Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011, Pastoral Psychology
The results of a survey conducted in 1988 on the traditional deadly sins and the schedule of virtues formulated by Erik H. Erikson were previously reported by Capps (Pastoral Psychology 37:229-253, 1989). The results of a second survey conducted in 1998 were reported by Capps and Cole (Pastoral Psychology 48:359-376, 2000). This article reports on a third survey conducted in 2008-2009. All three surveys employed a research instrument constructed by Capps titled Life Attitudes Inventory. Major findings of the third survey are that lust and melancholy are considered the deadliest of the deadly sins, with anger rounding out the top three. Envy is thought to be the least deadly sin. The sins most personally struggled with are pride, envy, and apathy, with both genders accounting for the high ranking of pride, women for envy, and men for apathy. Men's and women's views whether individual sins are more characteristic of men or of women were also reported, with greed especially ascribed to men and envy to women. Similarities and differences between young, middle and mature adults' views on and experiences of the deadly sins are reported, as are comparisons between the members of two Christian denominations (Presbyterians and Methodists).
Text and Performance Quarterly, 2006
Every sin is the result of a collaboration,'' claimed Seneca, observing that sin is both a cultural and an intersubjective process. Seneca's pointed formula implies both cultural performances that maintain normative order and a collusive, furtive will to resist that order. Sin is, to be sure, a rhetorical construct*/but it is also a resource. It is simultaneously social and surreptitious. Above all others, the seven deadly sins have become emblematic for understanding many of the practices of everyday life (sometimes vaunted, sometimes reviled). Some have gone so far as to claim that the seven deadly sins illustrate the excesses and abuses of Western society as a whole (Lyman). With this in mind, we take as a starting point in this special issue that sin has long held a firm grasp on our cultural imagination. Internal battles between good and evil are at the very heart of most of our storytelling; external battles between good and evil comprise the bulk of our tales of history. The discourse and imagination surrounding the seven deadly sins is particularly dramatic because the stakes are drawn so high. As a product of Christian guides to proper living, the seven deadly sins are constructed as offenses against God's will that lead to certain damnation and the death of the soul. They are literally deadly. These are the sins of anger, envy, gluttony, greed, lust, pride, and sloth. 1 The seven deadly sins are tied to personal behavior and decorum, articulating prohibitions concerning human desire. In his Inferno, Dante explains that the seven deadly sins are all failed relationships to love, articulated within the three relational categories of perversion, insufficiency, or excess. Whether understood as emotions or actions, as directed at self or other, or as spiritual or social matters, the seven deadly sins routinely enact relationships that cut to the heart of the onto-epistemic labors of performance. The contributors to this issue all engage Dante's typology in one way or another to perform sin through perversion, insufficiency, and/or excess (of style, of topic, of method).
Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality
2021
The subject of sin is very fundamental and crucial to the Christian faith and theology. The Bible reveals that sin is at the heart of the misery and evil displayed by human kind. Also, the effectes sin is not only limited to the world, but also to the Church. Although the believer, through Christ's death, burial, and resurrection has been delivered from the nature and power of sin, many still engage in it, and consequently, it negatively impacts their fellowship with God, Other believers, and their environment. This paper seeks to discuss the concept, source, consequence, and remedies or solutions to sin.
This presentation is the second part of a two-session Special Focus program on why sexual sins are especially harmful. It is an adaptation of a sermon by Edward D. Seely at Christ Church of Oak Brook in the western suburb of Chicago and which is on the Sermons subpage of the Christian Worship page on this Website: https://fromacorntooak12.com/sermons/. Key subjects addressed in this Special Focus session are: the significant difference between sex sins and other sinfulness; the value of the human body, which is made in the image of God and is a temple of the Holy Spirit; the meaning and importance of God’s call upon Christians to be holy to him who is most holy; our relationship with God; the vast variety of sexual sins and their destructive effects for the individuals involved, family, church, and society; and God’s unique help in overcoming sexual temptation and sins. Other related matters include such additional critical dimensions of the subject as church; forgiveness in Jesus Christ; marriage; and other subjects including the following: cohabitation; commandments; commitment; danger; divorce; drunkenness; fertility; flirting; forgiveness; fornication; freedom; God; gossip; greed; help in the Lord; holiness; Holy Spirit; homosexuality; honoring God; identity; idolatry; immorality; incest; Jesus Christ; lust; marriage; modeling; nuptial joy; obedience; obey; one flesh; pornography; prostitution; sanctification; self-control; sex; sexual desire; sexual self-discipline; sexually transmitted diseases; society, effects on; soul; Spirit; STDs; sin; slander; teen-agers; temptation; Trinity; wickedness.
