Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Exploiting nuclear waste transuranic (TRU) inventories could be the promising key to developing reliable, clean, and sustainable nuclear energy. Towards this objective, different strategies are being considered, and one of the most effective strategies is the development of advanced fuels based on TRU nuclides. In this paper, a novel advanced TRU-based fuel is proposed and investigated as an alternative to the traditional fuel U-ZrH 1.65 for the existing Moroccan research reactor TRIGA Mark II. The TRU nuclides used were derived from a typical 60 GWd/ton PWR-UOX reactor's spent nuclear fuel (SNF) after one use and five years of storage. Before any new fuel loading, several studies must be performed. Hence, The current study focused on the neutronic fuel burnup point of view. MCNP6.2 stochastic code with its burn capability, CINDER90, was used to perform the calculations. In order to get a comprehensive view of the fuel conversion, analyses were performed for the reactor with the traditional fuel U-ZrH 1.65 , and the results were used as the basis for comparative studies of the reactor with the proposed TRU-based fuel. According to the findings, using TRU-based fuel has numerous advantages over traditional fuel U-ZrH 1.65 , such as long lifetime operation, better reactivity control, and low production of some biological hazardous fission products (short-lived fission products, 90 Sr, and 99 Tc). Furthermore, the fuel has highly significant plutonium (Pu) and minor actinides (MAs) burning ratios of about 95.1% and 92.5%, respectively. The results indicate a practical fuel option for the near future, which could be the first step towards using TRU nuclides in existing TRIGA-type reactors.
Atomic Energy, 1992
The strategy indicated in the title predetermines the development of one or another area in which the transuranium nuclides contained in the spent fuel of nuclear power plants can be used. It is natural to analyze the existing and future nuclearfuel-cycle schemes. We shall define as transuranium the transuranium nuclides proper including the uranium that has not been burned-up in the reactor.
As described in companion papers, Westinghouse is proposing the adoption of a thorium-based fuel cycle to burn the transuranics (TRU) contained in the current Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF) and transition towards a less radiotoxic high level waste. A combination of both light water reactors (LWR) and fast reactors (FR) is envisaged for the task, with the emphasis initially posed on their TRU burning capability and eventually to their self-sufficiency. Given the many technical challenges and development times related to the deployment of TRU burners fast reactors, an interim solution making best use of the current resources to initiate burning the legacy TRU inventory while developing and testing some technologies of later use is desirable. In this perspective, a portion of the LWR fleet can be used to start burning the legacy TRUs using Thbased fuels compatible with the current plants and operational features. This analysis focuses on a typical 4-loop PWR, with 17x17 fuel assembly design and TRUs (or Pu) admixed with Th (similar to U-MOX fuel, but with Th instead of U). Global calculations of the core were represented with unit assembly simulations using the Linear Reactivity Model (LRM). Several assembly configurations have been developed to offer two options that can be attractive during the TRU transmutation campaign: maximization of the TRU transmutation rate and capability for TRU multi-recycling, to extend the option of TRU recycling in LWR until the FR is available. Homogeneous as well as heterogeneous assembly configurations have been developed with various recycling schemes (Pu recycle, TRU recycle, TRU and in-bred U recycle etc.). Oxide as well as nitride fuels have been examined. This enabled an assessment of the potential for burning and multi-recycling TRU in a Th-based fuel PWR to compare against other more typical alternatives (U-MOX and variations thereof). Results will be shown indicating that Th-based PWR fuel is a promising option to multi-recycle and burn TRU in a thermal spectrum, while satisfying top-level operational and safety constraints.
Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2012
Large quantities of nuclear waste plutonium and minor actinides (MAs) have been accumulated in the civilian light water reactors (LWRs) and CANDU reactors. These trans uranium (TRU) elements are all fissionable, and thus can be considered as fissile fuel materials in form of mixed fuel with thorium or naturanium in the latter. CANDU fuel compacts made of tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) type pellets would withstand very high burn ups without fuel change. As carbide fuels allow higher fissile material density than oxide fuels, following fuel compositions have been selected for investigations: ① 90% nat-UC þ 10% TRUC, ② 70% nat-UC þ 30% TRUC and ③ 50% nat-UC þ 50% TRUC. Higher TRUC charge leads to longer power plant operation periods without fuel change. The behavior of the criticality k N and the burn up values of the reactor have been pursued by full power operation for > w12 years. For these selected fuel compositions, the reactor criticality starts by k N ¼ 1.4443, 1.4872 and 1.5238, where corresponding reactor operation times and burn up values have been calculated as 2.8 years, 8 years and 12.5 years, and 62, 430 MW.D/MT, 176,000 and 280,000 MW.D/ MT, with fuel consumption rates of w16, 5.68 and 3.57 g/MW.D respectively. These high burn ups would reduce the nuclear waste mass per unit energy output drastically. The study has show clearly that TRU in form of TRISO fuel pellets will provide sufficient criticality as well as reasonable burn up for CANDU reactors in order to justify their consideration as alternative fuel.
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2000
Energy production in nuclear power plants on the basis of fission processes lead inevitably to fission products and to the generation of new actinide isotopes. Most of these fission products are rather shortlived and decay within less than about 500 years to stable nuclides. However, a few of them, e.g. 99 Tc and 129 I, are longlived and may contribute to the radiotoxicity and hazard associated with an envisaged repository for their long-term disposal in a stable geologic formation, e.g. a salt dome. The majority of the generated actinide isotopes are fairly longlived, e.g. 239 Pu with a halflife of more than 20 000 years. Therefore, their direct storage poses a heavy burden on the capacity and the possible environment impact of a repository. Furthermore, the energy content of these actinides could be deployed for producing additional nuclear fission energy after recovering them from unloaded irradiated fuel by suitable reprocessing techniques. Various possibilities exist for burning these actinides in different types of reactors, e.g. in light water reactors (LWRs), or LMFRs, adhering to available technology, or in actinide burners particularly designed for the purpose of their efficient incineration. The different options will be discussed in the paper. Transmutation of the manmade actinides and longlived fission products will require advanced technologies e.g. regarding reprocessing losses, remote fabrication techniques, and most probably, isotope separation processes. However, the almost complete elimination of these nuclides resulting from fission energy production in a continued recycling process may be the only feasible way to limit the effects of nuclear power generation to a tolerable and fair level for generations to come.
2011
The deep burn (DB) project aims at the destruction of legacy inventories of plutonium (Pu) and minor actinides (ma) leftover in used fuel from the operation of light water reactors (LWR). In its initial phase, the project examined the performance of high temperature reactors (HTR) for the db purpose. The performance is assessed based on two principal criteria. The first of these is "effectiveness," which pertains to the ability of the concept to indeed result in significant reduction of the Pu and MA inventories. The second criterion is "safety," which, for TRISO-based fuel, pertains primarily to the continuity of integrity of the TRISO particle, the primary barrier to the release of radionuclides from the fuel to the near field (i.e., within the reactor plant) and beyond (possibly to unrestricted public areas). Most of these issues have been addressed in previous reports. The focus of this final report is to present results on the optimization of the core of a db pebble bed reactor (PBR) and to examine the performance of the fuel in the variant of db that considers features akin to the modified open fuel cycle (MOFC) concept. In the context of this study, MOFC is represented by its implication of the inclusion of selected fission product isotopes and of some americium (am) content into the db fuel. The most significant accomplishments documented in this report are: x Core analysis of a HTR-MODULE-type * design loaded with Deep-Burn fuel. x Core analysis of a HTR-MODULE-type design loaded with Deep-Burn fuel and Uranium. x Core analysis of a HTR-MODULE-type design loaded with Deep-Burn fuel and Modified Open Cycle Components. x Core analysis of a HTR-MODULE-type design loaded with Deep-Burn fuel and Americium targets.
