Participatory Design: A Historical Perspective
Henry Sanoff2021
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
Participatory design is an attitude about a force for change in the creation and management of environments for people. Its strength lies in being a movement that cuts across traditional professional boundaries and cultures. Its roots lie in the ideals of a participatory democracy where collective decision-making is highly decentralized throughout all sectors of society, so that all individuals learn participatory skills and can effectively participate in various ways in the making of all decisions that affect them. Increasingly complex decision-making processes require a more informed citizenry that has considered the evidence on the issue, discussed potential decision options and arrived at a mutually agreed upon decision (Abelson et al, 2003).Today participatory design processes are being applied to urban design, planning, and geography as well as to the fields of industrial and information technology. Research findings suggest that positive outcomes are associated with solutions...
Related papers
Participatory Design
Journal of Design, Planning and Aesthetics Research
Participatory design is the involvement of people in the creation and management of their built and natural environments. Its strengths are that it cuts across traditional professional boundaries and cultures. The activity of participatory design is based on the principle that the built and natural environments work better if citizens are active and involved in its creation and management instead of being treated as passive consumers. The main purposes of participation are to involve citizens in planning and design decision-making processes and, as a result increase their trust and confidence in organizations, making it more likely that they will work within established systems when seeking solutions to problems; to provide citizens with a voice in planning, design and decision-making in order to improve plans, decisions, service delivery, and overall quality of the environment; and to promote a sense of community by bringing people together who share common goals. A wide range of t...
Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning
Architecture and Urban Planning, 2016
This study analyses motivations, results and technology of the participatory design approach. It is a review based on 32 papers, presenting recent studies on participatory design in architecture and urban planning during the time period from 2000 to 2014. As a result, the main motivations, outcomes and the role of technology are emphasised and discussed. Furthermore, recommendations for future research directions for participatory design research in the field of urban planning are also provided.
Participatory Design: Participatory Urban Management
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Cities and Communities, 2020
Definition Participatory design in urban management defines multiple types of participatory processes developed in a wide range of policy domains, which differ from representative mechanisms (e.g., political elections), direct democracy initiatives (e.g., public petitions and referenda), and forms of public information or consultation. The participation of associated and non-associated citizens to the formulation, implementation, and/or assessment of public policies aims to contribute to the quality of democratic governance against the decrease of citizenry trust toward elected representatives and provide more effective responses to wider community.
The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2015
We investigate the diversity of participatory design research practice, based on a review of ten years of participatory design research published as full research papers at the Participatory Design Conferences (PDC) 2002-2012, and relate this body of research to five fundamental aspects of PD from classic participatory design literature. We identify five main categories of research contributions: Participatory Design in new domains, Participatory Design methods, Participatory Design and new technology, Theoretical contributions to Participatory Design, and Basic concepts in Participatory Design. Moreover, we identify how participation is defined, and how participation is conducted in experimental design cases, with a particular focus on interpretation, planning, and decision-making in the design process.
The significance of early stages in participatory design for social sustainability
The source literature devoted to participatory design concentrates very often on studying preferences in feeling architecture, as the culmination and a really key case is the post-occupancy evaluation (POE). The participation of respondents, users in managing the architectural environment is established especially in the field of these elements, where creation takes place with the use of an easy means of communication – a drawing, graphics and also those, which are oriented towards picking out the subjective component of assessment, for which the objectification process is not so important. Such study recognizes individual preferences and it enables one to draw conclusions, relatively non-distant from social expectations, using statistics rules. In such constructed action, the effectiveness of participation is strongly conditioned on the range of ability to involve a big group of potential recipients of architectural design. In investigations carried out for over 50 years of functioning of the social participation as the system of supporting the effectiveness of architectural design, oriented towards supporting local communities, the other proposals also appear, widening the range of possible participation. However, most of these actions take place far away outside the borders of Poland and therefore the mechanisms used in them are difficult to inculcate in the local area. In the paper the significance of early stages of the Method Architektura dla Lokalnej Społeczności (AdLS) – Architecture for the Local Society is presented, which makes an attempt at improving social participation through constructing mechanisms of objectifying opinions of architecture recipients, involving them in constructing the language of dialogue, the system of multi-criteria assessment, selection of criteria and more conscious working within the confines of designing as well as building long-term social relations with simultaneously retaining rules
Participatory Design Projects: A Retrospective Look
Participatory Design Conference, 1992
This paper revisits participatory design (PD) projects that were reported at conferences sponsored by IFIP WG9.1 (Computers and W<rlc) over the past decade. Drawing upon both published accounts and recent questionnaire responses from the researchers involved, it examines the factors that have contributed to the strengths and weaknesses of these leading PD projects. While the central notions of PD appear to have stood up well, for various reasons the projects generally have not lead to self-sustaining processes within their host organizations. Suggestions for future projects are offered.
