Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2013, 1. Drčar, Tomislav: O naravi svetlobe, Ljubljana, 2013 / ISBN 978-961-276-893-5 / 270566912 / CIP 539.122 / 535
The law on the quantization of effect is introduced and applied for the consistent derivation and classical reinterpretation of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation, the de Broglie wavelength, photon, Planck's relation, Einstein's mass-energy equivalence relation, the spin, and for calculating the potential step, potential barrier, the one-dimensional infinite potential well, linear harmonic oscillator, rigid rotor, and the hydrogen atom. New electrodynamics and an explanation of Young's experiment and Bragg scattering with matter particles are proposed. A new perspective on quantum mechanics is open, new potential opportunities are revealed, and new questions are raised. This method can be adapted into a high school logical and consistent course of the basics of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.
This paper attempts to summarise the basics of a radical new field in particle physics: quantum mechanics. It includes an in-depth explanation of 4 basic concepts of quantum mechanics, which are Quantum Field Theory, Deriving the Theory of Addition of Velocities or Distances, Deriving how E=mc2 was modified for massless and stationary particles and The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
Rethinking Quantum Mechanics./Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP)., 2018
Annotation: The possibility has been shown to obtain the key results of quantum mechanics with no resort to specific postulates based on the thermodynamics of stationary processes. A derivation of the Planck radiation law has been offered to proceed from the assumption the wave is a true quantum of radiation. It has been found that the average energy of such a quantum is numerically equal to the Planck constant. The law of spectral series formation has been obtained without the use of quantum numbers. The photo-effect equation has been supplemented taking into consideration the photoelectric yield. A hypothesis-free derivation of the Schrödinger stationary equation has been given along with its modification as a kinematic first-order equation. The possibility has been shown to consider quantum mechanics as a branch of classical physics studying wave processes.
By the end of the nineteenth century theoretical physicists thought that soon they could pack up their bags and go home. They had developed a powerful mathematical theory, classical mechanics, which seemed to described just about all that they observed, with the exception of a few sticking points. In particular the classical world was ruled by Newtonian physics where matter (atoms) interacted with a radiation field (light) as described by Maxwell's equations. However as it turned out these sticking points were not smoothed over at all but rather were glimpses of the microscopic (and relativistic) world which was soon to be experientially discovered. As has been stated countless times, by the end of the first decade of the twentieth century quantum mechanics and relatively had appeared and would soon cause classical mechanics, with its absolute notions of space, time and determinacy to be viewed as an approximation. Historically the first notion of quantized energy came in 1900 with Planck's hypothesis that the energy contained in radiation could only be exchanged in discrete lumps, known as " quanta " , with matter. This in turn implies that the energy, E, of radiation is proportional to its frequency, ν, E = hν (1.1) with h a constant, Planck's constant. This allowed him to derive his famous formula for black body spectra which was in excellent agreement with experiment. From our perspective this is essentially a thermodynamic issue and the derivation is therefore out of the main theme of this course. The derivation of such a formula from first principles was one of the sticking points mentioned above. While Planck's derivation is undoubtedly the first appearance of quantum ideas it was not at all clear at the time that this was a fundamental change, or that there was some underlying classical process which caused the discreteness, or that it was even correct. However there were further experiments which did deeply challenge the continuity of the world and whose resolution relies heavy on Planck's notion of quanta.