Rethinking the Light Water Reactor Fuel Cycle by Evgeni Shwageraus Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Engineering on September 8, 2003, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ABSTRACT The once through nuclear fuel cycle adopted by the majority of countries with operating commercial power reactors imposes a number of concerns. The radioactive waste created in the once through nuclear fuel cycle has to be isolated from the environment for thousands of years. In addition, plutonium and other actinides, after the decay of fission products, could become targets for weapon proliferators. Furthermore, only a small fraction of the energy potential in the fuel is being used. All these concerns can be addressed if a closed fuel cycle strategy is considered offering the possibility for partitioning and transmutation of long lived radioactive waste, enhanced proliferation resistance, and improved utilization of natural resources. It is generally believed that dedicated advanced reactor systems have to be designed in order to perform the task of nuclear waste transmutation effectively. The development and deployment of such innovative systems is technically and economically challenging. In this thesis, a possibility of constraining the generation of long lived radioactive waste through multi-recycling of Trans-uranic actinides (TRU) in existing Light Water Reactors (LWR has been studied. Thorium based and fertile free fuels (FFF) were analyzed as the most attractive candidates for TRU burning in LWRs. Although both fuel types can destroy TRU at comparable rates (about 1150 kg/GWe-Year in FFF and up to 900 kg/GWe-Year in Th) and achieve comparable fractional TRU burnup (close to 50a/o), the Th fuel requires significantly higher neutron moderation than practically feasible in a typical LWR lattice to achieve such performance. On the other hand, the FFF exhibits nearly optimal TRU destruction performance in a typical LWR fuel lattice geometry. Increased TRU presence in LWR core leads to neutron spectrum hardening, which results in reduced control materials reactivity worth. The magnitude of this reduction is directly related to the amount of TRU in the core. A potential for positive void reactivity feedback limits the maximum TRU loading. Th and conventional mixed oxide (MOX) fuels require higher than FFF TRU loading to sustain a standard 18 fuel cycle length due to neutron captures in Th232 and U238 respectively. Therefore, TRU containing Th and U cores have lower control materials worth and greater potential for a positive void coefficient than FFF core. However, the significantly reduced fuel Doppler coefficient of the fully FFF loaded core and the lower delayed neutron fraction lead to questions about the FFF performance in reactivity initiated accidents. The Combined Non-Fertile and UO2 (CONFU) assembly concept is proposed for multirecycling of TRU in existing PWRs. The assembly assumes a heterogeneous structure where about 20% of the UO2 fuel pins on the assembly periphery are replaced with FFF pins hosting TRU generated in the previous cycle. The possibility of achieving zero TRU net is demonstrated. The concept takes advantage of superior TRU destruction performance in FFF allowing minimization of TRU inventory. At the same time, the core physics is still dominated by UO2 fuel allowing maintenance of core safety and control characteristics comparable to all-UO2. A comprehensive neutronic and thermal hydraulic analysis as well as numerical simulation of reactivity initiated accidents demonstrated the feasibility of TRU containing LWR core designs of various heterogeneous geometries. The power peaking and reactivity coefficients for the TRU containing heterogeneous cores are comparable to those of conventional UO2 cores. Three to five TRU recycles are required to achieve an equilibrium fuel cycle length and TRU generation and destruction balance. A majority of TRU nuclides reach their equilibrium concentration levels in less than 20 recycles. The exceptions are Cm246, Cm248, and Cf252. Accumulation of these isotopes is highly undesirable with regards to TRU fuel fabrication and handling because they are very strong sources of spontaneous fission (SF) neutrons. Allowing longer cooling times of the spent fuel before reprocessing can drastically reduce the SF neutron radiation problem due to decay of Cm244 and Cf252 isotopes with particularly high SF source. Up to 10 TRU recycles are likely to be feasible if 20 years cooling time between recycles is adopted. Multi-recycling of TRU