Evidence-Based Surgery

World Journal of Surgery, 2012

Background Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult. Methods Through a systematic review of the literature, this article explores the barriers to achieving a strong evidence base in surgery and offers potential solutions to overcome the barriers. Results Many barriers exist to evidence-based surgical research. They include enabling factors, such as funding, time, infrastructure, patient preference, ethical issues, and additionally barriers associated with specific attributes related to researchers, methodologies, or interventions. Novel evidence synthesis techniques in surgery are discussed, including graphics synthesis, treatment networks, and network meta-analyses that help overcome many of the limitations associated with existing techniques. They offer the opportunity to assess gaps and quantitatively present inconsistencies within the existing evidence of RCTs. Conclusions Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidencebased surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.

Digestive Surgery, 2003

The assessment of the optimal treatment option based on best current knowledge is called evidence-based medicine (EBM). Considering the cost explosion in public health systems, EBM should also incorporate proper utilization of the restricted economical resources and should enforce quality assurance in medicine. It is imperative that surgeons realize that randomized controlled trials are applicable to the operative specialties in a large scale, and are necessary to provide evidence-based surgery. So far, only 3.4% of all publications in the leading surgical journals are randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, only 44.1% of the published surgical randomized controlled studies compared different surgical procedures, whereas 55.9% of the articles compared medical therapies in surgical patients. Evidence-based surgical therapy is essential for further development of a high- quality surgical standard, which will also provide quality assurance in future surgical care. This article prese...

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2006

Background: The use of the terms evidence-based medicine (EBM) and healthcare (EBHC) has become commonplace in the medical as well as in the surgical literature. Using the best available evidence, however, is not yet a working routine among surgeons because of the large amount and complexity of published research and the lack of user-friendly tools and necessary skills for the use of research results. Discussion: This article encourages to formulate surgically relevant questions and to answer them on the basis of high-quality research, preferably by using systematic reviews which are based on the quality criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. Conclusions: As currently only 77 Cochrane reviews address surgical procedures; much work remains to be done to enlarge the number of high-quality and relevant reviews. Similarly, the number and quality of randomized controlled trials need to be increased in all surgical specialties.

Oman Medical Journal, 2012

Surgery as a discipline has perhaps been slower than other specialties to embrace evidence based principles. Today, surgeons all over Asia are prepared to challenge the dogma of yesterday. Surgical science which rests on a strong foundation of laboratory and clinical research can now be broadened to include the armamentarium of evidence based practice to advance surgical knowledge. The sheer volume of easily accessed information creates a new challenge. This article discusses keeping up with new information and finding the best available answers to specific questions amidst all the other information.

Journal of Surgical Education, 2010

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude of surgical trainees toward evidence-based medicine (EBM) and their perceived barriers to its practice.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2001

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 1999

Introduction: Evidencebased medicine (EBM) has been proposed as a new paradigm of practising medicine. However, an unproductive polarisation between supporters and opponents can make its unbiased assessment difficult. This review gives an overview of the arguments and discusses their surgeonspecific importance. Discussion: As EBM claims a position in the centre of medicine, it borders with other highly debated topics as, for instance, rationing and equity of care, doctor-patient interaction, medical research and education. Most arguments against EBM relate to its role in reducing health expenses by rationing healthcare. We think that the principles of EBM can be applied to make the inevitable process of rationing fair and reproducible. In addition, evidence-based surgery is criticised for interfering with patient individuality and physician autonomy, although this is a misunderstanding. Furthermore, the evidence-basis of EBM, in particular the randomis-ed controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review, has been subject of discussion. Additionally, surgical research has its own inherent difficulties and, ultimately, some clinicians have doubted the practical feasibility of applying EBM at the bedside, because searching and critically appraising the literature is too difficult and time consuming. Conclusions: We believe that most critics consider EBM to be a potentially dangerous tool, because they fear it will be used against themselves. Thus, these conflicts only prove that EBM as a methodology may have a strong impact on solving them. As EBM has already made discernible progress, surgeons should not stand aside from these activities, which are bound to strongly influence healthcare in the next century.

World Journal of Surgery, 2009

Background Evidence-based surgery (EBS) is stressed to increase efficiency and health care quality, but not all surgeons and surgical nurses use EBS in clinical practice. To define future tailor-made interventions to improve evidence-based behavior, the aim of this study was to determine the attitude and awareness among surgeons and surgical nurses as to the paradigm of EBS and the barriers experienced when practicing EBS. Methods In this cross-sectional study, surgeons and surgical nurses at a university hospital in Amsterdam were invited to complete the BARRIERS scale and McColl et al. questionnaire. An evidence quiz was composed for the surgeons. Results Response rates were 67% (29/43) for surgeons and 60% (73/122) for nurses. Attitudes toward EBS were positive. Among the surgeons, 90% were familiar with EBS terms, whereas only 40% of the nurses were. Common barriers for surgeons were conflicting results (79%, 23/29) and the methodologic inadequacy of research reports (73%, 21/29); and for nurses they were unawareness of EBS (67%, 49/73) and unclear reported research (59%, 43/73). Only about half of the convincing evidence presented in the quiz was actually applied. Conclusions Surgeons have a positive attitude toward EBS and are familiar with EBS terminology, but conflicting results and methodologic shortcomings of research reports are major barriers to practicing EBS. Continual confrontations with available evidence through frequent critical appraisal meetings or grand rounds and using more aggregate sources of evidence are advocated. Nurses can probably benefit from EBS training focusing on basic skills. Finally, collaboration is needed among surgeons and nurses with the same zest about EBS.

International Journal of Surgery, 2011

Surgeons are faced with the dilemma that many clinical questions in their daily practice to do not have universally agreed answers, but patients increasingly demand the 'best practice' from their doctors. In addition time pressures mean that clinicians are unable to keep up with the full spectrum of published research. We have adopted an approach first pioneered in emergency medicine, namely the Best Evidence Topic or Best BET. Clinicians select a clinical scenario from their daily practice that highlights an area of controversy. From this, a three-part question is generated and this is used to search Medline and other appropriate databases for relevant papers. Once the relevant papers are found, these papers are critically appraised, the relevant data to answer the question is extracted, tabulated and summarised. A clinical bottom line is reached after this process. The resulting BETs, written by practising surgeons can then provide robust evidence-based answers to important clinical questions asked during our daily practice.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009

Despite the many benefits of ambulatory surgery, there remain inherent risks associated with any surgical care environment that have the potential to jeopardize patient safety. This practice advisory provides an overview of the preoperative steps that should be completed to ensure appropriate patient selection for ambulatory surgery settings. In conjunction, this advisory identifies several physiologic stresses commonly associated with surgical procedures, in addition to potential postoperative recovery problems, and provides recommendations for how best to minimize these complications.