Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, Al Balagh Academy Papers
This essay rigorously examines the theological concept of tawaqquf, or non-commitment, within the framework of Islamic theology, with a specific focus on its implications for Adamic exceptionalism. By scrutinising the indiscriminate utilisation of tawaqquf, it elucidates its inappropriate application when addressing pivotal theological inquiries. Through detailed analysis of Qur'anic verses, scholarly consensus, and the doctrinal tenets upheld by Ahl al-Sunnah w'al-Jamāʿah, the essay interrogates the legitimacy of maintaining a non-committal stance concerning critical issues such as the lineage of Prophet Ādam's descendants. By meticulously dissecting the multifaceted dimensions of tawaqquf and delving into the intricate nuances of theological interpretation, it aims to disentangle the conflicting implications of Adamic exceptionalism within Islamic theological discourse, as ratified by orthodoxy and consensus. Moreover, the essay underscores the imperative of deeply engaging with classical scholarly texts to establish consensus positions, which may not be explicitly stated but hold authoritative sway within the theological framework of Ahl al-Sunnah w'al-Jamāʿah, while cautioning against the potential pitfalls of deviating into theological innovation when entertaining alternative perspectives grounded in rare or rejected opinions.
Yaqeen Institute, 2018
and holds a PhD in Arabic and Islamic Studies from the University of the Western Cape. Formerly, he was a lecturer in Islamic theology and legal theory at the Dar al-Uloom in Cape Town, South Africa. His research interests concern how traditional approaches to Islamic theology and law relate to contemporary Muslim society. He has published Women and Leadership in Islamic Law: A Critical Survey of Classical Legal Texts (Routledge), Islam and Biological Evolution: Exploring Classical Sources and Methodologies (UWC) and Expressing I`rāb: The Presentation of Arabic Grammatical Analysis (UWC). Disclaimer: The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in these papers and articles are strictly those of the authors. Furthermore, Yaqeen does not endorse any of the personal views of the authors on any platform. Our team is diverse on all fronts, allowing for constant, enriching dialogue that helps us produce high-quality research.
2016
The mediaeval North African scholar A+mad Zarr]q (d. 899¦1493) expertly melded Sufism with theology and jurisprudence. His familiarity with the three systems of thought led him to devise Sufi adages on the model of legal and theological maxims. A conviction that right belief and correct practice were the basic conditions for becoming a Sufi further impelled Zarr]q to formulate a number of legal and theological rules applicable within the sphere of Sufism. As an Ash<ar\ theologian, Zarr]q stated certain theological precepts that he then interpreted in the Sufi context. My paper aims to evaluate the theological dimensions of Qaw[<id al-Ta~awwuf, with special attention to its author’s integrative discourse on theology and Sufism.
2015
This research aims to challenge a popular contemporary Traditionalist trend of intra-Muslim theological disengagement and isolation, which is justified by a conception of a puritan Traditionalist theology entirely hypothetically based on scripture and a utopian monolithic understanding of the first three generations of Islam (the Salaf). One of the many inevitable consequences of such a popular trend is one of intolerance and hence sectarianism. Intra-Muslim theological disengagement amongst modern Traditionalists and the problems therein will be challenged by proving that the theology of the Traditionalist scholar, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d. 751/1350), whose work is a main reference for contemporary Traditionalists, is much indebted to his critical engagement and intra-Muslim dialogue with fellow non-Traditionalist theologians and philosophers. This will be evident in my analysis of Ibn al-Qayyim’s discussions on topics related to divine determination, which is a fundamental doctri...