183 philosophical implications of quantum mechanics and develop a new way of thinking about nature on the nanometer-length scale. This was undoubtedly one of the most signiicant shifts in the history of science. The key new concepts developed in quantum mechanics include the quantiza-tion of energy, a probabilistic description of particle motion, wave–particle duality, and indeterminacy. These ideas appear foreign to us because they are inconsistent with our experience of the macroscopic world. Nonetheless, we have accepted their validity because they provide the most comprehensive account of the behavior of matter and radiation and because the agreement between theory and the results of all experiments conducted to date has been impressively accurate. Energy quantization arises for all systems whose motions are connned by a potential well. The one-dimensional particle-in-a-box model shows why quantiza-tion only becomes apparent on the atomic scale. Because the energy level spacing is inversely proportional to the mass and to the square of the length of the box, quantum effects become too small to be observed for systems that contain more than a few hundred atoms. Wave–particle duality accounts for the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics and for indeterminacy. Once we accept that particles can behave as waves, we can form analogies with classical electromagnetic wave theory to describe the motion of particles. For example, the probability of locating the particle at a particular location is the square of the amplitude of its wave function. Zero-point energy is a consequence of the Heisenberg indeterminacy relation; all particles bound in potential wells have nite energy even at the absolute zero of temperature. Particle-in-a-box models illustrate a number of important features of quantum mechanics. The energy-level structure depends on the nature of the potential, E n n 2 , for the particle in a one-dimensional box, so the separation between energy levels increases as n increases. The probability density distribution is different from that for the analogous classical system. The most probable location for the particle-in-a-box model in its ground state is the center of the box, rather than uniformly over the box as predicted by classical mechanics. Normalization ensures that the probability of nding the particle at some position in the box, summed over all possible positions, adds up to 1. Finally, for large values of n, the probability distribution looks much more classical, in accordance with the correspondence principle. Different kinds of energy level patterns arise from different potential energy functions, for example the hydrogen atom (See Section 5.1) and the harmonic oscil-lator (See Section 20.3). These concepts and principles are completely general; they can be applied to explain the behavior of any system of interest. In the next two chapters, we use quantum mechanics to explain atomic and molecular structure, respectively. It is important to have a rm grasp of these principles because they are the basis for our comprehensive discussion of chemical bonding in Chapter 6.
Physics Essays, 2012
Some aspects of the interpretation of quantum theory are discussed. It is emphasized that quantum theory is formulated in a Cartesian coordinate system; in other coordinates the result obtained with the help of the Hamiltonian formalism and commutator relations between 'canonically conjugated' coordinate and momentum operators leads to a wrong version of quantum mechanics. In this connection the Feynman integral formalism is also discussed. In this formalism the measure is not well-defined and there is no idea how to distinguish between the true version of quantum mechanics and an incorrect one; it is rather a mnemonic rule to generate perturbation series from an undefined zero order term. The origin of time is analyzed in detail by the example of atomic collisions. It is shown that the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for the closed three-body (two nuclei + electron) system has no physical meaning since in the high impact energy limit it transforms into an equation with two independent time-like variables; the time appears in the stationary Schrödinger equation as a result of extraction of a classical subsystem (two nuclei) from a closed three-body system. Following the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky experiment and Bell's inequality the wave function is interpreted as an actual field of information in the elementary form. The relation between physics and mathematics is also discussed.
Foundations of Physics, 2007
A common understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) among students and practical users is often plagued by a number of "myths", that is, widely accepted claims on which there is not really a general consensus among experts in foundations of QM. These myths include wave-particle duality, time-energy uncertainty relation, fundamental randomness, the absence of measurement-independent reality, locality of QM, nonlocality of QM, the existence of well-defined relativistic QM, the claims that quantum field theory (QFT) solves the problems of relativistic QM or that QFT is a theory of particles, as well as myths on black-hole entropy. The fact is that the existence of various theoretical and interpretational ambiguities underlying these myths does not yet allow us to accept them as proven facts. I review the main arguments and counterarguments lying behind these myths and conclude that QM is still a not-yet-completely-understood theory open to further fundamental research.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2015
This work is dedicated to Louis de Broglie whose deep unconventional work has founded Quantum Mechanics and 90 years later permits to re-found it.
Erwin Schrödinger – 50 Years After
ResearchGate, 2020
This paper summarizes the basic principles of the common-sense interpretation of quantum physics that we have been exploring over the past few years. We also touch on some areas we did not explore before. We note, for example, that the ring current model of matter-particles must also come with a dynamic view of the fields surrounding charged particles. Potential barriers -or their corollary: potential wells – should, therefore, not be thought of as static fields: they vary in time. They result from two or more charges moving around and creating some joint or superposed field. Hence, a particle breaking through a ‘potential wall’ or coming out of a potential ‘well’ probably just uses an opening which corresponds to a classical trajectory. This should offer a new perspective on the foundations of quantum mechanics.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2009
Some aspects of the interpretation of quantum theory are discussed. It is emphasized that quantum theory is formulated in a Cartesian coordinate system; in other coordinates the result obtained with the help of the Hamiltonian formalism and commutator relations between 'canonically conjugated' coordinate and momentum operators leads to a wrong version of quantum mechanics. In this connection the Feynman integral formalism is also discussed. In this formalism the measure is not well-defined and there is no idea how to distinguish between the true version of quantum mechanics and an incorrect one; it is rather a mnemonic rule to generate perturbation series from an undefined zero order term. The origin of time is analyzed in detail by the example of atomic collisions. It is shown that the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for the closed three-body (two nuclei + electron) system has no physical meaning since in the high impact energy limit it transforms into an equation with two independent time-like variables; the time appears in the stationary Schrödinger equation as a result of extraction of a classical subsystem (two nuclei) from a closed three-body system. Following the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky experiment and Bell's inequality the wave function is interpreted as an actual field of information in the elementary form. The relation between physics and mathematics is also discussed.
