Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
In this course, we will be examining cultural, technological, and political economic practices that have come to shape the production and consumption of popular music. Drawing upon a number of theoretical positions, we will look at the competing discourses, subject positions, cultural practices and ideologies that surround popular music. From the 19th century virtuoso to the current era of transnational digital production and consumption, we will trace how industrial organization, aesthetics and imagery, social protest and resistance, technology and individual style have come to constitute popular music. The overall goal of this course is to provide students with a vocabulary and an interpretive framework to understand the global popular music industry and the variety of ways in which popular music is socially and culturally constructed.
Science, Technology & Human Values, 1989
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
This paper introduces the IASPM Journal special edition entitled Twenty-First Century Popular Music Studies (PMS), in which a number of papers respond to Philip Tagg’s paper “Caught on the Back Foot: Epistemic Inertia and Visible Music” (2011). Respondents discuss a lack of ethnographic methodology in three prominent journals, Popular Music, Popular Music and Society and Journal of Popular Music Studies; the success of PMS in Australasia and the role of ethnomusicology there; the potential of ecomusicology for PMS; the proliferation of PMS courses in new universities in the UK; gender and sexuality within PMS; differences between the concepts of invisible and of ubiquitous music; and the need for addressing corporeality within PMS. The common threads of these discussions are brought out, and a number of key issues emerge. Interdisciplinarity is emphasized and the interactions of classical and popular music, ethnomusicology as well as recording and production are examined. It is suggested that PMS might consider tactical alignments with other relevant bodies in order to overcome epistemic inertia, including ethnomusicology organisations, the Association for the Study of the Art of Record Production, and academics and practitioners involved in teaching and making popular music.
In this course, we will define music as contemporary if it is popular with performers and audiences who are young and/or in touch with what is culturally current. Since nothing becomes popular without support from broad institutional forces, we will study the way contemporary music forms a soundtrack for the social and economic powers, practices and beliefs that, in turn, make that music popular. The properly philosophical aspect of our study will involve defining what is musical about popular music. The cultural theoretical aspect of our study will involve defining how pop, rock, hip hop, dance, punk, funk, soul and jazz music contribute to the institutional forces which support it. In both studies we will privilege space over time, ethnography over history, imagination over the Law and simulation over autonomy. We will identify the significance of contemporary music in terms of its dependence on commodity fetishism, its politics of resistance (somehow deeply rooted in nostalgia), its covert racism and sexism, and on the reservoir of alcohol and drugs that fuels its cultural industrial production. We will also discuss issues associated with file-sharing and the intimidating practices of the RIAA.
𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑠 (Canada), University of Alberta, vol. 33, no. 1, 2024
This paper seeks to unravel and understand the conditions and ways in which cultural capitalism operates that drive its production, exchange, distribution and consumption in the digital age; as well as understanding the powers that hold it and those it serves, the circuits in which it is heard, the spaces in which it is prohibited, its context and historical transformations. Music as an artistic production and symbolic object has always been linked to its characteristic instruments and technologies of its time. But when the economy catches up with it and it becomes merchandise, other means and channels are put into play for its dissemination, storage and control. It seeks to demonstrate those stealthy operations with which intermediaries operate. An analysis is made regarding the logic of consumption and production of users, on power relations and asymmetries between some actors in the music industry.
2010
… Studies Association Conference (APSA)(Adelaide, 29 …, 2004
21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook (Volume 2), 2007
The sociology of music has enjoyed a notable boom during the final decade of the twentieth century and the early years of the twenty-first century. This is partly evident in the rising number of publications that address music in some capacity, be it the creation, dissemination, or reception of various musical genres. In this chapter, offer an overview that attends to the three domains of production, content, and consumption. These domains represent analytical stinctions that may blur in both sociological scholarship and contemporary experience. Nevertheless, distinguishing among these domains provides a convenient way to organize the vast works known as music sociology. To employ a musical metaphor, this chapter surveys substantive themes and variations that occur when sociologists turn to music.
