Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2019
University of Alberta Press gratefully acknowledges the support received for its publishing program from the Government of Canada, the Canada Council for the Arts, and the Government of Alberta through the Alberta Media Fund. University of Alberta Press gratefully acknowledges and thanks the University of Alberta Libraries for its financial support of this book, which allows for the electronic edition to be available as an Open Access title. e r w ▶ This collection is dedicated to government information librarians whose commitment to democratic engagement, professional values, and intellectual curiosity inspire stewardship and service for the betterment of the public good. Special thanks go to
Government Publications Review, 1993
The distribution of Canadian government publications has remained virtually unchanged for 60 years. While there is much development work being done currently. two key influences on the activities stand out. Firstly, there has been a tremendous change because of technological advancement in data accessibility. Secondly, there has been an awareness by librarians that either legislation will have to replace guidelines in the distribution of documents or that the present guidelines must be strengthened and enforced properly. There have been many developments on the provincial scene as well in terms of depository distribution mechanisms. * The author would like to express special gratitude to Andrew Hubbertz of the University of Saskatchewan for his tremendous help in editing this paper, offering suggestions, and helping to write parts of the Statistics Canada section. ** Vivienne Monty has been a government and business specialist for 20 years. She is the author of Ctrmditrn Su7trll BlrsinrJss Handbook, Toronto: CCH Canadian Ltd. 1992 [2nd edition], 210~. She is also the author of a forthcoming article on "The Documentation of the EEC." in Jmrrntrl of Busincs.s crnd Finrrncr Lihricrmhip.
Government Publications Review, 1992
Recently promulgated policies indicate that the federal government views government information as a corporate resource. While the policies acknowledge that revenues need to be generated to offset the considerable cost of gathering and disseminating government information, there is an explicit recognition of an obligation on the part of the government to keep the citizenry informed. This paper surveys the present status of major government information players and selected information issues in the context of possible policy impacts on Canadian libraries. Print on paper is the traditional medium for disseminating official information to the Canadian citizenry. The locus for this medium resides in the Canada Communication Group-Publishing Division (CCG-P) [until recently referred to as the Canadian Govemment Publishing Centre (CGPC)], which operates under the general administration of the Department of Supply and Services. The CCG-P is charged with carrying out the following functions: procurement of printing and control of stock; fulfillment of mail orders; warehousing and distribution of publications; advertising, promotion, and marketing; coordination of copublishing government issuances with the private sector; and production of the checklist of government publications and administration of the nation's network of depository libraries through the Depository Services Program (DSP). Historically, all departments within the Canadian federal government have arranged for the publication of their traditional print materials through the Publishing Centre. This practice is currently being modified. In an effort to encourage greater service orientation and to promote cost-effectiveness, the CCG-P in April 1990, was granted the status of a special operating agency. This status is eventually to make the Division's services totally optional for most federal departments and place it on the same footing as the private sector. The precedent of similar actions in 1983 by Her Majesty's Stationery Office in the United Kingdom, leads one to anticipate further changes in the relationship of the Division with government departments [2]. While until recently the CCG-P was obligated to accept all manuscripts submitted by authoring agencies, the Division, in an effort to meet a mandate to become self-supporting, was not obliged to sell an agency's publication at an agency-specified price. As a result, departments' arrangements with the Publishing Division vary greatly. The Division will take the risks and absorb all costs associated with publishing and printing in cases where a department will let CCG-P retain any profits, set the print run, market, and sell a publication at a price established by the Group. Otherwise, departments must pay in full CCG-P's costs in publishing the materials, or the department must pay the difference between the cost of producing the publication and the price it wishes to have the Publishing Division charge. There is concern that such full-cost recovery charges by CCG-P, combined with the general financial exigency that has been prevalent in the Canadian federal government, may well be having a chilling effect on departmental publishing activities, although the number of titles published by the Division has increased significantly in recent years [ 31. Government departments also have an additional option in that they can arrange through the Publishing Division to have a manuscript copublished with a private sector publisher. Originally established to serve as a subsidy to encourage the growth of the domestic Canadian publishing industry and to protect it from being overrun by United States firms, copublishing provides the private sector publisher with an opportunity to do business with the government. In all arrangements with the private sector, the Division attempts to determine if value to the government will be forthcoming. Value can be evident in such ways as making additional copies of resulting publications available to depository libraries, more success in marketing books and getting them on to bookstore shelves, payment of royalties to the government, cost avoidance to the government, or perhaps even the transfer of some of the government's research and development costs to the private sector. Critics of the program maintain that the lure of private-sector publishing and distribution channels diverts the most profitable governmental works to private publishers. Expense and
IFLA, 2021
Boulder printing of government documents ended. By this time, most government documents were available online. The Depository Services Program (DSP) became the DSP E-collection. Many publications are not included because of strict guidelines for acceptance. Canada has had a legal depository program since 1953, and two copies of each publication must be deposited at the National Library of Canada, including digital publications. All Canadian Parliamentary records from 1867 to date are available. Research publications from the Library of Parliament assist in finding needed information. Many government publications are available on the Open Government Portal. Mohammed Zuheir Bakleh and Lize Denner focus on government libraries in the Middle East and North Africa. They provide us with details about the types of government libraries in these regions, which include legislative libraries, judicial libraries, and executive libraries (such as the libraries of ministries and departments of government) and the services they provide. These services include document delivery, research assistance, and current events awareness. These libraries lack adequate budgets, staff, and technology. Collections are weak because of the lack of acquisitions plans, as well as a lack of Arabic tools for doing research. The authors point out that there is a lack of understanding of the value of libraries in many Middle Eastern and North African countries and suggest that libraries need to work cooperatively through their library associations to strengthen their role. Library associations can offer a venue to discuss current issues and offer support to each other. There is also a need for increased training of librarians.