2021
Among other intricate socio-political and economic factors, the inability to develop a comprehensive and effectively responsive theology is of particular importance in tackling the prevailing trauma and shortcomings among contemporary Muslim communities. This paper suggests that there is today a pressing need to develop an updated Islamic theology that requires a much more nuanced assessment of the Islamic legacy beyond the ‘progressive/liberal vs. conservative/moderate’ dichotomy. It calls for a new Islamic theology where the basic tenets of Islamic faith are explained in a critical dialogue both with tradition and with contemporary thought, society, culture. In the first part, the paper identifies four major challenges in developing such an updated theology: i.) the scientific and skeptic challenge, i.e. need for fresh reflections on the nature of the divine reality, causality, revelation, and faith; ii.) the pluralist challenge, i.e. rethinking religious difference, diversity and human freedom; iii.) the secular challenge, i.e. reconsidering the interaction among power, society, and faith and iv.) the challenge of practicing faith in a globalized, capitalist, and digitalized world. These challenges urge to develop respectively an updated philosophical, political, and pastoral Islamic theology. The paper provides a general framework that can facilitate the process of updating. The second part focuses on three primary conditions needed in the updating process. First, it is needed to question the modern apologia resulted from the reactionary and reductionist tendencies of what I call ‘modern Muslim trauma’. Secondly, there is a need to foster a critical, constructive, and confident dialogue with other religious and secular rationalities, particularly in the West. The paper claims that such an engagement had been exemplified in the past where Muslims had adopted or interacted with other thoughts in establishing Islamic orthodoxy. Thirdly, it is required to address the later prevalence of nomocentric approach in Islamic theology. The paper asserts that this was largely due to the disconnection of theology (i.e. kalam and falsafa) from jurisprudence (fiqh).
Journal of Qur'anic Studies 17:2, 2015
The thesis of a single pillar or axis around which the longer Medinan suras are structured has been highly influential in the field of sura unity, and scholarship on the structure and coherence of Surat al-Baqara has tended to work towards charting the progress of a dominant theme throughout the textual blocks that make up the sura. In order to achieve this, scholars have divided the sura into discrete blocks; many have posited a chain of lexical and thematic links from one block to the next; some have concentrated solely on the hinges and borders between these suggested textual blocks. The present article argues that such methods, while often in themselves illuminating, are by their very nature reductive. As such they can result in the oversight of important elements of the sura. From a starting point of the Adam pericope provided in Q. 2:30–9, this study will focus on the recurrence of a number of its lexical items throughout Sūrat al-Baqara. By methodically tracing the passage of repeated, loosely Fall-related, vocabulary, it will attempt to widen the contextual lens through which the sura’s textual blocks are viewed, and establish a broader perspective on its coherence. Via a discussion of the themes of ‘gardens’, ‘parable’, ‘prostration’, ‘covenant’, ‘wrongdoing’ and finally ‘blindness’, this article will posit ‘garments’, not as a structural pillar, but as a pivot around which many of the identified repeated lexical items of the sura rotate.
Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 2018
Abstract: This article investigates the centrality of language in the Qur’ānic story of Adam as a human being or insān. Based on the Qur’ān’s view of human creation, Adam emerges as a creature who is uniquely capable of naming things. Analyzing the semantic difference between the two key concepts of insān and bashar, I argue that the human being as khalīfa is the “successor” to non-speaking creatures rather than a successor to God, as is commonly understood. The appearance of the concept of insān in the Qur’ānic model of creation refers primarily to the creation of a speaking animal. Hence, the Qur’ānic use of the term khalīfa should also be seen as signifying an evolutionary stage in humanity’s social life on earth rather than providing the basis for a political institution. Understanding the concept of khalīfa in the light of the human acquisition of language instead of mastery over God’s earthly creation leads to a fundamentally different picture of political sovereignty in Islam from that held by proponents of political Islam.