Participatory design in an era of participation
CoDesign, 2017
This special issue on participatory design in an era of participation presents emerging topics and discussions from the thirteenth Participatory Design Conference (PDC), held at Aarhus University in August 2016. The PDC 2016 marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Participatory Design conference series, which began in 1990 with the first biannual conference in Seattle. Since then, the PDC conferences have continued to bring together a multidisciplinary, international community of researchers and practitioners around issues of cooperative design. The theme for the 2016 PDC conference was 'Participatory Design in an Era of Participation'. Critical and constructive discussions were invited on the values, characteristics, politics and future practices of participatory design in an era in which participation has now become per
Related papers
The Importance of Describing Participatory Design in the Making
2012
This article is a call to describe Participatory Design (PD) projects in the making, i.e. to show how the heterogeneous elements in the field are gradually organised in a participatory manner as the projects progress. It is based on two arguments. The first is a negative argument. Very often, PD projects are not described in the making. As a result, the landmarks to be used to evaluate them remain unclear or invisible. The second argument is of a more positive nature. The articles that do describe projects in the making enable landmarks to be defined that can be effectively used to evaluate PD projects. The notion of emerging groups is one of these landmarks.
Participatory Design: Examples and Institutional Needs
1996
This paper will discuss two participatory design projects, a supports needed to make participatory design a viable option.
Participatory Methods in Urban Design
Универзитет уметности у Београду, Факултет примењених уметности eBooks, 2022
“… so what?” Limitations of Participatory Design on Decision-making in Urban Planning
This article addresses certain Participatory Design (PD)-related aspects of the project OurCity that took place in Meri-Rastila, a multicultural suburb in East Helsinki, Finland. The aim of OurCity was to democratize design processes and to empower local residents to influence the redevelopment of their area. PD processes were a key component to the OurCity project and its activities, particularly in relation to the process of drafting an Alternative Master Plan (AMP) for the area. The plan competed with, and lost by a narrow margin to, the plan drafted by the Helsinki City Planning Department. In AMP the scope of PD was underestimated. In this article, we argue that it is necessary to make PD processes more visible in the end products of participatory planning. We base this argument on firsthand experience as members of the OurCity team and on an analysis of printed media and digital texts.
How Participatory Design Works
Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction
DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
Participatory design and "democratizing innovation
Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC '10, 2010
The field of Strategic Design supports designers in researching and designing for the complexity of today's cities by embracing the idea of strategic dialogue, in which designers align with different actors and their interests. In this article, we discuss how democratic dialogues-foregrounded in the Participatory Design (PD) tradition-play a role in complex urban design processes (i.e. 'infrastructuring') and entail different types of dialogues of which strategic dialogue is merely one. After framing Strategic Design and PD, we describe five designer roles and their associated dialogues. This description forms the basis of an exploratory typology of democratic dialogues that was applied and exemplified in a case study about a Living Lab in the neighbourhood of Genk. The Lab attempts to design alternative futures for work in the city together with citizens, public and private organisations. We claim that engaging with this typology allows designers to understand and design infrastructuring processes in the urban context and to open up different design dialogues and roles for discussion.
Participatory design for sustainable social change
Design Studies, 2018
Tendencies in contemporary participatory design suggest a move away from engagement of limited stakeholders in preconfigured design processes and predefined technology outcomes, towards more complex and long-term engagement with heterogeneous communities and larger ecologies of social and technological transformation. Building on core values of participatory design, we introduce three dimensions of engagement of scoping, developing and scaling that we argue can be essential in developing a holistic approach to participatory design as a sustainable practice of social change. The dimensions foreground central aspects of participatory design research that are discussed in relation to a long-term project exploring design and digital fabrication technologies in Danish primary and secondary education.
Societal Change Through Participatory Design
Question: Can participatory design effect a reduction in the violence we are witnessing in today's society? Disenfranchisement is one of the root causes for the upsurge of extreme social friction we are witnessing today, and this feeling can be reduced by incorporating participatory design into new urban projects. Particularly, housing developments built by authorities for those on the low end of the socioeconomic scale, where it seems, most of these perpetrators of violence are found and groomed. Thus, it could be argued that participatory design can effect a positive change within a group of people, therefore society. Current examples of housing for low income families, when contrasted against this new model that has emerged, demonstrate the advantages of this design model as a basis to form cohesion between diverse community members. One well documented participatory example from the Brighton area of the United Kingdom is an excellent exemplar when contrasted against the traditional model. This new model of incorporating community interaction as part of the urban planning design criteria breaks down insular lifestyles thus diminishing the tendency for social or religious disenfranchisement and the resultant social problems.
Exploring Participatory Designas a Strategy to Act within the City
Strategic Design Research Journal, 2016
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.