Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations
All learners must have access and opportunity to engage meaningfully in the highest levels of mathematics. Mathematics specialists are uniquely situated to contribute to the creation of access and equity for all learners by addressing three target areas with their mathematics teachers and administrators. In order to catalyze change, mathematics specialists need to be prepared to target three obstacles to access and equity: beliefs and expectations, curriculum and instruction, and intervention. This preparation can take place through leadership courses intentionally created to explore the role of change agent and provide practice in negotiating the role.
International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2019
This research report will discuss mathematics specialists and the way in which they communicate ideas of equity and social justice within a ma e og am ha lead o a a e endorsement in mathematics education leadership. Many mathematics specialist programs focus on developing their mathematical content knowledge for teaching, but these specialized leaders also need to learn about curriculum, assessment, pedagogy, and leadership for school change. Thi e ea ch de c ibe one ma hema ic eciali og am ini ial effo in de elo ing mathematics teacher leaders who take action within their K-12 school contexts. Preliminary findings suggest that the mathematics specialists within this program are aligning their views of equitable mathematics instruction with Principles to Actions (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2014) and the Teaching for Robust Understanding Framework (Schoenfeld, 2015). Implications for the program are that we are still exploring how to incorporate these ideas and facilitate critical conversations as teacher educators within our classrooms.
2000
The purpose of the study described in this paper was to determine the facilitators and barriers teachers in middle-school mathematics classrooms faced when trying to implement equity and reform objectives. The study is set in the context of the Statewide Systemic Initiative (SSI) in Ohio known as Project Discovery. In 1995, a major evaluation of the SSI, known as The Landscape Study, was begun. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from a wide range of sources across the state. This study focuses on the qualitative data collected at seven middle-school sites visited over a twelve-month period. Data were analyzed using a framework which outlined four dimensions of reform developed by Rossman. These dimensions were Technical, Cultural, Political and Moral. A fifth dimension designated Caring was also identified. The paper concludes with a series of challenges for reformers and equity advocates. (Contains 35 references.) (Author/ASK) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
1997
The purpose of this paper is to explore the links between equity and reform in mathematics education. An overview of the research into problems associated with equity and mathematics education is presented, followed by an overview of the types of initiatives that have been employed to overcome the problems. A framework for viewing the problems and solutions is discussed followed by an operational definition of equity in the mathematics classroom. A review of two large-scale reform efforts in mathematics is presented and the data derived from monitoring these reform efforts forms the basis for this paper. A wide range of quantitative and qualitative data from the reform monitoring efforts is employed to examine the technical, cultural, political, and moral dimensions of enacting equity in reform. Contains 65 references. (Author/DDR)
A book review of a collection of 14 chapters that tell the story of Railside High School, a school where mathematics teachers successfully transformed their mathematics department to create classrooms in which all the students could successfully tackle challenging mathematics.
His research draws upon queer theory and disability studies to explore how students are constructed as low-achieving and how teachers can move from looking at individual deficits to models of curriculum and pedagogy based on Complex Instruction.
Teacher Education Quarterly, 2015
Teacher education is critical in preparing teachers to implement equitable instructional practices and thus contributes to improving educational and social conditions for underserved children and youths (Jacobsen, Mistele, & Srirman, 2012; Zeichner, 2009). Although the preparation of teachers to work with diverse student populations has been the subject ofa growing body of research (e.g., Cochran-Smith, Fieman-Nemser, McIntyre, & Demers, 2008; Cochran-Smith & Zeichner, 2005), few studies to date have explored conditions under which mathematics teacher educators (MTEs) can help teachers (1) develop equitable mathematics pedagogy (McLeman & Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, 2012; Strutchens et al., 2012). Although this literature illuminates important instructional practices of MTEs who teach through an equity lens, a systematic and broad-scale examination of these practices, including potential challenges, could inform mathematics teacher education by unpacking commonalities and differences in way...
