Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2005, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
…
6 pages
1 file
We prove that (A) if a countably compact space is the union of countably many D subspaces then it is compact; (B) if a compact T 2 space is the union of fewer than N (R) = cov(M) left-separated subspaces then it is scattered. Both (A) and (B) improve results of Tkačenko from 1979; (A) also answers a question that was raised by Arhangel'ski ǐ and improves a result of Gruenhage.
We prove that (A) if a countably compact space is the union of countably many D subspaces then it is compact; (B) if a compact T 2 space is the union of fewer than N(ℝ) = cov(ℳ) left-separated subspaces then it is scattered. Both (A) and (B) improve results of M. G. Tkačenko from 1979; (A) also answers a question that was raised by A. V. Arhangel’skii and improves a result of G. Gruenhage.
Topology and its Applications, 2007
For any space X, denote by dis(X) the smallest (infinite) cardinal κ such that κ many discrete subspaces are needed to cover X. It is easy to see that if X is any crowded (i.e. dense-in-itself) compactum then dis(X) m, where m denotes the additivity of the meager ideal on the reals. It is a natural, and apparently quite difficult, question whether in this inequality m could be replaced by c. Here we show that this can be done if X is also hereditarily normal. Moreover, we prove the following mapping theorem that involves the cardinal function dis(X). If f : X → Y is a continuous surjection of a countably compact T 2 space X onto a perfect T 3 space Y then |{y ∈ Y : f −1 y is countable}| dis(X).
1981
Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use.
Topology and its Applications, 2007
Let H 0 (X) (H (X)) denote the set of all (nonempty) closed subsets of X endowed with the Vietoris topology. A basic problem concerning H (X) is to characterize those X for which H (X) is countably compact. We conjecture that u-compactness of X for some u ∈ ω * (or equivalently: all powers of X are countably compact) may be such a characterization. We give some results that point into this direction. We define the property R(κ): for every family {Z α : α < κ} of closed subsets of X separated by pairwise disjoint open sets and any family {k α : α < κ} of natural numbers, the product α<κ Z k α α is countably compact, and prove that if H (X) is countably compact for a T 2-space X then X satisfies R(κ) for all κ. A space has R(1) iff all its finite powers are countably compact, so this generalizes a theorem of J. Ginsburg: if X is T 2 and H (X) is countably compact, then so is X n for all n < ω. We also prove that, for κ < t, if the T 3 space X satisfies a weak form of R(κ), the orbit of every point in X is dense, and X contains κ pairwise disjoint open sets, then X κ is countably compact. This generalizes the following theorem of J. Cao, T. Nogura, and A. Tomita: if X is T 3 , homogeneous, and H (X) is countably compact, then so is X ω. Then we study the Frolík sum (also called "one-point countable-compactification") F (X α : α < κ) of a family {X α : α < κ}. We use the Frolík sum to produce countably compact spaces with additional properties (like first countability) whose hyperspaces are not countably compact. We also prove that any product α<κ H 0 (X α) embeds into H (F (X α : α < κ)).
