Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2015, Forest Ecosystems
This article considers threats to a project slipping on budget, schedule and fit-for-purpose. Threat is used here as the collective for risks (quantifiable bad things that can happen) and uncertainties (poorly or not quantifiable bad possible events). Based on experience with projects in developing countries this review considers that (a) project slippage is due to uncertainties rather than risks, (b) while eventuation of some bad things is beyond control, managed execution and oversight are still the primary means to keeping within budget, on time and fit-for-purpose, (c) improving project delivery is less about bigger and more complex and more about coordinated focus, effectiveness and developing thought-out heuristics, and (d) projects take longer and cost more partly because threat identification is inaccurate, the scope of identified threats is too narrow, and the threat assessment product is not integrated into overall project decision-making and execution. Almost by definition, what is poorly known is likely to cause problems. Yet it is not just the unquantifiability and intangibility of uncertainties causing project slippage, but that they are insufficiently taken into account in project planning and execution that cause budget and time overruns. Improving project performance requires purpose-driven and managed deployment of scarce seasoned professionals. This can be aided with independent oversight by deeply experienced panelists who contribute technical insights and can potentially show that diligence is seen to be done.
International journal of project management, 2001
This paper makes a case for a shift to strategy-based project management, a component of which is real time management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities using a life cycle project management approach. Risk analysis and management should not be viewed as a separate planning and response operation. Risk and opportunity management is a way of thinking and a philosophy that should permeate the entire spectrum of project activities. Shifting to business objectives and focusing on the whole of life risks/ rewards are of paramount importance. Evaluation of risks must be based not only on delivering projects on time and within budget but also on crafting, developing and operating a long term business entity which can deliver the business objectives of the parties concerned while meeting or exceeding community expectations. #
This work is the result of my research as a member of the Engineering Design and Methodology group at the Technische Universität Berlin. Here I would like to thank my colleagues for an always pleasant time and an inspiring working environment. My special thanks go to Dr. Bruno Gries, Patrick Müller, and Andreas Bischof; they supported my reflections by giving me always honest feedback. Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt-Kretschmer contributed to this work by giving me insights into aspects of design practice you will never find in any textbook and who always reminded me to stick to my own schedule.
E3S Web of Conferences
The project delivery process is vulnerable to the contractual relations, roles and responsibilities of clients, contractors and consultants. Scholars view that construction projects are vulnerable to risks and uncertainty when project management fails to integrate stakeholders’ interests and resolve the tension between the stakeholders’ power expectations. This study examines the nature of project risks and uncertainty and the effectiveness of an innovative project management tool (the SAP_PPM system) in mitigating risks and uncertainty in the project delivery process. This study adopts a qualitative research approach that interviews project managers in South Africa to obtain the data to address the study problem. The study found that the failure of projects occurred when project risk and uncertainty resulted in litigation, stakeholders dissatisfaction and project delay. An emergent theory was identified, substantively explaining that using the SAP-PPM system in the project delivery...
This paper argues that all current project risk management processes induce a restricted focus on the management of project uncertainty. In part this is because the term 'risk' encourages a threat perspective. In part this is because the term 'risk' has become associated with 'events' rather than more general sources of significant uncertainty. The paper discusses the reasons for this view, and argues that a focus on 'uncertainty' rather than risk could enhance project risk management, providing an important difference in perspective, including, but not limited to, an enhanced focus on opportunity management. The paper outlines how project risk management processes might be modified to facilitate an uncertainty management perspective.
Risk is defined as an event that has a probability of occurring, and could have either a positive or negative impact to a project should that risk occur.(Van Scoy, 1992) Risk management is a broad factor affecting quite a number of business sectors however it’s also a factor which must be addressed by every human being on earth regarding their way of living otherwise if ignored human life is left in harm’s way and susceptible to death, diseases and poverty. However to a project, risk management is an ongoing process that continues through the life of a project. It includes processes for risk management planning, identification, analysis, monitoring and control. Many of these processes are updated throughout the project lifecycle as new risks can be identified at any time. It’s the objective of risk management to decrease the probability and impact of events adverse to the project. On the other hand, any event that could have a positive impact should be exploited. (Laurie Williams 2004). The purpose of this Essay is to address the challenge of dealing with risks and opportunities professionally which is becoming one of the key success factors in business today. Most companies have realized the requirements turbulent markets present and have started to adapt to this turbulence. But risks and opportunities are greater in turbulent markets, so they call for active strategic risk management.