Islamochristiana, 2014
2018
Qurʾanic Hermeneutics argues for the importance of understanding the polysemous nature of the words in the Qurʾan and outlines a new method of Qurʾanic exegesis called intertextual polysemy. By interweaving science, history, and religious studies, Abdulla Galadari introduces a linguistic approach which draws on neuropsychology. This book features examples of intertextual polysemy within the Qurʾan, as well as between the Qurʾan and the Bible. It provides examples that intimately engage with Christological concepts of the Gospels, in addition to examples of allegorical interpretation through inner-Qurʾanic allusions. Galadari reveals how new creative insights are possible, and argues that the Qurʾan did not come to denounce the Gospel – which is one of the stumbling blocks between Islam and Christianity – but only to interpret it in its own words. There is a debate among academic and religious scholars alike on the reliability of classical Qurʾanic exegesis for interpretation. This book proposes a new and innovative method of Qurʾanic exegesis called intertextual polysemy, using provocative examples. It breaks away the shackles of classical exegesis and tries to demystify the concept of Muhammad’s revelation and allegories by adopting concepts of neuropsychology. It introduces Psychological Qurʾanic Criticism as a field, similar to that found in Biblical Studies. The book proposes a method that argues the importance of understanding the polysemous nature of the words in the Qurʾan and uses intertextuality between the Qurʾan and itself, as well as between the Qurʾan and the Bible to identify how words and their various morphologies are used. It also gives insightful but controversial examples using this methodology. To argue in favour of such a method, the book touches very crucial and sometimes controversial subjects. An example of such, contrary to recent scholarly debates, the book argues that “taḥrīf,” according to the Qurʾan, perhaps means turning away (inḥirāf) from Scriptures, and not necessarily changing either the words or their meanings. This is a diverging thought from existing literature that did not look at this as a possible definition of the term. The book also presents few working examples of intertextual polysemy for Qurʾanic hermeneutics. It gives examples for intertextualizing the Qurʾan with itself, as well as between the Qurʾan and the Bible. Many of the stumbling blocks between Christianity and Islam when it comes to Christology and the theology are completely reinterpreted showing that in fact the Qurʾan did not come to denounce the Gospel, but only interpret it in its own words. With those examples, it shows how new creative insights on understanding possible deeper meanings to the Qurʾan along with its Biblical subtext. As examples adopted in the book, it shows how the term Ibn Allah in the Qurʾan is defining the Temple of God, not actually the Son. It also mentions how the concept that God neither begets nor is begotten in the Qurʾan is an attempt to interpret the Logos in the Gospel of John and not denying it, as it is currently assumed by both academic and religious scholars. This book is very different than existing literature in Qurʾanic studies in that it proposes and argues in favour of a new method of Qurʾanic hermeneutics using a linguistic approach that is not found in any other books in the field, stemming from a possible neuropsychological basis.
Welt des Islams, 2010
is paper analyses the genre of contemporary tafsīr, focussing on the attitude of modern Sunnite exegetes towards Jews and Christians, on the role of different strands of tradition and of ideological bias for their interpretion of the Qurʾān, and on the similarities and differences between Qurʾānic commentaries from different regions of the Muslim word. It is based on the study of seventeen Qurʾānic commentaries from the Arab World, Indonesia and Turkey that have been published since 1967. e analysis of the authors' background reveals that in recent times, Qurʾānic commentaries tend to be written by professional male ʿulamāʾ from a provincial background, usually holding a faculty position in Islamic theology. As most exegetes' aim is to stress the timeless relevance of the Qurʾān, few of the commentaries make direct reference to contemporary events. Still, many of them are, in a very modern way, more concerned with providing religious guidance than with explaining the Qurʾān's meaning. However, the "traditional" explanatory approach is still alive, predominantly in commentators who are affiliated with Egypt's Azhar University. Besides the tradition of premodern Sunnite tafsīr, which all commentaries build on to a certain extent, Salafī exegesis is clearly influential in the way in which several commentaries strive at disassociating themselves from Christians and Jews and at building up a dichotomy between "us" and "them" in their exegesis of Q 5:51, which contains an interdiction against taking Christians and Jews as awliyāʾ (a term that is variably understood as meaning friends, allies, intimates, confidants, helpers, or leaders). It is striking that Arab 1) I am grateful to Elif Dilmaç and Peter Pink for their invaluable help with any questions I had about my translations of Turkish and Indonesian texts and to Regula Forster and Axel Havemann for their useful comments on the draft of this paper. Welt des Islams 50 (2010) 3-59 commentators, for the most part, show a much more hostile attitude towards Christians and Jews than their Indonesian and Turkish counterparts.
