تحلیل گفتمان اسلام ولایتی متاثر از انقلاب اسلامی در افغانستان

فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی علوم سیاسی, 2020

The purpose of this study is to investigate the political Islam of the jurisprudential guardianship (Imami script) in Afghanistan. In this way, we will explain the hypothesis that in Afghanistan, Islamists following the theory of Velayat-e-Faqih in the last three decades of the twentieth century, although succeeding in delegitimizing the opposition, ultimately failed to legitimize it. The findings of the study, conducted in the context of Hughes's "intellectual history" method of analysis, show that the Islamists of Velayat-e-Faqih province in Afghanistan have focused on the issue of legitimacy in historical, religious, political and external fields. In the field of delegitimization and legitimization, they followed certain trends. They had important influences in the growth of Shiite intellectual consciousness and increasing their political role, and took important steps in connection with the "export of the revolution" and the introduction of the "Velayat-e Faqih" in Afghanistan. At the same time, in some cases, due to inexperience and self-centeredness, they engaged in intersectarian wars and failed to create lasting legitimacy.

2020

ولایت فقیه رکن و مبنای اساسی در حوزه سیاست اسلامی و درواقع عنصر جهان‎شمول از «نظام سیاسی اسلام» است. پژوهش پیش‌رو با استفاده از روش کتابخانه‌ای در گردآوری اطلاعات و روش توصیفی تحلیلی در استنتاج دیدگاه و روش اجتهادی در کارکردها و برایندها به این پرسش پاسخ می‌گوید که آیا ولایت فقیه صرفا یک بحث فقهی است یا باید آن را از امور بینارشته‌ای به شمار آورد که برخی از وجوه آن را باید در علم کلام پی گرفت؟ اگر احتمال اخیر درست باشد، علم فقه و کلام چه تعاملی در مسئله ولایت فقیه با همدیگر دارند؟ حاصل بررسی وجوه تعامل کلام و فقه در سه حوزه مبادی تصوریه، تصدیقیه و توجیه به نتایج زیر منتج شده است: الف) در حوزه مبادی تصوریه ولایت در کلام با ولایت در فقه متفاوت است؛ همچنین با توجه با مباحث کلامی و فقهی می‌توان معنای درستی از اطلاق ولایت فقیه ارائه کرد. ب) در حوزه مبانی تصدیقیه اصل و مشروعیت ولایت فقیه منوط به پذیرش جامعیت دین و نظریه انتصاب یا مجموعی است. اگرچه تبیین یک رکن در نظریه مجموعی بر عهده فقه است، تبیین رکن دیگر در نظریه اخیر یا تمام رکن در نظریه انتصاب بر عهدۀ‌ کلام است. ج) در حوزه توجیه هم م...

2019

journal of Linguistic Research, 2021

این پژوهش، بر پایة رویکرد تحلیل گفتمانی فوکو برداشت گفتمانی مشارکان را از واژه‌های تاریخی-سیاسی بررسی می‌کند و در پی آن است که صورت‌بندی‌های متفاوت تاریخی-گفتمانی و ماهیت متغیر آنها، چگونه در واژه‌ها به عنوان مصداقی از حقیقت گفتمانی (برساختة گفتمانی) نمود یافته و با واژه‌ها بازتولید و یادآوری می‌شوند؟ به عبارت دیگر چگونه «واژه» به تنهایی یک گفتمان قابل‌تحلیل است؟ این پژوهش طی دو مرحله و دو پرسشنامه و به ترتیب با 110 و 135 مشارک از دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی به عنوان نسل جوان معاصر انجام شده‌است. روش این پژوهش کیفی و کمی و مبتنی بر توصیف و تحلیل است. پرسشنامة دوم در 5 گروه پرسشی، پیوند واژه با دوره‌های تاریخی و گفتمان‌ها، تفاوت گفتمان واژه در هر دوره و گفتمان فردی مشارکان را ارزیابی می‌کند. داده‌ها به صورت کیفی و کمی و در قالب آمار و نمودار توصیف و تحلیل شده‌است. تحلیل کمی و آمار استنباطی داده‎ها که شامل 21 گویه بودند با نرم افزار SPSS ارائه شد که وجود پیوند معنادار میان «واژه‌ها» با «دوره‌ها و گفتمان‌های تاریخی» را تأیید می‌کرد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد برخی واژه‌ها مانند واژه‌های تاریخی... Based on Foucault's discourse analysis approach, this study examines participants' discourse perceptions of historical-political words and tries to find the answer to the question of how different historical-discourse formulations and their changing nature is expressed in words as a referent of discourse truth (constructed discourse) and reproduced and recalled by words. In other words, how is the "word" itself a discourse that can be analyzed? This research was conducted in two stages and two questionnaires with 110 and 135 participants. The method of this research is qualitative-quantitative and based on description and analysis. The second questionnaire in 5 groups of questions evaluates the connection of the word with historical periods and discourses, the difference between the discourse of the word in each period, and the individual discourse of the participants. The data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively in the form of statistics and graphs. Quantitative analysis of data from 21 items by SPSS software confirmed a significant relationship between "words" and "historical periods and discourses". The results showed that some words, such as historical-political words, are to some extent formed in discourse and are tied to specific historical discourses. And reciprocally, independently and disregarding any background and verbal context, they can represent and induce that discourse and reconstruct the components related to that discourse in the mind of the addressee. Thus, although the words have their own lexical meaning in the language, according to different contexts, conditions of occurrence, different minds, and finally different discourses, they show different perceptions, influences, and relative meanings and carry different discourses, and the concept they have in the mind is a historical one that has been formed in history. This study concludes that words reflect the reorientation of the discourse formulations and articulations of history and they alone can be studied in discourse analysis and ethnology.

Comparative Theology, 2018

It is more than 30 years that attending inter-religious meetings and symposiums has been on the agenda of some of the Iran's religious and social institutions. Those who have been and are still active in this area, as well as the different approaches they choose are an important source of analysis in terms of knowledge and experience. This research seeks to understand the knowledge and experience of the activists of the area and their critical interpretation of inter-religious dialogue and to provide a systematic analysis of it by constructing and systematizing its respective themes. Therefore, this research has been conducted with descriptive-analytic approach and qualitative method. For this purpose, along with theoretical findings, we have tried to collect empirical data using semi-structured interview techniques. The sampling method is purposeful and theoretical saturation criterion is an interview with 15 activists in this field. Thematic analysis method is also used for data analysis. Analyzing the findings, it became clear that the critics did not pay close attention to the religious and denominational origins of the subjects and were neutral in their critical analysis of them. Hence, their view to "the other" and the dialogue is "extra-religious" and they acknowledge the views and the ideas of this field in political and cultural terms and analyze them on this framework. In this approach, originality is with "the other" and the theological pluralism viewpoint is governed. Hence, dialogue with another-religious is not considered to be religious, but as an ethical-based subject. Through dialogue, critics do not seek to prove legitimacy, but consider their action as a means of looking at another according to moral standards, acting on ethical imperatives and sharing and generalizing ethics in controversial