Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
We demonstrate that different categories of software raise different ethical concerns with respect to whether software ought to be Free Software or Proprietary Software. We outline the ethical tension between Free Software and Proprietary Software that stems from the two kinds of licenses. For some categories of software we develop support for normative statements regarding the software development landscape. We claim that as society's use of software changes, the ethical analysis for that category of software must necessarily be repeated. Finally, we make a utilitarian argument that the software development environment should encourage both Free Software and Proprietary Software to flourish.
“Free software” is software that respects the users’ freedoms by granting them access to the source code, and allowing them to modify and redistribute the software at will. Richard Stallman, founder of the Free software movement, has argued that creating and distributing non-Free software is always a moral injustice. In this essay, I try to identify the ethical foundations of Stallmanism. I identify three major trends in Stallman’s thinking—libertarian, utilitarian, and communitarian—and I argue that none is sufficient to justify the radical claim that distributing non-Free software is always wrong (unless we accept extremely demanding ethical standards that Stallman himself does not consistently endorse). I recommend thinking of Stallmanism as an attempt to optimize the satisfaction of a number of core values, including freedom, cooperation, and happiness, and I stress the importance of connecting the Free software movement to other political struggles against oppression.
… of the Sixth International Conference of …, 2005
The Handbook of Information and …, 2007
understanding of both the general frameworks and specific issues that define the fields of information and computer ethics. The editors would like to acknowledge the support they received from their respective institutions while composing the Handbook.
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2003
In this essay we argue that the current social and ethical structure in the Open Source Software (OSS) Community stem from its roots in academia. The individual developers experience a level of autonomy similar to that of a faculty member. Furthermore, we assert that the Open Source Software Community’s social structure demands benevolent leadership. We argue that it is difficult to pass off low quality open source software as high quality software and that the Open Source development model offers strong accountability. Finally, we argue that Open Source Software introduces ethical challenges for universities and the software development community.
The John Marshall journal of computer & information law
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2011
Free and open source software has transformed from what has been characterized as a resistance movement against proprietary software to become a commercially viable form of software development, integrated in various forms with proprietary software business. In this paper we explain this development as a dependence on historical formations, shaped by different ways of justifying the use of open source during different periods of time. These formations are described as arrangements of different justificatory logics within a certain time frame or a certain group of actors motivating the use of free and open source software by referring to different potentialities. The justificatory arrangements change over time, and tracing these changes makes it easier to understand how the cultural, economic and social practices of open source movements are currently being absorbed and adopted in a commercial context.
2002
This article proposes an analogy between organic life forms and software packages. It uses Charles Darwin's arguments of natural selection, such as increased variability and ease of reproduction, to support the claim that Free Software enjoys important competitive advantages over proprietary software.
Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Yıllığı 2021, Volume 11 (Istanbul: Yetkin, 2022), p. 79-92., 2021
Cross-border transactions on software are very common due to global trends in technology. The Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement have largely achieved global harmonization in terms of economic rights, but jurisdictions have different principles for moral rights. These discrepancies may place cross-border transactions at the risk of invalidationespecially in cases where the laws of the licensee prevails over the choice of law. This paper explores how Turkiye, the European Union, France and the United States implemented moral rights to computer programs and aims to provide insight into the recent developments under Turkish law. This paper does not elaborate on economic rights and employee works schemes.
Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science Research , 2024
This article addresses the pressing issue of software thieving by using a software-update case study to examine the underlying ethical challenges in software production and usage. A proposed foundational framework highlights four critical factors: 1) the application of force, 2) the taking of resources, 3) knowledge processing, and 4) direction setting. This approach enables a comprehensive global analysis of the ethical dimensions in software development and use, contrasting voluntary exchanges with those compelled by thieving. Focusing on a case study of a large manufacturer, these foundational factors are applied to both individual and organizational behavior. The core challenge identified is the temptation for individuals and organizations to exploit the ease of force-driven resource acquisition rather than adhering to foundational ethical guidelines. Traditional reliance on published codes of ethics for moral reassurance is found to be inadequate, particularly within complex organizational structures where key decisions are pre-determined before employees are tasked with their execution. The foundational approach reveals the susceptibility of organizations to distorted and high-ignorance-content interpretations of law and ethics. This article outlines potential solutions to enhance ethical adherence, emphasizing the need for robust ethical guidelines that permeate all levels of decision-making within organizations.
Ethics and Information Technology, 2009
Abstract To many who develop and use free software, the GNU General Public License represents an embodiment of the meaning of free software. In this paper we examine the definition and meaning of free software in the context of three events surrounding the GNU General Public License. We use a case involving the GPU software project to establish the importance of Freedom 0 in the meaning of free software. We analyze version 3 of the GNU General Public License and conclude that although a credible case can be made that the ...
Handbook of Research on Open Source …, 2007
Ethics and Information Technology, 2009
SCRIPT-ed, 2006
What is the status of the Free and Open Source Software (F/OSS) revolution? Has the creation of software that can be freely used, modified, and redistributed transformed industry and society, as some predicted, or is this transformation still a work in progress? Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software brings together leading analysts and researchers to address this question, examining specific aspects of F/OSS in a way that is both scientifically rigorous and highly relevant to real-life managerial and technical concerns. The book analyzes a number of key topics: the motivation behind F/OSS-why highly skilled software developers devote large amounts of time to the creation of "free" products and services; the objective, empirically grounded evaluation of software-necessary to counter what one chapter author calls the "steamroller" of F/OSS hype; the software engineering processes and tools used in specific projects, including Apache, GNOME, and Mozilla; the economic and business models that reflect the changing relationships between users and firms, technical communities and firms, and between competitors; and legal, cultural, and social issues, including one contribution that suggests parallels between "open code" and "open society" and another that points to the need for understanding the movement's social causes and consequences. "This important and wide-ranging collection illuminates the social, economic, technical, and legal processes propelling the fantastic growth of free and open source softward.
Economic Theory, 2004
Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, 2003
Abstract: Although there is evidence of wide-spread organizational and societal adoption of open source and free software (OS/FS) products, processes, philosophy and business models, our understanding of OS/FS in the organizational and societal contexts is still quite limited. In this panel, we seek to stimulate an open and productive conversation by articulating the key research questions which have informed, and emerged from, the study of the socio-cultural, legal, ethical and policy issues associated with OS/FS.
Within the IS literature there is little discussion on selling software products in general and especially from the ethical point of view. Similarly, within computer ethics, although there is much interest in professionalism and professional codes, in terms of accountability and responsibility, the spotlight tends to play on safety-critical or life-critical systems, rather than on software oriented towards the more mundane aspects of work organisation and society. With this research gap in mind, we offer a preliminary ethical investigation of packaged software selling. Through an analysis of the features of competition in the market, the global nature of the packaged software market and the nature of product development we conclude that professionalism, as usually conceived in computer ethics, does not apply particularly well to software vendors. Thus, we call for a broader definition of professionalism to include software vendors, not just software developers. Moreover, we acknowledge that with intermediaries, such as implementation consultants, involved in software selling, and the packaged software industry more generally, there are even more " hands " involved. Therefore, we contend that this is an area worthy of further study, which is likely to yield more on the question of accountability.
The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology Privacy Law, 2011
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.