This presentation is the first part of a two-session Special Focus program on why sexual sins are especially harmful. Key subjects addressed in this Special Focus session are: who God is and how he relates to us; the meaning and importance of God’s call upon Christians to be holy to him who is most holy; our relationship with God; the vast variety of sexual sins and their destructive effects for the individuals involved, marriage, family, church, and society; God’s unique help in overcoming sexual temptation and sins. Other related matters include such additional critical dimensions of the subject as adultery; body; bestiality; children, negative effects of sin on; basic trust; cohabitation; commitment; conscience; creation; danger; divorce; domestic violence; faithfulness; forgiveness; fornication; Holy Spirit; homosexuality; identity; image of God; incest; Jesus Christ; marriage; marital joy; model; nuptial joy; obedience; obey; one flesh; ownership; personal space; polygamy; prostitution; revelation; right and wrong; self-control; sexual dynamic; sexually transmitted diseases; society, effects on; Spirit; STDs; teen-agers; temptation; trust.
Envy (resentment, jealousy, rivalry, discrimination etc), 2022
In economic theory, altruism is seen as a positive relationship between the individual members of society; on the other hand, envy can be understood as a negative form of relationship. While altruism increases the level of material well-being by immaterial components, envy leads to a clear reduction in the level of material well-being. If envy spreads in society, there is a risk of conflicts that can lead to civil warlike conditions and anarchy. The development of a social ethics that excludes envy as a basic pattern of behavior and can, for example, build on the values of Christian neighborly love, is therefore a priority. 1
Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 2025
Sin has damaged human relationships with God, fellow beings, and the universe. It could only be resolved by God's grace. Even believers who have been redeemed still have the potential to fall into sin when faced with temptation. The purpose of this research is to discover and describe the pattern of human fall into sin and the efforts of believers in resisting temptation and fighting sin. This study employs a qualitative theological research method with text analysis. The findings reveal that the pattern of falling into sin begins with temptation, which enters through the five senses and is then processed by the human mind and heart. The response is subsequently expressed in thoughts, feelings, and actions. A sinful heart tends to lead a person toward sin, whereas a heart filled with God's Word is more likely to overcome trials and endure tests of faith. Therefore, believers must fill and guard their hearts with God's Word so that their hearts, minds, and will align with His will and are reflected in actions that glorify Him.
Predigtreiehe "Die sieben Todsünden", published by Johann Ev. Hafner, Evangelische Studierendengemeinde Potsdam, Sommersemester 2011, 2022
In economic theory, altruism is seen as a positive relationship between the individual members of society; on the other hand, envy can be understood as a negative form of relationship. While altruism increases the level of material well-being by immaterial components, envy leads to a clear reduction in the level of material well-being. If envy spreads in society, there is a risk of conflicts that can lead to civil warlike conditions and anarchy. The development of a social ethics that excludes envy as a basic pattern of behavior and can, for example, build on the values of Christian neighborly love, is therefore a priority. 1
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that addictive behaviours are not the result of moral failings but rather emerge from basic human needs going unmet during key developmental phases of life. Each of the seven deadly sins will be examined in direct relation to a specific level of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, revealing a psychological and behavioural pattern rooted in deprivation rather than inherent vice. This paper argues that the connection between unmet needs and the manifestation of sin-like behaviours is not merely theoretical-it is observable, evidence-based, and supported by both modern psychological research and real-world examples.
