Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, IJASS JOURNAL
While the academic concept of Critical Race Theory (CRT) is more than 40 years old, the debate over whether CRT should be included in today’s K-12 educational system has surfaced over the last decade, leading to highly contested political races and dividing school systems. Individuals who support the teaching of critical race theory believe that it is a means of analyzing and recognizing how race and racism are historically foundational to American law and institutions. Opponents believe that teaching CRT only serves to reinforce viewing all aspect of American society through a racial lens and that arguably people indirectly inherit guilt as a result of racial oppression caused by their ancestors. School leaders face accusations of indoctrinating students by teaching CRT and grapple with finding a balance in ensuring that there are not inequalities in education. This research analyzes both qualitative and quantitative data on the perspectives of school leaders as it relates to the teaching of CRT. The research uses a quantitative data set with 96 respondents and a qualitative data set with 80 respondents for data analysis.
Structured Abstract Purpose: Though the first published application of Critical Race Theory (CRT) to education occurred 20 years ago, implications of CRT for educational leadership did not occur until Lopez (2003) conducted a CRT analysis of the politics of education literature. No publications explicitly identify the implications of CRT for leadership practice. Given the gap in the literature, the research question that anchors this paper asks: How can CRT inform educational leadership to eliminate racism? Research Methods: To address the research question, I conducted a literature analysis of CRT in educational leadership, identified the CRT tenets that guided each publication and derived six primary, interrelated CRT tenets from this analysis. I also extracted from the publications explicit and implicit implications for leadership practice as these implications related directly to each of the six CRT tenets. Findings/Implications: I describe each of the CRT tenets and explain how each can inform educational leadership practice. To close the paper, I propose a CRT Inventory for Leading to Eliminate Racism. The Inventory suggests questions to guide leadership practice for each of the CRT tenets. I also offer implications for future research. Five Descriptive Words/Phrases: Critical race theory, leading to eliminate racism, critical epistemologies, leadership, race Type of Paper: Empirical/Conceptual
UCLA IDEA Publications, 2022
After a summer 2020 surge of protest-fueled antiracist energy across the nation and increase in K–12 education efforts to explore issues of race and racism in U.S. society (often at students’ request), pushback against a caricatured vision of “Critical Race Theory” (“CRT”) in K–12 public schools rose over the 2020–2021 school year. Propelled by common talking points, media attention, state legislation, and school board protests, school- and district-level conflicts increased and intensified over the year and into summer 2021 as critics sought to restrict or “ban” curriculum, lessons, professional development, and district equity and diversity efforts addressing a broad but often loosely defined set of ideas about race, racism, diversity, and inclusion. In 2020–2021, “CRT” became a caricatured catch-all term opponents used to try to limit and prohibit much such learning. In a rapid-response multi-method study funded by the Spencer Foundation for Research in Education, we have sought since spring 2021 to understand the current context of extreme pressure on educators attempting to teach on issues of race/racism in our country, and more generally to work on issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion in schools and districts so all students are supported as they learn.
The Urban Review, 2006
In this article, the authors critically synthesize how Critical Race Theory (CRT) as an emerging field of inquiry has been used as a tool of critique and analysis in K-12 education research. The authors point out that CRT has been used as a framework for examining: persistent racial inequities in education, qualitative research methods, pedagogy and practice, the schooling experiences of marginalized students of color, and the efficacy of race-conscious education policy. The authors explore how these studies have changed the nature of education research and stress the need for further research that critically interrogates race and racism in education.
Behavior and Social Issues, 2023
Critical Race Theory (CRT) and its potential contributions to K-12 public education is under scrutiny by lawmakers and parent groups across the United States. Banning the tenets of CRT will produce even less equitable outcomes for our most vulnerable student populations. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical for behavior analysts working alongside educators in public schools. This paper will unite educators and behavior analysts in a scholarly discussion of the origins, definition, and opposition to CRT; highlight current inequities and disparities in educational systems; outline the effectiveness of culturally relevant pedagogical practices; and propose a call to action for behavior analysts to collaborate with educators to improve equitable student outcomes.
