Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1996, Contemporary Jewry
The effects of generation, eduation, ethnicity, and gender on Holocaust knowledge are explored, using data from a United States national survey, a university student survey and qualitatfve interviews with university students. Knowledge levels are greatest among more educated respondents, respondents whose political corn mg of age was during the Holocaust, and among Jewish respondents. Results for gender are sample-specific. Indepth interviews, which complement survey data, indicate that social psychological processes of identification with Holocaust victims influence knowledge and underlie demographic effects. Thus, public knowledge about the Holocaust is not determined statically by individuals' social structural characteristics. Rather, public knowledge is flexible and could be enhanced by Holocm~t education that emphasizes identification. Implications of the results for theories linking generation to knowledge and for methodological issues m sample design are identified As concern about Holocaust denial and distortion mounts , recent studies have attempted to assess the level of Holocaust knowledge various groups possess (Golub and Cohen 1993;. This study examines Holocaust knowledge with the goal ofdeterminm~ whether, and how, various social factors influence it. To do so, I use ,ht~ flora a United States national sample, a University of Michigan student sample, and qualitative, in-depth interviews with a student sample to study the relation.~h'm of Holocaust knowledge to four social influences: generation, education, ethnicity, and gender.
Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 1998
Holocaust-knowledge surveys attracted considerable public attention in 1993, when media reports stated that 22% of the American public appeared to deny the existence of the Holocaust. Once this disturbing result was explained by question-wording experiments (experiments that exposed difficulties with the wording of the questions), public-opinion researchers abandoned discussion of Holocaust-knowledge surveys. In retrospect, the discourse about these surveys appears to have been limited, overlooking critical assumptions about the methodologies and theoretical bases of Holocaust-knowledge surveys. In this paper, assumptions about the primacy of question-wording studies, the exclusion of emotions from definitions of knowledge, and the omission of critical-thinking skills from these definitions are identified with data from a multi-method study of Holocaust knowledge. The paper employs theoretical perspectives in Holocaust and genocide studies to search for alternative methods of conceptualizing and measuring knowledge, and to illustrate how methods and meaning could be better integrated.
Philosophy Study, 2017
, the Israeli Ministry of Education declared that the matriculation exam in history would no longer include the Holocaust, and instead students would be required to write a research paper. Following this decision, we wished to test the level of knowledge concerning the Holocaust among undergraduate students (excluding those who study contemporary history, which includes Holocaust studies). For this purpose, 145 participants were sampled, students at four Israeli academic institutions: two universities and two colleges. The research question referred to remembering information about the Holocaust and the study took into account students' different personal, family, and academic background (having participated in the journey to Poland or not, having relatives who had died or survived the Holocaust, being religious or secular). The knowledge survey refers to terms from four areas: people, historical events during the Holocaust era, organizations that operated in that period, and places and methods of killing. In general, the level of knowledge was found to be very low (general knowledge score: 42.6 of 100). No significant differences were found in scores by religion or participation in the journey to Poland, aside from knowledge about places and methods of killing, where we found a significant difference between those who participated in the journey to Poland and those who did not. In addition, no significant differences were found between participants whose relatives had died in or had survived the Holocaust, or by either the number of years since high school graduation or gender. From the respondents' answers, it appears that high school studies play an essential role as the main perceived source of knowledge (90.4% referred to school as a main or additional knowledge source). When asked about the new exam format, the majority (52.1%) replied that they would prefer writing a research paper to taking an exam. The low level of knowledge that we found raises practical questions: Are the schools teaching correctly? Should the study program be reviewed? Are we providing the right highlights? What is the contribution of the journey to Poland if 60% of the participants are not familiar, for example, with Mordechai Anielewicz? What can be done to improve the situation? Will the decision to exclude Holocaust topics from the high school finals in history and to require students to write a research paper, improve the situation? What is the future of remembrance in a generation that will have no Holocaust survivors to tell their personal story? It is necessary to check the importance of the school as a primary source of knowledge and how to improve the study methods so that the knowledge will be preserved. Perhaps the informal teaching that includes the journey to Poland plays an important role and should be used more often. Furthermore, despite students' support of the reform and the conception that writing a research paper is better than taking an exam about the Holocaust, there is a need to check what is included in this research paper and whether writing it on a specific subject connected to
Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 2008