International journal of risk and contingency management, 2013
Risk is an inseparable event or occurrence to any project and it is a consequence of uncertainties and unknowns associated with the project and its execution. Past research studies generally focused on types of risks and risk management processes. This research effort, using a survey questionnaire, is an attempt to understand types of specific risk mitigation approaches that are commonly employed and their dependency with the type of an organization. This research effort also addressed relation between risk mitigation strategy of an organization and individual project manager's propensity to risk. Research results show that project risk management plan and it development is likely to be influenced by cost and time aspects of a project but not on the project scope. Further, results revealed that many organizations depend on contingency budget rather than a formalized risk management plan.
2018
This paper illustrates various activities, where identification of risk is a primary task before its actual occurrence whereas proper plan can be done and executed to handle the risk during project period and complete the project successfully. The study has been done to find out the common risk, during project. The study was based on data, having experiences of 5 to 20 years from various fields contributing in different project phases. During survey it was found that 72% of respondents think that the budget and resource provided for project are probably sufficient, with margin. It may not be 100% realistic but can be managed with some addition efforts. Budget is complete financial estimation of the cost required for each and every task to achieve the goal or success of the project over project life cycle. 60% of respondents believe that timeline provided by the institute for the project is not enough to compete the scheduling and planning of the project. According to 80% respondents...
2004
The paper presents a model for Project Risk Analysis and Management (PRAM) which embarks upon the problems of existing approaches and aims at rectifying these issues. The problems with the existing models are: either they are too complex to be used by all and every project manager or the approach is too simplistic to take into account the total picture and provide a quantified value of benefits of implementing PRAM. This causes PRAM to be viewed as an additional cost for a project while the benefits from PRAM could easily out pay the costs. The base of the model is Project Risk Network (PRN) which is derived and developed from Project Activity Network (PAN). The model emphasises on assessment of the impact of each risk and suggests a procedure which is a compromise between a relatively complex approach such as system dynamics or simulation and a very simplistic method like ranking of risks which treats each risk discretely and ignores the interaction between the risk factors. The model while simple takes into account risk transferability and accounts for total impact of risks on the project. The result of the analysis is a risk profile for each risk and a Total Project Risk Profile (TPRP) for the whole project. The results of the analysis not only could be used to assess the benefits of using PRAM but also could help in developing risk management decisions and strategies and answering a number of what if questions.
The aim of this paper is to discuss the phenomenon of uncertainty in projects and attempt to integrate it as part of project management. Despite the fact that project management discipline has gained a lot of attention in the past decade from both academia and practitioners, there is still considerable potential for development in this field. Recent trends in project management stress the need to re-address the issue of uncertainty. Though one can come across the notion of uncertainty in traditional project risk management literature rather often, there is no common understanding between the scholars as to what this term means. Based on the review of the existing research, I present my own definition of uncertainty as a crucial element in managing projects. The management of uncertainty is seen as a necessary condition for effective project management. Sources of uncertainty are wide ranging and have a fundamental effect on projects and project management. These sources are not confined to potential events, and include lack of information, ambiguity, characteristics of project parties, trade offs between trust and control mechanisms, and varying agendas in different stages of the project life cycle. There is a high level of uncertainty with both positive and negative effects in any project. The traditional approach to project management still puts a lot of emphasis on assuring conformance to time, budget and scope constraints. Considerations, such as continuous improvement, customer-centric thinking, reflective learning are often left behind. This leads to the fact that project companies become less flexible, unable to accumulate knowledge and experience necessary for coping with uncertainty. Moreover, in project risk management literature, there is no common understanding as to what uncertainty is. DEFINITIONs: Project: A project is a unique, transient endeavour, undertaken to achieve planned objectives, which could be defined in terms of outputs, outcomes or benefits. A project is usually deemed to be a success if it achieves the objectives according to their acceptance criteria, within an agreed timescale and budget. A project is a temporary endeavour designed to produce a unique product, service or result with a defined beginning and end (usually time-constrained, and often constrained by funding or deliverables) undertaken to meet unique goals and objectives, typically to bring about beneficial change or added value. [Wikipedia] A project is a series of complex, connected activities with a common purpose; our most common context is a project to develop or refine a program, but principles of project management apply to most projects. Often program and project are used interchangeably, but nominally, a program is a larger concept