FIU Law Review
Race Ethnicity and Education, 2019
Critical race theory (CRT) in education has been used to expose and analyze racism in K-12 schooling and higher education. However, the theory has been underutilized as an inventory lens applied to school leadership practice. Our paper takes on this inquiry by highlighting the work done by an administrative leadership team at a majority racially diverse middle school in the Mountain western region of the U.S. Through an examination of the practice of racism as whiteness as property through teacher expectations, classroom instruction and teacher-student and parent interactions and by implementing changes in areas of student discipline, and color-blind teacher perceptions, the leadership team developed racial equity pathways which served as an important implementation of CRT leadership.
2016
Using Critical Race Theory (CRT) as a guiding framework, this paper is an educator’s testimonio against the post-racial ideology that currently plagues our society, especially as witnessed in the U.S. educational system. A testimonio is a qualitative narrative form that puts forth powerful messages that carry a sense of urgency. Testimonios speak to an individual’s experiences that resound across groups of people.Testimonios especially speak to oppression and marginalization and thus have been historically used in the struggles of people of color. Here the author speaks to how testimonios can be used as a means to debunk the post- racial fallacy.The author also argues that a firm understanding of ideology and knowledge of how whiteness works further strengthens the challenging work of people of color in the academy and beyond. As all other testimonios, this account urges that there be action and thus it calls on other educators from all walks of life and positions to respond to a ca...
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2021
This article examines the purposeful use of counternarrative to develop an antiracist school identity. Based on a seven-year ethnographic project at an elementary school in the southeast U.S., it illustrates how counternarrative can be employed as strategy to embed Critical Race Theory (CRT) into school equity discourse and, in doing so, help public schools disrupt majoritarian narratives that deny the salience of race. It argues that by developing counternarratives rooted in the perspectives and knowledge of teachers of color, and then using those counternarratives specifically for the purposes of strategizing, schools and researchers can help CRT achieve its activist function in K-12 school contexts.
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2007
... Correspondence: Correspondence: Jeanne M. Powers, Division of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Arizona State University. PO Box 872411, Tempe, AZ 85287-2411, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Publication History. ...
Equity & Excellence in Education, 2002
What can critical race theory, a movement that has its roots in legal scholarship, contribute to research in education? Plenty, as it turns out. Much of the national dialogue on race relations takes place in the context of education--in continuing desegregation and affirmative action battles, in debates about bilingual education programs, and in the controversy surrounding race and ethnicity studies departments at colleges and universities. More centrally, the use of critical race theory offers a way to understand how ostensibly race-neutral structures in education--knowledge, truth, merit, objectivity, and "good education"--are in fact ways of forming and policing the racial boundaries of white supremacy and racism (Roithmayr, 1999, p. 4).
Qualitative Inquiry, 2002
Urban Education, 1999
This article explores the connectivity of research and theories of African American emancipatory pedagogy to Critical Race Theory (CRT). In doing so, the guiding principles and maxims of CRT as an emergent ethical and moralistic discourse on race and racism in the law will be briefly outlined. Next, the premises of CRT will be used to analyze ethnographic interviews conducted with eight African American teachers. The interview data will then be used as a manner in which to articulate a Critical Race Pedagogy.
Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 2012
Does the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States prove that critical race theory is not true, or at least has overstated its contrarian claims that racism is permanent?" This is the question that co-editors Ladson-Billings, Gillborn and Taylor (2009) pose in their foreword to Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education (p. ix). In a recent New York Times article, Westen (2011) has suggested that Obama failed expectations because he has not told the right story. Westen (a professor of psychology) explained that we come to expect certain stories, usually centered around heroes and villains, and that that the kind of story that Americans were hoping to hear from Obama would have provided a clear alternative to the dominant narrative of the right. With Obama, "there was no story-and there has been none since" (p. SR, 6). Meanwhile, here in Canada, Stephen Harper is said to be systematically spinning a revisionist Canadian story, one that undermines the long-held Liberal narrative of Charter, flag, peacekeeping and multiculturalism and that revolves instead around conservative symbols of: the Arctic, military, national sports and, especially, monarchy (Taber, 2011, p. A3). Foundational to critical race theory (CRT) is stories. The truth about stories, Indigenous writer and scholar Thomas King (2003) says, is that they are all we are. Stories convey what we believe; what we imagine and experience, as well as insulate us from what we don't want to think about. Writing about the Canadian treatment of Indigenous peoples, Thomas King is not a card-carrying critical race theorist, but his method of counter-story telling, by combining critical analysis with personal storytelling, is in keeping with CRT, the foundational tenets of which are addressed in this edited volume. One of its key tenets is storytelling. As the title of Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education suggests, the volume is intended to serve as an introduction to CRT and how it can be applied to educational theory, policy and practice. Except for Taylor's introduction, all chapters were previously published, most in the 1990s, half in legal journals, the rest in journals devoted to education and qualitative research, saving an article from American Psychologist. Of the twenty chapters, six were published post-2000. As several of the contributors point out, CRT started out as a branch of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) and as such, originated as a critical response to the treatment of race in legal discourse and practice. CLS, which had its inception in the 1970s, has focused on the power relationships embedded within legal decisions. CRT concentrates on race, and arose in response to the stalling of civil rights litigation, especially from watershed cases like Brown v Board of Education. CRT has several main tenets: that racism is a permanent, normative feature of (American) society, that any apparent legal progress has been due more to interest convergence (benefits to Whites) than to genuine social justice, that racism needs to be understood historically and that the narratives of oppressed peoples stand as privileged accounts of lived experiences of racist policy and practice (Taylor, 2009). CRT carries on CLS' interest in the law but extends it to other spheres, notably, education. Like CLS, CRT defines itself as a counter-discourse that explores alternative forms of expression and evidence and is highly critical of claims of positivistic social science to neutrality.
2021
The purpose of this project was to cultivate a series of professional development training sessions for secondary teachers to incorporate concepts of Critical Race Theory in their classrooms, through the use of social justice education, social emotional learning, and student-centered learning. The researcher examined material in favor and in opposition to the project topic to collect information on how to best serve educators and students. The researcher engaged with academic writing as well as with high school teachers and administrators about this project topic. This manuscript and attached training material is the result of the researcher's findings and serves to answer the question of whether aspects of Critical Race Theory should be implemented in secondary classrooms as well as if so, how should teachers do so—all in hopes of better supporting more equitable and just education for high school educators and students. <br>
Race Ethnicity and Education, 2005
Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education, 2013
2015
The increasing diversity of our classrooms means we must learn to work with, and across, cultural, racial and gendered differences, without falling into diversity management. This paper employs Critical Race Theory (CRT) and paradigmatic frameworks to address social crises in our classrooms—thus demonstrating how we can value (i.e., not erase) our differences and equitably share power in the classroom. Employing an CRT intersectional analysis, I will explore the social, economic, and cultural dimensions of racial (in) justice in diverse contexts (within frameworks that recognize the salience of social identities including, but not limited to, class, and race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, immigration status and ability). Examples will be provided from my own teachings of how CRT has been employed in the university classroom setting and how student’s powerful testimonies and voices connect storytelling to validate their lived experiences. The aim of this presentation is to ...
2016
As the nation's schools become increasingly diverse along ethnic and racial lines, examining and understanding the racial complexities in the United States is more germane now than ever in the nation's history. To that end, critical race theory (CRT) has been a transformative conceptual, methodological, and theoretical construct that has assisted researchers in problematizing race in education. As we reflect on 20 years of CRT, it is essential to examine in what ways, if any, CRT is influencing school practice and policy. Given the disparate educational outcomes for students of color, researchers have to inquire about the influence of CRT on the lived experiences of students in schools. In this article, the authors lay out the historical trajectory of CRT, discuss its influence on educational research, and then evaluate to what extent, if any CRT has had on school policy and practice. The article will conclude with research, practice, and policy implications that may influence CRT's development over the next 20-year period. Race and education have always been an essential element in the way opportunities for learning have manifested in U.S. schools. Throughout the last several centuries, there has been an ongoing quest for educational inclusion
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.