2013
Hostetler (2005) describes "good" education research as that which attends to the well-being of students, teachers, and communities. In this essay, the author proposes measuring equity-based research in mathematics education against Hostetler's standard. She argues that current equity-based research has not adequately addressed the mathematical experiences of marginalized students due to its primary focus on the "achievement gap." Such a focus leaves the social and political hierarchies that produce marginalization intact and unquestioned. She presents methodological diversity as a strategy for reconceptualizing mathematics education research in a way that addresses the more foundational quality and opportunity gaps that are at the root of equity issues in mathematics education. She also offers embracing methodological clarity, shifting the site of research, and pursuing interdisciplinary opportunities as three ways in which mathematics education researchers ...
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2015
In this article, the author provides insight into the pedagogical processes for dele-gating mathematical authority to students, through the use of specific classroom structures, as a means to strive toward equity. Employing qualitative methods, the author analyzes transcripts of classroom video, along with field notes and teacher and student interviews, collected during one semester of the participating teacher’s Algebra I course. The author addresses how the teacher’s practice was striving to-ward equity through the use of classroom structures that delegated mathematical authority to students. Analyses revealed that the teacher delegated mathematical authority through the use of student presentations, Shuffle Quizzes, and Participa-tion Quizzes. Each instance featured was chosen to highlight a different facet of the ways in which delegating authority repositioned students as competent sense-makers.
Doctoral Dissertation, 2013
Attention to the pursuit of equity has been a growing priority for mathematics classrooms in the last two and a half decades. While classroom discourse has become a central feature of classrooms that strive toward equity, one continuing concern for classroom researchers in mathematics education involves understanding how and when group interactions support or interfere with student learning. In this dissertation, I respond to these calls by simultaneously offering perspectives of mathematical learning from underrepresented students alongside empirical evidence of these students’ transformative classroom experiences. In this study, I used ethnographic methods to analyze student and teacher classroom interactions and interviews during the first and last units in a semester one Algebra 1 class where learning was facilitated primarily by student-led whole class and student-student small-group interactions. In Paper 1, I propose a combined analytic framework for studying classroom interactions by coordinating Status and Positioning Theories. In Paper 2, I investigate the teacher’s classroom structures and pedagogical practices to reveal a process for delegating mathematical authority to students. Students' perceptions reveal the classroom structures, and pedagogical practices expand what counts as mathematical smartness in this classroom. In Paper 3, I investigate students’ changed perceptions of competence over the course of the study. I find that the development of specific social and sociomathematical norms mediated students’ perceptions of improved competence in this classroom. Throughout this dissertation, I argue that this teacher’s practice strives toward equity by expanding mathematical smartness and changing students’ perceptions of competence in mathematics. I suggest that future work should analyze the systemic inequities that lead to uneven representation of any groupings of students in tracked classrooms. I also argue that future work striving toward equity in mathematics education should further investigate empirical evidence of additional processes for delegating authority to high school students, additional classroom structures and pedagogical practices that expand mathematical smartness, additional social and sociomathematical norms that can mediate students’ perceptions of competence, and additional classrooms that contribute to successes for all students in high school mathematics.
2015
Author(s): LOUIE, NICOLE L. | Advisor(s): Schoenfeld, Alan H | Abstract: What does it mean to be “good at math”? Traditionally, schools have valued getting the right answer quickly—a perspective that excludes important aspects of mathematics, as well as many students. This multi-site case study investigates how teachers work together to redefine mathematics and mathematical competence. The study involved more than a year of ethnographic observations and interviews at two diverse urban high schools on the West Coast of the United States, where teachers expressed strong commitments to serving all students, especially students from non-dominant backgrounds. The dissertation tells a complex story of teacher learning, as viewed through the lenses of classroom instruction (Chapter 2), collegial conversation (Chapter 3), and the organization of teachers’ professional support networks (Chapter 4). Drawing on scholarship that takes learning as a negotiation of meaning through engagement in s...
The Mathematics Educator, 2005
International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2019
Emb acing he heme of hi ea mee ing, e eek a a comm ni o con ide he ole of expansion, displacement, and growth in mathematics education in the privileging of some and marginalizing of others. Following on the topics discussed at the Working Group between 2009-2018, this year the focus is on balancing the need to reflect and collect around issues of equity and diversity in mathematics education and orienting toward action. Each session is designed to address the needs of (or to create opportunities for) attendees interested in equity, generating and brainstorming new subtopics, potential projects, and/or working to establish standalone working groups dedicated to furthering research on equity. The purpose being to encourage a mo e a a f om big-en e i hinking and o a d mo e od c i e o king collec i e .