in the CONFU assembly reduces the relative fraction of fissile isotopes in the TRU vector from about 60% in the initial spent UO2 to about 25% at equilibrium. As a result, the fuel cycle length is reduced by about 30%. An increase in the enrichment of UO2 pins from 4.2 to at least 5% is required to compensate for the TRU isotopics degradation. The environmental impact of the sustainable CONFU assembly based fuel cycle is limited by the efficiency of TRU recovery in spent fuel reprocessing. TRU losses of 0.1% from the CONFU fuel reprocessing ensure the CONFU fuel cycle radiotoxicity reduction to the level of corresponding amount of original natural uranium ore within 1000 years. The cost of the sustainable CONFU based fuel cycle is about 60% higher than that of the once through UO2 fuel cycle, whereas the difference in total cost of electricity between the two cycles is only 8%. The higher fuel cycle cost is a result of higher uranium enrichment in a CONFU assembly required to compensate for the degradation of TRU isotopics and cost of reprocessing. The major expense in the sustainable CONFU fuel cycle is associated with the reprocessing of UO2 fuel. Although reprocessing and fabrication of FFF pins have relatively high unit costs, their contribution to the fuel cycle cost is marginal as a result of the small TRU throughput. Reductions in the unit costs of UO2 reprocessing and FFF fabrication by a factor of two would result in comparable fuel cycle costs for the CONFU and conventional once through cycle. An increase in natural uranium prices and waste disposal fees will also make the closed fuel cycle more economically attractive. Although, the cost of the CONFU sustainable fuel cycle is comparable to that of a closed cycle using a critical fast actinide burning reactor (ABR), the main advantage of the CONFU is the possibility of fast deployment, since it does not require as extensive development and demonstration as needed for fast reactors. The cost of the CONFU fuel cycle is projected to be considerably lower than that of a cycle with an accelerator driven fast burner system. Thesis Supervisor: Mujid S. Kazimi Title: TEPCO Professor of Nuclear Engineering Director, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (CANES) Thesis Supervisor: Pavel Hejzlar, ScD Title: Principal Research Scientist; Program Director, Advanced Reactor Technology Program, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (CANES)
Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2014
The flexibility of innovative Na-cooled fast reactors for burning Pu and/or Minor Actinides (MA) is investigated with respect to different fuel cycle strategies. Under phasing-out conditions, the burner systems are used for reducing to a minimum level the accumulated TRansUranic (TRU) inventory, whereas when continuous use of nuclear energy is envisaged (on-going case), burner systems may be dedicated to MA management only.
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2011
The reprocessing actinide materials extracted from spent fuel for use in mixed oxide fuels is a key component in maximizing the spent fuel repository utility. While fast spectrum reactor technologies are being considered in order to close the fuel cycle, and transmute these actinides, there is potential to utilize existing pressurized heavy water reactors such as the CANDU ® 1 design to meet these goals. The use of current thermal reactors as an intermediary step which can burn actinide based fuels can significantly reduce the fast reactor infrastructure needed. This paper examines the features of actinide mixed oxide fuel, TRUMOX, in a typical CANDU nuclear reactor. The actinide concentrations used were based on extraction from 30 year cooled spent fuel and mixed with natural uranium in 4.75% actinide MOX fuel. The WIMS-AECL model of the fuel lattice was created and the two neutron group properties were transferred to RFSP in order to create a 3 dimensional time average full core model. The model was created with typical CANDU limits on bundle and channel powers and a burnup target of 45 MWd/kgHE. The TRUMOX fuel design achieved its goals and performed well under normal operations simulations. This effort demonstrated the feasibility of using the current fleet of CANDU reactors as an intermediary step in burning reprocessed spent fuel and reducing actinide burdens within the end repository. The recycling, reprocessing and reuse of spent fuels produces a much more sustainable and efficient nuclear fuel cycle using existing and proven reactor technologies.
