Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Tinnitus: differential effects of therapy in a single case

1985, Behaviour Research and Therapy

DISTRESS ATTRIBUTED TO TINNITUS (a) Difficulty in concentrating on everyday activities such as reading and watching TV (though his regular work provided some relief). (b) Fear that he would not be able to put up with his noises and that he would 'break down'. (c) Heightened awareness of his pulse through its effect on his tinnitus and consequently, acute awareness of changes/irregularities in his pulse which were thought to signal some danger to his health. His ability to sleep was not affected. METHOD Measures The loudness of tinnitus and experienced annoyance were recorded three times per day on 7-point scales (i.e. 'very soft' to 'the loudest your tinnitus has ever been' and 'not at all annoying' to 'the most annoying your tinnitus has ever been'). Difficulty getting to sleep and waking in the night were also noted. Three questionnaires were administered at intervals: (1) Disability was measured by a 23-item checklist of daily activities (DQ) which were rated for interference by tinnitus (i.e. 'not at all', 'a little', 'a lot', 'no opportunity'). (2) Problems, beliefs and attitudes associated with tinnitus were assessed with a 40-item questionnaire (Tinnitus Effects Questionnaire, TEQ). This questionnaire has been factor analysed (in preparation) and it was scored for the first three factors-'emotional distress' (related to worries about tinnitus) and 'intrusivenes' (in situations of attending to external situations or private thoughts) and 'insomnia'. (3) A standardized measure of 'psychopathology'. i.e. the Crown-Crisp Experiential Index (CCEI; Crown and Crisp, 1979).