Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing research with enhanced quality and pace. AI applications aid researchers throughout the research process, from generating content and reviewing literature to grammar check and plagiarism. This study examines the role of AI in academic writing to enhance research writing. The paper also explores the empirical studies which throw light on the adoption and usage trends of AI by researchers and Academic professionals globally. Through a critical analysis, this study examines the impact, integration and capability, costs, and benefits of AI in making research workflow easier and reliable. This paper also explores the future implications of AI in Research, considering the challenges and ethical issues that come with it.
Lanna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2024
Background: Artificial intelligence is already altering the world and raising important questions for society, the economy, and governance. Scholars have largely focused on the utility of AI for human existence. Limited scholarly works seem to specifically address the potential and the adverse effects of AI-dominated use in the area of academic research. Objective: This paper attempts to reflect on the implications of the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic research. Specifically, it examines the potential and possible threats of AI to academic research. Methodology: The paper adopted an exploratory research approach that seeks to explore the emerging AI relationship with academic research to stimulate further study in the new field. Data were collected through a literature search to support the polemic discussion of the issues raised. Results: The paper posits that Artificial Intelligence's dominant use in academic research has the potential to analyse large datasets with speed and ease, reduce plagiarism, and improve literature review. However, it is likely to limit critical thinking, academic creativity, and the creation of indolence among academics and can also induce machine-mediated plagiarism, known as AIgiarism. Conclusion: The paper concludes that though the application of Artificial Intelligence presents some advantages in the field of education, unethical reliance on it diminishes human creativity in scholarship and formerly recognises indolence in academic activities. Unique contribution: The paper has articulated a discussion that can inform ethical and legal framework on the application of Artificial Intelligence in academic research. Recommendation: AI tools need to be developed to distinguish between AI-supported research write-ups and human-written papers. This is important to discourage AIgiarism (plagiarism), which is inevitably thrown up by intelligent software applications.
INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan/Insania, 2023
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in academic writing has gained significant attention due to its potential impact on authorship, the natural character of academic works, and ethical considerations. This Study aims to assess the faculty members' perceptions on their current usage of AI in academic writing and explore its future implications. The research involved an online survey administered to 68 faculty members responding to closed and open-ended questions. The study revealed faculty members' perceptions of AI integration in academic writing and its implications for authorship and the authenticity of academic work. Findings reveal widespread adoption of AI tools among faculty members, offering efficiency, productivity, and accuracy benefits in areas like grammar checks, reference management, writing assistance, and plagiarism detection. However, concerns arise over authorship preservation and maintaining academic work's unique character, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines. Ethical considerations and best practices are also highlighted to use AI while safeguarding academic integrity effectively. These insights extend to educators, policy makers, and researchers, offering a comprehensive view of AI's current role in academic writing and guiding ethical discussions and best practices. Ultimately, this research enhances teaching and learning practices in Indonesian higher education institutions through responsible AI integration.
