Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
…
10 pages
1 file
Let X and Y be real normed spaces and f : X → Y a surjective mapping. Then f satisfies { f (x) + f (y) , f (x) − f (y) } = { x + y , x − y }, x, y ∈ X, if and only if f is phase equivalent to a surjective linear isometry, that is, f = σU , where U : X → Y is a surjective linear isometry and σ : X → {−1, 1}. This is a Wigner's type result for real normed spaces.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2020
Let X and Y be real normed spaces and f : X → Y a surjective mapping. Then f satisfies { f (x) + f (y) , f (x) − f (y) } = { x + y , x − y }, x, y ∈ X, if and only if f is phase equivalent to a surjective linear isometry, that is, f = σU , where U : X → Y is a surjective linear isometry and σ : X → {−1, 1}. This is a Wigner's type result for real normed spaces.
Annals of Functional Analysis, 2017
We demonstrate that any surjective isometry T : A → B not assumed to be linear between unital, completely regular subspaces of complexvalued, continuous functions on compact Hausdorff spaces is of the form T (f) = T (0) + Re µ • (f • τ) + i Im ν • (f • ρ) , where µ and ν are continuous and unimodular, there exists a clopen set K with ν = µ on K and ν = −µ on K c , and τ and ρ are homeomorphisms. T (f) = µ • (f • τ), (1.1) where |µ(y)| = 1 for all y ∈ Y and where τ : Y → X is a homeomorphism. This classic result has been extended to mappings between subspaces of C(X) and C(Y), and a general survey of such results can be found in [4]. We note one in
Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 2018
Let X, Y be compact Hausdorff spaces and E, F be Banach spaces over R or C. In this paper, we investigate the general form of surjective (not necessarily linear) isometries T : A −→ B between subspaces A and B of C(X, E) and C(Y, F), respectively. In the case that F is strictly convex, it is shown that there exist a subset Y 0 of Y , a continuous function Φ : Y 0 −→ X onto the set of strong boundary points of A and a family {V y } y∈Y0 of real-linear operators from E to F with V y = 1 such that T f (y) − T 0(y) = V y (f (Φ(y))) (f ∈ A, y ∈ Y 0). In particular, we get some generalizations of the vector-valued Banach-Stone theorem and a generalization of Cambern's result. We also give a similar result in the case that F is not strictly convex, but its unit sphere contains a maximal convex subset which is singleton.
2019
In his 1950 doctoral thesis, [7] Jerison was the first to consider BanachStone problem for isometries on a continuous vector-valued function space. Given an isometry T from C(S,E) to C(Q,E), where S and Q are compact Hausdorff spaces and E is a Banach space, he wanted to know if S and Q were homeomorphic. Jerison showed that the answer is no in general. The idea of a Banach space Y satisfying the Banach-Stone property was first given by Cambern [1]. A pair (E, Y ) of Banach spaces will be said to satisfy the (strong) Banach-Stone property if for every surjective isometry T from C(S,E) to C(Q,Y ), where S,Q are compact Hausdorff spaces, there is a homeomorphism ψ from Q onto S and a map t 7→ h(t) which is continuous from Q into the space B(E, Y ) of bounded operators from E into Y with the strong operator topology such that
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2012
Let X, Y , Z be compact Hausdorff spaces and let E 1 , E 2 , E 3 be Banach spaces. If T : C(X, E 1)×C(Y, E 2) −→ C(Z, E 3) is a bilinear isometry which is stable on constants and E 3 is strictly convex, then there exists a nonempty subset Z 0 of Z, a surjective continuous mapping h : Z 0 −→ X × Y and a continuous function ω : Z 0 −→ Bil(E 1 × E 2 , E 3) such that T (f, g)(z) = ω(z)(f (π X (h(z)), g(π Y (h(z)) for all z ∈ Z 0 and every pair (f, g) ∈ C(X, E 1) × C(Y, E 2). This result generalizes the main theorems in [2] and [6].
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1988
Surjective isometnes between some classical function spaces are investigated. We give a simple technical scheme which verifies whether any such isometry is given by a homeomorphism between corresponding Hausdorff compact spaces. In particular the answer is positive for the C1(X), AC[0,1], LipQ (X) and lipQ (X) spaces provided with various natural norms. 1. Introduction. Let A and B be Banach spaces. By an isometry from A onto
Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 2000
Let E be a real Banach space. A norm-one element e in E is said to be an isometric reflection vector if there exist a maximal subspace M of E and a linear isometry F : E → E fixing the elements of M and satisfying F (e) = −e. We prove that each of the conditions (i) and (ii) below implies that E is a Hilbert space. (i) There exists a nonrare subset of the unit sphere of E consisting only of isometric reflection vectors, (ii) There is an isometric reflection vector in E, the norm of E is convex transitive, and the identity component of the group of all surjective linear isometries on E relative to the strong operator topology is not reduced to the identity operator on E.
Characterization of isometries in l^2 space, 2022
In general sense, we can define the isometries as transformations which preserve distance between elements. In this paper, we show a characterization of isometries in l^2(X)(for a nonempty set X) which is a Hilbert space .
Aequationes Mathematicae, 2000
A description of all continuous (resp. differentiable) solutions f mapping the real line R into a real normed linear space (X, •) (not necessarily strictly convex) of the functional equation f (x + y) = f (x) + f(y) has been presented by Peter Schöpf in [10]. Looking for more readable representations we have shown that any function f of that kind fulfilling merely very mild regularity assumptions has to be proportional to an odd isometry mapping R into X. To gain a proper proof tool we have also established an improvement of Edgar Berz's [4] result on the form of Lebesgue measurable sublinear functionals on R.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 2011
Israel Journal of Mathematics, 1993
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2001
Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series, 2006
Recent Trends in Operator Theory and Applications, 2019
Central European Journal of Mathematics, 2011
Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 1998
International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 2020
Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 2008
Journal of Functional Analysis, 1975
Geometry & Topology, 2021
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2004
Studia Mathematica, 2009
Proyecciones (Antofagasta), 2019
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1998
Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 2015
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2008