Theology and Science, 2023
In this article, I respond to my interlocutors, who have raised various points while engaging my book, Islam and Evolution: Al-Ghazālī and the Modern Evolutionary Paradigm. In addressing their arguments and points of engagement, I have ordered this article into four parts: (1) methodological issues, (2) scientific issues, (3) metaphysical issues, and (4) hermeneutic issues.
The following article explores how the hermeneutic prioritization of the Qur'an or " modern scripturalism " has prompted within western academe a theological turn in the scholarly study of the Qur'an. The Muslim feminist exegetical discourse serves as the case study. First, I argue that this discourse is resonant with other modern scripturalist movements across the world, like the Ahl-i-Qur'an in South Asia. However, because the feminist exegetical discourse is located in the Euro-American academy, it is also part of and contributing to the generation of a new academic discourse in which Muslim academics are engaging increasingly in a variety of constructive theological projects. Then, with this development in mind, the article concludes with a prescriptive theological exploration of how the Qur'an might be creatively re-conceptualized for modern Muslim theologies taking shape within western academe.
“The Biblical Adam in Islamic traditions”, in Adam and Eve Story in Jewish, Christian and Islamic Perspectives, eds. A. Laato e L. Valve, “Studies in the Reception History of the Bible” n. 8, Turku – Winona Lake, IN, Åbo Akademi University & Eisenbrauns, 2017, 259-285.
Stephen Cúrto, 2020
Of all the various ideological controversies in the history of Islamic thought, one of the most highly contentious areas are those surrounding the ontological nature of the Divine attributes (Sifāt Allah). Such questions surrounding God"s attributes, and what delineation, if any, is to be made between the nature of God in his Divine attributes and in his Being (Dhāt Allah) preoccupied some of the greatest classical participants in the "ilm al-kalām systematic theological disputation tradition. This study engages Qurānic paradigms of theomorphic anthropology and re-interrogations by Sufi thinkers. There is a rich debate within Islamic Scholarship on the nature of the Divine attributes, and their interrelationship, if any, with Banī Adam. Many of the mystical Sufi scholars, such as Ibn "Arabī, Mūlla Sadra, Nāsir Khusraw, and Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī all articulated onto-theological concepts in their writing that became known as Wah} dat al-Wujud, Tajallī Allah, Tajallī al-Nafs" Nafs-e "Aql, and Nafs-e Kūl. This paper argues that the idea of Divine immanence articulated in concepts like "Tajallī al-Nafs" is not a later retrojection onto Qur"ānic material. Rather it is the Qurānic material that exegeted with a meaningful and consistent hermeneutic resulted in their theosophical understandings.
