Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Thinking about Chemistry in Byzantium and the Islamic World

2023, Journal of the History of Ideas 84.4

https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2023.a909532

Abstract

The term “alchemy,” born out of early modern professional polemics among chemists, is problematic as a historical category. The present article shifts away from asking what pre-modern alchemy “really” was, to asking how medieval scholars writing in Greek and Arabic thought about the practice of treating and combining naturally occurring substances to produce apparently quite different substances, and how they interpreted, valorized, or critiqued this practice and its results — in other words, what they thought about chemistry.

Key takeaways

  • For the history of alchemy in Byzantium and the Islamic world, connections with other "occult sciences" and, in the case of Arabic alchemy, with Shiism and Su sm, have been impor tant topics of investigation.
  • In a short treatise, On the Necessity of the Art of Kīmiyāʾ, 19 the tenth-century Muslim philosopher Abū Naṣr al-Fārābī (b. Turkestan, d. 950 Damascus) wrote to af rm "the Art" (al-ṣināʿah), an expression that often refers, as here, to the Sacred Art, a domain understood to include methods for ennobling base metals.
  • Was Ibn Sīnā "attacking" or "opposing" alchemy in this passage?
  • This line of argument is clearly related to Ibn Sīnā's, but in Ibn Taymiyyah it has become more rigid: the possibility of changing speci c differences, which Ibn Sīnā considered extremely dif cult to the point of prob ably being impossible in practice, is rejected out of hand by Ibn Taymiyyah.
  • They all agreed that in practice, artisans can closely approximate the perceptible qualities of precious metals arti cially.