Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011, Operations Research
…
33 pages
1 file
Workers in a bucket brigade production system perform unproductive travel when they walk to get more work from their colleagues. We introduce a new design of bucket brigades to reduce unproductive travel. Under the new design, each worker works on one side of an aisle when he proceeds in one direction and works on the other side when he proceeds in the reverse direction. We propose simple rules for workers to share work under the new design and find a sufficient condition for the system to self-balance. Numerical examples suggest that the improvement in throughput by the new design can be as large as 30%. Even with a 20% reduction in labor, the new design can still increase throughput by 7%.
Production and Operations Management, 2017
A cellular bucket brigade is a way to coordinate workers along an aisle with work content on both sides. Each worker in a cellular bucket brigade works on one side of the aisle when he proceeds in one direction, and he works on the other side when he proceeds in the reverse direction. Although the cellular bucket brigade eliminates the unproductive walkback, it requires more hand-offs to assemble a product than a traditional (serial) bucket brigade. These hand-offs may waste significant production capacity as each of them requires an exchange of work, which can be complicated and time consuming in practice. This motivates us to investigate the impact of hand-off times on the cellular bucket brigade's performance. We identify sufficient conditions to ensure no workers are idle in the long run and for the system to self-balance in a model with hand-off times. Our results suggest that even with significant hand-off times, the cellular bucket brigade can remain substantially (about 50%) more productive than the traditional bucket brigade especially if the team size is small and the workers' work velocities are close to their walk velocity.
Production and Operations Management, 2013
It is challenging to maximize and maintain productivity of a U-line with discrete stations under the impact of variability. This is because maximizing productivity requires assigning workers to suitable tasks and maintaining productivity requires sufficient flexibility in task assignment to absorb the impact of variability. To achieve this goal, we propose an operating protocol to coordinate workers on the U-line. Under the protocol the system can be configured such that its productivity is maximized. Workers are allowed to dynamically share work so that the system can effectively absorb the impact of variability. Analysis based on a deterministic model shows that the system always converges to a fixed point or a period-2 orbit. We identify a sufficient condition for the system to converge to the fixed point. Increasing the number of stations improves productivity only under certain circumstances. The improvement is most significant when the number of stations in each stage increases from one to two, but further dividing the U-line into more stations has diminishing return. Simulations based on random work velocities suggest that our approach significantly outperforms an optimized, static work-allocation policy if variability in velocity is large.
Production and Operations Management, 2009
One way to coordinate workers along an assembly line that has fewer workers than work stations is to form a bucket brigade. The throughput of a bucket brigade on discrete work stations may be compromised due to blocking even if workers are sequenced from slowest to fastest. For a given work distribution on the stations we find policies that maximize the throughput of the line. When workers have very different production rates, fully cross-training the workers and sequencing them from slowest to fastest is almost always the best policy. This policy outperforms other policies for most work distributions except for some cases in which limiting the work zones of workers produces higher throughput. In environments where the work can be adjusted across stations, we identify conditions for a line to prevent blocking.
Warehousing in the Global Supply Chain, 2012
European Journal of Operational Research, 2006
Previous work on the dynamics of bucket brigades has focused on systems in which workers can be ordered with respect to their speeds and where this ordering does not change throughout the line. While this assumption is valid in most environments, it may not be satisfied in some. We consider such environments and explore the conditions under which bucket brigades continue to be effective (compared to a traditional static allocation) with respect to self-balancing behavior and throughput performance. A two worker bucket brigade is studied where one worker is faster than the other over some part of the production line and slower over another part of the line. We analyze the dynamics and throughput of the bucket brigade in two environments with passing and blocking. We present the dynamics of the system in each region of the parameter space and provide insights and operating principles for the implementation and management of the bucket brigades under various scenarios.
European Journal of Operational Research, 2007
The dynamics and throughput of a bucket brigade production system is studied when workers' speeds increase due to learning. It is shown that, if the rules of the bucket brigade system allow a re-ordering of its workers then the bucket brigade production system is very robust and will typically rebalance to a self-organizing optimal production arrangement. As workers learn only those parts of the production line that they work on, the stationary velocity distribution for the workers of a stable bucket brigade is non-uniform over the production line. Hence, depending on the initial placement of the workers, there are many different stationary velocity distributions. It is shown that all the stationary distributions lead to the same throughput.
2006
Previous work on the dynamics of bucket brigades has focused on systems in which workers can be ordered with respect to their speeds and where this ordering does not change throughout the line. While this assumption is valid in most environments, it may not be satisfied in some. We consider such environments and explore the conditions under which bucket brigades continue to be effective (compared to a traditional static allocation) with respect to self-balancing behavior and throughput performance. A two worker bucket brigade is studied where one worker is faster than the other over some part of the production line and slower over another part of the line. We analyze the dynamics and throughput of the bucket brigade in two environments with passing and blocking. We present the dynamics of the system in each region of the parameter space and provide insights and operating principles for the implementation and management of the bucket brigades under various scenarios. � 2004 Elsevier ...
2013
One of the most challenging issues in manual assembly lines is to achieve the best balance of workloads. There are many analytic approaches to solve this problem, but they are often neglected, since they are time-consuming and require high level engineering skills. Fashion bags packaging lines must comply with a number of different products with low production volumes, while the organization of the line is often under the mere responsibility of the foreman, who balances workloads in an empirical way. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effectiveness of the arrangement of bucket brigades (BBs) for an assembly line of luxury handbags. To do this, it was decided to perform a testing activity in a company producing fashion handbags in order to compare the self-made design with the BBs and with a simple assembly line balancing problem algorithm. The originality of this research lies in the fact that there are no studies in the literature on BBs applied to the packaging of highly variable small batches. The results were excellent, showing the advantages of BBs in terms of flexibility, the reduction of work in the process and the ability to handle small anomalies.
2005
Zone-picking gives lower values in average flow time, average travel, and average WIP. However, it causes more orders to be split and therefore, higher average WIC. This increases the work in sortation and consolidation. 107 5.3 Comparison on the average flow time per order (in minutes) by a single bucket brigade and zone-picking with different bucket sizes. .. .. .. .. 5.4 Comparison on the average flow time per order (in minutes) by two bucket brigades and zone-picking with different bucket sizes .
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2005
2004
Journal of Scheduling, 2000
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2005
Annals of Operations Research, 1995
International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 2015
Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1995
… International Journal of …, 2009
2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2011
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2011
Naval Research Logistics, 2009
Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018
2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC), 2012
Advances in Applied Probability, 2006
Proc of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2014