Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2010, Archive for Mathematical Logic
We answer questions concerning an existence of almost precipitous ideals raised in [5]. It is shown that every successor of a regular cardinal can carry an almost precipitous ideal in a generic extension of L. In L[µ] every regular cardinal which is less than the measurable carries an almost precipitous non-precipitous ideal. Also, results of [4] are generalized-thus assumptions on precipitousness are replaced by those on ∞-semi precipitousness. 1 On semi precipitous and almost precipitous ideals Definition 1.1 Let κ be a regular uncountable cardinal, τ a ordinal and I a κ-complete ideal over κ. We call I τ-almost precipitous iff every generic ultrapower of I is wellfounded up to the image of τ. Clearly, any such I is τ-almost precipitous for each τ < κ. Also, note if τ ≥ (2 κ) + and I is τ-almost precipitous, then I is precipitous. Definition 1.2 Let κ be a regular uncountable cardinal. We call κ almost precipitous iff for each τ < (2 κ) + there is τ-almost precipitous ideal over κ.
Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1980
We prove under the assumption of the existence of a measurable cardinal and precipitous ideal on to, that every E~ set is Lebesgue measurable, has the Baire property and is either countable or contains a perfect subset. We get similar results for X~ sets, if we add the additional assumptions of C. H. and that P~ (22",) carries a normal precipitous ideal.
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1989
We investigate two-cardinal properties of ideals. These properties involve notions such as Luzin sets, special coverings, etc. We apply our results to the ideals of meagre sets and of negligible sets in the real line. In case of the negligible sets, we relate these properties to caliber and precalibers of the measure algebra.
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 2018
We provide solutions to several problems of Foreman about ideals, several of which are closely related to Mitchell's notion of strongly proper forcing. We prove: (1) Presaturation of a normal ideal implies projective antichain catching, enabling us to provide a solution to a problem from Foreman [8] about ideal projections which is more comprehensive and simpler than the solution obtained in [4]. (2) We solve an older question from Foreman [9] about the relationship between generic hugeness and generic almost hugeness. (3) Finally, we provide solutions to two technical questions from Foreman [7] and [8] related to his Duality Theorem. We will say that a triple (n, κ, I) is a counterexample for Question 1.1 iff there exists some ideal J such that the tuple (n, κ, I, J) satisfies the assumptions of Question 1.1, yet I is not κ +(n+1)-saturated. By the new Theorem 1.2, together with a result from [4] (see Fact 2.22 in Section 2 below), in order to provide counterexamples for Question 1.1 it suffices to find presaturated, nonsaturated ideals. If κ is the successor of a regular cardinal, there is a highly modular way to do this: Theorem 1.3. Fix n ∈ ω. Suppose µ is regular, µ <µ = µ, κ = µ + , and |℘℘(κ +n)| < κ +ω. Suppose I is a normal, κ +(n+1)-presaturated ideal on ℘ κ (κ +n) with uniform completeness κ such that BI cf(κ) = µ Then there is a cardinal preserving poset P(µ, κ) such that, lettingĪ denote the ideal generated by I in V P(µ,κ) , there is some S ∈Ī + such that V P(µ,κ) |= "(n, κ,Ī ↾ S) is a counterexample for Question 1.1." The proof of Theorem 1.3 goes through a technical theorem which generalizes some arguments of Baumgartner-Taylor [2] and makes use of the notion of strong properness (see Theorem 4.1 in Section 4). Consider fixed m, n ∈ ω with m ≥ 1. Starting from a model with an almost huge cardinal, Kunen, Laver, and Magidor proved that one can force to obtain a 5 See Section 2. 6 An embedding from one poset into another is regular if it is order and incompatibility preserving, and pointwise images of maximal antichains remain maximal. 7 There is a cost to the simpler proof, however. Cox-Zeman [4] provided examples of ideals which had projective antichain catching but weren't even strong ideals. All ideals in this paper will be presaturated, and thus strong. 8 The general definition of δ-(pre)saturation appears in Definition 2.13. For an I on some Z ′ ⊆ ℘(κ +n) as in Question 1.1, presaturated means κ +(n+1)-presaturated, and in particular the quotient will be κ +(n+1)-preserving.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008
We construct a model without precipitous ideals but so that for each τ < ℵ 3 there is a normal ideal over ℵ 1 with generic ultrapower wellfounded up to the image of τ .
Archive for Mathematical Logic, 2011
We consider a question of T. Jech and K. Prikry that asks if the existence of a precipitous filter implies the existence of a normal precipitous filter. The aim of this paper is to improve a result of Gitik (Israel J Math, 175:191-219, 2010) and to show that measurable cardinals of a higher order rather than just measurable cardinals are necessary in order to have a model with a precipitous filter but without a normal one.
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 2005
We show that the reduced cofinality of the nonstationary ideal NS κ on a regular uncountable cardinal κ may be less than its cofinality, where the reduced cofinality of NS κ is the least cardinality of any family F of nonstationary subsets of κ such that every nonstationary subset of κ can be covered by less than κ many members of F . For this we investigate connections of the various cofinalities of NS κ with other cardinal characteristics of κ κ and we also give a property of forcing notions (called manageability) which is preserved in <κ-support iterations and which implies that the forcing notion preserves non-meagerness of subsets of κ κ (and does not collapse cardinals nor changes cofinalities).
arXiv (Cornell University), 2020
In this note we give equivalence of the existence of K-partitions with the existence of the precipitous ideal which is essentially topological. This way we strengthen the main result of Frankiewczi and Kunen (1987). * The author is partially supported by Wroc law Univercity of Science and Technology grant of K34W04D03 no. 8201003902.