Cette Ctude explore la question suivante: est-ce qu'un Cvinement historique majeur comme le Holocauste a des consCquences inter-gCnCrationnelles observables au niveau micro-sociologique, sur un Cchantillon representatif de jeunes adultes juifs, nCs aprPs la deuxiPme guerre mondiale, parmi lesquels certains sont des enfants de survivants, et d'autres ne le sont pas. Les consCquences CtudiCes ici sont des attitudes socio-politiques telles que l'engagement 1 defendre la libertC d'expression d'opinions dissidentes; la propensit6 B dCfendre activement des droits menaces, pour juifs et non-juifs; l'attitude face a la politique d'immigration; et l'engagement a dCfendre Israel. Les variables explicatives CtudiCes, relatives au Holocauste, sont le statut d'enfant de survivant; la fagon dont les repondants se sentaient affect&, ou non, par I'expCrience de leurs parents pendant la deuxieme guerre mondiale; et connaissance et curiosite envers le Holocauste. Nos rCsultats montrent que les variables relatives au Holocauste contribuent de fagon significative B expliquer la variation pour toutes les variables d6pendantes; il apparait que les facteurs relatifs B la connaissance de la deuxiPme guerre mondiale et B la curiosit6 envers celle-ci, sont plus importants que le statut d'enfant de survivant. Les implications de nos r6sultats pour la comprChension des rdes de la famille et d'CvPnements historiques majeurs dans la socialisation politique, sont dCbattues. This study explores whether a major historical event like the Holocaust has observable inter-generational micro-level consequences within a representative sample of young Jewish adults born after the event, some of whom are children of survivors and some who are not. The consequences studied here are such socio-political attitudes as: commitment to civil liberties for dissenting views; tolerance for minorities; propensity for militant defense of threatened rights of Jews and non-Jews; views on immigration policy; and commitment to the defense of Israel. The Holocaust-related explanatory variables examined are: I/ status as a child of survivors; 21 whether respondents felt affected by parents' experiences during World War 11; and 31 curiosity and knowledge
This work addresses how public and private attitudes toward the Holocaust and Holocaust survivors in the United States may have influenced the way in which the survivors viewed themselves and their relations with others. It seems that both ‘public’ and ‘private’ attitudes toward the Holocaust and its survivors in America impeded a better understanding of the Holocaust and the survivor experience. Further, the above may have – in fact – adversely affected the adult psychological development of the survivors. Finally, an alternative explication of the dynamics underlying the attitudes examined here will be presented that can contribute to a more correct and beneficial way of approaching survivors of events producing similar psychological manifestations as the Holocaust.
2016
What new insights can social scientific methods uncover from material predominantly situated within the humanities—oral histories, in particular—and why might this methodological development be valuable for the greater interdisciplinary field of Holocaust (and Genocide) Studies? In this project, I use the videorecorded testimonies of the Shoah Foundation archive to create a testable and replicable theory about the influence of national rhetoric on memory. In particular, I research how and why the typical Soviet-Jewish Holocaust testimony is likely to differ from a non-Soviet—for example, Polish, French, or Hungarian—narrative of victimhood and oppression. I hypothesize that national rhetoric impacts memory, in particular the memory of child survivors that remained in the Soviet Union until its collapse. The mechanism that links national rhetoric to memory is the socialization, or assimilation, that these young people experienced during their formative postwar years. I suggest that these factors—national rhetoric, socialization, and assimilation—lead child survivors to recall those who helped or harmed them in a particular manner. To operationalize my study, I developed a code to trace the confluence of proper nouns and strong emotional responses in videotaped survivor testimonies. I chose videotaped testimonies, as opposed to written or audio testimonies, as the presence of metadata (namely: silences, facial reactions, and body language) is most observable with this medium. In this preliminary test of my methodology, I began with survivors born in Minsk, who remained there after the war, but intend to expand my analysis to other cities that demonstrate assimilative variation throughout the post-Soviet region. In addition to the empirical portion of this research, I also address the potential ethical problems in quantifying sensitive archival material. By reading oral testimonies as both text and a response to text, I demonstrate patterns in how this group of Soviet-Jewish survivors uniquely remembers their own childhood, wartime experiences. Ideally, this method could not only reinforce, objectively and systematically, our current hypotheses about history and memory, but could also generate new theories that scholars may have overlooked.
Political Psychology
This research tested whether chronic or contextually activated Holocaust exposure is associated with more extreme political attitudes among Israeli Jews. Study 1 (N 5 57), and Study 2 (N 5 61) found that Holocaust primes increased support for aggressive policies against a current adversary and decreased support for political compromise via an amplified sense of identification with Zionist ideology. These effects, however, were obtained only under an exclusive but not an inclusive framing of the Holocaust. Study 3 (N 5 152) replicated these findings in a field study conducted around Holocaust Remembrance Day and showed that the link between Holocaust exposure, ideological identification, and militancy also occurs in real-life settings. Study 4 (N 5 867) demonstrated in a nationally representative survey that Holocaust survivors and their descendants exhibited amplified existential threat responses to contemporary political violence, which were associated with militancy and opposition to peaceful compromises. Together, these studies illustrate the Holocaustization of Israeli political cognitions 70 years later.
