Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1999
This interpretive case study of FoxMeyer Drugs\u27 ERP implementation is based on empirical frameworks and models of software project risks and project escalation. Implications of the study offer suggestions on how to avoid ERP failure
This interpretive case study of FoxMeyer Drugs' ERP implementation is based on empirical frameworks and models of software project risks and project escalation. Implications of the study offer suggestions on how to avoid ERP failure.
Software projects' past goes back to four or more decades. We encounter the first software project risk management paper in 1991[1] and the study [2] reports that in 1995 US spent $250 billion to software projects and these projects had estimated $59 billion in cost overruns and another $81 billion had spent on canceled software projects.Although failures are tremendous, we have observed the project risks and critical success factors are given like shopping lists and so the remedies of risk factors. Very few studies exist for searching the relationships of these risk factors and the relationship between remedies and risk factors. We are trying to construct a simple model of risks and remedies borrowing concepts from systems and control theory.
Journal of Information Technology, 2001
The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors in implementing traditional management information systems projects, describe the risk factors associated with enterprise-wide/ERP (enterprise resource planning) projects and identify the risk factors in ERP projects which are unique to these projects. Some of the unique challenges in managing enterprise-wide projects which were highlighted through the ndings included the challenge of re-engineering business processes to ' t' the process which the ERP software supports, investment in recruiting and reskilling technology professionals, the challenge of using external consultants and integrating their application-speci c knowledge and technical expertise with existing teams, the risk of technological bottlenecks through client-server implementation and the challenge of recruiting and retaining business analysts who combine technology and business skills.
Information technology (IT) projects are susceptible to changes in the business environment, and the increasing velocity of change in global business is challenging the management of enterprise systems such as enterprise resource planning (ERP). At the same time, system success depends on the rigor of the project management processes. Scope creep, poor risk management, inadequate allocation of human resources over time, and vendor management are some common problems associated with the implementation of an enterprise system. These issues pose threats to the success of a large-scale software project such as ERP. This research adopts a case study approach to examine how poor project management can imperil the implementation of an ERP system. Having learned the lessons from the failure of its first ERP implementation, the company in this case reengineered its project management practices to successfully carry out its second ERP implementation. Many critical project management factors contributed to the failure and success of this company's ERP system. This study explores and identifies critical elements of project management that contributed to the success of the second ERP implementation. For those organizations adopting ERP, the findings provide a roadmap to follow in order to avoid making critical, but often underestimated, project management mistakes.
In recent years ERP systems have received much attention. However, ERP projects have often been found to be complex and risky to implement in business enterprises. The organizational relevance and risk of ERP projects make it important for organizations to focus on ways to make ERP implementation successful.
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) projects are considered to be expensive, time-consuming, difficult to manage and risky. This paper presents how companies should consider and manage the risks in their ERP project. The focus in a qualitative case study is on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and it illustrates how the risks i n the case firms are identified, analyzed and managed.
2011
Studies in recent years have revealed the challenges involved in deploying ERP solutions due to its complexity. Before attempting to implement ERP systems, it is essential to study various aspects such as project management, training, and change management in detail to manage the associated risks. When an ERP project is undertaken with insufficient planning, it may result in failure to integrate business processes and in substantial financial loss. Research has been pursued to identify critical risk/failure factors that may arise during implementation and the measures that should be taken to manage them. However, there is lack of research in identifying the management of critical risk/failure factor using a structured methodology. This raises a question of ‘can a structured methodology identify and manage critical risk/failure factors and support deploying ERP solutions with a better quality?’ A study of Microsoft Sure Step Methodology is performed to identify critical risk/failure ...
International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 2012
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are used to provide companies with integrated information for operations management and decision-making. An ERP implementation project may become a troubled project at any stage during the life cycle of the project. We must detect and correct the causes of a project's problems before it fails. This study investigated troubled ERP implementation projects, sought the root causes of the troubled
Evolving in early 1990s, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) has become a global standard for the premier business firms for maintain their operations. ERP automates and streamlines business processes, reduces the complexity of collaboration, optimizes the operations that helps to gain superior control over business. However, ERP implementation success rate is meager in the world due to its complex nature of implementation and cost. This paper shows how to access the success of ERP implementation through a case study of a leading pharmaceutical company of Bangladesh. This study identified the causes of preliminary success in pre-implementation phase and the causes of delay in the implementation phase of ERP.