2010
This paper reports the continued evaluation of the attractiveness of materials mixtures containing special nuclear materials (SNM) associated with various proposed nuclear fuel cycles. Specifically, this paper examines two closed fuel cycles. The first fuel cycle examined is a thorium fuel cycle in which a pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) is fueled with mixtures of plutonium/thorium and {sup 233}U/thorium. The used fuel is then reprocessed using the THOREX process and the actinides are recycled. The second fuel cycle examined consists of conventional light water reactors (LWR) whose fuel is reprocessed for actinides that are then fed to and recycled until consumed in fast-spectrum reactors: fast reactors and accelerator driven systems (ADS). As reprocessing of LWR fuel has already been examined, this paper will focus on the reprocessing of the scheme's fast-spectrum reactors' fuel. This study will indicate what is required to render these materials as having low utilit...
This study assesses the feasibility of designing a finite once-through Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) fed with trans-uranium isotopes (TRU) from LWR spent fuel to be critical and to have a low peak-to -average radiation damage to graphite. The study also quantifies the transmutation effectiveness of this MSR considering the following measures : fractional transmutation of all actinides, of 239 Pu and of 237 Np and its precursors, radiotoxicity and decay-heat.
Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2009
Prospective fuels for a new reactor type, the so called fixed bed nuclear reactor (FBNR) are investigated with respect to reactor criticality. These are ① low enriched uranium (LEU); ② weapon grade plutonium + ThO2; ③ reactor grade plutonium + ThO2; and ④ minor actinides in the spent fuel of light water reactors (LWRs) + ThO2. Reactor grade plutonium and minor actinides are considered as highly radio-active and radio-toxic nuclear waste products so that one can expect that they will have negative fuel costs.The criticality calculations are conducted with SCALE5.1 using S8–P3 approximation in 238 neutron energy groups with 90 groups in thermal energy region. The study has shown that the reactor criticality has lower values with uranium fuel and increases passing to minor actinides, reactor grade plutonium and weapon grade plutonium.Using LEU, an enrichment grade of 9% has resulted with keff = 1.2744. Mixed fuel with weapon grade plutonium made of 20% PuO2 + 80% ThO2 yields keff = 1.2864. Whereas a mixed fuel with reactor grade plutonium made of 35% PuO2 + 65% ThO2 brings it to keff = 1.267. Even the very hazardous nuclear waste of LWRs, namely minor actinides turn out to be high quality nuclear fuel due to the excellent neutron economy of FBNR. A relatively high reactor criticality of keff = 1.2673 is achieved by 50% MAO2 + 50% ThO2.The hazardous actinide nuclear waste products can be transmuted and utilized as fuel in situ. A further output of the study is the possibility of using thorium as breeding material in combination with these new alternative fuels.
Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2013
The present paper compares the reactor physics and transmutation performance of sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (FRs) for TRansUranic (TRU) burning with thorium (Th) or uranium (U) as fertile materials. The 1000 MWt Toshiba-Westinghouse Advanced Recycling Reactor (ARR) conceptual core has been used as benchmark for the comparison. Both burner and breakeven configurations sustained or started with a TRU supply, and assuming full actinide homogeneous recycle strategy, have been developed. State-ofthe-art core physics tools have been employed to establish fuel inventory and reactor physics performances for equilibrium and transition cycles. Results show that Th fosters large improvements in the reactivity coefficients associated with coolant expansion and voiding, which enhances safety margins and, for a burner design, can be traded for maximizing the TRU burning rate. A trade-off of Th compared to U is the significantly larger fuel inventory required to achieve a breakeven design, which entails additional blankets at the detriment of core compactness as well as fuel manufacturing and separation requirements. The gamma field generated by the progeny of U-232 in the U bred from Th challenges fuel handling and manufacturing, but in case of full recycle, the high contents of Am and Cm in the transmutation fuel impose remote fuel operations regardless of the presence of U-232.
