Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, NATO Veteran Initiative
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19823.44960…
7 pages
1 file
The article reflects on NATO's journey since its inception in 1949, highlighting its role in maintaining global security and stability. It also addresses contemporary challenges such as geopolitical tensions with Russia and China, cybersecurity threats, and the importance of technological advancements in defense. Discover how NATO continues to adapt and evolve to meet the demands of the modern world and reaffirm its commitment to collective defense and international cooperation. "However, despite the NATO allies pledging continuous military aid to Ukraine, the 2024 forum lacks a clear roadmap to end Russia’s aggression either through diplomatic pursuit or direct involvement in the war. It becomes imperative to interrogate NATO on how long Ukraine would depend on allies to defend itself against Putin’s war in Ukraine. One of the concerns of the 2024 Washington Summit is the lack of a comprehensive blueprint to promote sustainable peace beyond military aid provisioning. Moreover, another fundamental distress regarding the future of NATO lies in the changing political leadership among its key allies. For instance, if America’s commitment declines, changes, or withdraws from the alliance (although it requires a 2/3 majority of the Senate or an act of Congress) resulting from the changing policy of a new political administration, such action will have a dire consequential impact on the organisation. "
By the end of November 2010, NATO will have a new Strategic Concept, one in which the major guidelines of action for the Alliance will be set, supposedly in tune both with the current international security climate and its own responsibilities within it. Based on the NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement report drafted by the Group of Experts led by the former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, this policy brief attempts to critically analyze NATO’s current and future role in international security, pointing out several aspects and issues for which the Alliance should have a different approach. This policy brief is the result of a brainstorming session that took place in the Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra, on September 14h, 2010.
2006
A Brief Look at the Recent History of NATO´s Future Gunther Hellmann "(NATO) is directed against no one; it is directed solely against aggression. It seeks not to influence any shifting ´balance of power´ but to strengthen the ´balance of principle´." 1 "An alliance such as NATO (...) has to be an alliance designed not merely for the protection of the power of this or that party but for the protection of values in the service of which this power is employed. These values include, in particular, respect for human rights, the rule of law, democracy, the freedom of expression, and a market economy. Such an alliance protects not state sovereignty or anyone's geopolitical interests, but a certain type of human culture and civilization. By implication, the main glue of this alliance is not simply a calculation of mutual advantage or the accident of geopolitical interests or of a potential common adversary, but rather something incomparably more profound: namely, solidarity. Indeed, NATO for me is a commonwealth-in-solidarity of those sharing common values, with its principles of solidarity and openness being implied by the very nature of these values." 2 "NATO is a disappearing thing." 3 "I believe in NATO." 4 The dominant narrative of the history of transatlantic relations centers on the creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) after World War II as a significant break in established patterns of American 1 "Difference between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Traditional Military Alliances", Appendix to "The North Atlantic Treaty", Hearings before the U.S. Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, 81st Congress, 1st Session,
2019
For its seventieth anniversary, NATO's condition is assessed by considering the challenges it faces in the near to long term. With Trump's election, US' posture in the alliance is changing, prefiguring a retrenchment path that leaves Europe with the difficult task of security recalibration before novel threats posed by a reenergized Russia, a growing China and a series of other dangers ranging from hybrid attacks to critical infrastructure protection. Furthermore, NATO's unswervingly-committed attitude to democratic values of the past is giving way to a more illiberal environment, which questions one of the key assumptions underlying the transatlantic alliance. The "open door" policy, largely applied after the end of the Cold War, is being rethought. In spite of a broadened agenda, common defense is returning as the main competence of the alliance, which has to deal with the rapid development of military technology and the new concern posed by non-state actors. In addition , non-aligned member states are pushing for a different kind of leadership and security provision. Will the alliance be able to survive seventy years more?