2014
It has been a confusing and stressful couple of years for those of us working with Canadian federal government information. Changes to information policies and procedures have impacted the way publications and documents are produced, disseminated, and accessed. The library community's response has, by necessity, been reactive but renewed federal programs might provide opportunities for partnerships that were not possible in the past. Background The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS), akin to the Office of Management and Budget in the United States, leads the Government of Canada (GC) information management strategy. This includes the development of policies and directives, standards, guidelines, and tools that inform departmental policy implementation. Library and Archives Canada (LAC) is responsible for acquiring, preserving, and providing access to the documentary heritage of Canada, as established by the Library and Archives of Canada Act [1]. The Depository Services Program of Canada (DSP) is administered by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) and provides a central distribution source for published Canadian government information. The DSP is informed by the Communications Policy of Canada [2]. Both organizations collect and provide access to Canadian government information. Poorly-Implemented Policy In the late 1990s, the TBS began implementing a precursor to the "Common Look and Feel" protocol (CLF) in order to harmonize the look of government websites and improve accessibility standards, making it easier for people (both sighted and visually impaired) to navigate GC web content [3]. Unfortunately, not all departments dedicated the resources necessary to make this change and/or adapt existing content to be in compliance with the new standard. Despite requests from LAC and DSP staff to capture web content before removal, much was lost as departments made under-funded attempts to bring their sites into compliance. A government audit in 2007 showed that all tested websites failed basic priorities for compliance and that roughly half suffered from serious violations [4]. This was highlighted in a 2010 Federal Court judgment that found the noncompliance to be an infringement of subsection 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court declared that the government had a constitutional obligation to bring its websites into compliance with the Charter within 15 months [5]. Since the declaration did not apply to
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 2018
Library Resources & Technical Services, 2003
The authors would like to acknowledge the librarians who commented so helpfully upon the pilot questionnaire, who took time to complete the questionnaire with such care and thought, and who despite their hectic work schedules volunteered to be interviewed, whether or not they were finally included in our interview sample. Marc Richard of McGill University Libraries and France Bouthillier of McGill's Graduate School of Library and Information Studies generously gave their time and expertise to translate the English-language questionnaire and accompanying letter into French. Liz McKeen of the NLC was a source of encouragement, support, and help at various stages of the project. Finally, Amy MacLean and Valerie Nesset, our research assistants, as is often the case, did the bulk of the day-today work, and we are greatly indebted to them.
2010
a unique organizational model among data libraries (by which I mean to include, as well, data archives and data banks) in the manner in which it is jointly operated by the library and Computing Centre of the university. How it came to be as it is is a result of its historical development; it continues to function as it does due to the success of the original model. In 1963/64, a Statistical Centre for the Social Sciences was established in the university’s Faculty of Arts, primarily through the efforts of the departments of economics, political science, and anthropology and sociology. The purpose of the center was to provide statistical and programming consultation to faculty and graduate students in the Faculty of Arts, i.e., to act as an intermediary between the social scientists and the Computer Centre. By 1965 the Statistical Centre hadentered into membership agreements with the, then, Inter-University Consortium for Political Research (ICPR) and the International Survey Library...
1993
Those of you who subscribe to the ARCHIVES LISTSERV on the Internet may have seen a recent discussion on the merits of using "super-utilities" such as the Research Libraries Information Network (RLIN), OCLC, or (in Canada) UTLAS. The exchange raises very significant issues for archivists, and especially archival institutions, contemplating either the development of new, or the use of already existing, information exchange networks. The issues become more germane as Canadian archivists and archives generate standardized descriptive records in accordance with Rules for Archival Description. The issues raised in this "electronic exchange," which is reproduced below with the permission of the authors, raise more questions than answers for those of us thinking about a national information exchange network for Canadian archives. The following questions and issues are of particular interest:
2011
How the CRA administers and fulfills its obligation under the legislation and processes for getting some types of government information.