than a project. (A project is a sequence of unique, complex, and connected activities having one goal or purpose and that must be completed by a specific time, within budget, and according to specification). [UC davis, 2013] Management in businesses and organizations is the function that coordinates the efforts of people to accomplish goals and objectives using available resources efficiently and effectively. Management includes planning, organizing, staffing, leading or directing, and controlling an organization to accomplish the goal. [Wikipedia] Management is often included as a factor of production along with‚ machines, materials, and money. According to the management guru Peter Drucker [1909-2005], the basic task of management includes both marketing and innovation. Practice of modern management originates from the 16th century study of low-efficiency and failures of certain enterprises, conducted by the English statesman Sir Thomas More [1478-1535]. Management consists of the interlocking functions of creating corporate policy and organizing, planning, controlling, and directing an organization's resources in order to achieve the objectives of that policy. Project management: This is the application of processes, methods, knowledge, skills and experience to achieve the project objectives. Project management; is the process and activity of planning, organizing, motivating, and controlling resources, procedures and protocols to achieve specific goals in scientific or daily problems. Management is frequently used as an enabler for meeting an uncertain and turbulent environment. Consequently, the overall effectiveness of the project management process is essential for long-term profitability. The aim and final effects of project management are to predict the outcome, i.e. cost, time and quality. Uncertainty: We define uncertainty as a context for risks as events having a negative impact on the project's outcomes, or opportunities, as events that have beneficial impact on project performance. This definition stresses dual nature of uncertainty in potentially having both positive and negative influence on the project's outcomes. Uncertainty can arise from sources both internal and external to the project. [LeRoy & Singell, 1987] Uncertainty: in contrast, is an event or a situation, which was not expected to happen, regardless of whether it could have been possible to consider it in advance. In other words, uncertainty is when the established facts are questioned and thereby the basis for calculating risks (known negative events) or opportunities (known positive events) is questioned. [Own Definition] Uncertainty: This is a term used in subtly different ways in a number of fields; it applies to predictions of future events, to physical measurements that are already made, or to the unknown. Uncertainty arises in partially observable and/or stochastic environments, as well as due to ignorance and/or indolence. However, uncertainty is inherent in the objectives of the project itself, as we use assumptions and expectations in defining and realizing the outcome of the project. A project's ability to identify and react to uncertainty will influence the outcome of the project. [Wikipedia]
Advances in business information systems and analytics book series, 2018
As projects are associated with risks due to the presence of uncertainties and unknowns, risk management assumes importance in project success. This chapter is an attempt to examine various risk mitigation strategies that are commonly employed if different industrial sectors. The chosen risk strategy would also largely depend either on individual's or organization's propensity to take risks. The authors summarize the findings of a research study in this chapter. The research results show that effort and details of a risk management for a project are governed by risks associated with cost and time and not necessarily with the project scope. Also, many organizations prefer a contingency budget to the project plan to developing a detailed risk management plan.
The development of new technologies and the implementation of such technologies in new applica-tions is a continuous effort to close technological and logistical knowledge gaps. Although knowledge gaps can be closed by accident — like the case of Archimedes who closed an important knowledge gap about the laws of nature while bathing — in most cases in modern times knowledge gaps are closed by a consistent, organized effort, namely by projects. Project Management methodologies attempt to manage the risk generated by the one-time nature of projects. This risk is generated by the lack of knowledge and its resulting uncertainty. Tools for managing project risks and their consequences including risk identification, risk quantification, risk elimination, risk reduction, risk sharing, and risk control, were developed and are implemented to some degree in many technological projects. However most of these tools are based on statistical theory (e.g. the central limit theorem). Unfortunately,...
Texila International Journal of Management, 2025
This research explores the crucial role of risk management in enhancing project success amid prevalent project failures linked to inadequate risk practices. In today’s complex project environments, organizations face uncertainties that can derail objectives and hinder performance. Despite a focus on effective project management methodologies, many projects still fall short of meeting their goals due to overlooked risks and insufficient assessment processes. This study aims to identify common risks affecting project success across sectors and evaluate current risk management practices among project managers. By employing both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study highlights significant gaps in existing practices and proposes a comprehensive framework for integrating risk management throughout the project lifecycle. The research findings provide actionable insights and practical recommendations to improve project outcomes and advance the field of project management by enhancing understanding of effective risk management strategies.