The objective of this study is to categorize the threats and controls in ERP implementations, with the objective to understand the methods in which administrations can abate the commercial hazards involved. The Implementation of ERP systems has been challenging for many organizations. Given the many reports of significant failures, the application of wrapped ERP software and related changes in business processes has showed not to be an easy task. As many organizations have exposed, the implementation of ERP systems can be a colossal disaster unless the process is controlled cautiously. The study sets the base for further research into the control structure so vital for the success of the applications of ERP systems and analyses the threat for such implementation in an organization.
'Implementation-Realizing Operations Management Knowledge', Proceedings of 16th International Annual Conference of the European Operations Management Association, 2009
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) projects are strategic and capital intensive, so failure may be costly and even cause bankruptcy of companies. Previous studies have proposed ways for improving implementation, but they are mostly generic and follow standardized project management practices as specified in various standards (e.g. the "project management body of knowledge" of the Project Management Institute). Because ERP is interdisciplinary (involving change management, project management and information technology management), it warrants a customized approach to managing risks throughout the life cycle of implementation and operation. Through a practical case study, this paper demonstrates a qualitative, user friendly approach to ERP project risk management. Firstly, through a literature review it identifies various risk factors in ERP implementation. Secondly, the risk management practices of a UK-based multinational consulting company in one of its clients are evaluated. The risk factors from the case study organization and literature are then compared and discussed.
The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 2001
The implementation of ERP systems has been problematic for many organizations. Given the many reports of substantial failures, the implementation of packaged ERP software and associated changes in business processes has proved not to be an easy task. As many organizations have discovered, the implementation of ERP systems can be a monumental disaster unless the process is handled carefully. The aim of this study is to identify the risks and controls used in ERP implementations, with the objective to understand the ways in which organizations can minimize the business risks involved. By controlling and minimizing the major business risks in the first instance, the scene can be set for the successful implementation of an ERP system. The study was motivated by the significance, for both the research and practice communities, of understanding the risks and controls critical for the successful implementation of ERP systems. Following the development of a model of risks and controls, a field study of an ERP system implementation project in an organization was conducted to provide a limited test of the model. The results from the field study provided support for risks and controls identified in the literature. The results also identified several controls not mentioned in the reviewed literature. The study lays the foundation for further research into the risk/control framework so important for the success of the implementations of ERP systems.
2017
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems have been regarded as one of the most important information technology developments in the past decades. While ERP systems provide the potential to bring substantial benefits, their implementations are characterized by large capital outlay, long duration, and high might be a solution to ensure the success of ERP system implementations in organizations. The overall objective of this research is to to provide detailed analysis and impacts of business processes re-engineering and communication risks on ERP projects. At the begging, the research describes ERP systems in conjunction with the nature of Information Technology projects. Research identifies the communication and business processes re-engineering risks in ERP implementation projects and analyzes the causes. Accordingly, a conceptual research framework is presented, and the procedures and research methods are outlined. Secondly, quantitative data is provided based on twenty-one ERP projects implemented in North America. Data accompanied by based analytical statements and conclusions. Thirdly, an approach is developed based on fault tree analysis to decompose ERP systems failure and assess the relationships between ERP project failure and Communication and Business processes re-engineering risks. The principles and processes of this approach and related fault tree analysis and design methods are presented. Fourthly, certain conclusions and practical strategies are proposed. The current research does not only contribute to the body of knowledge of information system risk management, but also can be used as an effective tool for practitioners to actively analyze, assess, and manage the risks of ERP system implementations.
Information Systems, 2012
Conducting Risk Management of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) projects is an ambitious task. ERP projects are complex undertakings for business enterprises, as the associated risk factors include myriad technological, managerial, psychological and sociological aspects. Moreover, such factors are often tightly interconnected and can have indirect effects on projects. Such features make Risk Management more difficult, uncertain and important than in traditional projects, especially in the Assessment stage. The aim of this paper is to propose an innovative technique to support Risk Analysis in order to provide a better, more structured and systematic understanding of the major relations amongst various risk factors, on the one hand, and between risk factors and the specific effects associated with ERP projects, on the other. A real case study regarding a multinational company and involving a panel of experts and practitioners is presented to illustrate application of the method.
