Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012, Choice Reviews Online
…
10 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This chapter explores the intersection of Buddhist philosophy and artificial intelligence (AI), particularly the ethical and social implications of creating self-aware and self-directed machine minds. It argues that Buddhism's understanding of consciousness allows for the possibility of AI possessing a semblance of sentience, suggesting a developmental approach where machines can evolve from self-centered beings to compassionate entities. The discussion focuses on the moral responsibilities involved in creating such machine minds, emphasizing the need for their nurturing towards growth in wisdom and empathy, ultimately advocating for a framework that encourages harmony between humans and machines.
Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 2020
Significant questions confront Buddhist traditions in the wake of emergent technologies: can the human body be configured in a certain way, such that it reveals a new world or environment to inhabit beyond optimized self-preservation or survival? Can we manipulate our bodies with technologies-inhibited (or enhanced) by a chemical, a trauma, a contemplative technique, or an implant-such that we are reoriented to a transformed and liberating understanding of the nature of the world and our being in it? As new technologies enhance certain domains of cognitive performance by modelling and extending the structure and capacities of cognition, Buddhism, with a theory of mind and mental development in the absence of an independent essence, owner, or agent like a self, can potentially be a valuable resource. Buddhism provides a useful theoretical foundation to articulate not only the potentials for engineering intelligence, but also by identifying problems in this project.
Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal, 2022
In this article, I will explore the debate on the ethical challenges posed by AI. I will do so by engaging in conversation with Dr. Peter Hershock who is expert in Modern Buddhism and Ethics. Dr. Hershock has recently published a landmark study on the matter called Buddhism and Intelligent Technology: Toward a More Humane Future. He argues that the main challenge that AI poses, is not technological, but ethical. And that we need to establish an ethics that will foster a shared flourishing for all on this planet if we want to resolve the predicament of value conflicts embedded in the technologically driven advancement of AI. This could be done through development of what Dr. Hershock calls virtuosic relational dynamics, a relational way of organizing our society that goes beyond individualism. To reach there, the perspectives offered by Buddhist philosophy will be discussed and explained. In conclusion, we will propose that Buddhist philosophy can offer insights and practices that may enrich our pursuit of sustainable AI ethics.
Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2022
In this article, I will explore the debate on the ethical challenges posed by AI. I will do so by engaging in conversation with Dr. Peter Hershock who is expert in Modern Buddhism and Ethics. Dr. Hershock has recently published a landmark study on the matter called Buddhism and Intelligent Technology: Toward a More Humane Future. He argues that the main challenge that AI poses, is not technological, but ethical. And that we need to establish an ethics that will foster a shared flourishing for all on this planet if we want to resolve the predicament of value conflicts embedded in the technologically driven advancement of AI. This could be done through development of what Dr. Hershock calls virtuosic relational dynamics, a relational way of organizing our society that goes beyond individualism. To reach there, the perspectives offered by Buddhist philosophy will be discussed and explained. In conclusion, we will propose that Buddhist philosophy can offer insights and practices that may enrich our pursuit of sustainable AI ethics.
2020
Given our increasing interaction with artificial intelligence and immersion in virtual reality, which epistemic and moral attitudes towards virtual beings might we think proper, relevant, and fulfilling? That is the basic question that this article wishes to raise. For the main part, it presents a descriptive analysis of our current situation, which is meant to expose features of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) that seem both salient and easily aligned with central Buddhist concerns. Developed without any requirement for, or expectation of, the existence 1 Kathmandu University Centre for Buddhist Studies at Rangjung Yeshe Institute. Email: [email protected]. Many thanks are due to my esteemed colleagues at the Center for the Study of Apparent Selves (www.csas.ai) with whom I have the good fortune of exploring the issues that this paper takes preliminary notice of. We gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the Templeton World Charity Foundation. Than...
