003
Quantum Science and Technology, 2021
Fortschritte Der Physik-progress of Physics, 2003
Physical Review A, 2014
Physical Review A, 2005
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2007
Physical Review A, 2008
Physical Review A, 2008
Physical Review A, 2013
Physical Review Letters, 2004
Fortschritte der Physik, 2003
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2006
Physical Review A, 2004
2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2020
Physical Review A, 2002
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2014
Physical Review A, 2011
New Journal of Physics, 2021