Nature and Science of Sleep, 2023
Some people call this artificial intelligence, but the reality is this technology will enhance us. So instead of artificial intelligence, I think we'll augment our intelligence.-Ginni Rometty In today's scientific landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing research methodologies and scientific writing, reshaping how we conduct and disseminate research. As AI's presence grows, so do questions surrounding ethics, authenticity, and the integrity of scientific publications. The increasing use of AI tools, such as large language models (LLMs) like Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Google Bard, and Bing AI, in research publications has raised concerns and sparked discussions within the research and academic communities. 1 While AI and LLMs offer potential benefits, such as improved efficiency and transformative solutions, they also present challenges related to ethical considerations, bias, fake publications, and malicious use. 2 AI has the potential to enhance various aspects of research, including data processing, task automation, and personalized experiences. 1 However, AI usage in research and scientific writing can pose risks such as bias reinforcement, data privacy concerns, perpetuating data inaccuracies, and the potential for reduced critical thinking due to overreliance. 3 Therefore, the development of guidelines for using AI in research and scientific writing is crucial to ensure this technology's responsible and ethical application. This editorial, published in Nature and Science of Sleep, primarily aims to enhance awareness of the evolving role of AI in research and scientific writing, emphasizing both its potential advantages and ethical challenges. By promoting responsible AI use, advocating for ethical guidelines, and engaging stakeholders, we strive to empower authors, reviewers, and the broader research community to navigate the dynamic landscape of AI in scientific writing while upholding the highest standards of integrity and credibility. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need for the development of international guidelines that guide the responsible use of AI and LLMs in research and scientific writing. AI's Potential Benefits and Challenges AI holds the promise to profoundly transform research and education through various key advantages. Firstly, it has the capability to process vast amounts of data swiftly and efficiently, empowering researchers to navigate through sophisticated datasets and draw out meaningful insights. 1 Additionally, the automation features of AI streamline tasks like formatting and citation, freeing up substantial time and energy for researchers, which can then be redirected towards more complex and innovative work. 3,4 Lastly, AI can curate personalized learning journeys for students, tailoring the experience to their unique needs and learning preferences. 5 Nevertheless, while promising, AI systems have notable drawbacks, especially in health and medical research. These systems can amplify and perpetuate biases present in the training data, leading to skewed predictions and potentially
Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology , 2024
Background The discussion about the role of AI (artificial intelligence) in the wider society has been going on for over a decade. In many industry sectors, such as medicine, we have seen that AI programs can automate tasks, manage quality control, and increase efficiency. In academia, AI is becoming popular and is widely used. In social sciences, we have seen arguments that the increased use of AI in society will result in deskilling and job losses. One could argue that AI will increase productivity, perform certain jobs more precisely and faster than humans ever could, and reduce the need for people to do boring, repetitive jobs. In short, the kind of arguments not dissimilar to the ones used at the time of the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century (Mokyr et al. 2015) or the introduction of robots in the industry in the late twentieth century (Dhillon et al., 2002). More recently, we have seen rapid growth in the capability of AI tools in academia, such as ChatGPT, in the 2020s. This is due to the rapidly increasing capacity of machine learning, particularly Generative AI (GenAI), which is what ChatGPT is. This has increased public, media, and academic interest in the topic. Many nontechnical people, including students, have been amazed by the enormous capabilities of ChatGPT to produce text equal to the average human-produced text (Simkhada et al., 2024). Undoubtedly, the adoption of AI, especially amongst students and pupils, is also advancing rapidly in Nepal. This has been a concern for high school and university teachers. Furthermore, this issue becomes even more crucial in the field of academic writings and journal article publications. We, as editors and editorial board members of the Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology (DJSA), see potential in the use of AI in research in our field, but at the same time, we do worry about its misuse in academic writing and publishing. AI's Perception of Its Usefulness in Sociology As a little experiment, we tested the usefulness of GenAI in sociology by asking for the free version of ChatGPT on August 29, 2024 (https://chat.chatbotapp.ai/chats). The following question was asked: 'What is the role of artificial intelligence in sociology?' The full answer we received is listed in Box 1.
International Journal of Adult Education and Technology
Evidence shows that artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important subject in academia, representing about 2.2% of all scientific publications. One concern for doctoral programs is the future role of AI in doctoral writing due to the increase in AI-generated content, such as text and images. Apprehensions have been expressed that the use of AI may have a negative impact on a doctoral student's ability to think critically and creatively. In contrast, others argue that using AI tools can provide various benefits resulting in rigorous research. This conceptual article first discusses the developing relationship between AI and dissertation writing skills. Second, the article explores the origins of the traditional dissertation and outlines 21st-century dissertation options which reflect contextual needs and utilization of AI. Third, identified writing challenges are highlighted before turning to an in-depth examination of AI-generated tools and writing craft skills required to...