Buddhist Moral Conscience and Artificial Intelligence Consequences, 2024
The foundation teaching of Buddhism, expressed in the Four Noble Truths, is that the stress and unhappiness of life (duhkkha) is caused by our desires and ego-clinging. The notion of "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) is understood broadly as any kind of artificial computational system that shows intelligent behavior, i.e., complex behavior that is conducive to reaching goals. This intersection seeks to understand how Buddhist concepts can inform scientific theories and technological advancements in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Digital advancements and frequent application of such kind of technological inventions are become most effective tools of Artificial Intelligence. Uprooting the poisons of greed, hatred and delusion expressing them in a more positive form with compassion and wisdom can lead to a more peaceful and harmonious society. This will help to develop in emerging field at the intersection of multidisciplinary understandings in application
Journal of Global Buddhism, 2020
When Buddhism fails to live up to the projected promise of its doctrine or past forms, it is often the human nature of its adherents (‘Bad Buddhists’), rather than the content of its teachings (‘Bad Buddhism’), that is blamed. But what if such human failings - greed, corruption, violence, even mortality - could be transcended? In the quest for a ‘good Buddhism,’ high-tech designs that utilise robotics, artificial intelligence, algorithmic agency, and other advancements are increasingly pursued as solutions by innovators inside and outside Buddhist communities. In this paper, we interrogate two recent cases of what we call ‘Buddhist techno-salvationism’. Firstly, Pepper, the semi-humanoid robot who performs funeral sutras to a rapidly secularising and aging population of parishioners in Japan. Secondly, the Lotos Network, a US start-up proposing to use blockchain technology to combat financial corruption within global sanghas. We argue that such robotic and digital experiments are the logical outcome of techno-salvationist discourses that identify human failings as the principal barrier to perfect Buddhist praxis. If not always practical solutions, these interventions are powerful nonetheless as contested projections of Buddhist futures.
2021
Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format, with the exception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author.
Masahiro Mori is a well-known Japanese robotics scholar whose notion of Uncanny Valley is worldly famous. Mori is also an initiator of the Robot Contest and a student of Buddhism and a practitioner of Zen. He constructs his original Buddhist philosophy of robotics throughout his career. His robotics work and his learning of Buddhism develop together side by side in an interesting intertwined manner. This paper will take up the issues such as the ethical personality, quality of minds, and experiences of engineers as key components in and for an "ethi-cal design" of robots by examining Mori's Buddhist philosophy of robotics. This paper is divided into four sections. After an introductory part, in the second section, we will explore Mori's view of Zen as aspiritual source for technological creativity. In Section 3, we will examine his view into a robot-contest as a location of a realized teaching of Buddhism, especially, in relationship to the Diamond S¯ utra, in order to see Mori's educational contribution. In Section 4, we will examine how Mori became engaged to learn and practice Buddhism and came to the realization of Buddhahood in relation to robotics. " We (humans) have become entangled with very strong co-habitants of machine and technology. We need to acquire a high spiritual status to control power originating from a combination of human power and mechanical power. To learn to do so, we need to learn religion. " (M. Mori, Mori Masahiro no bukky¯ o ny¯ umon [Mori Masahiro's introduction to Buddhism], K¯ osei Shuppan, Tokyo, 2003, 168-169)
Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics—Proceedings of Robophilosophy , 2020
This paper explores if humanoid robots can be thought of as conscious, deserving of person rights, and even divine in a Buddhist context. What are the practical and ethical implications of the possible Buddhist claim "all humanoids have Buddha-nature"?
Oxford Scholarship Online, 2018
One reason it matters whether phenomenally conscious robots will soon be forthcoming is that such robots would have moral rights. The view that they are on the horizon often rests on a certain philosophical view about consciousness, one called “nomological behaviorism” in this chapter. The view entails that, as a matter of nomological necessity, if a robot had exactly the same patterns of dispositions to peripheral behavior as a phenomenally conscious being, then the robot would be phenomenally conscious. The chapter experimentally investigates whether the folk think that certain (hypothetical) robots made of silicon and steel would have the same conscious states as certain familiar biological beings with the same patterns of dispositions to peripheral behavior as the robots. The findings provide evidence that the folk largely reject the view that silicon-based robots would have the sensations that they, the folk, attribute to the biological beings in question.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2020
Humana.Mente, 2020
Sophia: Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures: Vol. 58, N. 4, January, 2020
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4 (6)/2018, 4-13. , 2018
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 2024
AI and Ethics, 2023
AI & SOCIETY, 2013
Neural Network World
Course syllabus, 2024
International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 2011
Itineraries of an Anthropologist: Studies in Honour of Massimo Raveri, 2021
Deleted Journal, 2024
AI & SOCIETY, 2017
Journal of Evolution and Technology, 2014