Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2007, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
A 72-year-old man presented with a short history He had a past history of deep venous thrombosis and and thrombolysis 1 , alteplase was withheld due to a was therefore added in the belief it would help stabilise the patient. The levosimendan infusion Within four hours of the levosimendan infusion a O 2 to FiO 2 ratios. The patient was independent of non-invasive ventilatory and vasopressor therapy within 36 hours and It has been reported that 10 to 15% of patients with 2 3 .
Pulmonary Circulation, 2021
Acute pulmonary embolism is a frequent condition in emergency medicine and potentially fatal. Cause of death is right ventricular failure due to increased right ventricular afterload from both pulmonary vascular obstruction and vasoconstriction. Inodilators are interesting drugs of choice as they may improve right ventricular function and lower its afterload. We aimed to investigate the cardiovascular effects of three clinically relevant inodilators: levosimendan, milrinone, and dobutamine in acute pulmonary embolism. We conducted a randomized, blinded, animal study using 18 female pigs. Animals received large autologous pulmonary embolism until doubling of baseline mean pulmonary arterial pressure and were randomized to increasing doses of each inodilator. Effects were evaluated with bi‐ventricular pressure–volume loop recordings, right heart catheterization, and blood gas analyses. Induction of pulmonary embolism increased right ventricular afterload and pulmonary pressure (p <...
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, 2022
The inodilator levosimendan, in clinical use for over two decades, has been the subject of extensive clinical and experimental evaluation in various clinical settings beyond its principal indication in the management of acutely decompensated chronic heart failure. Critical care and emergency medicine applications for levosimendan have included postoperative settings, septic shock, and cardiogenic shock. As the experience in these areas continues to expand, an international task force of experts from 15 countries (Austria,
Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Introduction: Significant impairment of left ventricular function causes low cardiac output syndrome in the immediate postoperative period in 3-14% of patients undergoing surgery, increasing the mortality 15-fold. Aim: To assess the use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2016. Material and methods: The analysis included 14 patients: 3 (21.4%) women and 11 (78.6%) men aged 65.4 ±11.8 years. The mean value of left ventricular ejection fraction amounted to 20 ±6.25%. In 11 patients, levosimendan infusion was started immediately after the induction of anesthesia. Three patients received the agent during the early postoperative period due to low cardiac output syndrome refractory to conventional therapy. The dosage was modified within the range of 0.05-0.2 µg/kg/min. On the day of the surgery, all patients received continuous infusion of adrenaline and levonor. Results: The cardiac index amounted to 2.8 ±0.71 l/m 2 after several hours of infusion and 2.9 ±0.1 l/m 2 the next morning. The first examination showed that the mean systemic vascular resistance was 1010 dyn/s-5 and the second: 940 ±100 dyn/s-5 ; mixed venous blood saturation amounted to 66 ±7.5% and 65.5 ±8%, respectively. Respectively, the mean concentration of lactates was 2.0 ±0.96 mmol/l and 1.8 ±0.24 mmol/l. Mechanical lung ventilation lasting more than 48 hours was required in 50% of the patients. Two patients with chronic kidney disease required bedside renal replacement therapy before the procedure. Two (14.3%) patients died. Nine (64.3%) patients were discharged home, and three were transferred to cardiac wards. Conclusions: Levosimendan therapy proved safe in the study group. The nature of the study and the small sample size preclude the formulation of detailed conclusions.
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 2021
Introduction: In the 20 years since its introduction to the palette of intravenous hemodynamic therapies, the inodilator levosimendan has established itself as a valuable asset for the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Its pharmacology is notable for delivering inotropy via calcium sensitization without an increase in myocardial oxygen consumption. Areas covered: Experience with levosimendan has led to its applications expanding into perioperative hemodynamic support and various critical care settings, as well as an array of situations associated with acutely decompensated heart failure, such as right ventricular failure, cardiogenic shock with multiorgan dysfunction, and cardio-renal syndrome. Evidence suggests that levosimendan may be preferable to milrinone for patients in cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery or for weaning from extracorporeal life support and may be superior to dobutamine in terms of short-term survival, especially in patients on beta-blockers. Positive effects on kidney function have been noted, further differentiating levosimendan from catecholamines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Expert opinion:Levosimendan can be a valuable resource in the treatment of acute cardiac dysfunction, especially in the presence of beta-blockers or ischemic cardiomyopathy. When attention is given to avoiding or correcting hypovolemia and hypokalemia, an early use of the drug in the treatment algorithm is preferred.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2013
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2007
Journal of clinical medicine research, 2014
Levosimendan, the active enantiomer of simendan, is a calcium sensitizer developed for treatment of decompensated heart failure, exerts its effects independently of the beta adrenergic receptor and seems beneficial in cases of severe, intractable heart failure. Levosimendan is usually administered as 24-h infusion, with or without a loading dose, but dosing needs adjustment in patients with severe liver or renal dysfunction. Despite several promising reports, the role of levosimendan in critical illness has not been thoroughly evaluated. Available evidence suggests that levosimendan is a safe treatment option in critically ill patients and may reduce mortality from cardiac failure. However, data from well-designed randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients are needed to validate or refute these preliminary conclusions. This literature review is an attempt to synthesize available evidence on the role and possible benefits of levosimendan in critically ill patients with s...
