Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
16 pages
1 file
This article discusses the principles and considerations involved in the use of random skin flaps for reconstructive surgery, particularly in facial defects resulting from tumor resections. It emphasizes the importance of preoperative planning, assessment of wound characteristics, and the management of surrounding anatomical structures to achieve both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Various flap techniques are illustrated through case examples, highlighting the need for tailored approaches based on individual patient circumstances.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2011
Background This report aims to describe the technique of using combined flaps for reconstruction of wide-range facial defects. Methods Two or more flaps were combined to repair wide-range facial wounds, complying with the principle of facial aesthetic subunits to maintain the inherent structural characteristics of the face, to design incision lines conforming to the natural facial contour lines (e.g., nasolabial fold, sulcus alaris, nasomaxillary suture, palpebral margin, vermilion border, hairline) or wrinkles, and to leave hidden incision lines if possible. There were 18 cases with excessively large facial defects requiring the use of a graft with local flaps. Results From April 1996 to May 2008, 124 patients had their wide-range facial defects repaired by combined flaps. The size of the defects ranged in size from 2.5 9 4 to 9 9 10 cm. The healing for all the patients was uneventful, and the flap survived completely without complications. After an average of 6 months (range, 1-48 months), 87 of the patients were available for follow-up evaluation. There was no recurrence of tumor. The repaired tissues were well matched with surrounding tissue in color, texture, and contour. Incision lines were sheltered, and there were no anatomic deformities of the eyelid, upper lip, or nasal ala.
International Surgery Journal, 2020
Background: Face is the center of attention during communication and the expression of emotion. Facial defects resulting from trauma and the excision of skin malignancies are relatively common. How this defect is treated is determined by a variety of factors including the location, size and the underlying cause of the defect, the projected functional morbidity, the medical history of the patient, and feasibility of surgery. Aim was to study various local flaps using for coverage of defect, outcomes and complications.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Our study shows result of 92 patients during January 2016 to December 2019 who had facial defects were taken up for the study. Reconstructive options were selected depending on defect size, location. Follow-up of patients ranged from 6 months to 1 year.Results: The most common malignant tumors of the face are basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. Local flap is always preferable than skin grafts as it p...
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. With respect to any drug or pharmaceutical products identified, readers are advised to check the most current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the manufacturer of each product to be administered, to verify the recommended dose or formula, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of practitioners, relying on their own experience and knowledge of their patients, to make diagnoses, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual patient, and to take all appropriate safety precautions. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2013
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2005
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the subjective and the objective functional and aesthetic follow-up results of the recipient and donor sites after reconstruction of extensive facial defects with the anterolateral thigh flap. Methods: Between December of 2001 and April of 2003, the anterolateral thigh flap was used to reconstruct large facial skin defects after malignant tumor resection in 23 white patients. All patients had a standardized interview, physical examination, and clinical photographs. Results: The mean flap size was 108 cm 2. Fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flaps were used in 15 patients and musculocutaneous flaps were used in eight patients with exposed dura, open sinuses, or orbital defects. An extra free osteocutaneous fibula flap was necessary to reconstruct the affected mandible in 10 patients. The donor site was skin grafted in 18 patients. The flap survival rate was 96 percent. At follow-up, color mismatch (71 percent) and flap bulkiness (50 percent) were encountered most often. Four of five patients with speech problems had received an additional free osteocutaneous fibula flap.
ENT Updates, 2020
Objective: V-Y advancement flaps are pliable local flaps that can be used in nearly every part of the body with relatively minimal technical difficulty. These flaps provide the best color and quality match, especially in the facial region. With effective planning, donor site morbidity can be acceptable, even on the face. Methods: The results of 38 patients who underwent 53 V-Y advancement flap facial reconstructions were analyzed retrospectively. The defects were evaluated according to their anatomical region, etiology, postoperative complications, and final aesthetic results. Results: V-Y advancement flaps were used for defects that were either not amenable to primary repair or had a high risk of cosmetic distortion. The defects were located in the cheek (9 patients), nasolabial fold (7 patients), nose (6 patients), forehead (5 patients), preauricular area (3 patients), infraorbital region (3 patients), lower lip (1 patients), gingivobuccal sulcus (2 patients), and medial canthal region (2 patients). In 32 patients, the primary pathology was malignant tumor (22 basal cell carcinomas, 9 epidermoid carcinomas, 1 malignant eccrine poroma). Etiologies of the other patients' defects were benign tumors (n=2), traumatic wounds (n=2), and contractures (n=2). Conclusions: Despite the widespread use of V-Y flaps in surgical practice, the technique continues to demonstrate additional advantages, particularly in facial reconstruction. They are not only applicable for medium and small defects, but can be used for all defects with sufficient surrounding tissue. They enable various modifications and the elevation of multiple flaps.
Microsurgery, 2008
Background: Managing post-traumatic or post-oncosurgical facial defects presents challenges. Minor defects may be treated with skin grafts or small local flaps, while larger ones necessitate advanced techniques like tissue expanders, prefabricated flaps, or free flaps. The enduring utilization of the forehead flap over centuries underscores its reliability in reconstructing substantial and intricate facial defects. Aim: Assess the viability and adaptability of forehead flap for facial reconstruction. Materials and Methods: 20 patients who underwent coverage of facial defects after trauma or tumor excision using forehead flaps were retrospectively analysed. The patient satisfaction and flap-related complications were analyzed. Results: 20 patients (18 males and two females) underwent reconstruction of different facial defects using 20 forehead flaps. The complication occurred in one patient only. The remaining 19 patients showed no complications and passed an uneventful follow-up period. All the patients were fully satisfied. Conclusion: The forehead flap effectively addresses facial defects, likely offering optimal results with its excellent skin match in color, texture, and thickness. Despite the rising popularity of free flaps, the forehead flap remains a valid and secure choice, ensuring both aesthetic and functional success in covering facial defects.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Azerbaijan Medical Association Journal, 2016
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2004
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2007
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2014
Journal of Investigative Surgery, 2019
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
Archives of plastic surgery, 2017
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 2015
Journal of dermatology and skin science, 2021
Dermatologic Surgery, 2017
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2020
Dermatologic Surgery, 2006
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2007
Dermatol Surg, 2006
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2007
Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 2022