Envy and resentment weave a dark thread through the tapestry of Scripture, emerging as self-destructive emotions that poison the human spirit and wreak havoc on relationships, communities, and one’s standing with God. Often birthed by pride, these twin forces magnify when the self-exalted heart refuses to rejoice in another’s virtue or God’s favour, setting the stage for their deadly toll. As Proverbs 16:18 (NKJV) warns, "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall," a truth borne out in the bitter fruits of envy and resentment across God’s Word—seen even in Naaman, whose initial pride nearly barred him from healing until he humbled himself to God’s simple command (2 Kings 5:11-14). From the primal jealousy of Cain in Genesis to the calculated resentment of the Jewish leaders in the Gospels, the Bible portrays these twin forces as ‘deadly emotions’—not merely in their capacity to end physical life, but in their power to kill the soul, fracture peace, and defy God’s design. Yet, Scripture offers more than a diagnosis; it provides a divine response—a pathway out of the mire through gratitude, forgiveness, and the transformative love of God. A journey through key biblical narratives reveals the destructive nature of envy and resentment and the redemptive antidote that counters them.
2020
The concept of the seven deadly sins has been used in Catholic confessionalpractices through the usage of penitential manuals, but this concept has also been discussed by variousphilosophers such as Thomas Aquinas and Roger Bacon. Moreover, the concept was so popular thatpoets such as Dante Alighieri, Geoffrey Chaucer, John Gower and Christopher Marlowe, authors suchas William Langland and theologians such as John Wycliffe among others have also used this concept,whether to enrich their works or shed light on the concept from their own perspective. This papertracks the development of the concept from the “deserts of Egypt”, through Hellenistic theology, SoulJourney, the Gnostics, aerial demons and the ascetics to the works of Evagrius of Pontus and JohnCassian to the standardization of the concept by Pope Gregory the Great in the 6 th century
This book addresses the eclipse of shame in Christian theology by showing how shame emerges in Christian texts and practice in ways that can be neither assimilated into a discourses of guilt nor dissociated from embodiment. Stephanie N. Arel argues that the traditional focus on guilt obscures shame by perpetuating the image of the lonely sinner in guilt. Drawing on recent studies in affect and attachment theories to frame the theological analysis, the text examines the theological anthropological writings of Augustine and Reinhold Niebuhr, the interpretation of empathy by Edith Stein, and moments of touch in Christian praxis. Bringing the affective dynamics of shame to the forefront enables theologians and religious leaders to identify where shame emerges in language and human behavior. The text expands work in trauma theory, providing a multi-layered theological lens for engaging shame and accompanying suffering.
Early Theatre, 2004
Among the Henslowe-Alleyn papers at Dulwich College is a document long prized by theatre historians: the handwritten 'plot' of a play called The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins (Dulwich College MS XIX), apparently designed to be hung on a peg backstage at a playhouse. The text of this play does not survive, but it is usually thought to be identical with Richard Tarlton's 'famous play of the seauen Deadly sinnes', referred to in 1592 by Gabriel Harvey and Thomas Nashe. 1 The plot is extremely valuable for its scene-by-scene description of the play's action, which lists the characters and (most of) the players who played those characters in each scene. There are twenty players' names in all
Research Article, 2015
There is no doubt that Islam has a clear methodology about everything which is related to mankind and expressed it on easy way to understand it everyone, the subject of sin also discussed in Quran and hadith with detail from various aspects, Allah and his beloved prophet peace be upon him taught us the right and wrong way, and differentiated righteous from sins, and inform us from its effect on us here and hereafter, because it have very serious influence on our soul , due the committing sins the sinner affect physically and psychologically . And it's also clear that we are living in the era of depression, every 4th person in our society suffered from different psychological disease like depression, anxiety and sadness, in this paper I will present the concept of Islam about sins and its psychological effect on our life. Keywords: Righteous, sins, major, minor, darkness, depression
Roczniki Teologiczne
At the beginning of 2014, during his morning meditations, Pope Francis, when referring to a famous phrase by Pius XII, stated that losing the sense of sin is the evil of this civilisation, an evil that strengthens Christian mediocrity and is inversely proportional to directing attention towards – and constructing – the Kingdom of God among men. The categories of sense of sin and sense of guilt, at least in theory and without generalisations, become understandable in the context of the Christian experience and the ecclesial consciousness; yet, when the human horizon is extended, the two concepts do not find a right to citizenship because the question is not even raised. The children and creators of contemporary culture, the men and women of our time, although directed towards the Kingdom of God, are strongly influenced by the global and plural secularist mentality, and this has a negative impact on their attitudes, behaviour and expressions of their existence. The Church, both within...
