Faculty Survey, Liaison Survey, and General Librarian Survey
Megan Lotts2010
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
AI
AI
The Faculty Survey conducted by Megan Lotts and Julie Arendt at Southern Illinois University Carbondale aims to explore the interactions between academic departments and librarians across various institutions in the United States. By analyzing survey responses about the perceived importance of library support, the research intends to identify factors that contribute to successful collaborations between faculty and librarians. The survey emphasizes voluntary participation, confidentiality, and the importance of feedback on library services, which will guide future enhancements in librarian-faculty relationships.
Related papers
A Tale of Two Liaison Programs: University of Central Florida Libraries and Louisiana State University Libraries Partnering for Subject Librarian Excellence
"Roll With the Times, or the Times Roll Over You", 2017
Are you considering establishing a new or re-invigorated subject liaison program in your library but don't know how to begin? Why not partner with an established liaison program at another library? Throughout the spring and fall of 2015, key public service managers at Louisiana State University (LSU) Libraries visited six Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL) to see, among other things, successful liaison programs. The LSU librarians were particularly impressed with the University of Central Florida (UCF) Libraries' three-year-old reimagined subject librarian program. Following this visit, LSU managers began reworking their program by fine-tuning liaisons' program assignments and creating a liaison training program that focused on academic program profiling, faculty profiling, curriculum mapping, curriculum integrated instruction, increased liaison visibility and accessibility, and proactive outreach to faculty and students. In this article, public service heads from UCF and LSU discuss how their liaison programs are the same and how they differ, how librarians collaborated in finding new ways of reaching faculty, what the challenges are in their current programs, and what the future may hold. Hopefully, lessons learned by UCF and LSU will provide insight for other academic libraries wishing to create liaison programs designed to support student and faculty success at their own institutions. (Please see http://guides.ucf.edu/ucflsu for graphics.
Improving Library Relations with the Faculty and University Administrators: The Role of the Faculty Outreach Librarian
An academic library's most powerful constituents are faculty and admin istrators. In an attempt to satisfy the needs of individual departments and faculty members, many libraries employ subject specialists. To the degree that a subject specialist is proactive, or the department is heavily dependent on the library's services, those needs will be met. However, few libraries have developed systematic programs to reach all faculty members or to begin targeting university administrators as a special user group. The rationale for doing so is twofold: to educate them on the growing role of information technology in research and teaching, and to enhance their support for new electronic resources. At George Wash ington University, the position of faculty outreach librarian was created to fill such a need. This article discusses how that position evolved, the projects initiated, and the outcomes that have led to revised marketing strategies.
Phase III University of Iowa Libraries Faculty and Staff Study
2011
The Faculty and Staff Study is the third phase of a three-part research project by the University of Iowa Libraries. The study was designed to assess faculty and staff satisfaction with library-wide services and resources. The purpose of this study is to obtain objective, quantifiable information from the faculty and staff at the University of Iowa regarding library services and resources. The objectives of the Faculty and Staff Study were: to ascertain and understand how faculty and staff access library resources and services; to ascertain what library services, resources, collections and facilities faculty and staff use for study, teaching and research; to ascertain faculty and staff perceptions of library resources and services; to ascertain how satisfied faculty and staff are with library resources and services; to identify unmet needs and areas for improvement.
College and University Libraries/Departmental Libraries; Association of College and Research Libraries; American Library Association/Policy Statements
College & Research Libraries, 1994
There is a long history of debate and controversy surrounding the existence of academic branch libraries. Although the reasons for reviewing branch libraries are numerous and varied, there is a need for consistency in the review process. Using recent ACRL guidelines and standards as a foundation, the authors propose a model methodology for reviewing academic branch libraries which may be utilized by any institution undertaking such a process. Disciplines Library and Information Science Comments This article is form College & Research Libraries 55 (1994): 342-354.
