Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Animal teeth as amulets in the Bronze Age Period

2024, The International Conference on Amulets (ICA 2024) The Amulets, from the objects to the belief

Abstract

Animal skeletal elements were used for production of personal ornaments since the Palaeolithic times. In particular animal teeth were widely used, since the Upper Palaeolithic and into the historical periods. Animal teeth were used with minimal modifications, usually just the perforation was added in the upper part, and they were aligned onto a string to create a necklace or bracelet, or sawn to some clothing item. They were presumably selected for their morpho-technic characteristics, but also for their symbolic meaning and value, derived from the connection with the animal from which they were taken. Teeth of some animals were used more than the others – in particular, residual canines of red deer and canines of Canids were widespread in different geographical and chronological settings. In this paper will be analysed animal teeth used as decorations in the Bronze Age, within the Maros cultural group, widespread in the river Maros (Moriš, Mureş) basin in present-day northeastern Serbia, southeastern Hungary and western Romania. Two necropoles were excavated in the second half of the 20th century in the Banat region in Serbia: Ostojićevo and Mokrin. Grave goods consisted of ceramic pots, bronze jewellery and weapons, gold jewellery, as well ornaments from shell, bone and teeth. In particular, animal teeth were quite frequent. Mainly teeth from dog (Canis familiaris) were used, although other teeth from other animals occur as well – residual canines of red deer (Cervus elaphus), teeth from equids (Equus sp.), etc. The amount of the teeth varies considerably from grave to grave – while at some just one or few teeth were found, while in some over twenty teeth were found. Use wear traces on these objects are very interesting. All these teeth were used (perforations are polished and worn), suggesting they were used during the lifetime and not just produced for the funeral purposes, but it is even more interesting to note that the degree of use wear differs on teeth found together, thus suggesting that the ornamental piece that contained them (necklace, bracelet) was enriched and/or repaired during the usage. The position in the grave suggests that they were used as necklaces, but also were part of clothing – most likely, sawn to the belts. Furthermore, some of the amulets produced from lithic raw materials or from shell imitate up to a certain extent the morphology of the animal teeth, in particular red deer residual canines. Within Maros culture cemeteries, they are mainly associated with female graves, but they were found in settlements as well, lost or discarded. The symbolic meaning of these amulets cannot be identified with certainty, however, certain hypotheses can be made, which are complementary (i.e., not mutually exclusive) – their long use and traces of repair suggests they were valued items, their association with female graves suggest they were perhaps used to display status and/or identity. Furthermore, their traits – frequent presence in graves, strict choice of animal species, as well as long use and traces of repair suggest they also had apotropaic and/or prophylactic meaning, most likely connected with the meaning ascribed to the animals from which the teeth were taken.