モニュメントと集合的記憶：交渉される記憶のダイナミズム
Huyuki Doi2023, 土井冬樹, 木村彩音, 前田宙
https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759903800110visibility
…
description
12 pages
link
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
リーディング研究における談話の重要性に関する一考察 : 結束性(cohesion)の理論から学ぶもの
Casele Research Bulletin, 1994
認知領域の知覚・記憶・思考研究間のつながりを考える
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, 2007
参加型アプローチによる交渉モデルの獲得
Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2006
Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement
科学文法の説明、言語ゲームの理解 : チョムスキーとウィトゲンシュタイン
Casele Research Bulletin, 1991
ＮＬＡ変法におけるミダゾラムとジアゼパムの比較
THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1985
A well-controlled comparative study was carried out with midazolam vs. diazepam in 234 patients subject to surgical operation on the usefulness for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in a modified NLA. One hour after injection i. m. with atropine sulfate and hydroxydine hydrochloride, 0.2mg/kg of midazolam or 0.2mg/kg of diazepam was administered i. v. to induce anesthesia, followed by the administration with 1mg/kg of pentazocine. Midazolam was significantly superior to diazepam in the smoothness of induction of anesthesia, the depth of maintenance of anesthesia and in the grade of causation of vascular pain. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the fluctuation of vital signs and the process after the operation in terms of arousal, start of spontaneous respiration and amnestic effects. No problematic adverse reactions were observed clinically or in clinical laboratory test results. Judging from the efficacy and safety, midazolam was considered to be more useful than diazepam in a modified NLA.
認識手段・認識結果の非別体性 : プラジュニャーカラグプタのPV III 319解釈
The Annals of the Research Project Center For the Comparative Study of Logic, 2007
Acquisition of rules and communication
2003
本論文では、言語習得・使用に関する規則の種類を整理し、Chomskyの言語哲学とも、私たちの日常的体験とも整合する規則論を提示し、第二言語習得におけるコミュニケーション経験の必然性について論考する。1ではKrashen以降の規則論を検討し、(1)「コミュニケーションの学びは、基本的にはコミュニケーションを重ねることではないのか」、(2)「形と意味を結びつける規則には意識的なものもあるのではないのか」という問題点を提示する。2では(2)の問題点を解決する新しい規則論を展開する。3では「発話規則」の実践上の問題を考える中で、(1)の主張が、単なるトートロジーを超えて、正しく妥当なものであることを論証する
Related papers
A game-theoretic model of referential coherence and its empirical verification using large Japanese and English corpora
ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 2008
Referential coherence represents the smoothness of discourse resulting from topic continuity and pronominalization. Rational individuals prefer a referentially coherent structure of discourse when they select a language expression and its interpretation. This is a preference for cooperation in communication. By what principle do they share coherent expressions and interpretations? Centering theory is the standard theory of referential coherence [Grosz et al. 1995]. Although it is well designed on the bases of first-order inference rules [Joshi and Kuhn 1979], it does not embody a behavioral principle for the cooperation evident in communication. Hasida [1996] proposed a game-theoretic hypothesis in relation to this issue. We aim to empirically verify Hasida's hypothesis by using corpora of multiple languages. We statistically design language-dependent parameters by using a corpus of the target language. This statistical design enables us to objectively absorb language-specific d...
知識獲得の非認知的基盤 : ウィトゲンシュタインの『確実性の問題』から
Bulletin of Faculty of the Education Hiroshima University Part 1 Educational Research, 1994
Model of expression and operation of conceptual memory in the brain
The Brain & Neural Networks
柔軟な列車予約方式に対する組合せオークションによるアルゴリズム
IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, 2005
We present algorithms for flexible seat distribution problems, which is defined as a problem to give an appropriate travel plan to each passenger after receiving their requests concerning their travel demands. Seat distribution problems occur when a flexible seat reservation system is implemented in which passengers are allowed to reserve seats by submitting their demands instead of specifying trains. To solve the seat distribution problem, we have formalized it as a winner determination problem of the combinatorial auction mechanism. It should be noted that difficulty of the seat distribution problem varies depending on instances of the problem, because the number of demands often varies and users' requests sometimes converge on particular trains. This suggests that in order to get solutions with high quality, algorithms that appropriately control the search space are indispensable. In this paper, we present three kinds of such algorithms for the seat distribution problem together with the results of several experiments.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.