Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, European journal of public health
AI
This study investigates the health of mothers across different family structures in Sweden, emphasizing the role of alternate living arrangements and parental cooperation. Utilizing data from the 2010 Swedish Level of Living Survey, it reveals that lone mothers with sole custody report significantly poorer self-rated health compared to other family types. Furthermore, challenges in parental cooperation are linked to worse health outcomes, indicating the importance of shared parental responsibilities.
International Journal of Health Services, 2016
Alternate living, i.e. children living 50-50 with their parents following separation is emerging as a new family form. This study is the first to differentiate separated mothers with sole/main custody from mothers with alternately living children, analysing health outcomes and using a sample representative of the population. The association between the self-rated health (SRH) of mothers and different family structures are examined. Parental cooperation is included in the analyses as a potential mediator. Data on 755 mothers from the 2010 Swedish Level of Living Survey were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Single mothers with sole/main custody reported poorer SRH than couple mothers in intact families while the difference was not significant for single mothers with children living alternately and mothers in stepfamilies. Controlling for potential confounders, probabilities for poor SRH for single mothers were reduced. The excess risk among mothers with sole/ main custody may be due to poorer socioeconomic conditions. Employment was significantly more common among mothers with alternate living and an important explanatory factor for their better health compared to single mothers with sole/main custody. Adjusting for parental cooperation lowered the increased probability for poor SRH among single mothers with sole/main custody compared to single mothers with alternate living.
International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
Poverty and problems of support among lone parents seem to be international phenomena. In recent decades much research has pointed to the disadvantageous situation of lone parents, with regard to both socioeconomic circumstances and health status. Swedish lone parents seem to be in a more economically favourable situation than their counterparts in many other countries. There are a range of studies reporting poor health among lone mothers, often in comparison with mothers living with a partner. Studies from Britain 5-9 and Norway 10,11 demonstrate poorer self-perceived health among the lone-mother group. A recent Swedish study 12 has shown that the socioeconomic conditions of lone mothers deteriorated over the period 1979-1995. Background Being a lone mother often implies disadvantage in terms of both socioeconomic circumstances and health. Our aim was to examine differences in mortality, severe morbidity and injury between lone mothers and mothers living with partners, on the assumption that the disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances contribute to poor health.
SSM - Population Health
Father involvement and joint physical custody in post-separation families are increasingly common. In Sweden, 35 percent of the children of separated parents live equally much with both parents. Since parenthood is gendered, the associations between child living arrangement and parental health may vary between women and men. This study analyzes the association between children's living arrangement and mental health of parents, and how this interacts with material and social circumstances. Drawing on The Swedish Survey of Living Conditions (ULF) 2008-2013, the association between child living arrangements and mental health (worry/anxiety) of parents in five family structures: two biological parents, reconstituted with joint or main/sole custody arrangements, single with joint physical custody, and single with main or sole custody, were analyzed. Data on 9,225 mothers and fathers with resident children aged 0-17 were analyzed by logistic regressions for average marginal effects adjusting for socio-demographic, socioeconomic and social factors. Analyses of interaction effects were made using the synergy index. Substantial family type differences were found in mental health between two biological parent family and all other family types for mothers, and two biological parent family and single parents for fathers. For the single mothers, the higher risk for worry and anxiety was still found following controls for socioeconomic factors. For fathers, the only differences that remained following control for socioeconomic factors was that of single fathers with children in joint physical custody. Interaction effects were found for the combination of single motherhood and non-employment, indicating a higher risk of mental health problems for single mothers (both with joint and sole custody), than would be expected from a simple addition of these exposures, suggesting that this is a vulnerable group. The results indicate that joint custody is associated with higher risk for worry and anxiety for the parents, especially for mothers both re-partnered and single, but also for single fathers.
Social Science & Medicine, 1998
AbstractÐA number of studies have shown that lone parents have poorer health status than the general population. However, what is missing from the existing literature is any systematic assessment of the contribution that lone parents' relatively poor socioeconomic circumstances make to their relative health disadvantage. This paper aims to ®ll this gap. It employs a large national dataset based on three consecutive years of the British General Household Survey (1992/1993 to 1994/1995) to assess the relative health status of lone parents in comparison to couple parents, and to evaluate the importance of dierent explanations for their health dierences. The results con®rm that lone parents, particularly lone mothers, have poor health status relative to parents living as couples. The observed health dierences mirror variations in socioeconomic circumstances. However, even when a wide range of demographic and socioeconomic circumstances are included in multivariate models, lone mothers still have signi®cantly poorer health than couple mothers for four out of ®ve health variables. The paper concludes by discussing alternative explanations for the health dierences between lone and couple parents Ð such as the absence of an intimate/con®ding relationship, the stress and stigma associated with becoming a lone parent and health selection Ð and by highlighting future options for policy and research in this area. #
Comparative Population Studies, 2013
Families produce health, but changes in familial structures are made responsible for many negative health trends in the population. How does the health of younger children today in Germany develop when comparing whether the parents live together or separately? Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), we are able to show that children in traditional marriages are not generally healthier than children in other families. For example, the risk of suffering health problems is even signifi cantly lower among younger children of single mothers than among children of married mothers. Nevertheless, children of married mothers have a higher birth weight and a body mass index (BMI) that deviates less from the norm than the children of divorced mothers. Longitudinally and under control of possible selection effects, there is evidence that the separation and divorce of parents has negative health effects. Especially the mental and intellectual state of the mother, rather than her material situation, can help to cushion the negative consequences of a separation on her children's health. Against the background of increasing numbers of single mothers, we will discuss the current and future signifi cance of these fi ndings.