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 2010
JOURNAL OF ADVANCE RESEARCH AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES, 2021
The complexities inherent in the process of reconstruction is one that cannot be overemphasized, most importantly, the need to reconstruct NATO in the post Trump era. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was established in 1949 with the aim of providing collective security against threats and ideological conflicts posed by the Soviet Union. The United States of America has since then played strategic, pivotal and leadership roles for the sustainability of NATO. The organization's essential purpose is to safeguard the liberty and security of all its members by both political and military endeavors. Collective defense and security heart is the alliance, as well as the need to foster unity, solidarity and cohesion amongst member states. This paper, hinged on historical and analytical approaches, examines the essence of NATO from a historical perspective, and proper solutions as regards the reconstruction of NATO in the post Trump era. Evidently, realities on ground show the need to reconcile alongside member states, the vision and purpose of NATO in the 21st Century.
The challenges of the future demand effective and coordinated action by nations with common interests. For the United States and its allies, NATO is by far the best vehicle available for organizing such action. NATO has made impressive strides toward adapting itself to the demands of a changed and changing world, but its members should recognize that neither the Alliance nor their own military establishments are yet perfectly suited to these demands. Fielding the requisite military capabilities will not come cheaply, nor will further institutional changes within NATO be cost-free. But it is well worth the effort.
World Focus, 2024
WORLD FOCUS takes up every month one international issue and gives an analysis of its various aspects by persons well known for their specialisation in the subject. The issues covered are topical or near topical, but of an abiding interest. The analysis is simple enough to interest even an initiate to world affairs, but without sacrificing depth. The aim is to present an Indocentric view on a particular issue currently facing the world. Opinions expressed in the articles are personal views of the author and in no way reflect the opinion of World Focus. The author is solely responsible for the contents in his/ her article and the World Focus takes no responsibility in this regard.The Contents of this magazine cannot be reproduced in any form with out prior permission from World Focus. Any legal issues pertaining to World Focus will be settled in NCT region of Delhi only. Unsolicited articles will not be returned or acknowledged. World Focus reserves the right to edit articles for brevity and clarity before publication.
Belügyi Szemle, 2020
NATO has survived until its 70th anniversary, essentially in the same condition as practically every year of its existence. According to commentators and external experts, the Alliance seems to be in a constant crisis, and every new version of the crisis is seen as final and deadly. By contrast, for those who are active internally, NATO seems stronger than ever before - it is engaging in more places than ever before, presenting new initiatives at an unprecedented pace and in ever-longer summit declarations. The problem situation presented in this way allows us to formulate the main research problem: What role does NATO play in shaping the global security system? The research problem formulated in this way consists of detailed problems formulated in the form of questions: 1) What are the current challenges for NATO? 2) What are the current threats to NATO? 3) What is Donald Trump's policy towards NATO? The aim of the presentation is to present an analysis of the role of NATO in e...
African Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (AJSSHR), 2019
The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) is the strongest and most successful political cum military alliance the world has ever known to date. Founded in 1949, the transatlantic alliance served as a bulwark for Western Europe countries from the expansion of the Soviet Union, its ideology-communism and, nuclear warheads during the Cold War. In the year 1991, the gigantic Soviet Union collapsed which marked the end of the Cold War. As the Soviet Union no longer posed a threat to NATO members, the Alliance took on new missions from conflict management in the Balkans and Maghreb, counterterrorism operations in South Asia and the Middle East, to anti-piracy missions off the Horn of Africa. At this juncture the question arising is this: is NATO a relic of the Cold War or an indispensable alliance in the 21 st century? This paper recounts the eventful history of NATO from 1949 to 2019. It also answers the question, is NATO an obsolete or relevant alliance in the 21 st century? and most importantly, it discusses at length the accomplishments and problems the Alliance faces in the post-Cold War era. These research objectives were successfully carried out using the historical approach with the qualitative method of secondary data collection. Concerning the findings in this research paper, it was discovered that NATO's achievements are being overshadowed by the plethora of challenges bedeviling it, the biggest of which is defence spending shortfall.