2016
World Music is often analysed as an interlinked series of music genres that can be specified from an ethnomusicological perspective. But in its contemporary form it is also part of a cultural economy, a sub-set of the global music industry. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a sketch of the main features of the global macro-economy of music followed by comments on the World Music “genre-market ” and its relation to the macro-economy. The chapter has four sections. It begins with a definition of the music industry worldwide. This is followed by a summary of the key financial data of the industry and an estimate of the royalty flows of the music industry between global regions. The third section deals with the corporate structures of the industry. The final section considers the main characteristics of World Music as a cultural industry. Definition of the Music Industry Worldwide The past twenty years has seen a growing interest by national governments in the potential economic...
Contemporary Popular Music Studies: Proceedings of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music 2017, red. Marija Dumnić Viltijević, Ivana Medić. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2019
In this paper, I argue that the implicit or explicit dependence on hegemony theory within popular music studies has resulted in diminishing the relevance of the aural dimension of culture and neglecting a wider consideration of the political effects of sound. Instead, I advocate a turn towards posthegemonic theory which employs vocabularies of "affect," habit," and multitude" to account for the physical effects of sonic intensities without trying to collapse them into meanings. Offering a brief analysis of two contrasting examples of popular music practices in a corporate environment-company song and lip dub-I demonstrate how posthegemonic approach might extend the analytical capacities of popular music studies by providing ways of thinking and doing politics that are not dependent on establishing consent or exercising coercion, but rather on immanent processes that are activated and reproduced beneath consciousness.
Welcome to the module. The aim of this module is to provide students with an understanding of popular culture, music, and art within a global context. This course explores contemporary social and cultural issues through the lens of music, arts and popular culture. It aims to develop students' confidence to assess a broad range of arguments by moving from the descriptive to the analytical. Students should learn that the search for single explanations reduces the complexity of social phenomena and how we understand them.
The legacy of Larry Gross: Media, culture, and inequality (P. Messaris & D. Park, Eds.)
Musicians have always “borrowed” from one another, from Bach to Bizet to Biz Markie. Copying is an essential element of musicking, and, by the same token, we can understand historical constraints on these practices as attempts to impose thing- ness upon music by institutional interests with commercial, technological or sociopolitical agendas. Yet the story is more than a Manichean battle between the forces of musical liberation and repression; rather, the push-and-pull between regulation and resistance is itself an engine of innovation. Without the looming threat of copyright infringement, would Western composers have invested as fully in Orientalism? Without the cartelization of sampling permissions, would hip-hop’s underground, and the “mixtape culture” that characterizes it, have grown as influential or as prevalent? In short, the shape of our musical culture today is the result of centuries of battles, negotiations, and accommodations, an elaborate and ongoing dance between the thing- ifying pressures of markets, technologies and ideologies on one side, and the human drive to music on the other.
IASPM@Journal, 2016
The Capitalist Imaginaries of Popular Music, 2024
Traditionally, popular music has been said to contest, resist, and defy the powers that be. In this new book, I challenge this long-standing orthodoxy. I argue that popular music participates in the social reproduction of the biggest power there is: capitalism. I argue that this is done mainly through the widespread mediation of a very particular and remarkably cohesive ideology of greatness and value. This ideology is drawn from principles and prescriptions that have long been constitutive of neoliberal capitalism.
Ph. D. dissertation defended at the University of Huddersfield, U.K. A commentary on my publications on 1) Music and Society in Italy; 2) A psychoanalytical interpretation on myths on the origins of music, and the minimalist turn of the 1980s; 3) Bob Dylan and American culture; 4) Italian singer-songwriters; 5) Popular music as a planetary experiment.
Popular Music and Society, 2017
Contemporary Popular Music Studies: Proceedings of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music 2017, 2019
This is the second volume in the series that documents the 19th edition of the biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of Popular Music. The volume contains contributions on the variety of musical genres from all over the world. Authors engage with the role of popular music in contemporary music education, as well as definitions and conceptualizations of the notion of ‘popular’ in different contexts. Other issues discussed in this volume include methodologies, the structure and interpretations of popular music scenes, genres and repertoires, approaches to education in this area, popular music studies outside the Anglophone world, as well as examinations of discursive and technological aspects of numerous popular music phenomena.
Symbolic Interaction, 2006
Sociology Compass, 2009
Journal of Sociology, 2008
An immediate problem facing anyone committed to the task of mapping out a conceptual territory for cultural sociology in the field of popular music studies is where to begin. Part of the issue here relates to popular music studies' status as a field of academic study already overlain with a rich diversity of disciplinary approaches.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.