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2017
In 2005, the NCTM Research Committee devoted its commentary to exploring how mathematics education research might contribute to a better understanding of equity in school mathematics education (Gutstein et al., 2005). In that commentary, the concept of equity included both conditions and outcomes of learning. Although multiple definitions of equity exist, the authors of that commentary expressed it this way: “The main issue for us is how mathematics education research can contribute to understanding the causes and effects of inequity, as well as the strategies that effectively reduce undesirable inequities of experience and achievement in mathematics education” (p. 94). That research commentary brought to the foreground important questions one might ask about equity in school mathematics and some of the complexities associated with doing that work. It also addressed how mathematics education researchers (MERs) could bring a “critical equity lens” (p. 95, hereafter referred to as an ...
2019
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2018
Understanding how mathematics preservice teachers (M-PSTs) learn about issues of equity is essential to addressing the inequities that persist in mathematics education. In this article, we use (Gutiérrez, in: Herbel-Eisenmann, Choppin, Wagner, Pimm (eds) Equity in discourse for mathematics education: theories, practices, and policies, Springer, New York, 2012a) aspects of equity (i.e., access, achievement, identity, and power) to describe the reported opportunities to learn about equity (Equity OTLs) in five purposefully chosen secondary mathematics teacher education programs. Data included interviews with M-PSTs and instructors from four types of courses-mathematics content, mathematics for teachers, mathematics education, and general education-in each program. The mathematics-and algebra-specific Equity OTLs were most frequently related to issues of access and achievement, whereas the Equity OTLs reported in general education courses were more often related to issues of power and identity. In addition, the two programs housed in universities with more diverse populations had a relatively greater reported emphasis on equity. Implications for teacher education and future research are discussed.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2012
2021
This paper highlights how coursework within a synchronous online mathematics specialist program enhanced candidates' leadership knowledge and provided structures that addressed issues of equity and access. A focus on one online assignment grounded in Lesson Study played a pivotal role in developing equity-centered leadership and instructional practices. Program instructors and recent alumni illuminate how designing, implementing, and reflecting on the Lesson Study experience served as a cornerstone for advancing their mathematics instruction in the following ways: (a) as instructors designing an online leadership course, (b) as learners within an online environment, and (c) as educators within their K-8 school settings. The description of these experiences supports the broader mathematics education community's goal of achieving a cohesive vision for the teaching and learning of mathematics, while promoting equitable practices in schoolbased work.
Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2000
Most mathematics teacher educators (MTEs) would agree that teachers must be prepared to provide equitable mathematics instruction to all their students. However, to date, there is not a wide database regarding the practice of MTEs who play an integral role in this preparation. In this paper we argue that additional information is needed about the approaches in which MTEs have addressed or incorporated equity issues such as race, identity, language, and culture as a core part of the preparation of teachers. We further argue for the importance of developing a research agenda that examines the practices of MTEs who teach through this lens of equity, the goal of which would be to build models of professional development that prepare and support other MTEs to develop this specialized knowledge.
Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2002
In this article, I address the need for a more clearly articulated research agenda around equity issues by proposing a working definition of equity and a focal point for research. More specifically, I assert that rather than pitting them against each other, we must coordinate (a ...
Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual Meeting of …, 2006
This paper presents a reflection on my research largely grounded on my interest in students', teachers', and parents' ideas about mathematics. Starting with some considerations from a cognitive point of view, in particular preservice teachers' understanding and beliefs, I move onto sociocultural aspects. I specifically address issues related to context, valorization of knowledge, participation, and in-school and out-of-school mathematics. I draw on examples from my research in Latino, working-class communities to highlight the need (yet the complexity) to focus on all interested parties (parents, teachers, and students) and on mathematics if we are to address equity in mathematics education.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.