Liaison Librarian Task Force 2012 - 2013, The University of Maryland Libraries, Final Report, 31 May 2013
2013
TEACHING, LEARNING AND LITERACIES Librarians are involved in instruction through face-to-face, online, and/or blended classes in areas of their specialty, as well as in general, core and other courses. They offer training on databases, research tools, bibliographic management programs, and in other specific areas to support education and research in the academic units. Technological advancements coupled with drastic changes in users' information needs and expectations are having a great impact on library instruction. The existing information literacy models are outdated, as undergraduate students are more technologically savvy, and their expectations are higher. Librarians should avoid developing a library-centric program and should set information literacy discourse within a framework that is relevant and valuable to classroom faculty and align it with the educational goals and mission of the institution. Some experts considered the possibility that librarians
Subject Liaisons in Academic Libraries: An Open Access Data Set from 2015
portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2017
The work of subject liaison librarians in academic libraries has morphed to include a variety of roles that reach beyond the traditional. This study captures responses of 1,808 participants from land-grant, Oberlin Group, and Association of Research Libraries (ARL) institutions to a questionnaire about subject liaison librarians. The questionnaire contains eight demographic questions, five questions about liaison responsibilities, seven outreach and instruction questions, three traditional reference questions, two scholarly communications questions, three collection development questions, and an open-ended question. This is the largest data set compiled to date on academic subject liaison librarians. The data set has been made available on an open access basis in hopes that use of the data will facilitate cross-study comparisons. The Data Set T he data set created for this study, "Subject Liaisons in Academic Libraries: An Open Access Data Set from 2015," is comprised of data collected about subject liaison librarians and the work they are doing in academic libraries. The data set has been made available on an open access basis. It contains information from 1,808 participants, specifically librarians from land-grant institutions, mostly large public universities; the Oberlin Group, mostly small liberal arts colleges; and Association of Research Libraries (ARL) libraries. The participating librarians answered eight demographic questions, five questions about subject liaison responsibilities, seven outreach and instruction questions, three traditional reference questions, two scholarly communications questions, and three collection development questions. There was also an open-ended question that asked for comments of any kind. Two of the questions were standardized: Q9 "Where did you get your library/information science degree?" and Q13, type of library. Information deemed to have identifying characteristics has been redacted and labeled "REDACTED-Identifying Information."
Toward a New Enterprise: Capitalizing on the Faculty-Librarian Partnership
College & Research Libraries, 2003
In spring 2000, the authors undertook a study to explore the interaction between academic librarians and faculty at the University of Manitoba, the impact of librarians' contributions, and the future roles of librarians. The following five areas were investigated: teaching/instruction, infor mation services, information technology, research, and collections. The results clearly show that when faculty interact with librarians, librarians have a very positive and considerable impact on both faculty and stu dents. In addition, the faculty responses indicate that they are receptive to collaborating with librarians at a higher level of interaction than cur rently experienced.
What Liaisons Say about Themselves and What Faculty Say about Their Liaisons, a U.S. Survey
Liaison librarians and faculty in chemistry, English, and psychology departments at colleges and universities in the United States were surveyed. They answered questions about services provided by the liaison and satisfaction. Liaisons' satisfaction with their performance was associated with active liaison service, such as recent contact with the department and more time spent on liaison work. Faculty satisfaction with liaisons was associated with contact with their liaisons. We did not find associations between liaisons' descriptions of their work and faculty satisfaction with their liaisons for the pairs of faculty and their liaisons we were able to match.
R. David Lankes (with contributions from Wendy Newman, Sue Kowalski, Beck Tench, and Cheryl Gould). The New Librarianship Field Guide . Cambridge, Mass.; London, England: MIT Press, 2016. 226p. Paper, $22 (ISBN 978262529082). LC 2015-39943
College & Research Libraries
The University Library: The Center of a University Education?
portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2006
Subject Librarians Relations with Faculty at the University of Botswana: A Review of Liaison Activities
2000
Overview of the Subject Librarian System at the University of Botswana Library UBL adopted the system of subject librarianship in 1981. The philosophy of this system is based on the strong liaison component built into it, so that the best "climate" is provided for collection development, information, reference, and instructional services. The main functions of the subject librarian are: (1) to develop and maintain the subject collection in the library, (2) to provide subject oriented library instruction to students, and (3) to promote and provide reference and information services to all library patrons.