A large and growing number of Canadian families with children are headed by lone mothers. Research undertaken in Canada, the United States and Britain have found evidence that children from lone-mother families exhibit more difficulties in the context of family life and school than children from two-parent families. For many, these difficulties continue into their adolescence and persist into early adulthood. This paper examines the relationship between lone-mother status, mother and family characteristics, and child difficulties, through an analysis of data from children 6 to 11. The results demonstrate that lone-mother families are poorer, and their children have more difficulties in the behavioral, emotional, social and academic domains. While the analysis shows that lonemother status on its own acts as a significant predictor of all child difficulties, the size of effect is weak. Importantly, the strength of association between lone-mother status and child outcome generally decreases when sociodemographic and personal variables are added to the model predicting child outcome. The evidence suggests that children from lone-mother families probably develop difficulties for the same reason that children from two-parent families develop difficulties, with two important exceptions. First, the presence of hostile parenting in a lone-mother family significantly increases the risk of child morbidity in a way that is not seen for two-parent families. Second, since lone-mother status remains a significant independent predictor of child outcome in the presence of other stronger predictor variables, further work needs to be done to explain the mechanisms through which lone-mother status influences child well-being. These results suggest that policies aimed at healthy child development should be aimed at all families, and not specifically lone-mother families. Given equal access to programs, services aimed at alleviating the factors strongly associated with the child difficulties and/or problems should be aimed at the whole population and should be helpful to both lone-mother and twoparent families. The exception is in the area of parenting, where specific programs aimed at lonemothers may be warranted. Low income, parenting problems, low maternal education and maternal depression are consistently and significantly associated with child difficulties and represent important areas for policy intervention Children and Lone-Mother Families:
Lone mothers are more likely to be unemployed and in poverty, which are both factors associated with a risk of poor health. In Switzerland, weak work-family reconciliation policies and taxation that favours married couples adopting the traditional male breadwinner model translate into low labour market participation rate for mothers. In the case of lone mothers, employment can be associated with better health because it eases the potential economic hardship associated with being the sole earner. However, working can represent an additional stress factor due to lone mothers’ responsibility as the main caregiver. We investigate how family arrangements and employment status are associated with self-reported health in Switzerland. Our analyses on the Swiss Household Panel (waves 1999-2011) suggest that lone mothers who are out of the labour market have a higher probability of reporting poor health, especially those with an upper secondary level of education. Lone mothers reported being in better health when working full-time versus part-time, whereas the opposite applied to mothers living with a partner.
In the UK up to one half of all children will spend at least some time growing up with just one parent resident in the home, either at birth or later as result of separation or divorce. Yet, in spite of its frequency, and a rapid increase in its prevalence, there is little empirical evidence on how the nature of lone-parenthood has changed over recent decades. Nor is there evidence on how the growth in lone-parenthood, to the extent that it is now a social norm, has been associated with a shift in the consequences for children of growing up in a lone-parent family. This study aims to fill these substantial gaps in the literature using data from four major UK birth cohort studies. These follow large samples of children born in the years 1958, 1970, 1990 and 2000 and contain very detailed information on children and their families as well as, for the earlier cohorts, information on outcomes as adults. This data therefore allows the experience of children who have ever lived in a lone-parent family to be tracked over a long period of time. We find evidence of changes in the timing and duration of lone parenthood, with both more children entering lone parent families from birth as well as in later childhood, and an increasing delay to re-partnering. Across cohorts we find the negative effect of growing up in a lone parent family to have declined but we also find evidence of greater diversity of outcomes.