2025
Artificial intelligence-based Language Tools (AILTs) are being increasingly used in essay writing in higher education. Its application promotes global and multicultural perspectives in education and plays a critical role in advancing scholarly communication and research dissemination. However, these benefits cannot be measured without also considering student perspectives. This study analyzes the positive and negative aspects identified by students regarding the use of AILTs in their written texts at university. A total of 314 undergraduate and graduate education students were surveyed, and results were analyzed using the Reinert method. The results show that positive aspects are linked to the three pillars of text construction (planning, textualization, and revision). The negative aspects highlight concerns about academic integrity and student competencies. These findings can help guide teachers on how they can promote the responsible and beneficial use of AILTs.
International Journal of Information Studies and Libraries, vol. 9, no. 2, 2024
Navigating the ethical landscape of generative AI in research writing presents both opportunities and challenges for academia. Tools like ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, and Microsoft’s Copilot are revolutionizing scholarly practices by automating routine tasks, improving productivity, and democratizing access to knowledge. However, these advancements raise significant ethical concerns, including plagiarism, bias, intellectual property issues, and data privacy. Addressing these concerns requires a comprehensive ethical framework to ensure responsible AI integration in research. Libraries play a pivotal role in this process by acting as ethical gatekeepers through education, guideline development, and advocacy for equitable access to AI tools. They can foster an ethical research culture by organizing workshops, promoting transparency in AI usage, and supporting diverse contributions to academia. The urgency for ethical regulation of generative AI is paramount to prevent misuse, ensure fairness, and uphold scholarly integrity. Key principles, such as respect for human dignity, transparency, privacy protection, and accountability, must guide the responsible use of AI in research. Collaboration among researchers, policymakers, librarians, and technologists is essential to address emerging challenges and continuously refine ethical standards. By embedding ethical considerations into academic practices, institutions can ensure that AI serves as a tool to enhance innovation without compromising integrity. This abstract calls for a shared commitment to balancing technological advancements with ethical practices to shape a principled and inclusive research landscape driven by responsible AI integration.
Kurdish Studies, 2024
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become integral to scientific research, offering unprecedented capabilities in data analysis, predictive modeling, and literature review. This article explores the multifaceted impact of AI on research methodologies, academic discourse, and ethical considerations. The integration of AI in scientific investigation streamlines data collection, expedites analytical procedures, and facilitates predictive modeling in fields such as biomedicine and social sciences. However, the ethical implications of AI in academic publishing necessitate careful consideration. Concerns surrounding authenticity, transparency, reproducibility, bias, data privacy, dependence on AI, and peer review are addressed. The article delves into the evolving policies of major publishers, including Elsevier, Wiley, and Springer, regarding the use of generative AI in scholarly publications. While publishers exhibit a growing interest in AI, variations in policies reflect ongoing debates on transparency, accountability, and the ethical implications of AI-generated content. The discussion extends to the educational impact of AI on students and researchers, emphasizing the need for critical evaluation and support for emerging scientific writers. The conclusion acknowledges the transformative potential of AI in scientific inquiry but underscores the importance of understanding and respecting its limitations. Balancing the benefits of AI with ethical considerations is crucial for maintaining the integrity of research practices in an era increasingly shaped by technological advancements.
Springer, Cham, 2024
In the context of higher education, designing and writing an academic essay and artificial intelligence come together to form a revolutionary intersection where each transforms and improves the other in turn. By providing dynamic, inter-active learning environments and individualized learning experiences by using innovative technologies and adaptable learning methodologies, artificial intelligence (AI) enhances academic writing. Research conducted in Lebanon on the effects of AI on students in higher education was restricted to the medical domain. As a result, there is a gap in the research on students majoring in business. Therefore, the objective of this study was to inspect how business students in Lebanese higher education are affected by the adoption of artificial intelligence in their academic writing. Using information gathered from Google, a sample of 376 business students from 13 private universities and the Lebanese University participated in the study. The quality of academic writing was found to be positively correlated with the adoption of AI technology, as indicated by Pearson correlation analysis. Regression analysis also demonstrated that the use of AI significantly and favorably affects academic writing quality. Keywords: Business students; Higher education; Academic writing; Artificial intelligence; Lebanon
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can write poetry and news articles that go undetected by human readers. Can students use AI to write college assignments that go undetected by their professors? Past and current perceptions of AI in education have differed; while some people view AI as a tool, others view it as a threat to learning. We surveyed 83 students and 82 faculty, providing them with 4 writing samples, 3 generated by undergraduate students and 1 generated by the AI-chatbot, ChatGPT-3. We found that neither faculty nor students could detect AI-generated writing at above chance levels. Faculty and students had similar opinions on the ethicality of various uses of AI technology and how much these uses are likely to compromise learning. Faculty reported a high level of concern regarding the potential effects that AI could have on their pedagogical practices. Prior experience with ChatGPT-3 and analyzing the structure and organization of the response was found to improve detection abi...