Topological Algebra and its Applications, 2014
We prove that a separable Hausdor_ topological space X containing a cocountable subset homeomorphic to [0, ω
Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1987
Telgarsky calls a topological space C-scattered when each of its non-empty closed sets contains a compact set with non-empty relative interior. With respect to infinite products, hyperspaces, and the partially ordered set of compactifications, we study the class of paracompact C-scattered spaces and two of its subclasses, MacDonald and Willard's A'-spaces and Λ-spaces. 0. Introduction. All spaces are Hausdorff spaces. A space X is said to be C-scattered [16] provided that each of its non-empty closed subspaces contains a compact set with non-empty relative interior. The notion of C-scatteredness seems a simple simultaneous generalization of scattered (Ξ= each non-empty set has a relative isolated point) and of local compactness. However, the class of paracompact C-scattered spaces is most interesting because [19] it contains its perfect pre-images, it is closed under finite products, it contains all closed continuous images of paracompact locally compact spaces, and for each of its members X, X X Y is paracompact iff Y is paracompact. Presently we study this class and two of its subclasses. Section 1 is due to the third author and § §2 and 3 are due to the first two authors. In §1 of our paper, we show that each countable product of paracompact C-scattered spaces is paracompact. This result improves upon the same theorem, due to Rudin and Watson [18], for paracompact scattered spaces, and answers the question raised for Λ'-spaces by the first two authors of this paper. As a corollary, we find that each countable product of Lindelof C-scattered spaces is Lindelof, a result due to Alster [2]. In the second section, we investigate hyperspaces of paracompact C-scattered spaces-a situation so complex that we limit our attention to A '-spaces. An A'-space is a space whose set of accumulation points is compact [10]. Thus, an ^I'-space is paracompact C-scattered. It is known [12] that the compact-set hyperspace ^(X) is locally compact (metrizable) iff X is locally compact (respectively, metrizable). Here we present an example of a Lindelof scattered A '-space X such that ^(X) is neither C-scattered or normal. Further, we prove that ^(X) is an A '-space 277 278
Topology and its Applications, 2009
We show that if a space X is the union of not more than κ-many discrete subspaces, where κ is an infinite cardinal, then the same holds for any perfect image of X. It follows that a compact Hausdorff space with no isolated points can never be covered by fewer than continuum many discrete subspaces; this answers a question of I. Juhász and J. van Mill. We also consider coverings by right-separated and left-separated subspaces.
Topology Proc. 29
All spaces in this note are assumed to be separable and metriz- able. A subset of a space is called a C-set if it can be written as an intersection of clopen subsets of the space. Note that a space is zero-dimensional if and only if ...
Topology and its Applications, 1997
For an infinite cardinal a, we say that a subset B of a space X is Ca-compact in X if for every continuous function f : X -~ II~ ~, f [B] is a compact subset of II~ ~. This concept slightly generalizes the notion of a-pseudocompacmess introduced by J.F. Kennison: a space X is a-pseudocompact if X is Ca-compact in itself. If a = w, then we say C-compact instead of C~-compact and ~v-pseudocompactness agrees with pseudocompactness. We generalize Tamano's theorem on the pseudocompactness of a product of two spaces as follows: let A C_ X and B C_ Y be such that A is z-embedded in X. Then the following three conditions are equivalent: (1) A x B is C~compact in X x Y; (2) A and B are Ca-compact in X and Y, respectively, and the projection map ~r : X x Y ~ X is a za-map with respect to A x B and A; and (3) A and B are Co-compact in X and Y, respectively, and the projection map ~':X x Y -+ X is a strongly z~-map with respect to A x B and A (the z~-maps and the strongly z~-maps are natural generalizations of the z-maps and the strongly z-maps, respectively). The degree of C,~-compactuess of a C-compact subset B of a space X is defined by: p(B, X) = cx~ if B is compact, and if B is not compact, then p(B, X) = sup{a: B is Ca-compact in X}. We estimate the degree of pseudocompacmess of locally compact pseudocompact spaces, topological products and E-products. We also establish the relation between the pseudocompact degree and some other cardinal function's. In the context of uniform spaces, we show that if A is a bounded subset of a uniform space ~X,~/), then A is Ca-compact in X, where (X,~) is the completion of (X,/,/) iff f(A) is a compact subset of R ~ from every uniformly continuous function from X into ~'~; we characterize the C~-compact subsets of topological groups; and we also prove that if {Gi: i E I} is a set of topological groups and A~ is a Ca-compact subset of G,~ for all i E I, then I-L~ A~ is a Co-compact subset of 1-[iel Gi. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
Glasgow Mathematical Journal, 1985
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Mathematica Slovaca, 2019
arXiv (Cornell University), 1997
Topology and its Applications, 2008
Topology Proc, 1977
Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1968
Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), 1967
Arxiv preprint math/0701354, 2007
arXiv: General Topology, 2019
Journal of Functional Analysis, 1976
Studia Mathematica, 1999
Advances in Mathematics, 2020
Topology and its Applications, 2002
Results in Mathematics
Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1988
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 2006
Topology and its Applications, 2021
arXiv (Cornell University), 2021
American Mathematical Monthly, 1992