Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2018, Teacher Development
Drawing on data from the co-construction of an online research-informed guide for the teaching of English as an additional language (EAL), analysis highlights the complexities inherent in translating research into practice for different stakeholders. Discussion argues for the recognition of communal constructivism as a pedagogy of learning that can build understanding between researchers and practitioners for how practice might become research-informed.
Academic Language and Learning (ALL) is a relatively recent practice field known in Australian Higher Education as Academic Skills Advising or Student Support. Changing social, political and economic circumstances shape ALL work in complex and contradictory ways. Of crucial current significance are discourses calling for education to become an evidence-based practice. This paper outlines the main tenets of evidence-based practice discourses (EBPD); recapitulates Gert Biesta's critique of EBPD' views of education as instrumental technology and positivistic science; and explores how these critiques hold in the managerial expropriations of these discourses in the ALL context. The paper argues that, while these managerial expropriations ostensibly provide ALL with some legitimacy, they simultaneously reduce its practice to means-to-end interventions servicing the language/learning commodity; and increasingly consign its research to techno-scientific evaluation investigating managerial outcomes and acting as powerful panoptic surveillance. The paper calls for the continued critique of dominant discourses and their reproducing practices; and reconnecting with questions of educational purpose in ALL thereby enabling more radical and meaningful re-imaginings of this work.
Reading Horizons, 2020
Learning to use critical practice-based research as part of teaching is an important goal for preservice teachers, especially for those who plan to teach English learners in linguistically diverse settings. In this study, the authors examine the experiences of preservice teachers who were introduced to a framework for enacting iterative, transformative action research and used the framework to study their own teaching in a one-on-one writing partnership with young English learners. Using an established self-efficacy survey instrument, as well as qualitative measures such as course artifacts and observations of teaching, the authors conducted a mixed-methods study to examine the impact of research engagement on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, self-reported knowledge of practice-based research, and agency. Findings suggest that the experience helped preservice teachers increase their knowledge of practice-based research and reflect on their teaching decisions, but gains in self-ef...
Educational Action Research, 2021
This article examines the possibilities and challenges in turning a top-down action research project led by high-level public authorities into a shared and collaborative, multi-site and multiprofessional bottom-up action research project. For this purpose, the article explores the initial stages of a European level action research project called 'Linguistically Sensitive Teaching in All Classrooms' that aimed to help teacher education systems better acknowledge linguistically diverse student populations in seven European countries. The analysis of the data sought to identify how to promote linguistically sensitive initial teacher education by incorporating reflection tasks into existing courses, and how to transform a top-down research project into a shared and collaborative bottom-up action project. The primary data consisted of 19 video-recorded online research meetings. Qualitative analysis was used to identify 'critical moments' in the data; these included a moment of major insight where transformation of project related ideas took place. The findings showed that linguistically sensitive teaching as a phenomenon is complex and the related terminology challenging to translate between languages and contexts. Furthermore, a European level action research requires negotiating a joint understanding of the roles of the participants and the individual perceptions of project ownership in each context. This suggests that a deeper understanding of the processes of participation and the partnerships involved in the action research may be as valuable as the actual reflection tools developed in the project in securing a systematic change towards linguistically sensitive teacher education.
Teaching English worldwide has proved to be more challenging with the development of technical and advanced science disciplines. Science and technical fields have made strides in introducing new curricula to supply the marketplace with employees and researchers by employing partnerships and modernized courses while some researchers argue that English language curricula maintain the same content and pedagogic practices West and William, 2015). Although many English language practitioners have incorporated some cultural topics, they still face resistance from both students and colleagues. Therefore, English language teachers strive to re-examine their curriculum and educational outcomes in order to cope with the vibrant academic as well as global culture, especially in Higher Education sectors. While some English departments and centres have approached changing course materials and sometimes the curriculum itself, more research can help English teachers consider engaging students in designing and developing the curriculum. Many teachers complain about the lack of student engagement and motivation, especially in the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC, henceforth) region, and hence this paper aims to encourage more active engagement with Higher Education students in interdisciplinary research. This paper critiques research-based education as discussed by contemporary pedagogic scholars and explores possibilities of engaging students in research and designing the curriculum as part of their higher education process. The paper focusses on research that solves real-world problems as indicated in 21 Century Skills. This research suggests that English teachers can implement constructive education through two research approaches. The first is research to develop the English language curriculum while the second is to involve students in an interdisciplinary research that employs English as a language as well as a knowledge vessel in their field.