Russian Physics Journal, 2011
Interpretation of quantum physics and its principles is a problem that has yet to be solved to the end in spite of the fact that quantum physics formulated more than 80 years ago successfully explains the microcosm phenomena. Today there are several competing interpretations, including the Copenhagen interpretation in different forms, the Everett many-worlds interpretation, the Gell-Mann and Hartle many-histories interpretation, and the nonlocal hidden variables theory. From the above-listed interpretations, the most advanced quantum theory that does not require changes of the mathematical apparatus is the Copenhagen interpretation. All other interpretations (with possible exception of the many-worlds interpretation) call for changes in the quantum theory formalism.
Physical Sciences Forum, 2021
We formulate a didactic proposal for introducing some fundamental concepts of quantum physics to advanced high school students, and to their teachers. The inspiration comes from some of the fundamental papers about the subject by Albert Einstein, in which many of these concepts, for example light quanta, wave-particle duality, and probability, were introduced for the first time, in a characteristically illuminating way. The proposal can be supplemented by a discussion of elementary tools of statistical physics, which are needed at some point. Preliminary results, both with students and teachers, are very promising.
AppliedMath, 2024
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY
Contemporary Mathematics, 2010
This is a brief outline of the mathematics of quantum mechanics. It begins with examples of unitary time evolution given by the Schrödinger equation. It is then shown how the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators gives a general framework for studying solutions of the Schrödinger equation. There is a discussion of the role of Planck's constant and uncertainty principles. This is followed by a section on spin and statistics. The exposition concludes with remarks about the various roles played by self-adjoint operators in the formulation of quantum mechanics. While the main purpose of this outline is to give a succinct and mathematically correct account of the basic notions of quantum mechanics, there is also an attempt to explain why giving a coherent interpretation of quantum mechanics is so difficult.
2009
These notes offer a basic introduction to the primary mathematical concepts of quantum physics, and their physical significance, from the operator and Hilbert space point of view, highlighting more what are essentially the abstract algebraic aspects of quantisation in contrast to more standard treatments of such issues, while also bridging towards the path integral formulation of quantisation. A discussion of the (first) Noether theorem and Lie symmetries is also included to complement the presentation. Emphasis is put throughout, as illustrative examples threading the presentation, on the quantum harmonic oscillator and the dynamics of a charged particle coupled to the electromagnetic field, with the ambition to bring the reader onto the threshold of relativistic quantum field theories with their local gauge invariances as a natural framework for describing relativistic quantum particles in interaction and carrying specific conserved charges.
ResearchGate, 2020
As a pointer, and a service to other amateur physicists, I thought it would be useful to sum up the main pitfalls and discoveries I stumbled upon while working my way through Feynman’s Lectures. I call it a Survivor’s Guide to Quantum Physics because – at times – it did feel like going through a jungle, or wading through deep water, or climbing a mountain for which there is no map. Indeed, while there is a tendency to present quantum physics as a coherent set of principles and theory, it is not. At best, it is a toolbox with some novel mathematical techniques, approaches and models. At worst, it tries to present itself as an alternative to classical physics, which it is not. Quantum physics is, in essence, a combination of Maxwell’s equations and the Planck-Einstein relation. That is it. Nothing more. Nothing less. In the QED sector, at least. The one and only quantum is Planck’s quantum of (physical) action, and its physical dimension – a force times a distance times a period (cycle time) – is, unfortunately, not always well understood by those who are supposed to understand it – which is why there is a lot of nonsense around. In short, we hope this short paper might help you to avoid the mistakes I made, and that is to waste time on things you should not waste time on: stuff that is not useful, or plain wrong even. And then I will also try to highlight the little shortcuts or visualizations that may help you to get a much more intuitive grasp of things.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.