Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
27 pages
1 file
My presentation at Aberdeen Proving Ground on the Environmental Protection Agency's General Conformity Rule.
Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 2012
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 2009
2000
Summary of Argument: Throughout this proceeding, EPA has identified no policy or normative criteria to justify its NAAQS standards, thus suggesting that science alone can be used to determine the appropriate air quality standard. Science plays a critical, indeed essential, role in evaluating the risks of possible air quality standards being considered for adoption by EPA. However, science by itself
Early in 2009, the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations came into force in the European Community. As the very first European Regulation on choice of law, it finally enables environmental lawyers to refer to a single primary source throughout the EC when dealing with conflict of laws issues (that is, cases having a foreign element, such as those involving transboundary pollution) rather than asserting the law applicable according to the private international laws of the numerous Member States. This article focuses on the rules relating to environmental damage and, in particular, on Article 7, which appears to be the 'black sheep' of Rome II. In contrast to Rome II as a whole, Article 7 has no real background in European tradition; it is expressly grounded in Community law, and, last but not least, it deliberately creates uncertainty. Despite its character as an inverse mirror of the system of Rome II, Article 7 is a welcome solution in the interests of the protection of the environment and it reinforces Community policies in the absence of further harmonisation in this field since, for the purpose of deterrence, the burden of uncertainty falls on the alleged polluter.
Brooklyn law review, 2014
Architectural Research Quarterly, 2012
British Standard 8213-1: 2004 provides design recommendations for windows, door-height windows and rooflights, based upon a detailed assessment of the risk of accident encountered in their use and cleaning. Conservation Area guidance in Edinburgh's New Town sees windows instead as part of the special character of the place. The contradictions between BS 8213-1 and Edinburgh City Council's Conservation Area Guidelines are considered here as a creative opportunity for design.
Transportation Research Record, 1995
Perspectives on Politics, 2007
Strategic Behavior and the Environment, 2011
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 1987
Social Studies of Science, 2006
Jewish and Israeli Law - An Introduction, 2017
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
Acoustics Today, 2012
A Research Agenda for Experimental Economics, 2021
Pace Environmental Law Review, 1993