Canadian Public Policy, 2014
Abstract: Les entrevues en profondeur avec des représentants du gouvernement sont un élément de recherche essentiel lors de l’étude d’un gouvernement. Les facteurs historiques et institutionnels, et en particulier la dynamique interne informelle qui influence les politiques, exigent une très bonne compréhension, en général mieux concrétisée grâce à ces méthodes d’entrevue. Au Canada, de nombreuses tendances au sein de l’administration fédérale portent visiblement sur la réglementation et la centralisation croissante des renseignements du gouvernement. On a noté de l’ingérence politique dans les demandes d’accès à l’information; on a supprimé les résultats de la recherche scientifique; et l’accès des médias aux politiciens est devenu très contraignant. Nous nous sommes donc demandé si le resserrement des contrôles portant sur les renseignements avait aussi eu un effet sur les entrevues de recherche auprès des représentants du gouvernement. Le présent article explore cette question lors d’entrevues avec des universitaires et des fonctionnaires du gouvernement fédéral du Canada. Nous cherchons à savoir s’il y a eu resserrement de l’accès aux entrevues de recherche auprès du gouvernement et, le cas échéant, s’il y a un effet sur la façon et la nature de notre recherche. Abstract: In-depth interviews with government officials are a critical research method for the study of government. Historical and institutional factors, and particularly the informal internal dynamics that influence policy, require a depth of understanding that is often best investigated through such interview methods. At the federal level in Canada we see many trends that point to the increasing centralization and control of government information. There has been political interference in Access to Information Requests; the outcomes of scientific research have been suppressed; and media access to politicians has become highly constrained. This led us to ask whether tightening controls on information have also affected access to research interviews with government officials. This paper explores this issue by interviewing both academics and public servants in the Canadian federal government. We ask is there evidence of a tightening grip on access to governmental research interviews and, if so, is this affecting how and what we research?
Government Publications Review. Part A
Taken as a single category, published government documents constitute the richest and most comprehensive information base for investigating a country's modern past. This paper explores the availability, range, and potential usefulness of published federal-and provincial-level Canadian governmental sources to 1925, paying particular attention to those materials most likely to be useful for investigating conditions and behavior over long periods of time. The documents published by the Canadian and the Ontario provincial governments are focused on as being representative of material which researchers should expect to find in documents published by other provinces and, in some degree, other governments in Western countries.
beyond the Web: technologies, knowledge and …, 2001
Government Information Quarterly, 2005
Canadian Public Administration, 2010
Government Information Quarterly, 2009
2005
The eight essays in this elegant volume discuss Canada's archives and their history from the point of view of knowledgeable practitioners who helped shape the Canadian archival system. Sponsored by the Canadian Council of Archives (CCA), the book's concept, and to a large extent its execution too, emerged naturally as a result of the decision of the International Council on Archives (ICA) to hold its twelfth congress in Montreal in September 1992. In keeping with their purpose to honour archives in Canada, these essays emphasize our achievements. But they are also more than a puff of pride. Each author in his or her own way demonstrates their careful reading of recent events in Canadian archives. The result is a celebratory compilation marked by unusual candour, for the authors do not gloss over areas that are weak or problems yet to be resolved. The tone is conversational, candid talk among good friends, and the impression conveyed by the book is one of confidence in the fu...
In 2009, the Treasury Board of Canada issued a directive to help ensure effective recordkeeping practices enabling departments to create, acquire, capture, manage and protect the integrity of information resources of business value to Government of Canada programs and services. Currently, numerous departments are engaged and work is well in hand on this directive and several aspects are being systematically addressed under the scope of effective recordkeeping practices. This directive addresses the identification of information resources of business value based on analysis of departmental functions and activities, the establishment and implementation of key methodologies, mechanisms and tools that support the departmental recordkeeping requirements, proper documentation of recordkeeping practices of accountability, stewardship, performance measurement, reporting and legal requirements, and timely communication with departmental managers and employees on the risks associated with poo...
Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 2011
Walby, K. and M. Larsen. 2011. ‘Getting at the Live Archive: on Access to Information Research in Canada’. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 26/3: 623-634.
Library Hi Tech News, 2011
The author visited Canada during March 2010 to study Canadian Archival system especially records management in archives in Ontario province; the driving rationale for the study was the realization that there existed very less or no archives and record management program in India. This study intends to report different types of archives and record management (ARM) programs in Canada, with special reference to e-records management viz. automation status, creation of virtual exhibits, preservation of digital images, metadata standard for e-records etc. The prime objectives were to overview the current state of modern record keeping in the Government of Canada and identify the core competencies required to build effective record keeping infrastructures in the electronic work environment that has emerged in most government institutions.
Canadian Review of Sociology/Révue canadienne de sociologie, 2022
This paper explores some of the implications that administrative data, defined as data initially collected for purposes other than research, will have for Sociology. Although administrative data are "found" rather than "made" and, in turn, pose several challenges, we argue that the potential of these data warrant the investment,
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.