International Journal of Computer Applications, 2012
The ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) is a major innovation in the Field of Information Systems and Organization Management. Including their ability to make the organization more integrated and consistent, and absolute control of information. But the implementation of these projects remains a disturbing adventure that may lead to success or deadly failure of the organization that is embarking on this project. The aims of this article are to determine the necessary critical success factors for the ERP and causes of failures,through a comparative study of large organizations that have adopted ERP , for addressing the convergence and divergence points in implementation ERP. Such a study will allow us to develop a governance model for ERP
Malahat Pouransafar, Maral Cheperli, Mohammad Reza Faraj Tabrizi, 2013
Implementing an information technology project is a very challenging task that needs several preparations such as assigning a professional project manager, receiving top management support , employee engagement ,etc. Same studies have been conducted about the success and failure factors of the enterprise resource planning (ERP) projects and several researchers concluded that the ERP projects are very vulnerable.This qualitative research is an attempt to summarize the most common failure factors of the ERP projects in Iranian manufacturing industries. key words: ERP failure Factor, IT project Management,
Business Process Management Journal, 2010
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to help managers to successfully plan, implement, and operate enterprise resource planning (ERP) projects using a risk management framework. Design/methodology/approach -This paper adopted a combined literature review and case study method. Using literature review, the paper first identified major issues of managing ERP projects and develops a risk management framework for managing those issues. The proposed risk management framework was then applied to a ERP implementation project of a UK-based energy services group and its effectiveness for managing ERP projects implementation had been demonstrated. Additionally, the risk factors as identified from the case application are compared with the risk factors from the previous researches so as to suggest mitigating measures. Findings -All the risk factors are categorized into planning, implementation and operations phases along with project processes, organizational transformation and information technology (IT) perspectives. Project implementation phase is the most vulnerable to failure. The case study results reveal that the effect of other projects on on-going ERP project, management of overall IT architecture and non-availability of resources for organizational transformation are most critical from likelihood and impact perspectives. Managing risk across various phases of project and equal emphasize to effective project management, organizational transformation and IT adoption are the key to success in ERP implementation. Practical implications -The risk factors, which were identified using literature review and the case study, have great significance as mitigating measures of those risks may result successful implementation of ERP projects in the industry. Additionally, proposed risk management framework could be customized to implement ERP projects elsewhere. Originality/value -ERP projects are risky as they are capital intensive, technically complex, and call for organizational transformation. There are both success and failure stories. However, both researchers and practitioners agree, that if it can be implemented and operated successfully and benefits should be achievable. Although there are many studies on ERP implementation, little has been discussed on managing risks of ERP projects. Therefore, this paper bridges the gap.
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) projects are considered to be expensive, time-consuming, difficult to manage, and extremely risky. ERP projects are risky from strategic, operational, technical and organisational perspectives. Risks and critical success factors of ERP projects have been widely studied, and the management of risks is a key to a successful ERP project. Generic risk analyses have faced inflation, and in the worst case companies do not manage risks in their ERP project at all. This paper presents the risks in their ERP project. Focus is on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), because they often have limited resources and competencies for analyzing and managing ERP project risks. In this paper we reflect our results to some of the previous studies of ERP project risks in order to present a new approach to ERP risks. Qualitative case study of three SMEs gives empirical evidence to our view to ERP risks. As a result we state that in addition to generic project management risks there should be assessed also company specific risks which, in fact, are usually the fundamental issues that should be considered in the early phase of the ERP project.
Over the past decade, Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERP) have become one of the most important developments in the corporate use of information technology. ERP implementations are usually large, complex projects, involving large groups of people and other resources, working together under considerable time pressure and facing many unforeseen developments. In order for an organization to compete in this rapidly expanding and integrated marketplace, ERP systems must be employed to ensure access to an efficient, effective, and highly reliable information infrastructure. Despite the benefits that can be achieved from a successful ERP system implementation, there is evidence of high failure in ERP implementation projects. Too frequently key development practices are ignored and early warning signs that lead to project failure are not understood. Identifying project success and failure factors and their consequences as early as possible can provide valuable clues to help project managers improve their chances of success. It is the long-ra nge goal of our research to shed light on these factors and to provide a tool that project managers can use to help better manage their software development projects. This paper will present a review of the general background to our work; the results from the current research and conclude with a discussion of the findings thus far. The findings will include a list of 23 unique Critical Success Factors identified throughout the literature, which we believe to be essential for Project Managers. The implications of these results will be discussed along with the lessons learnt.
This study firstly examines the current literature concerning ERP implementation problems during implementation phases and causes of ERP implementation failure. A multiple case study research methodology was adopted to understand "why" and "how" these ERP systems could not be implemented successfully. Different stakeholders (including top management, project manager, project team members and ERP consultants) from these case studies were interviewed, and ERP implementation documents were reviewed for triangulation. An ERP life cycle framework was applied to study the ERP implementation process and the associated problems in each phase of ERP implementation. Fourteen critical failure factors were identified and analyzed, and three common critical failure factors (poor consultant effectiveness, project management effectiveness and poo555îr quality of business process re-engineering) were examined and discussed.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.