This paper contributes to the understanding of vulnerability of lone mothers in Switzerland. Vulnerability is a dynamic process along which individuals may experience falls and losses of resources, but through which they might also rise and gain empowerment as a consequence of coping and adaptation mechanisms. Vulnerability that originates within one specific life domain (e.g. family, employment, health) can then spill over to other life domains. Lone mothers and their children are often identified as vulnerable populations because of their overrepresentation among the poor and the less healthy compared to the general population. Yet, lone mothers are increasingly heterogeneous in terms of social background and resources, so that durations into and experiences of lone motherhood vary substantially. Such heterogeneity poses new challenges for defining the relative disadvantage of lone mothers and their families which we argue should have to be appraised through a multidimensional perspective. Drawing on a number of quantitative and qualitative data sources we first discuss the transition to lone parenthood and in which ways it is relevant to the analysis of multidimensional vulnerability for lone mothers in the Swiss context. Second, we refer to original empirical results on lone mothers’ labour market participation over the last two decades by focussing on differences by age and educational level. Finally, we discuss various findings on the relationship between lone parenthood, employment, and health from our research project on lone mothers to highlight the conjunctures of disadvantages across life-course domains leading to vulnerability. Switzerland is an interesting case study, because of a welfare shaped around a two-parent and one main earner family model and a gendered unequal distribution of caring and financial responsibility within the family. Weak work-family reconciliation policies discourage mothers’ full-time participation to the labour market. In such context particularly, the transition to lone motherhood might represents excessive strains for parents who have little choice but to take on alone both full care and financial responsibilities.
Journal of Poverty, 2020
Maternal marital status may contribute to health disparities among children; marriage often associates with better outcomes. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we tested separate structural equation models to compare direct and indirect relationships between maternal economic hardship, parenting stress, and adolescent self-rated health among 3,146 married and unmarried mothers. Although parenting stress did not associate with adolescent health for either group, economic hardship directly associated with poorer adolescent self-reported health for only unmarried mothers, and unmarried mothers had a stronger negative relationship between economic hardships and parenting calling for policies to address these disparities.
The Lancet, 2000
Journal of Divorce & Remarriage
Joint physical custody (JPC) refers to children living alternatively and about equally with both parents after a parental separation or divorce. The practice has been debated in relation to child well-being because of the frequent moves imposed on children and the potential stress from living in 2 homes. This study describes the background to the high frequency of Swedish children in JPC and the results from research on Swedish children's well-being in this living arrangement. Children in JPC report better well-being and mental health than children who live mostly or only with 1 parent. No Swedish studies have found children's health to be worse in JPC than in sole parental care from child age of 3 years and beyond. The existing literature cannot, however, inform us about the mechanisms behind the findings. The risks of selection effects into living arrangements are plausible. For this purpose, longitudinal studies are warranted.
Sociol Health Illn, 2014
Europe, and how these may differ by welfare regime. Data from the European Social Survey are used to compare self-rated general health, limiting longstanding illness and depressive feelings by means of a multi-level logistic regression. The 27 countries included in the analyses are classified into six welfare regimes (Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, Southern, Nordic, Central-Eastern new-EU and Central-Eastern non-EU). Lone motherhood is defined as mothers not cohabiting with a partner, regardless of the legal marital status. Results indicate that lone mothers are more at risk of poor health than cohabiting mothers. This is most pronounced in the Anglo-Saxon regime for self-rated general health and limiting longstanding illness, while for depressive feelings it is most pronounced in the Bismarckian welfare regime. While the risk difference is smallest in the Central-Eastern regime, both lone and cohabiting mothers also reported the highest levels of poor health compared to the other regimes. Results also show that a vulnerable socioeconomic position is associated with ill-health in lone mothers, and that welfare regimes differ in the degree that they moderate this association.
Canadian Family Physician, 1985
The increase of single-parent families causes an increase in psychosocial problems and illness associated with stress. Divorce, separation, and lone parenting have now surpassed death as a cause of single-parent families. They are major life events, and the family physician who ...
Journal of Marriage and Family, 2011
This study uses Fragile Families data (N = 2,160) to assess health differences at age 5 for children born to cohabiting versus married parents. Regression analyses indicate worse health for children born to cohabiting parents, including those whose parents stably cohabited, dissolved their cohabitation, and married, than for children with stably married parents. The findings also suggest that stable cohabitation is no better for child health than cohabitation dissolution. Child health is better among those whose cohabiting parents marry than for those whose parents remain stably cohabiting, which indicates a possible health advantage of parental marriage, even if it occurs after the child's birth.
The Lancet, 2003
Conclusions Growing up in a single-parent family has disadvantages to the health of the child. Lack of household resources plays a major part in increased risks. However, even when a wide range of demographic and socioeconomic circumstances are included in multivariate models, children of single parents still have increased risks of mortality, severe morbidity, and injury. Lancet 2003; 361: 289-95
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, 2021
The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, 2009
This study examines the causal link between parental non-marital relationship dissolution and the health status of young children. Using a representative sample of children all born out of wedlock drawn from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we investigate whether separation between unmarried biological parents has a causal effect on a child's likelihood of developing asthma.
This paper aims to explore some relevant aspects of the intra family dynamics, to reveal the meanings and analyse the evolution of maternal single-parent families that are socially vulnerable, as it is described in the scholarly literature, and to present the specific characteristics of this family type. It also includes some results of a qualitative study carried out among single parent families in social risk situation, from Brasov County. One of the main ideas of the study is that the lack of future prospects and the restricted possibilities to escape from difficult situation, in which they are, induce to single-parents the feeling of fatality, perpetuating undesirable coping styles.
The triple bind of single-parent families, 2018
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.