International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 2023
AI tools are applications or software that specifically perform tasks that encompass a wide range of functions. Artificial intelligence plays a pivotal role in scholarly publication as it provides insights, helps in refining the article language, and grammar checking, and suggests improvement thus enhancing the efficiency, quality, and depth of the content of the research paper. The new educational paradigm has both benefits and drawbacks. The present study employs a cross-sectional online survey method. The study aims to analyze the role of AI tools among research scholars in the Vellore district. The study focuses on identifying the AI tools used by the researcher for effective writing. The study employs a self-designed questionnaire (Likert scale) with 40 items concerning variables like content creation, grammar and spelling, detection of plagiarism, paraphrasing and summarizing, citation generator, translation, assistance in outlining and structure, data visualization, editing and proofreading, sentiment analysis, collaborative writing, and its ethical considerations. The questionnaire was circulated to research scholars in Vellore District through Google Forms. The consent was obtained from the scholars on the initial page of the forms. The data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The tests like descriptive statistics, frequency, reliability, validity, normality, ANOVA, and regression were performed to analyze the data. The proposed research questions of the study aim to find the different AI tools used in content generation and the effectiveness of these tools when employed in research paper writing. The respondents also use Grammarly Go for grammar checking, tone, and clarity. In the preliminary survey, most of them accepted that AI tools help scholars ease the writing process. After Zotero, they found it easier to change the referencing style to the journal requirement. Most of the researchers accepted that they would use AI tools in writing, and many have also confirmed that they do not completely rely on AI tools as they use them based on requirements like paraphrasing, grammar checking, and citation. Hence, they conclude that AI tools are an advantage for scholars in research writing.
International Journal Of Global Community, 2024
The pace of development in artificial intelligence (AI) is quickening, and it holds immense potential to transform different facets of our existence. The use of AIpowered writing assistants has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, there are ethical issues surrounding this technology in the academic environment and the lack of an ethical framework in some academic institutions to guide its use creates more ethical dilemmas for students, academicians and researchers. This study argues for the inevitable need for ethical consideration and a framework to ensure the proper use and application of AI such as GPT in academia to promote the integrity and authorship of academic work. The study systematically assesses the literature to explore ethical gaps in using artificial intelligence in academia and its implications for academic integrity. In addition, the study proposes the reconciliation of the two sides of research, the new presence of AI in academia and academic integrity. We advocate for the creation of ethical frameworks to counter the misuse of AI in academics, research and writing, and promote authorship integrity for both AI and human scholars and a healthy juxtaposition of the two seemingly irreconcilable entities. There is a need for collaborative efforts among stakeholders, including students, faculty, administrators, and policymakers, to combat ethical issues in using AI in academics effectively. Institutions to develop more comprehensive and sustainable strategies to combat ethical issues surrounding the use of AI in academics and promote a culture of academic integrity in higher education settings.
Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 2024
Purpose – This study investigates the potential effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing the academic writing skills of Saudi EFL undergraduate students. It also examines the challenges associated with its use and suggests effective ways to address them in the education sector. Design/methodology/approach – The study employed a sequential mixed-methods approach, which involved distributing questionnaires to gather data from students, followed by conducting semi-structured interviews with a purposeful selection of eight students and six teachers. Findings – The findings revealed that students were generally satisfied with the effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing their academic writing skills. However, they also pinpointed some challenges associated with using ChatGPT, including plagiarism, overreliance, inadequate documentation, threats to academic integrity, and inaccurate information. To alleviate these challenges, effective strategies include deploying detection tools, equipping students and educators with training sessions, and revisiting academic policies and assessment methods. It is recommended that ChatGPT be used responsibly as an assistant tool, in conjunction with students’ ideas and teachers’ feedback. This approach can significantly enhance students’ writing skills and facilitate completing their research projects and assignments. Practical implications – ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in the educational landscape, but it is essential to use it judiciously. Therefore, teachers’ effective integration of ChatGPT into their classrooms can significantly enhance students’ writing abilities and streamline their research process. Originality/value – This study contributes to recent AI-based research and provides practical insights on the responsible integration of ChatGPT into education while addressing potential challenges.
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine, 2023
This article examines the advantages and disadvantages of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research and education and proposes the urgent need for an international statement to guide their responsible use. LLMs and AI demonstrate remarkable natural language processing, data analysis, and decision-making capabilities, offering potential benefits such as improved efficiency and transformative solutions. However, concerns regarding ethical considerations, bias, fake publications, and malicious use also arise. The objectives of this paper are to critically evaluate the utility of LLMs and AI in research and education, call for discussions between stakeholders, and discuss the need for an international statement. We identify advantages such as data processing, task automation, and personalized experiences, alongside disadvantages like bias reinforcement, interpretability challenges, inaccurate reporting, and plagiarism. Stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and civil society must engage in open discussions to address the ethical, legal, and societal implications. The proposed international statement should emphasize transparency, accountability, ongoing research, and risk mitigation. Monitoring, evaluation, user education, and awareness are essential components. By fostering discussions and establishing guidelines, we can ensure the responsible and ethical development and use of LLMs and AI, maximizing benefits while minimizing risks.
Management Research, 2024
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between academic writing and generative artificial intelligence (AI). Design/methodology/approach – This paper is characterized as exploratory and descriptive, with a qualitative approach. Two approaches were used: the first, a narrative review of the literature with a systematic search from which a data collection stage was carried out using asynchronous interviews by means of an online questionnaire. Findings – The results indicate that generative AI should be seen as a complementary tool for creative and critical academic writing. The data collected also highlighted issues related to academic dishonesty and the new type of plagiarism – plagiarism made possible by technologies – as well as issues of authorship and legitimacy of work carried out with AI and the loss of reflective and critical thinking and creativity. Research limitations/implications – The considerable increase in resources using AI in all dimensions of human life. Practical implications – The impact that the use of generative AIs can have on the creation of knowledge and the dissemination of scientific research. Social implications – The impact that the use of generative AIs can have on the creation of knowledge and on the dissemination of scientific research. Originality/value – The need for academia to anticipate the use of AI in academic writing and to incorporate its benefits into this process, especially considering researchers in training.
Biology of Sport
Natural language processing (NLP) has been studied in computing for decades. Recent technological advancements have led to the development of sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT). These models can perform a range of language tasks and generate human-like responses, which offers exciting prospects for academic efficiency. This manuscript aims at (i) exploring the potential benefits and threats of ChatGPT and other NLP technologies in academic writing and research publications; (ii) highlights the ethical considerations involved in using these tools, and (iii) consider the impact they may have on the authenticity and credibility of academic work. This study involved a literature review of relevant scholarly articles published in peer-reviewed journals indexed in Scopus as quartile 1. The search used keywords such as "ChatGPT," "AI-generated text," "academic writing," and "natural language processing." The analysis was carried out using a quasi-qualitative approach, which involved reading and critically evaluating the sources and identifying relevant data to support the research questions. The study found that ChatGPT and other NLP technologies have the potential to enhance academic writing and research efficiency. However, their use also raises concerns about the impact on the authenticity and credibility of academic work. The study highlights the need for comprehensive discussions on the potential use, threats, and limitations of these tools, emphasizing the importance of ethical and academic principles, with human intelligence and critical thinking at the forefront of the research process. This study highlights the need for comprehensive debates and ethical considerations involved in their use. The study also recommends that academics exercise caution when using these tools and ensure transparency in their use, emphasizing the importance of human intelligence and critical thinking in academic work.