Journal of Engineering Research, 2023
of advanced fuel systems formed ThO 2 75 wt.% and UO 2 25 wt.%, which worked with 19.5% enrichment of U 235. It analyzed the physical properties of mixed fuels using the composition of mixtures, such as the lattice parameters, thermal conductivity, specific heat, mechanical strength, and fission gas release. The codes FRAPCON-4.0 and FRAPTRAN-2.0 adapted can calculate the composite fuel response compared with uranium dioxide fuel used for light water reactors. In addition, the increased diffusion coefficient produced lower fuel swelling compared with UO 2. Thorium fuels had included an extensive range of applications, such as pressure-tube heavy water reactors (HWRs), light water reactors (LWRs), and thorium molten salt reactors. Advanced reactors, such as sodiumcooled fast reactors, can support the thorium mixed oxide fuel [1]. Early the Shippingport reactor, in Pennsylvania, USA, was a light water breeding reactor that operated with thorium as fuel during 1977-1982 [2]. Thorium is at least three times more abundant than uranium [3]. The natural isotopic distribution of thorium is 100% of Th 232 and is not fissile, but it is a fertile material, like U 238. Thorium requires fissile materials, such as U 235 and Pu 239 , to begin the reaction. Today, exist a few mixed fuel cycles based on thorium use (Th 232 +Pu 239), (Th 232 +U 233), (Th 232 +U 235), and other formulations, including dopant additions [4]. On the other hand, it researches innovative fuels, such as uranium nitride (UN) and uranium carbide (UC), which have several advantages over UO 2 , such as increased burnup capabilities and higher
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2010
Large quantities of plutonium have been accumulated in the nuclear waste of civilian LWRs and CANDU reactors. Reactor grade plutonium and heavy water moderator can give a good combination with respect to neutron economy. On the other hand, TRISO type fuel can withstand very high fuel burn-up levels. The paper investigates the prospects of utilization of TRISO fuel made of reactor grade plutonium in CANDU reactors. TRISO fuels particles are imbedded body-centered cubic (BCC) in a graphite matrix with a volume fraction of 68%. The fuel compacts conform to the dimensions of CANDU fuel compacts are inserted in rods with zircolay cladding. In the first phase of investigations, five new mixed fuel have been selected for CANDU reactors composed of 4% RG-PuO 2 + 96% ThO 2 ; 6% RG-PuO 2 + 94% ThO 2 ; 10% RG-PuO 2 + 90% ThO 2 ; 20% RG-PuO 2 + 80% ThO 2 ; 30% RG-PuO 2 + 70% ThO 2. Initial reactor criticality (k ∞,0 values) for the modes , , , and are calculated as 1.
Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019
The reactor performance and safety characteristics of mixed thorium mononitride (ThN) and uranium mononitride (UN) fuels in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) are investigated to discern the potential nonproliferation, waste, and accident tolerance benefits provided by this fuel form. This paper presents results from an initial screening of mixed ThN-UN fuels in normal PWR operating conditions and compares their reactor performance to UO 2 in terms of fuel cycle length, reactivity coefficients, and thermal safety margin. ThN has been shown to have a significantly greater thermal conductivity than UO 2 and UN. Admixture with a UN phase is required because thorium initially contains no fissile isotopes. Results from this study show that ThN-UN mixtures exist that can match the cycle length of a UO 2-fueled reactor by using 235 U enrichments greater than 5% but less than 20% in the UN phase. Reactivity coefficients were calculated for UO 2 , UN, and ThN-UN mixtures, and it was found that the fuel temperature and moderator temperature coefficients of the nitride-based fuels fall within the acceptable limits specified by the AP1000 Design Control Document. Reduced soluble boron and control rod worth for these fuel forms indicates that the shutdown margin may not be sufficient, and design changes to the control systems may need to be considered. The neutronic impact of 15 N enrichment on reactivity coefficients is also included. Due to the greatly enhanced thermal conductivity of the nitride-based fuels, the UN and ThN-UN fuels provide additional margin to fuel melting temperature relative to UO 2 .