F1000Research, 2014
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is acute inadequate tissue perfusion caused by the heart's inability to pump an adequate amount of blood. Due to the failure of classic inotrope agents, a sensitizer agent, levosimendan, has been used as a rescue therapy in such situations. In order to assess the effectiveness of levosimendan to treat CS, we studied its hemodynamic effects on patients with CS. A retrospective study was conducted at the ICU of the Military Hospital of Tunis between January 2004 and December 2009, and between January 2011 and December 2013. Twenty-six patients with CS refractory to catecholamines were included in our study. When catecholamines failed to improve the hemodynamic condition, levosimendan was introduced. This treatment was administered in two steps: a loading dose of 12 µg/kg/min was infused for 30 min; and then continuous infusion was given for 24 h at a dose of 0.1 µg/kg/min. Levosimendan significantly increased mean arterial pressure to 76 ± 7 mmHg at 48 h and...
Kardiologia Polska
Levosimendan is a new inodilator which involves 3 main mechanisms: increases the calcium sensitivity of cardiomyocytes, acts as a vasodilator due to the opening of potassium channels, and has a cardioprotective effect. Levosimendan is mainly used in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (class IIb recommendation according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines). However, numerous clinical trials indicate the validity of repeated infusions of levosimendan in patients with stable heart failure as a bridge therapy to heart transplantation, and in patients with accompanying right ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Due to the complex mechanism of action, including the cardioprotective and anti aggregating effect, the use of levosimendan may be particularly beneficial in acute coronary syndromes, preventing the occurrence of acute heart failure. There are data indicating that levosimendan administered prior to cardiac surgery may improve outcomes in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function. The multidirectional mechanism of action also affects other organs and systems. The positive effect of levosimendan in the treatment of cardio renal and cardio hepatic syndromes has been shown. It has a safe and predictable profile of action, does not induce tolerance, and shows no adverse effects affecting patients survival or prognosis. However, with inconclusive results of previous studies, there is a need for a welldesigned multicenter randomized placebo controlled study, including an adequately large group of outpatients with chronic advanced systolic heart failure.
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 2019
Revista Portuguesa De Cardiologia Orgao Oficial Da Sociedade Portuguesa De Cardiologia Portuguese Journal of Cardiology an Official Journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2009
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2010
2004
Set temperature, 35°C AH (mgH 2 O/l) 26.7 ± 0.3* 37.4 ± 0.6 38.0 ± 0.9 RH (%) 83.7 ± 1.0* 97.7 ± 1.4 93.2 ± 1.5 Set temperature, 37°C AH (mgH 2 O/l) 34.5 ± 1.6* 38.7 ± 2.2 † 43.1 ± 1.1 RH (%) 91.8 ± 3.2 87.7 ± 7.4 † 94.6 ± 0.9 *P < 0.05 vs DAR HC and MR 730, † P < 0.05 vs MR 730.
Critical Care, 2019
Despite interesting and unique pharmacological properties, levosimendan has not proven a clear superiority to placebo in the patient populations that have been enrolled in the various recent multicenter randomized controlled trials. However, the pharmacodynamic effects of levosimendan are still considered potentially very useful in a number of specific situations.Patients with decompensated heart failure requiring inotropic support and receiving beta-blockers represent the most widely accepted indication. Repeated infusions of levosimendan are increasingly used to facilitate weaning from dobutamine and avoid prolonged hospitalizations in patients with end-stage heart failure, awaiting heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. New trials are under way to confirm or refute the potential usefulness of levosimendan to facilitate weaning from veno-arterial ECMO, to treat cardiogenic shock due to left or right ventricular failure because the current evidence is...
2021
Traditionally, the management of patients with pulmonary embolism has been accomplished with anticoagulant treatment with parenteral heparins and oral vitamin K antagonists. Although the administration of heparins and oral vitamin K antagonists still plays a role in pulmonary embolism management, the use of these therapies are limited due to other options now available. This is due to their toxicity profile, clearance limitations, and many interactions with other medications and nutrients. The emergence of direct oral anticoagulation therapies has led to more options now being available to manage pulmonary embolism in inpatient and outpatient settings conveniently. These oral therapeutic options have opened up opportunities for safe and effective pulmonary embolism management, as more evidence and research is now available about reversal agents and monitoring parameters. The evolution of the pharmacological management of pulmonary embolism has provided us with better understanding r...