2018
Schweber and Resenly’s chapter, “Curricular imprints or the presence of curricular pasts: A study of one third grader’s Holocaust education 12 years later,” examines the long-term effects of a student’s encounter with the Holocaust. Based largely on interview data, the authors look at how individual and collective identity mediates Holocaust memory and how early curricular experiences matter over time. They conclude that in this case, experiences with Holocaust education in later years and avoidance of so-called casual learning about the topic followed an emotional pattern set by that early experience in formal education. The research highlights the challenges of learning about the Holocaust in depth at a young age, perhaps especially for Jewish children who identify with Jewish victimization.
In: Novis-Deutsch, N. S., Lederman, S., Adams, T. & Kochavi, A. J. (2023). Sites of Tension: Shifts in Holocaust memory in Relation to Antisemitism and Political Contestation in Europe. Haifa: The Weiss-Livnat International Center for Holocaust Research and Education, p. 298-317.
2018
20 th Annual Children's Identity and Citizenship European Association and 2 nd Joint CitizED Association Conference Citizenship & Identity in a 'Post-Truth' World ISBN: 978-83-8100-127-4 This is draft version of conference program. The final conference abstract book will be placed on CiCeA website with ISBN number just after conference. CiCea, established in 2006, is the Association focusing on citizenship education and identity formation in young people in Europe and the world. It is a dynamic and fast-expanding group of academics from across Europe, all engaged in research and scholarship on young people's social learning and their construction of identities. It is a subscription-based organization, whose members enjoy a number of distinct advantages:
2013
The literature on Holocaust survival and second-generation effects has been prone to controversy beyond criticisms of research methodology, sample selection, and generalizability of findings (e.g., Solkoff, 1992). A critical backlash has also been evident (Roseman & Handleman, 1993; Whiteman, 1993), even from among the children themselves (Peskin, 1981), against the penchant of the early Holocaust literature to formulate the transmission of deep psychopathology from one generation to the next. Such an unbending formulation has understandably aroused readers' strong skepticism and ambivalence, in part because to expose the magnitude of the Nazi destruction is to confirm Hitler's posthumous victory (Danieli, 1984, 1985). But seeking to correct this early bias wherein Holocaust suffering is equated with psychopathology has, often enough, also created an overcorrection that discourages understanding the Holocaust as a core existential and relational experience for both generatio...
American Ethnologist, 2008
Prospects, 2010
This article examines the responses of some 1,500 Canadians to a public opinion survey on knowledge of the Holocaust, awareness of genocide, and attitudes towards discrimination and diversity. Based on one of the most detailed surveys conducted to date on Holocaust knowledge, the study found strong correlations between greater reported Holocaust knowledge and concern over genocide, as well as greater recognition of anti-Semitism as a societal problem. Greater reported Holocaust knowledge did not, however, correlate consistently with greater openness towards selected dimensions of diversity. This counterintuitive phenomenon can likely be attributed to what respondents have learned about diversity and the limits of the effect of Holocaust education in this regard. Hence, further research is required on the relationship between the two. Finally, going forward, a case is made for a global assessment of levels of Holocaust knowledge.
"Holocaust Research and Generational Change: Regional and Local Studies Since the Cold War," in LESSONS AND LEGACIES VIII From Generation to Generation Edited and with an introduction by Doris Bergen (Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 2008), pp. 203-221
Seventy years have passed since the Holocaust, but this cataclysmic event continues to reverberate in the present. In this research, we examine attributions about the causes of the Holocaust and the influence of such attributions on intergroup relations. Three representative surveys were conducted among Germans, Poles, and Israeli Jews to examine inter-and intragroup variations in attributions for the Holocaust and how these attributions influence intergroup attitudes. Results indicated that Germans made more external than internal attributions and were especially low in attributing an evil essence to their ancestors. Israelis and Poles mainly endorsed the obedient essence attribution and were lowest on attribution to coercion. These attributions, however, were related to attitudes towards contemporary Germany primarily among Israeli Jews. The more they endorsed situationist explanations, and the less they endorsed the evil essence explanation, the more 1 0162-895X bs_bs_banner positive their attitude to Germany. Among Germans, attributions were related to a higher motivation for historical closure, except for the obedience attribution that was related to low desire for closure. Israelis exhibited a low desire for historical closure especially when attribution for evil essence was high. These findings suggest that lay perceptions of history are essential to understanding contemporary intergroup processes.
This work challenges contemporary thinking on memory by examining the complex ways in which the social inheritance of the Nazi Holocaust is gendered. It considers how the past is handed down in the US, Poland and Britain through historiography, autobiographies, documentary and feature films, memorial sites and museums. It explores the configuration of socially inherited memories about the Holocaust in young people of different cultural backgrounds. The book provides an approach to understanding the significance of gender in relation to cultural mediations of history.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.