International Journal of Project Management, 2005
A review of the outcome of many information technology (IT) projects reveals that they fail to meet the pre-specified project objectives of scope, time and budget. Despite well-established project risk management processes, project managers perceive their application as ineffective to manage risk. This failure may well be attributed to the inadequate application of those risk management processes. The purpose of this research was to investigate how project managers responsible for the management of risk in IT projects actually managed risk and to relate this back to established project risk management processes. In undertaking this investigation, we were seeking to understand the ways in which the project managersÕ approaches and behaviours, when considering risk in IT projects, differed from what might be expected. Results show that because of environment-related and decision maker-related conditions, project managers tend to deny, avoid, ignore and delay dealing with risk, with the consequence of those actions having an adverse influence on their perceived effectiveness of risk management and the project outcomes. If project risk management, and its underlying processes are not to be discredited, the behaviour of project managers when confronted by uncertainty should be considered and actions need to be taken to discourage project managersÕ irrational actions.
Global social sciences review, 2019
We are investigating the relation of project planning with project success and introduce project risk as a moderator. We examines how different dimensions (organizational, people, technical and technology, project management, economic and stakeholder) of project risk determine this relationship. A survey is carried out from information technology professionals from 20 registered firms in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Technology Board (KPITB). We find that overall project risk has significant moderation impact on the relation of project planning with project success. Information technology (IT) professionals of KPITB plan risk related project management. Technical, technological and economic aspects are detailed and insights on how other risk factors affect project success in IT sector include in the study. Our research highlights the significance of planning in the presence of risk.
2014
This document shows a possible way how to deal with insecurities in the time schedule of a project plan. It shows that Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), the most popular approach to handle this, bears some severe disadvantages. Furthermore it offers an alternative to overcome them by using Monte Carlo simulation. Finally it can be claimed that a complete change of paradigm is necessary: If you have any insecurities as inputs, everything becomes insecure. This might on the first sight convey the impression that the whole situation converts more complex, but we should rather accept this as the opportunity to apply all the well-known instruments from statistics.
Managing project risks is usually based on estimated impact and probability of an event that, if happen, would influence time, cost, scope, quality or benefits of a project. Authors analyse the problem of using this approach to risk management in the environments where either probability or impact, or both, are hard to estimate due to the unstable external conditions. Authors also discuss different approaches and their limitations in quantifying costs associated to risks.
International Journal of Project Management, 2006
This paper builds on discussions that took place over a series of meetings in the UK of the Rethinking Project Management Network. The management of uncertainty is seen as a necessary condition for effective project management. Sources of uncertainty are wide ranging and have a fundamental effect on projects and project management. These sources are not confined to potential events, and include lack of information, ambiguity, characteristics of project parties, tradeoffs between trust and control mechanisms, and varying agendas in different stages of the project life cycle. Common project management practice does not address many fundamental sources of uncertainty, particularly in 'soft' projects where flexibility and tolerance of vagueness are necessary. More sophisticated efforts to recognise and manage important sources of uncertainty are needed. Such efforts need to encompass organisational capabilities, including some aspects of organisation culture and learning.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2008
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to highlight the main findings of a successfully defended doctoral thesis that studied factors or interventions causing the discrepancy between how adequate project risks should be managed and how project risks are actually managed.
R and D Management, 2002
In times of increased competition and globalization, project success becomes even more critical to business performance, and yet many projects still suffer delays, overruns, and even failure. Ironically, however, risk management tools and techniques, which have been developed to improve project success, are used too little, and many still wonder how helpful they are. In this paper we present the results of an empirical study devoted to this question. Based on data collected on over 100 projects performed in Israel in a variety of industries, we examine the extent of usage of some risk management practices, such as risk identification, probabilistic risk analysis, planning for uncertainty and trade-off analysis, the difference in application across different types of projects, and their impact on various project success dimensions. Our findings suggest that risk management practices are still not widely used. Only a limited number of projects in our study have used any kind of risk management practices and many have only used some, but not all the available tools. When used, risk management practices seem to be working, and appear to be related to project success. We also found that risk management practices were more applicable to higher risk projects. The impact of risk management is mainly on better meeting time and budget goals and less on product performance and specification. In this case, we also found some differences according levels of technological uncertainty. Our conclusion is that risk management is still at its infancy and that at this time, more awareness to the application, training, tool development, and research on risk management is needed.
Project management decisions are made at the strategic, the tactical and the operational level. These decision levels are unarguably interrelated. Uncertainty in project management is primarily dealt with at an operational level by detecting operational risks and deciding on how to respond to them such that the tactical objectives can be met. We stress some major issues regarding the topics of risk management and robust project scheduling and discuss their consequences on more tactical and strategic decisions.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.