Paper Presented at ICELT (International Conference on English Language Teaching) Melaka, Malaysia, 2013
This study aims at describing what the research-based teaching is so that students understand and succeed in learning English as a starting point. The study provides specific information on a number of questions about how the English language learning should be done seeing students always tries to understand but difficult to do. All the teachers need an awareness of the indicators of research-based teaching and need to know how to conduct it. It then explores the insight of critical thinking and even more in a result as the response to research-based teaching. The findings of the study refer to a need for setting a standard accommodation for learners to become a participant instead of a recipient. The findings also highlight the need for teacher training in order to have a working knowledge of what to look for in conducting research-based teaching in the English language classroom.
2012
The discussion of “what counts as research” is endless and endlessly partisan. The use of research “evidence” is equally as polemical and frequently political, especially when such evidence is cited to justify yet another change in government policy. Ironically, educational research is arguably of relatively low status (one has only to consider how little funding it has] when compared to “pure science”.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 2001
Abstract. This essay begins by discussing current cynicism regarding the usefulness of research-based strategies in the field of education. Because of the large body of conflicting "research-based" information, many educators are finding themselves confused and alienated by the phrase "research shows. " Using examples of highquality research that utilizes diverse methodologies, a framework is presented for thinking about various types of research and their implications.
Scope: Contemporary Research Topics (Learning and Teaching), 2021
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2007
Background This paper examines the hierarchy of evidence (HoE) framework and evidence-based practice (EBP) for clinical practice and nurse education. Student evaluations of a post-qualifying EBP module identified consistent tension in interpreting research papers which did not appear to "fit" into their experience of nursing practice. Community nurses identified a lack of evidence informing their practice. Design A mixed methods study facilitated a comparative analysis of HoE framework and a complimentary Familial model developed to improve student understanding. Data collection methods included a focus group of module members (n=5), a sample of n=314 respondents. Findings Identified the HoE framework fails to help nurses interpret high and low evidence, thereby reducing the potential to implement evidence into clinical practice, but it was not clear why. The 'Familial model' appeared to enable a better understanding and relevance of evidence to inform clinical action. This is a unifying principle for EBP, yet one not found within a HoE framework. Conclusion The art of nursing does not merely respond to published literature, but patient interaction and clinical implementation for community nursing requires a broader interpretation of EBP for nursing action.
2017
Table 1 Research characteristics (adapted from Dagenais et al. 2014) Research Characteristics Characteristics of communication Practitioners' characteristics School characteristics Accessible and timely Facilities Skills and competencies Enjoys external support Objective and true Access to research and data Prior participation in research Wants evidence for decision making Easy to Quality Attitudes towards Encourages and 9 Research Characteristics Characteristics of communication Practitioners' characteristics School characteristics understand and implement research supports initiative Connected to school/classroom context Collegial discussions Willingness to innovate Has prior experience with initiatives Relevant Collaboration with researchers Self-efficacy and commitment Staff capacity and support to use research Sustained collaboration via networks and partnerships Experience Encourages internal collaboration Media Prior coursework in research methods Prioritises appropriate professional development activities Content area taught Needs innovation Training on how to make use of research Is committed to organisational learning Involvement in research Allocates time and resources, including available technology Source: Dagenais et al. (2014, p. 297-299) 2.2 Research characteristics Dagenais et al's (2014) characteristics represent practitioners' perceptions of the relevance of the evidence to their practice and these drive practitioners' decisions about research use. These characteristics also relate directly to the supply side issues identified by Nelson and O'Beirne (2014). However, the extent to which people's perceptions affect action can be considerable. Dagenais et al. (2008) found that, among various factors, practitioners' opinions about research emerged as the strongest predictor of their use of research-based information. Other features identified as important include clarity, timeliness, relevance, usability, amenability of research to action/transfer, applicability and sophistication in terms of how well the research-based information aligns with classroom needs and local contexts (Dagenais et al. 2014, p 299-300). 10. Do you have any other comments on research related EBT in your school?
