Ecancermedicalscience

Ecancermedicalscience, 2010

We present feasibility, toxicity and efficacy results of an intensified six-cycle ChlVPP/ABVVP regimen in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). From February 2004 to August 2007, 82 consecutive eligible patients were enrolled. According to the Hasenclever index, 64 patients (78%) were considered at low risk, 15 (18%) at intermediate and 3 (4%) at high risk. The most relevant toxicity was haematological: grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 32% of patients, grade 3-4 anaemia in 26% of patients. Severe infections and febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% of patients. With a median follow-up of 35 months (range 12-55), the three-year freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) were 75% (95% CI 65%-86%) and 94% (95% CI 87%-99%), respectively. The intensified ChlVPP/ABVVP regimen in advanced HL is effective, does not seem to differ from standard regimens in terms of FFTF and OS and showed a favourable toxicity profile.

British Journal of Haematology, 2004

Acta Oncologica, 1996

The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of two cytostatic regimens-chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine and prednisone ( ChlVPP) vs. ChlVPP alternating with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine and dacarbazine ( ABOD). One hundred eligible patients with stage IIIA-IVB Hodgkin's disease were randomized to either ChlVPP or ChlVPP alternating with ABOD. The complete response rate (CR) was 80% in both treatment groups. After a median follow-up time of 59 months, 42 (84%) of the patients in the ChlVPP-treated group were in CR compared with 39 (78%) treated with ChlVPP/ABOD. The estimated five-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 87% and 74%, respectively, for the ChlVPP-treated patients and 76% and 73% for the ChlVPP/ABOD-treated patients. The ChlVPP regimen showed a slightly better subjective tolerance than the ChlVPP/ABOD regimen. The given dose intensity was very close to optimal, and equal for the two regimens.

Hematological Oncology, 2006

In a multicentre phase 111 trial 146 previously untreated patients with high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas stage I1 IV were randomized to receive either four cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 iv d 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 iv d 1, vincristine 2 mg iv d 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 iv d 3-5, prednisolone 100 mg PO d 1-5) (treatment arm A), or four cycles of chemotherapy with hCHOP (cyclophosphamide 1200 mg/m2 iv d 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 iv d 1 + 2, vincristine 2 mg iv d 1, prednisolone 100 mg PO d 1-5) alternating with IVEP (ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 iv d 1-5, vindesine 3 mg/m2 iv d 1, etoposide 120 mg/m2 iv d 3-5, prednisolone 100 mg PO d 1-5) (treatment arm B). After four cycles of chemotherapy an involved field irradiation with a total dose of 35 Gy was given to all patients in complete or partial remission without persisting extranodal disease. A complete response (CR) was seen in 124/146 patients (86 per cent) with 87 per cent CR in arm A versus 83 per cent CR in a r m B. During a median follow-up of 17 months (range 2-40) 30 patients relapsed (1 6 patients arm A, 14 patients arm B). The overall survival at 40months is projected to be 71 per cent versus 70 per cent for arm A and B, respectively. Disease-free survival is projected to be 68 per cent in arm A and 59 per cent in arm B at 40 months. So far, the differences in CR, survival and disease-free survival are not statistically significant. Toxicity of all regimens was acceptable, however, with a significant morbidity and one treatment-related death in patients > 70 years after hCHOP. Main side effects were mild nausea/vomiting, leukopenia and fever/infection associated with leukopenia.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009

PurposeThis multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).Patients and MethodsPatients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (> 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm.ResultsThe overall response rates after completi...

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006

In early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) and combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy produce high disease control rates but also considerable late toxicity. The aim of this study was to reduce this toxicity using a combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) without jeopardizing disease control.

Expert Review of Hematology

Objective: To assess evidence on the safety and efficacy of ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin®], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), and A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on 29 July 2016 (updated 26 July 2018) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs assessing the treatment of newly-diagnosed advanced-stage HL with ABVD and BEACOPP (and their variants), and A+AVD. Results: The SLR identified 62 RCTs and 42 non-RCTs. Five-year overall survival rates for ABVD and BEACOPP were 60-97% and 84-99%, and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 58-81% and 83-96%, respectively. Both regimens were associated with tolerability issues and side effects. Discontinuation or dose reduction of bleomycin resulted in fewer adverse events, without significantly affecting efficacy. A head-to-head trial demonstrated improved efficacy for A+AVD vs ABVD, with an acceptable tolerability profile. No data from head-to-head trials comparing A+AVD with BEACOPP were available, and an indirect treatment comparison was not feasible. Conclusion: New therapies, such as A+AVD, maintain the efficacy observed with current treatments, and may provide a more tolerable treatment option for patients with advanced-stage HL.

British Journal of Haematology, 2014

Experimental Hematology & Oncology

The treatment landscape of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years. Gradual improvements have been made in the management of cHL patients, particularly in prolonging the survival rate for those in the relapsed setting. Most of these improvements came with the addition of brentuximab vedotin and PD1 blockade (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) into the current cHL treatment algorithms. On the other hand, the treatment approach to cHL has become more complex than ever before, with multiple ways to add and sequence therapies to achieve long-term remission. In this review, we will discuss the most up-to-date evidence on the management of cHL patients with the inclusion of ongoing clinical trials in cHL. We will provide a general overview of the current therapeutic landscape of cHL in light of these most recent data. We conclude with our perspective on how the approach to cHL treatment may evolve in the future.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011