Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1992, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
…
2 pages
1 file
This paper presents a range of applications of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), a comprehensive mesoscale meteorological modeling system. Applications discussed in this paper include large eddy simulations (LES) and simulations of thunderstorms, cumulus fields, mesoscale convective systems, mid-latitude cirrus clouds, winter storms, mechanically-and thermally-forced mesoscale systems, and mesoscale atmospheric dispersion. A summary of current RAMS options is also presented. Improvements to RAMS currently underway include refinements to the cloud radiation, cloud microphysics, cumulus, and surface soil/vegetative parameterization schemes, the parallelization of the code, development of a more versatile visualization capability, and research into meso-~-scale cumulus parameterization.
The overall performance characteristics of a limited area, hydrostatic, fine (52 km) mesh, primitive equation, numerical weather prediction model are determined in anticipation of satellite data assimilations with the model. The synoptic and mesoscale predictive capabilities of version 2.0 of this model, the Mesoscale Atmospheric Simulation System (MASS 2.0), were evaluated. The two part study is based on a sample of approximately thirty 12h and 24h forecasts of atmospheric flow patterns during spring and early summer. The synoptic scale evaluation results benchmark the performance of MASS 2.0 against that of an operational, synoptic scale weather prediction model, the Limited area Fine Mesh (LFM). The large sample allows for the calculation of statistically significant measures of forecast accuracy and the determination of systematic model errors. The synoptic scale benchmark is required before unsmoothed mesoscale forecast fields can be seriously considered.
Monthly Weather Review, 1997
A comparison study of four cumulus parameterization schemes (CPSs), the Anthes-Kuo, Betts-Miller, Grell, and Kain-Fritsch schemes, is conducted using The Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research mesoscale model. Performance of these CPSs is examined using six precipitation events over the continental United States for both cold and warm seasons. Grid resolutions of 36 and 12 km are chosen to represent current mesoscale research models and future operational models. The key parameters used to evaluate skill include precipitation, sea level pressure, wind, and temperature predictions. Precipitation is evaluated statistically using conventional skill scores (such as threat and bias scores) for different threshold values based on hourly rainfall observations. Rainfall and other mesoscale features are also evaluated by careful examination of analyzed and simulated fields, which are discussed in the context of timing, evolution, intensity, and structure of the precipitation systems. It is found that the general 6-h precipitation forecast skill for these schemes is fairly good in predicting four out of six cases examined in this study, even for higher thresholds. The forecast skill is generally higher for cold-season events than for warm-season events. There is an increase in the forecast skill in the 12-km model, and the gain is most obvious in predicting heavier rainfall amounts. The model's precipitation forecast skill is better in rainfall volume than in either the areal coverage or the peak amount. The scheme with the convective available potential energy-based closure assumption (Kain-Fritsch scheme) appears to perform better. Some systematic behaviors associated with various schemes are also noted wherever possible. The partition of rainfall into subgrid scale and grid scale is sensitive to the particular parameterization scheme chosen, but relatively insensitive to either the model grid sizes or the convective environments. The prediction of mesoscale surface features in warm-season cases, such as mesoscale pressure centers, windshift lines (gust fronts), and temperature fields, strongly suggests that the CPSs with moist downdrafts are able to predict these surface features more accurately.
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2009
For numerical weather prediction models and models resolving deep convection, shallow convective ascents are subgrid processes that are not parameterized by classical local turbulent schemes. The mass flux formulation of convective mixing is now largely accepted as an efficient approach for parameterizing the contribution of larger plumes in convective dry and cloudy boundary layers. We propose a new formulation of the EDMF scheme (for Eddy Diffusivity\Mass Flux) based on a single updraft that improves the representation of dry thermals and shallow convective clouds and conserves a correct representation of stratocumulus in mesoscale models. The definition of entrainment and detrainment in the dry part of the updraft is original, and is specified as proportional to the ratio of buoyancy to vertical velocity. In the cloudy part of the updraft, the classical buoyancy sorting approach is chosen. The main closure of the scheme is based on the mass flux near the surface, which is proportional to the sub-cloud layer convective velocity scale w *. The link with the prognostic grid-scale cloud content and cloud cover and the projection on the nonconservative variables is processed by the cloud scheme. The validation of this new formulation using large-eddy simulations focused on showing the robustness of the scheme to represent three different boundary layer regimes. For dry convective cases, this parameterization enables a correct representation of the countergradient zone where the mass flux part represents the top entrainment (IHOP case). It can also handle the diurnal cycle of boundarylayer cumulus clouds (EUROCS\ARM) and conserve a realistic evolution of stratocumulus (EUROCS\FIRE).
1998
Weather-sensitive business operations are primarily reactive to short-term (3 to 36 hours), local conditions (city, county, state) due to unavailability of appropriate predicted data at this temporal and spatial scale. This situation is commonplace in a number of applications including, but not limited to transportation, agriculture, energy, insurance, entertainment, construction, communications and emergency planning. Typically, what optimization that is applied to these processes to enable proactive efforts utilize either historical weather data as a predictor of trends or the results of synoptic-scale weather models. Alternatively, mesoscale (cloud-scale) numerical weather models operating at higher resolution in space and time with more detailed physics has shown "promise" for many years as a potential enabler of pro-active decision making for both economic and societal value. They may offer greater precision and accuracy within a limited geographic region for problems...
Tellus A, 2011
A B S T R A C T This work evaluates several techniques to account for mesoscale initial-condition (IC) and model uncertainty in a short-range ensemble prediction system based on the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model. A scientific description and verification of several candidate methods for implementation in the U.S. Air Force Weather Agency mesoscale ensemble is presented. Model perturbation methods tested include multiple parametrization suites, landsurface property perturbations, perturbations to parameters within physics schemes and stochastic 'backscatter' streamfunction perturbations. IC perturbations considered include perturbed observations in 10 independent WRF-3DVar cycles and the ensemble-transform Kalman filter (ETKF). A hybrid of ETKF (for IC perturbations) and WRF-3DVar (to update the ensemble mean) is also tested. Results show that all of the model and IC perturbation methods examined are more skilful than direct dynamical downscaling of the global ensemble. IC perturbations are most helpful during the first 12 h of the forecasts. Physical parametrization diversity appears critical for boundary-layer forecasts. In an effort to reduce system complexity by reducing the number of suites of physical parametrizations, a smaller set of parametrization suites was combined with perturbed parameters and stochastic backscatter, resulting in the most skilful and statistically consistent ensemble predictions.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2000
Monthly Weather Review, 2014
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2020
Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2019
2008
International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2011
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2012
Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2001
Weather and Forecasting, 2001
Developments in Teracomputing, 2001
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2012
Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2007
… 12th Conference on …, 2007
American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016