Academia.eduAcademia.edu

In This Issue, Volume 9, Issue 8

2018, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters

The awareness of frequent hitters in high-throughput screening campaigns, termed pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), was heightened considerably by the classification of a series of structural alerts that defined problematic compounds presenting as cryptically active leads that typically produced flat structureactivity relationships and could not be further optimized. In the present issue, Vidler et al. (DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00097) extend this study by analyzing an extensive and high quality screening data set harvested from the Lilly corporate database that examines the behavior of a large number of the PAINS structural alerts in over 3000 unique assays using multiple analytical formats. Only two of the PAINS substructure alerts, 1,4-diaminobenzene and rhodanine, showed significant pan-assay promiscuity, but these appeared to be enriched in AlphaScreen assays. A much larger fraction of the PAINS structural alerts were enriched for compound instability or the presence of a high Hill slope value indicative of greater than 1:1 compound/protein binding stoichiometry. A number of the alerts also enriched for cytotoxicity, indicating that cell-based assays may be inadequate for confirming the activity of molecules that incorporate a PAINS alert. This analysis provides additional insight into the interpretation of PAINS alerts and may help to reduce the propensity to pursue false positive leads.