International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) , 2023
Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in educational pedagogy, particularly in academic writing. The rapid growth of computing technologies has made AIED (Artificial Intelligence in Education) applications more feasible to implement. AIED is the use of AI (artificial intelligence) technologies or application programmes to support instruction, learning, or decision-making in learning environments. By employing a qualitative methodology and a literature review as research design and methodology, the study effectively contributed to the achievement of its goal. The primary objectives of this study include improving efficiency and greater idea development in academic writing using AIED. To succeed in academic writing, scholars must develop AIED literacy, which includes application, reliability, accountability, and engagement. This research focuses on the challenges and future possibilities of communication-instructional perspectives on AIED, which ought to be widely implemented in academic writing and will result in substantial changes to education. As a result, the focus of this study is on recommendations for educators and academics to ensure the benefits of AI-assisted writing, as well as its possibilities and challenges. This study explores the various ways that artificial intelligence (AI) may be used in ESL classrooms to improve student experience and instructional efficiency, as well as to generate an idea for the application of AI to academic writing. By employing AIED in academic writing, the idea under consideration can divert time and energy used for teaching and learning. IndexTerms-Artificial intelligence, Academic writing, AI challenges and opportunities.
Science Editing, 2023
This study was conducted to understand the perceptions and awareness of artificial intelligence (AI) in the academic publishing landscape. Methods: We conducted a global survey entitled "Role and impact of AI on the future of academic publishing" to understand the impact of the AI wave in the scholarly publishing domain. This English-language survey was open to all researchers, authors, editors, publishers, and other stakeholders in the scholarly community. Conducted between August and October 2021, the survey received responses from around 212 universities across 54 countries. Results: Out of 365 respondents, about 93% belonged to the age groups of 18-34 and 35-54 years. While 50% of the respondents selected plagiarism detection as the most widely known AI-based application, image recognition (42%), data analytics (40%), and language enhancement (39%) were some other known applications of AI. The respondents also expressed the opinion that the academic publishing landscape will significantly benefit from AI. However, the major challenges restraining the large-scale adoption of AI, as expressed by 93% of the respondents, were limited knowledge and expertise, as well as difficulties in integrating AI-based solutions into existing IT infrastructure. Conclusion: The survey responses reflected the necessity of AI in research and publishing. This study suggests possible ways to support a smooth transition. This can be best achieved by educating and creating awareness to ease possible fears and hesitation, and to actualize the promising benefits of AI.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2023
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research across all disciplines is becoming ubiquitous. However, this ubiquity is largely driven by hyperspecific AI models developed during scientific studies for accomplishing a well-defined, data-dense task. These AI models introduce apparent, human-recognizable biases because they are trained with finite, specific data sets and parameters. However, the efficacy of using large language models (LLMs)-and LLM-powered generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT-to assist the research process is currently indeterminate. These generative AI tools, trained on general and imperceptibly large datasets along with human feedback, present challenges in identifying and addressing biases. Furthermore, these models are susceptible to goal misgeneralization, hallucinations, and adversarial attacks such as red teaming prompts-which can be unintentionally performed by human researchers, resulting in harmful outputs. These outputs are reinforced in research-where an increasing number of individuals have begun to use generative AI to compose manuscripts. Efforts into AI interpretability lag behind development, and the implicit variations that occur when prompting and providing context to a chatbot introduce uncertainty and irreproducibility. We thereby find that incorporating generative AI in the process of writing research manuscripts introduces a new type of context-induced algorithmic bias and has unintended side effects that are largely detrimental to academia, knowledge production, and communicating research.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.