Pharmaceuticals
Pulmonary thromboembolism is a very common cardiovascular disease, with a high mortality rate. Despite the clear guidelines, this disease still represents a great challenge both in diagnosis and treatment. The heterogeneous clinical picture, often without pathognomonic signs and symptoms, represents a huge differential diagnostic problem even for experienced doctors. The decisions surrounding this therapeutic regimen also represent a major dilemma in the group of patients who are hemodynamically stable at initial presentation and have signs of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction proven by echocardiography and positive biomarker values (pulmonary embolism of intermediate–high risk). Studies have shown conflicting results about the benefit of using fibrinolytic therapy in this group of patients until hemodynamic decompensation, due to the risk of major bleeding. The latest recommendations give preference to new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA), except...
European Heart Journal Supplements
Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 2015
Aims: To study the hemodynamic effect of levosimendan administration in acute heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: Hemodynamic response to 24 h intravenous levosimendan infusion (0.1 lg/kg/min without a loading dose) in patients with severe AS (aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 , time-velocity integral between left ventricular out-flow tract and aortic valve <0.25), reduced LVEF (≤40%), and a depressed cardiac index (CI) <2.2 L/min/m 2 was determined in a sequential group of nine patients aged 76 AE 10 years (5 men). Results: Baseline mean ejection fraction was 33 AE 0.7%; mean aortic valve area was 0.37 AE 0.11 cm 2 /m 2 ; peak and mean gradients of 63.6 AE 20.53 and 36.7 AE 12.62 mmHg, respectively; and mean CI was 1.65 AE 0.20 L/min/m 2. At 6 and 12 h of levosimendan therapy, mean CI had increased to 2.00 AE 0.41 L/min/m 2 (P = 0.02) and 2.17 AE 0.40 L/min/m 2 (P = 0.01), respectively. At 24 h, mean CI had increased further to 2.37 AE 0.49 L/min/m 2 (P = 0.01). A significant beneficial effect was also observed in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary artery mean pressure, central venous pressure, systemic vascular resistances, pulmonary vascular resistances, stroke volume index, left ventricular stroke work index. NTproBNP levels decreased at 24 h of levosimendan treatment. Levosimendan infusion was also well tolerated. Five patients subsequently underwent aortic valve surgery replacement. One died (of postoperative multiorgan failure). At 30 days, overall survival was 75%. Conclusions: Levosimendan administration improves hemodynamic parameters in critically ill patients with severe AS and reduced LVEF. In our study, it provides a safe and effective bridge to aortic-valve replacement or oral vasodilator therapy in surgical contraindicated patients. A controlled study is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2012
Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in the setting of severe aortic stenosis are associated with a high mortality rate. Evidence on optimal medical therapy is scanty. Vasodilators were traditionally considered to be contraindicated in severe aortic stenosis, albeit this concept has recently been challenged. The use of levosimendan, which has positive inotropic, vasodilatory and cardioprotective properties seems attractive. We describe a small series of exceedingly ill patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction, in different clinical settings (acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock and difficult-to-wean ventilatory support), in which levosimendan was successfully used.
Research Square (Research Square), 2024
Background and Aim: Using thrombolytics in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients or not is a controversial issue. This study aimed to evaluate the e cacy and complications of half-dose alteplase and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) administration in PE patients with intermediate-high risk. Material and Methods: The patients diagnosed with intermediate-high risk PE at Ege University Medical Faculty Hospital between 01.01.2016-13.02.2023 were included in the study. The patients diagnosed with PE after the establishment of Ege Pulmonary Embolism Team (EGEPET) (2.10.2018) formed the prospective part with the thrombolytic group. The retrospective part-anticoagulation group-included the cases treated with LMWH before EGEPET. Two treatment groups were compared in terms of the onemonth mortality and the one-year mortality as primary outcomes. Results: No difference was found regarding the age, comorbidities and vital ndings between thrombolytic group and anticoagulation group. Only, the pulse value was higher in the thrombolytic group (p=0,032). After the treatment, the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio increased signi cantly, and the pulse rate decreased signi cantly in the thrombolytic group. Improvement was only seen in the pulse rate in the anticoagulation group. There was no major bleeding in both groups. One-month mortality in thrombolytic group was found in 4 patients (6.7%), while that was observed in 6 patients (15.8%) treated with LMWH (p=0,18). One-year mortality rates were 13.7% and 26.3% respectively (p=0,17). Conclusion: PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio improved signi cantly and rapidly in patients treated with thrombolysis. Even one-month and one-year mortality rates were reduced in thrombolytic group, but this difference was not found statistically signi cant. Declarations Author Declarations Funding: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; and also funding sources had no role in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Not any funding sources had used in this manuscript.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.