Springer eBooks, 2022
This book wants to provide a full and scholarly assessment of NATO's performance during and particularly after the Cold War. The guiding methodological principle is to evaluate the elements of continuity and the factors of transformation in NATO before and after 1989. The historical approach qualifies this volume among the literature on the Atlantic Alliance, largely dominated by political science and strategic studies. Good reasons justify a new book on NATO. In 2019 the 70th anniversary of the Atlantic Alliance received comparatively little attention by the general public and also by scholars. Much more attention had been dedicated in 2007 to the 50th anniversary of European Union (EU, born as European Economic Community, EEC), the other key organization
After 60 years of existence, the Atlantic Alliance remains the most reliable security organization for the Euro-Atlantic security. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has succeeded in adapting itself to the new international scenario. Starting from the '90s, NATO has undergone a deep evolution, both in qualitative and quantitative terms. On the one hand, the Alliance transformation consisted in the update of strategic goals, the development of new military means and new partnership frameworks. On the other hand, from being an occasional choice the enlargement has turned out to be an enduring open door policy. Over the course of the last decade, it brought about the admission of twelve new members. The NATO's evolution processes implied a shift from a traditional military pact to a new cooperative organization and from a defensive posture to a new expeditionary role. The depth of these processes entailed a reconsideration of the Alliance raison d'être involving new political and security challenges. These, in turn, have implied different and in some cases contradictory responses from the Allies. The aim of this book is to assess the challenges to NATO enlargement and transformation, offering national perspectives on the Alliance's evolution. Accordingly, the analysis focuses on three different levels - old members, new members and partners - in order to provide an appraisal of convergences and divergences on NATO's changing character and responsibilities.
Annuaire de la Faculté de Philosophie, 2022
The war on Ukraine, which began on 24 February 2022 with the invasion of the armed forces of the Russian Federation, is an event with a potential to cause tectonic changes in the current political, security and economic international order, including the possibility of a nuclear conflict. As it is the case with the other international and regional organizations, NATO too is enforced to reconsider its position in the multipolar world. The research problem of this paper is delimiting the reality from the myth of NATO that has rested for decades. It focuses on the search for the Alliance's real power in a multipolar international system, as well as seeking answers about the future of the European security order (especially through the prism of NATO-EU relations). The key hypothesis is that the course of events (in Ukraine but also the definite rise of multipolar international system) has been predictable. The reasons for the war were deeply embedded in the foundations of the hybrid international system. The preliminary conclusion is that NATO (albeit seemingly strengthened and expanded) will likely face with its irrelevance in a multipolar order. The thesis of a "global NATO" is just a veil that covers the restricted NATO mission primarily as an instrument of the US policy in Europe. Due to the Ukraine, EU (but also OSCE) is likely to see the shattered dreams of its own security system. It means it will be economically, politically and militarily completely dependent on Washington. NATO enlargement is reaching its peak, along with its primarily European reach. Globally, the United States will rely on its own forces and on alliance of the willing, now referred to as the "Collective West."
This book “Understanding NATO in the 21st Century: Alliance Strategies Security and Global Governance” provides the overview of the evolution, global security governance, alliances and future prospect for NATO. This book is mostly from U.S point of view how they look NATO and how they can use it in future. How U.S can dominate in the international affairs and how to counter the emerging superpowers. The impact of NATO created a competitive and cooperative environment at global and regional level and created a history of its own. As NATO moves into the 21st century its purpose, role and utility needs to be changed with the future situation of the world.
Public Law
The challenges of the future demand effective and coordinated action by nations with common interests. For the United States and its allies, NATO is by far the best vehicle available for organizing such action. NATO has made impressive strides toward adapting itself to the demands of a changed and changing world, but its members should recognize that neither the Alliance nor their own military establishments are yet perfectly suited to these demands. Fielding the requisite military capabilities will not come cheaply, nor will further institutional changes within NATO be cost-free. But it is well worth the effort.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.