On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes

General Relativity and Gravitation, 1987

It is proved that a Lagrangian field theory based on a linear connection in space-time is equivalertt to Einstein's general relativity interacting with additional matter fields.

2019

Here we are talking about the equivalence of Einsteinian gravitation equations solutions to relativist<br> accelerated frames. It was established that there is a uniformly accelerated frame. Such a frame is deformed<br> as an acceleration result, but it is a stiff frame according to Born, i.e. its metric tensor does not depend on<br> time. The frame is pseudo-Riemannian. It was proved that a uniformly accelerated frame is locally<br> equivalent to the relevant solution of Einstein's gravitational equation.<br>

Journal of Geometry and Physics, 2008

We compute all 2-covariant tensors naturally constructed from a semiriemannian metric g which are divergence-free and have weight greater than −2.

International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2000

Of the various formalisms developed to treat relativistic phenomena, those based on Clifford's geometric algebra are especially well adapted for clear geometric interpretations and computational efficiency. Here we study relationships between formulations of special relativity in the spacetime algebra (STA) Cℓ 1,3 of the underlying Minkowski vector space, and in the algebra of physical space (APS) Cℓ 3 . STA lends itself to an absolute formulation of relativity, in which paths, fields, and other physical properties have observer-independent representations. Descriptions in APS are related by a one-to-one mapping of elements from APS to the even subalgebra STA + of STA. With this mapping, reversion in APS corresponds to hermitian conjugation in STA. The elements of STA + are all that is needed to calculate physically measurable quantities (called measurables) because only they entail the observer dependence inherent in any physical measurement. As a consequence, every relativistic physical process that can be modeled in STA also has a representation in APS, and vice versa. In the presence of two or more inertial observers, two versions of APS present themselves. In the absolute version, both the mapping to STA + and hermitian conjugation are observer dependent, and the proper basis vectors of any observer are persistent vectors that sweep out timelike planes in spacetime. To compare measurements by different inertial observers in APS, we express them in the proper algebraic basis of a single observer. This leads to the relative version of APS, which can be related to STA by assigning every inertial observer in STA to a single absolute frame in STA. The equivalence of inertial observers makes this permissible. The mapping and hermitian conjugation are then the same for all observers. Relative APS gives a covariant representation of relativistic physics with spacetime multivectors represented by multiparavectors in APS. We relate the two versions of APS as consistent models within the same algebra.

The Einstein's equivalence principle is formulated in terms of the accuracy of measurements and its dependence of the size of the area of measurement. It is shown that different refinements of the statement 'the spacetime is locally flat' lead to different conculsions about the spacetime geometry.

Filomat, 2015

This paper gives a brief survey of the development of general relativity theory starting from Newtonian theory and Euclidean geometry and proceeding through to special relativity and finally to general relativity and relativistic cosmology.

In this essay I begin to lay out a conceptual scheme for: (i) analysing dualities as cases of theoretical equivalence; (ii) assessing when cases of theoretical equivalence are also cases of physical equivalence. The scheme is applied to gauge/gravity dualities. I expound what I argue to be their contribution to questions about: (iii) the nature of spacetime in quantum gravity; (iv) broader philosophical and physical discussions of spacetime. (i)-(ii) proceed by analysing duality through four contrasts. A duality will be a suitable isomorphism between models: and the four relevant contrasts are as follows: (a) Bare theory: a triple of states, quantities, and dynamics endowed with appropriate structures and symmetries; vs. interpreted theory: which is endowed with, in addition, a suitable pair of interpretative maps. (b) Extendable vs. unextendable theories: which can, respectively cannot, be extended as regards their domains of application. (c) External vs. internal intepretations: which are constructed, respectively, by coupling the theory to another interpreted theory vs. from within the theory itself. (d) Theoretical vs. physical equivalence: which contrasts formal equivalence with the equivalence of fully interpreted theories. I will apply this scheme to answering questions (iii)-(iv) for gauge/gravity dualities. I will argue that the things that are physically relevant are those that stand in a bijective correspondence under duality: the common core of the two models. I therefore conclude that most of the mathematical and physical structures that we are familiar with, in these models (the dimension of spacetime, tensor fields, Lie groups), are largely, though crucially never entirely, not part of that common core. Thus, the interpretation of dualities for theories of quantum gravity compels us to rethink the roles that spacetime, and many other tools in theoretical physics, play in theories of spacetime.

Philosophia Naturalis, 2009

General Relativity and Gravitation, 2011

We prove that some basic aspects of gravity commonly attributed to the modern connection-based approaches, can be reached naturally within the usual Riemannian geometry-based approach, by assuming the independence between the metric and the connection of the background manifold. These aspects are: 1) the BFlike field theory structure of the Einstein-Hilbert action, of the cosmological term, and of the corresponding equations of motion; 2) the formulation of Maxwellian field theories using only the Riemannian connection and its corresponding curvature tensor, and the subsequent unification of gravity and gauge interactions in a four dimensional field theory; 3) the construction of four and three dimensional geometrical invariants in terms of the Riemann tensor and its traces, particularly the formulation of an anomalous Chern-Simons topological model where the action of diffeomorphisms is identified with the action of a gauge symmetry, close to Witten's formulation of threedimensional gravity as a Chern-Simon gauge theory. 4) Tordions as propagating and non-propagating fields are also formulated in this approach. This new formulation collapses to the usual one when the metric connection is invoked, and certain geometrical structures very known in the traditional literature can be identified as remanent structures in this collapse.

Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2009

We develop a generic spacetime model in General Relativity which can be used to build any gravitational model within General Relativity. The generic model uses two types of assumptions: (a) Geometric assumptions additional to the inherent geometric identities of the Riemannian geometry of spacetime and (b) Assumptions defining a class of observers by means of their 4-velocity u a which is a unit timelike vector field. The geometric assumptions as a rule concern symmetry assumptions (the so called collineations). The latter introduces the 1+3 decomposition of tensor fields in spacetime. The 1+3 decomposition results in two major results. The 1+3 decomposition of u a;b defines the kinematic variables of the model (expansion, rotation, shear and 4-acceleration) and defines the kinematics of the gravitational model. The 1+3 decomposition of the energy momentum tensor representing all gravitating matter introduces the dynamic variables of the model (energy density, the isotropic pressure, the momentum transfer or heat flux vector and the traceless tensor of the anisotropic pressure) as measured by the defined observers and define the dynamics of he model. The symmetries assumed by the model act as constraints on both the kinematical and the dynamical variables of the model. As a second further development of the generic model we assume that in addition to the 4-velocity of the observers ua there exists a second universal vector field na in spacetime so that one has a so called double congruence (ua, na) which can be used to define the 1+1+2 decomposition of tensor fields. The 1+1+2 decomposition leads to an extended kinematics concerning both fields building the double congruence and to a finer dynamics involving more physical variables. After presenting and discussing the results in their full generality we show how they are applied in practice by considering in a step by step approach the case of a string fluid in Bianchi I spacetime for the comoving observers.