Islamochristiana, 2014
A REOPENING OF THE MUSLIM MIND: THE RECONSTRUCTION OF ISLAMIC THEOLOGY IN A QUR’ANIC PERSPECTIVE , 2025
Though written in response to Robert R. Reilly's "The Closing of the Muslim Mind: How Intellectual Suicide created the Modern Islamist Crisis?" (2010) it is full-fledged research on Islamic theology and its reconstruction in a Qur'anic perspective. It is a strong reply to Robert R. Reilly's book "Closing of the Muslim Mind ..." and an original attempt to reconstruct Islamic theology anew. This is the updated version of a book completed as an AI edited version in the first quarter of 2024. It is available at Amazon Kindle and Notion Press Paperback and Hardcover formats. The study in this book does not consist of historical academic research on any specific theological problem. It is a philosophical study confined to identifying un-Qur’anic ontology (metaphysics) that lies in the foundation of various Islamic theology(ies). It is an analytical study of important alien philosophical terms couched in un-Qur’anic metaphysics, directly or indirectly accepted by Muslim theologians in the Qur’anic discourse, from Greeks. It is a critical study of the equally un-Qur’anic cosmology, based on this un-Qur’anic ontology and alien terms. In short, this study is a philosophical investigation of the principles, approaches and factors responsible for causing confusion, inconsistency and misperception in traditional Muslim Ash’arite theology, Muslim philosophy and commentary of the Qur’an; and for causing disorientation to Muslim civilisation giving rise to sectarianism, religious dissension and intellectual decline. This study suggests a reconstruction of Islamic theology through radical reform in prevalent key conceptualisation frameworks (i.e., in its ontology, cosmology, hermeneutics, and the relation of Ḥadīth with the Aḥsan al-Ḥadīth) based upon Qur’anic epistemology and the principle of innovation. It critiques the earlier frameworks suggested by traditional Muslim theologians. It suggests a new framework of Qur’anic epistemology, ontology hermeneutics, and Ḥadīth as a precedent of divine law that opens up avenues of innovation and ijtihad for future researchers. The writer has presented a comparison of his work with the following 13 contemporary books in the last chapter: 1. The Closing of the Muslim Mind: How Intellectual Suicide Created the Modern Islamist Crisis. Forward by Roger Scruton. ISI Books, 2010. 2. Dr Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy, Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality, (ZED Books, 1991) 3. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, 2008 4. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, 2016 5. The Oxford Handbook of ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY, 2017, OUP, USA. 6. Routledge Handbook of Islamic Law, Routledge, 2019 7. The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, Oxford University Press UK in 2020 8. Leah Kinberg, "Muḥkamāt and Mutashābihāt (The Qur’an 3/7): Implication of a Qur’anic Pair of Terms in Mediaeval Exegesis", in Arabica, T. 35, Fasc. 2 (Jul. 1988), 143-172, Published by: BRILL 9. Epistemology of the Qur'an by Dr Ashraf Adeel, 2019, Springer 10. Dr Shezad Saleem, History of the Qur’an: A Critical Study, (Lahore: Al-Mawrid, 2nd edition, 2019). 11. God, Nature, and the Cause: essays in Islam and Science, by Basil Altaie, 2016, KR&M 12. The Qur’an, Morality and Critical Reason: The Essential Muhammad Shahrur, tr & ed, and Introduction by Andreas Christmann (Brill: Leiden. Boston, 2009) 13. Shabbir Akhtar, The Quran and the Secular Mind: A Philosophy of Islam, Routledge, 2008.
Islamic Perspectives on God and (Other) Monotheism(s), 2025
A logically rigorous and textually rooted exposition of Ismāʿīlī apophatic theology based on the philosophical thought of the most prominent Ismāʿīlī Muslim Neoplatonic philosopher-dāʿīs—Abū Yaʿqūb al-Sijistānī (d. ca. 361/971), Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī (d. ca. 412/1021), al-Muʾayyad al-Shīrāzī (d. 470/1077), Nāṣir-i Khusraw (d. 462/1070), ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Shahrastānī (d. 548/1153), and Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī (d. 672/1274). My primary purpose is to demonstrate the logical coherence and metaphysical merits of Ismāʿīlī apophasis both as a viable Islamic expression of tawḥīd and as an intellectually compelling formulation of classical theism (also called divine simplicity) in the contemporary philosophy of religion. The first section of this study will demonstrate that Ismāʿīlīs employed natural theology to prove the existence of God and that their belief in God was rooted in rational argument. The second section focuses on how Ismāʿīlīs articulate the transcendence of God above the physical and spiritual realms through a dual negation that is consistent with the rules of logic. The third section focuses on how Ismāʿīlīs articulate divine simplicity or the absolute oneness of God by negating all attributes from Him through another type of dual negation, which is based on the Neoplatonic semantics of scalar predication. The fourth section deals with the controversial Ismāʿīlī idea that God is beyond existence and non-existence. The fifth and final section shows how Ismāʿīlī apophatic theology still accommodates positive predications about God when they are understood as metonymic descriptions as opposed to literal ones.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.