2013
This study aims at describing what research-based teaching is so that students understand and succeed in learning English as a starting point. The study provides specific information on a number of questions about how the English language learning should be done seeing students always tries to understand but difficult to do. All the teachers need an awareness of the indicators of research-based teaching and need to know how to conduct it. It then explores the insight of critical thinking and even more in a result as the response to research-based teaching. The findings of the study refer to a need for setting standard accommodation for learners to become a participant instead of a recipient. The findings also highlight the need for teacher training in order to have a working knowledge of what to look for in conducting research-based teaching in the English language classroom.
2017
The field of education is awash with research. What is important for teachers however is accessing the right research, in the right way, at the right time. This paper presents an innovative way forward for teachers who want to develop evidence-informed practice and for those who want to be engage further with research. We start with explaining the concept of translational research, which is a systematic approach to the practical application of research knowledge. We have followed this approach in the development of the MESHGuides project, which provides research summaries for teachers. The research evidence is presented in a visual format so that it is accessible and can inform teacher's professional judgements and practices. This approach is informed by initiatives adopted in the field of medicine. Furthermore, we are developing the MESHConnect initiative that aims to create and engage communities of teachers both in and with research. This initiative aims to develop teachers by engaging them in the broader community of researchers in education, so that they are able to develop a critical perspective on research to inform their own professional practices.
Educational Action Research, 2020
Although English language teachers are increasingly being encouraged to engage in forms of collaborative practitioner research (PR), such as action research and exploratory practice, to date there are still comparatively few studies recounting the benefits of collaboration in research from teachers' perspectives. Drawing on culturalhistorical activity theory, our study aims to address this gap. Set in a Turkish university context, where collaborative PR has been encouraged in recent years, it draws on semi-structured interviews with teacher-researchers, a reflective account of collaboration in research kept by the first author and an analysis of research outputs produced in the setting. It focuses on teachers' initial engagement in research within the university, and how they overcame challenges at this point and subsequently in sustaining engagement in teacher-research through collaboration. Finally, in the hope their stories will inspire others, it highlights the benefits research participants felt they had gained from engaging collaboratively in teacher-research.
2018
Most policies and strategies to improve teaching practice and student learning have often underpinned their arguments on research as the basis to authenticate their appropriateness and potential effectiveness. In essence, the idea of using research to inform teaching and learning is often considered as important and at the heart of any attempt to improve teaching practice and student learning and achievement. However, there is little evidence to demonstrate how teachers use research to inform their teaching (Ingen et al, 2016). The idea of using research to inform practice (evidence-informed practice) attracted extensive discourse in the 1990s particularly in the UK following a keynote address by David Hargreaves in a teacher training conferences in which he made an unfavourable comparison between the teaching profession and the medical profession (Hargreaves, 1996; Hammersley, 1997; McIntyre, 1997; Foster & Hammersley, 1998; Gillborn & Gipps, 1998). Hargreaves (1996, 1) contends “....
Educational Researcher, 2018
Recent efforts to improve the quality and availability of scientific research in education, coupled with increased expectations for the use of research in practice, demand new ways of thinking about connections between research and practice. The conceptual framework presented in this paper argues that increasing research in educational decision-making cannot be simplified to an issue of dissemination or of motivating practitioners to access evidence-based research but rather is a bidirectional problem in which characteristics of both the research and practice communities must be understood and addressed in order to strengthen ties between research and practice in education.