2020
It is proved that a finite intersection of special preenveloping ideals in an exact category $({\mathcal A}; {\mathcal E})$ is a special preenveloping ideal. Dually, a finite intersection of special precovering ideals is a special precovering ideal. A counterexample of Happel and Unger shows that the analogous statement about special preenveloping subcategories does not hold in classical approximation theory. If the exact category has exact coproducts, resp., exact products, these results extend to intersections of infinite families of special peenveloping, resp., special precovering, ideals. These techniques yield the Bongartz-Eklof-Trlifaj Lemma: if $a \colon A \to B$ is a morphism in ${\mathcal A},$ then the ideal $a^{\perp}$ is special preenveloping. This is an ideal version of the Eklof-Trlifaj Lemma, but the proof is based on that of Bongartz' Lemma. The main consequence is that the ideal cotorsion pair generated by a small ideal is complete.
Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University - Mathematics, 2010
Yuksel et. al. introduced and studied pre-I-irresolute functions. The aim of this paper is to give a new class of functions called strongly pre-I-irresolute functions in ideal topological space which is stronger than the class of pre-I-irresolute functions. Some characterizations and several basic properties of this class of functions are obtained.
2017
We introduce the notion of $K$-ideals associated with Kuratowski partitions and we prove that each $\kappa$-complete ideal on a measurable cardinal $\kappa$ can be represented as a $K$-ideal. Moreover, we show some results concerning precipitous and Frechet ideals.
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 1995
Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 2014
We use techniques due to Moti Gitik to construct models in which for an arbitrary ordinal ρ, ℵ ρ+1 is both the least measurable and least regular uncountable cardinal.
2003
We prove the following two theorems. Theorem 1. Let X be a strongly meager subset of 2 ω×ω . Then it is dual Ramsey null. We will say that a σ-ideal I of subsets of 2 satisfies the condition () iff for every X C 2, if ∀ f ∈ ω ↑ ω {g ∈ ω ω : ¬(f? g)} ∩ X ∈ I, then X ∈ I. Theorem 2. The σ-ideals of perfectly meager sets, universally meager sets and perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense satisfy the condition ().
2020
If $\kappa$ is regular and $2^{<\kappa}\leq\kappa^+$, then the existence of a weakly presaturated ideal on $\kappa^+$ implies $\square^*_\kappa$. This partially answers a question of Foreman and Magidor about the approachability ideal on $\omega_2$. As a corollary, we show that if there is a presaturated ideal $I$ on $\omega_2$ such that $\mathcal{P}(\omega_2)/I$ is semiproper, then CH holds. We also show some barriers to getting the tree property and a saturated ideal simultaneously on a successor cardinal from conventional forcing methods.
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 2021
It is proved that a finite intersection of special preenveloping ideals in an exact category (A; E) is a special preenveloping ideal. Dually, a finite intersection of special precovering ideals is a special precovering ideal. A counterexample of Happel and Unger shows that the analogous statement about special preenveloping subcategories does not hold in classical approximation theory. If the exact category has exact coproducts, resp., exact products, these results extend to intersections of infinite families of special peenveloping, resp., special precovering, ideals. These techniques yield the Bongartz-Eklof-Trlifaj Lemma: if a : A → B is a morphism in A, then the ideal a ⊥ is special preenveloping. This is an ideal version of the Eklof-Trlifaj Lemma, but the proof is based on that of Bongartz' Lemma. The main consequence is that the ideal cotorsion pair generated by a small ideal is complete.
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2019
Working under large cardinal assumptions such as supercompactness, we study the Borel-reducibility between equivalence relations modulo restrictions of the non-stationary ideal on some fixed cardinal κ. We show the consistency of E λ ++ ,λ ++ λ-club , the relation of equivalence modulo the non-stationary ideal restricted to S λ ++ λ in the space (λ ++) λ ++ , being continuously reducible to E 2,λ ++ λ +-club , the relation of equivalence modulo the non-stationary ideal restricted to S λ ++ λ + in the space 2 λ ++. Then we show that for κ ineffable E 2,κ reg , the relation of equivalence modulo the non-stationary ideal restricted to regular cardinals in the space 2 κ , is Σ 1 1-complete. We finish by showing, for Π 1 2-indescribable κ, that the isomorphism relation between dense linear orders of cardinality κ is Σ 1 1-complete.
Annals of Mathematical Logic, 1976
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1995
Let l 0 {l^0} and m 0 {m^0} be the ideals associated with Laver and Miller forcing, respectively. We show that a d d ( l 0 ) > c o v ( l 0 ) {\mathbf {add}}({l^0}) > {\mathbf {cov}}({l^0}) and a d d ( m 0 ) > c o v ( m 0 ) {\mathbf {add}}({m^0}) > {\mathbf {cov}}({m^0}) are consistent. We also show that both Laver and Miller forcing collapse the continuum to a cardinal ≤ h \leq \mathfrak {h} .
2013
In earlier work of the second and third author the equivalence of a finite square principle square^fin_{lambda,D} with various model theoretic properties of structures of size lambda and regular ultrafilters was established. In this paper we investigate the principle square^fin_{lambda,D}, and thereby the above model theoretic properties, at a regular cardinal. By Chang's Two-Cardinal Theorem, square^fin_{lambda,D} holds at regular cardinals for all regular filters D if we assume GCH. In this paper we prove in ZFC that for certain regular filters that we call "doubly^+ regular", square^fin_{lambda,D} holds at regular cardinals, with no assumption about GCH. Thus we get new positive answers in ZFC to Open Problems 18 and 19 in the book "Model Theory" by Chang and Keisler.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.