Digital Archaeoludology

Session 1(a): Archaeology and Policy: challenges, responses, future outlook

2014

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Internet Archaeology, 2021

This article provides an overview of the current state of archaeological digital archiving in Flanders (Belgium). It briefly outlines the legally defined stakeholders and actors through which archaeological fieldwork is regulated and carried out. It subsequently describes related digital documentation and archiving practices, and guidelines. This is followed by a discussion on compliance with the FAIR Guiding Principles, and the article concludes with notes on the past and future of archaeological digital archiving in Flanders.

Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 46, 41-52., 2006

Archeomatica International, 2021

The 15th edition of the international conference ArcheoFOSS Open Software, hardware, processes, data, and formats in archaeology is now open. After the 2020’s conference is the second year in which the official conference languages are both English and Italian. The conference will address a range of important topics and themes relating to data sharing, open tools, processes and formats in the archaeological domain. The Organizing Committee invited scholars, independent researchers, institutions, freelance archaeologists, and professional companies involved in Cultural Heritage to submit their original researches or case studies by exposing the latest trends, theoretical or practical developments and challenges in the field. On behalf of the Scientific Committee 2021, the Organising Committee encouraged abstract proposals focused on some thematic areas. Furthermore, for the first time, ArcheoFOSS published the pre-acs volume to facilitate the sharing and the deep understanding of any issues.

2007

cover illustration: design: Karsten wentink (title & design based on works of René Magritte) photography: Jenne g. Boering (lochem), haaksbergerveen at dawn drawing: h.R. Roelink (B.a.i.), axe of Zuidbarge (dMa 1962-ii-143) scale 1:1,8 layout: Karsten wentink Mart Rietbroek (Microweb) corné van woerdekom 6 SpatialAnalysis 6.1 introduction 6.2 natural landscape of depositions 6.3 cultural landscape of depositions 7 ConcludingRemarks:TheCharacterofDepositions 7.1 introduction 7.2 physical properties of deposited axes 7.3 Functional analysis 7.4 spatial analysis 7.5 conclusion PartII:InterpretingPatterns:TheMeaningandSignificanceofNeolithic Depositions 8 Knowledge,GiftsandSacredPossessions 8.1 introduction 8.2 craftsmanship 8.2.1 Knowledge and know-how 8.2.2 cosmological knowledge 8.2.3 cosmological knowledge and craftsmanship 8.3 gift exchange 8.3.1 introduction 8.3.2 commensurability and reciprocity 8.3.3 inalienable possessions 8.3.4 Knowledge as an inalienable possession 8.4 sacred objects and gifts to the gods 8.4.1 introduction 8.4.2 what makes sacred objects sacred? 8.4.3 what kind of objects are sacred objects? 8.4.4 The fourth obligation 8.5 The significance of landscapes 8.5.1 The inalienability of landscapes 8.5.2 Monuments as inalienable places 8.5.3 The significance of boundaries 9 Not-an-AxeBiography 9.1 introduction 9.2 composition of depositions 9.3 deposition 9.3.1 introduction 9.3.2 when did deposition take place? 9.3.3 where did deposition take place? 9.4 ochre and the significance of wrapping 9.4.1 ethnographic examples of wrapping 9.4.2 The significance of wrapping 9.5 a life of exchange 9.5.1 production; the start of a life of exchange 9.5.2 exchange between knowledgeable agents 9.6 production 9.6.1 production sites 9.6.2 The nature and origin of meaning 9.7 why were flint nodules deposited? 10 AxeDepositioninitsCulturalContext 10.1 introduction 10.2 wetland depositions and megalithic tombs 10.3 The significance of axes 10.3.1 The symbolic value of axes 10.3.2 Farming and tRB identity 10.3.3 agriculture as part of a cosmological system 10.4 conclusion 11 DepositionsThroughTime:TRBandSGCDepositions 11.1 introduction 11.2 sgc depositional practices 11.2.1 introduction 11.2.2 sgc & tRB axe depositions 11.2.3 sgc & tRB graves 11.3 changing categories 12 ConcludingRemarks:TheMeaningofDepositions 12.1 introduction 12.2 The authentication of meaning 12.3 The production of meaning 12.4 tRB cosmology and knowledgeable exchange partners 12.5 deposition in natural places 12.6 depositions as a widespread phenomenon References Appendices 1: The database 12 : The database 2: axe typology 3: Residue analysis 4: Microscope photographs Acknowledgements paRt i ReseaRch questions, data and patteRns 100 km TRB sites Research area Figure 3.2 Distribution of TRB sites (including single finds) in the Netherlands (Digital Elevation Model provided by Archol).

Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 55, 2017