Library Trends, 2013
The relationship between research and practice in the work of members of the University of Sheffield's Information School (iSchool) was examined through a mixed-methods study carried out in two stages. Two focus groups with doctoral students and faculty members explored motivations for undertaking research, views about the impact of research, and the role of social media in its dissemination. Personal enjoyment and pursuit of knowledge for its own sake emerged as strong motivators but were also linked with expressing professional identity and contributing something useful to practice in the field. Differing stakeholder definitions of research impact were perceived as problematic, and multiple channels of communication were advocated, including judicious use of professional and social networks. A content analysis of journal articles written by iSchool faculty collected qualitative and quantitative data on the subject matter, methodology, references, and other dimensions of published output, including statements relating the research to practice. Published outputs highlighted diversity in the methods used, demonstrated collaboration with practitioners in conducting and communicating research, and identified five distinct ways of connecting research with practice. The study concludes with ten recommendations for strengthening the research-practice relationship in library and information studies.
This case study considers how educational researchers and practitioners can work together to engage in participatory knowledge building, a process rooted in both empirical research and the lived practices and expertise of on-the-ground educators that produces knowledge relevant to both educational theory and practice. The method shared was used as part of a broader approach called research-practice partnerships (RPPs), a model of collaboration between researchers and practitioners that departs from and counters traditional assumptions of “research translation” that suppose a unidirectional relationship where researchers simply share findings with educators, administrators, and youth. Instead, research-practice partnerships are characterized by joint work, mutuality, and a focus on persistent problems of practice across stakeholder groups. Within research-practice partnerships, we propose participatory knowledge building as one method that indexes these values. Rooting our case in the production of collaborative white papers addressing shared issues between researchers and practitioners, we first focus on practical techniques associated with participatory knowledge building, then discuss the outcomes of this approach for research- practice partnerships, and finally make recommendations for utilizing this approach. In discussing techniques to develop collective knowledge through participatory processes, we detail topic emergence and selection, leveraging community contexts as spaces for knowledge building, integrating basic research data, synthesizing and creating an initial draft of the paper, and engaging in community-based feedback and dissemination. We then detail the outcomes that such a process has for those engaged in research-practice partnerships, including development of shared language, fostering a collective knowledge-building orientation, surfacing practitioner expertise, implicit renegotiation of the focus of joint work, and catalyzing new educational experiments and shifts in practice. We close with lessons learned from our experience in this area and recommendations for others who are looking to engage in this practice. Broadly, the case highlights both the practicalities and affordances of using collaborative, participatory methods of knowledge production when the goal is first and foremost to improve educational practice.
The Language Educator, 2019
Invited framing article for special April/May 2019 issue of "The Language Educator": Connecting Research to Our Practice.
In this article we present an initiative in which two compulsory courses- Research Methodology and EFL Practice Teaching – were partially blended in a Teacher Education College. The methodology courses (i.e. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods) are courses in which students study topics as data collection and data analysis, while Practice Teaching is a pedagogic workshop which accompanies the students‟ teaching at school. The purpose of this collaboration is twofold: to create a relevant and positive research arena for the methodology courses on the one hand, and to promote critical and reflective teaching skills and thinking of student-teachers, on the other. In order to evaluate our collaboration an action research was conducted on 8 English student-teachers who took part in the Practice Teaching course. Findings are that the students repeatedly related to research concepts when referring to student learning. The interviewed students characterized various aspects of learning, mentioning a variety of tools used for collecting empirical information. Thus, the learning and understanding of statistics was enhanced when students conducted their own research using real data and addressing real problems. We therefore propose to use Practice Teaching course as an arena for application of other courses taught at the college (e.g. psychology, philosophy and language) so data collected about teaching and learning could serve as a basis to deal with various authentic issues.
Emerging Trends in Education Volumen 2, número 3, 2019
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.