Structured Interviews Reveal That Reference and Liaison Librarians—as Engaged, Proactive Partners—are Vital to the Academic Enterprise
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2022
A Review of: Johnson, A.M. (2020). Reference and liaison librarians: Endangered species or “vital partners?” Views of academic library administrators. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 784-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1786979 Objectives – To investigate the current state and prospects of reference and liaison librarianship. Design – Structured interviews consisted of 10 questions that lasted between 30 and 75 minutes. Setting – Fourteen medium-sized, urban universities geographically spread across the United States of America. Subjects – Fifteen library administrators with at least 10 years of experience. Methods – The author contacted academic library leaders from 17 benchmark institutions and head librarians from other R1 institutions whose libraries were members of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) or whose campus size and characteristics mirrored the author’s institution in that they were medium-sized urban universities. The study examined five p...
Faculty & Student Perspectives on the Role of the Library
Against the Grain
Library Usage by Faculty Members of Benguet State University
2020
The study's objectives were to determine Benguet State University faculty members' general impression of the library resources and their usage of these resources. To answer these objectives, questions on faculty members' satisfaction with the library resources, frequency of usage, purposes of using the library resources, reasons for not using the library resources, reasons of not being able to find the resources they are looking for in the library and suggestions for library development in terms of library resources were asked. It was found out that the majority of the faculty members have used the library resources at least once-a-term. On the other hand, those who did not use the library resources cited the Internet as the source of their information needs. Faculty members often used library resources for instructional support purposes, and book collections to be the most used library resources. Faculty members said that they partly found the library resources they were looking for during their last visit to the library. Furthermore, they also said that usually they rarely saw the library resources that they were looking for. They specified that the University Library has no resource/s on a particular subject because they could not find or get the resources they need. Moreover, faculty members would like to have more Internet access (Terminals/Wi-Fi) in the library. In terms of subject coverage, faculty members would like the Serials resources to be improved the most. Faculty members rated the library resources from Average to Good in terms of Recency, Relevance/Use, and Adequacy. Except for Optical Discs, which was rated Fair for its Adequacy. Generally, it was found that faculty members are satisfied with the library resources of the library. When compared according to employment status, faculty members use the library resources once a month and their frequency of use and satisfaction level of the library resources have no significant differences compared to sex, employment status, and rank. On the contrary, differences were found when the faculty members' level of satisfaction was compared according to College/Institute. The same was found when faculty members' frequency of use of the library resources was compared according to College/Institute.
Relationships Between Librarians and Faculty Still Need Further Investigation
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2012
A Review of: Phelps, S. F., & Campbell, N. (2012). Commitment and trust in librarian-faculty relationships: A systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(1), 13-19.
Liaison Librarianship
2019
This book chapter describes the work of liaison librarians. After reading this chapter, you will be able to describe common qualifications and responsibilities of liaisons in order to determine whether liaisonship is suitable for your needs and interests as a new librarian or LIS student. It will allow you to articulate skills and expertise requisite for liaison work in order to evalu¬ate your ability to provide services most effectively. You will be able to establish a plan to gain relevant skills and expertise in order to compete successfully for liaison job openings. It provides information about how to connect with faculty in their areas of responsibility in order to facilitate new outreach and deepen existing relationships. It should help you develop and assess support and outreach initiatives in order to identify gaps and provide greater support for patrons. Finally, it will help you appraise liaison work in order to advocate for promotion/tenure
Visit to University Libraries in the US by Mr J van Wyk and Mr H Mphidi 8 April 2003 to 3 May 2003
2007
This is a feedback report on a study visit by Mr Johann van Wyk and Mr Hamilton Mphidi from 8 April-3 May 2003, to libraries in the United States on behalf of the Faculty of Education and the Academic Information Service of the University of Pretoria.
Academic reference librarians : Getting by with a little help from our (special, public, school, law and medical librarian) friends
Library management, 2010
The purpose of this viewpoint paper is to consider how academic reference librarians might be guided by non-academic librarians as their roles shift and/or expand in a many different directions.
Restructuring a Liaison Program in an Academic Library
College & Research Libraries
New technologies, an expanding universe of knowledge, and a more sophisticated user base influence not only how we provide access to information, but also how we define and organize ourselves in relation to the public. The J. Murrey Atkins Library of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte has endeavored to strengthen the relationship between the library and the teaching faculty by restructuring the library’s liaison program. Concurrently, but independent of this redesign, three experienced reference librarians assessed their effectiveness as liaisons by conducting a survey of selected departments. A review of the development and implementation of the library’s program, together with an assessment of the faculty survey, confirm that specific elements are prerequisites of an effective liaison program.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.