International Journal of Energy Research, 2016
Spent nuclear fuel out of conventional light water reactors contains significant amount of even plutonium isotopes, so called reactor grade plutonium. Excellent neutron economy of Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors can further burn reactor grade plutonium, which has been used as a booster fissile fuel material in form of mixed ThO 2 /PuO 2 fuel in a CANDU fuel bundle in order to assure reactor criticality. The paper investigates incineration of nuclear waste and the prospects of exploitation of rich world thorium reserves in CANDU reactors. In the present work, the criticality calculations have been performed with 3-D geometrical modeling of a CANDU reactor, where the structure of all fuel rods and bundles is represented individually. In the course of time calculations, nuclear transformation and radioactive decay of all actinide elements as well as fission products are considered. Four different fuel compositions have been selected for investigations: ① 95% thoria (ThO 2) + 5% PuO 2 , ② 90% ThO 2 + 10% PuO 2 , ③ 85% ThO 2 + 15% PuO 2 and ④ 80% ThO 2 + 20% PuO 2. The latter is used for the purpose of denaturing the new 233 U fuel with 238 U. The behavior of the criticality k ∞ and the burnup values of the reactor have been pursued by full power operation for~10 years. Among the investigated four modes, 90% ThO 2 + 10% PuO 2 seems a reasonable choice. This mixed fuel would continue make possible extensive exploitation of thorium resources with respect to reactor criticality. Reactor will run with the same fuel charge for~7 years and allow a fuel burnup~55 GWd/t.
This work investigates the possibility of using thorium-based fuels as an alternative fuel for advanced power reactor APR-1400. MCNPX code version 2.7 with crosssection library ENDF.VII has been used to design an APR-1400 fuel assembly. This code has been used to study the neutronic performance of the proposed thoriumbased Fuel types (0.944 Th, U)O 2 , (0.955 Th, 233 U)O 2 , (0.934 Th, rgPu)O 2. The fuel burn-up parameters such as infinity multiplication factor (k inf), initial heavy metals concentrations, Minor actinides concentration and fission products concentration have been analyzed during 1500 effective full power days (FPDSs) for thoriumbased Fuel types and compared with the common fuel. The analysis of the horizontal thermal power and neutron flux distribution provides valuable insights into the behavior and performance of the suggested Fuel types in the APR-1400 assembly. The analysis of the neutronic results ensures the viability of using the proposed thorium-based fuel types as an alternative fuel to UO 2 because they achieved acceptable safety parameter values and provided a good power distribution through the fuel assembly compared to UO 2 .
2011
The growing inventory of spent nuclear fuel generated in the current “open cycle” adopted in the US can hamper the long term growth of nuclear energy. A proper strategy for closing the fuel cycle and generating “acceptable waste” should hence be a priority of the nuclear industry. While satisfactory technological solutions exist addressing portions of the overall problem, a fully integrated effective solution satisfying all public concerns has yet to be developed. Westinghouse is proposing a new approach, which involves redefining the specifics of the main components involved (fuel form, reactor type and reprocessing technique) so that the nuclear system overall generates wastes which are not perceived as a hazard by the public and with reduced requirements on their disposal. In a closed fuel cycle, the actinides in the spent fuel are typically recovered by reprocessing and recycled in a combination of reactors. Although the transmutation rate of actinides depends on the specific pr...
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1995
The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The PUMA project, a Specific Targeted Research Project (STREP) of the European Union EURATOM 6th Framework Program, is mainly aimed at providing additional key elements for the utilisation and transmutation of plutonium and minor actinides in contemporary and future (high temperature) gas-cooled reactor design, which are promising tools for improving the sustainability of the nuclear fuel cycle, hereby also contributing to the reduction of Pu and MA stockpiles, and to the development of safe and sustainable reactors for CO2-free energy generation. The project runs from
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.