My focus has been on examining the holistic nature of human sins of the variety that may be considered debts requiring Christians to seek forgiveness from God and others. By a holistic perspective I mean that the act of sin is inextricably linked within us to our spiritual core, thoughts, feelings and our biology and these internal modules are influenced by our past social context, including the people, settings, and time frames of our daily life. Sin does not occur in a vacuum nor can sin be analyzed by focusing on theological implications or biological correlations. An understanding of sin requires a holistic approach.
"Capital vices, or cardinal sins, have been discussed and debated since at least the 4th century, when Evagrius Ponticus, a Roman born monk who relished praise from his peers and married women, first wrote of the eight evil thoughts from which all sinful behavior was based. These evil thoughts - gluttony, fornication, avarice, sorry, anger, discouragement, vainglory, and pride - were later revised in the 6th century by Pope Gregory I to constitute the seven deadly sins: Luxuria (Lust), Gula (Gluttony), Avaritia (Greed), Acedia (Sloth), Ira (Wrath), Invidia (Envy), and Superbia (Pride). From the 14th century onwards, the deadly sins have been popularized by texts, including Dante Alaghieri’s 14th century masterpiece The Divine Comedy (Alagherii, 2010), and they have continued to be a prominent focus in contemporary art, music, television, film, comic books and, most recently, video games. The authors undertook the task of statistically representing the seven deadly sins at the county level wi- thin the Midwest region of the United States to determine what, if any, spatial coincidence occurred. Each of the seven deadly sins was given separate treatment based on sociological and economic characteristics and available data. Pride, the “greatest" and “root" of all sins, was determined to be the aggregation of each sin and represents the total sinfulness of a given county or region."
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011
Studies suggest that guilt feeling plays an important role in mental health. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship among two kinds of guilt feeling (pathological and non pathological), religious attitude and mental health. Participants were undergraduate students (N = 312), who were selected by available sampling and completed General Health Questionnaire (GHQ, 28), religious attitude questionnaire and researcher constructed guilt feeling Questionnaire. Our findings showed a negative significant correlation (P<0/001) between pathological guilt and mental health and a positive significant correlation (P<0/001) between non-pathological guilt and religious attitude.
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2021
A number of Christian theologians and philosophers have been critical of overly moralizing approaches to the doctrine of sin, but nearly all Christian thinkers maintain that moral fault is necessary or sufficient for sin to obtain. Call this the “Moral Consensus.” I begin by clarifying the relevance of impurities to the biblical cataloguing of sins. I then present four extensional problems for the Moral Consensus on sin, based on the biblical catalogue of sins: (1) moral over-demandingness, (2) agential unfairness, (3) moral repugnance, and (4) moral atrocity. Next, I survey several partial solutions to these problems, suggested by the recent philosophical literature. Then I evaluate two largely unexplored solutions: (a) genuine sin dilemmas and (b) defeasible sinfulness. I argue that (a) creates more problems than it solves and that, while (b) is well-motivated and solves or eases each of the above problems, (b) leaves many biblical ordinances about sin morally misleading, creating (5) a pedagogical problem of evil. I conclude by arguing that (5) places hefty explanatory burdens on those who would appeal to (b) to resolve the four extensional problems discussed in this paper. So Christian thinkers may need to consider a more radical separation of sin and moral fault.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.