Coronary Artery Aneurysms After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2022

… Journal of Angiology, 2012

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is defined as a dilation of the coronary artery that exceeds 1.5 times the reference diameter of the adjacent coronary segments which are angiographically normal. 1 Meta-analysis by Hakeem et al 2 reported that the incidence of CAA with drug-eluting stent (DES) was 0.6 to 1.9% at a mean follow-up of 9 months when compared with pre-DES era which was 1.4 to 4.9%.

JACC: Case Reports, 2020

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) after drug-eluting stent implantation is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.3% to 6.0%. Most of these aneurysms are asymptomatic. Hemoptysis as a presentation of CAA is very rare. The patient in our case had CAA after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation and presented with hemoptysis resulting from a leaking coronary

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2009

We present a case of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery aneurysm at the site of previous stent placement 3 years previously. The patient presented with recent worsening of angina. Angiography and 64 slice CT angiography confirmed the presence of 6 mm aneurysm of LAD at the site of previous stent involving the origin of diagonal, with thrombus proximal and distal to the stent. This patient was successfully managed by taking the posterior wall of the anterior descending artery while suturing the heel of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-LAD anastomosis. The idea was to create severe stenosis upstream to prevent distal embolisation from the site of aneurysm. The diagonal was grafted with a saphenous venous graft. Follow-up angiogram at 3 months demonstrated successful exclusion of the aneurysm and unobstructed flow through the grafts. #

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2022

Background Coronary artery aneurysms after drug eluting stents are rare. We present a case series of type II coronary aneurysms after implantation of Everolimus eluting stents including patients developing giant aneurysms with a toxic course. Case presentation Over a span of 3.5 years at our center 2572 patients were implanted Everolimus eluting stents out of which 4 patients developed coronary type II aneurysms an incidence of 0.00156 whereas 5838 patients were implanted Sirolimus eluting 2nd generation stents out of which 2 patients developed similar aneurysms with an incidence of 0.00034. The slight increase in incidence in Everolimus stents does not reach statistical significance (p = 0.054) and is limited by single centre non randomized study. We also propose a hypothesis that the slight increase in the incidence maybe due to allergy to Methacrylate present in Everolimus eluting Xience stent’s primer which is absent in other Sirolimus eluting stents used at our center but that ...

2009

We present a case of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery aneurysm at the site of previous stent placement 3 years previously. The patient presented with recent worsening of angina. Angiography and 64 slice CT angiography confirmed the presence of 6 mm aneurysm of LAD at the site of previous stent involving the origin of diagonal, with thrombus proximal and distal to the stent. This patient was successfully managed by taking the posterior wall of the anterior descending artery while suturing the heel of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-LAD anastomosis. The idea was to create severe stenosis upstream to prevent distal embolisation from the site of aneurysm. The diagonal was grafted with a saphenous venous graft. Follow-up angiogram at 3 months demonstrated successful exclusion of the aneurysm and unobstructed flow through the grafts.

American Heart Journal, 2005

American Heart Journal, 2011

Antiproliferative agents used in drug-eluting stents (DES) attenuate atherosclerosis, yet DES implantation has been linked to endothelial dysfunction. The downstream effects of DES on new lesion formation have not been previously directly examined. We sought to compare the development of de novo stenoses and need for treatment in the downstream coronary vessel of patients treated with DES or a bare-metal stent. Angiographic images and procedural information were prospectively collected on 463 adults who underwent implantation of a single stent in a proximal coronary artery, had an appropriate control vessel for comparison, and subsequently returned for intervention. Propensity matching identified 89 pairs of patients. End points were defined as angiographic identification of a de novo stenosis or need for secondary intervention in the downstream vessel within 12 months of initial intervention. In the overall (P < .01) and propensity-matched cohort (P = .01), there was reduced risk of new lesions downstream to DES. No difference was seen in respective control vessels (P = .14 and P = .99). A reduced need for downstream intervention with DES was seen in both the overall (P = .01) and propensity-matched cohorts (P = .04). No difference was seen in the control vessels (P = .98 and P = .36). Multivariate proportional hazards modeling of known atherosclerosis risk factors identified stent type as the sole predictor for downstream lesions (P < .01) and downstream events (P = .02). Patients receiving DES appear less likely to develop downstream stenoses and events compared with patients receiving bare-metal stents, suggesting beneficial downstream drug delivery.

Journal of The American College of Cardiology, 2006

This study examined human drug-eluting stents (DES) to determine the long-term effects of these stents on coronary arterial healing and identified mechanisms underlying late stent thrombosis (LST). BACKGROUND Although DES reduce the need for repeat revascularization compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), data suggest the window of thrombotic risk for Cypher (Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, Florida) and Taxus (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) DES extends far beyond that for BMS.

Korean Circulation Journal, 2008

This report describes the case of a 62-year-old woman who was previously diagnosed with stable angina. Coronary angiography revealed clinically significant stenosis in the middle of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, the first diagonal branch, the distal left circumflex (LCX) artery and the proximal posterior descending artery (PDA). After administering aspirin and clopidogrel, the patient underwent implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in the middle LAD artery and the first diagonal branch. Bare-metal stents were implanted in the distal LCX artery and the proximal PDA. Nineteen months later, follow-up coronary angiography revealed aneurysmal dilation at the middle LAD artery and the first diagonal branch. Forty-six months after implantation of the sirolimus-eluting stents, the size of the coronary aneurysm had increased to 12.4 mm; however, no sign of aneurysmal dilatation was observed at the bare-metal stent sites. This suggested that the implantation of the sirolimus-eluting stent was partially responsible for causing the coronary aneurysm. (Korean Circ J 2008;38:230-234)

Circulation, 2007

Although rare, stent thrombosis remains a severe complication after stent implantation owing to its high morbidity and mortality. Since the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES), most interventional centers have noted stent thrombosis up to 3 years after implantation, a complication rarely seen with bare-metal stents. Some data from large registries and meta-analyses of randomized trials indicate a higher risk for DES thrombosis, whereas others suggest an absence of such a risk. Several factors are associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis, including the procedure itself (stent malapposition and/or underexpansion, number of implanted stents, stent length, persistent slow coronary blood flow, and dissections), patient and lesion characteristics, stent design, and premature cessation of antiplatelet drugs. Drugs released from DES exert distinct biological effects, such as activation of signal transduction pathways and inhibition of cell proliferation. As a result, alth...

Background: Drug-eluting stents have been used in daily practice since 2002, with the clear advantages of reducing the risk of target vessel revascularization and an impressive reduction in restenosis rate by 50%-70%. However, the occurrence of a late thrombosis can compromise long-term results, particularly if the risks of this event were sustained. In this context, a registry of clinical cases gains special value. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world. Methods: We report on the clinical findings and 8-year follow-up parameters of all patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent from January 2002 to April 2007. Drug-eluting stents were used in accordance with the clinical and interventional cardiologist decision and availability of the stent. Results: A total of 611 patients were included, and clinical follow-up of up to 8 years was obtained for 96.2% of the patients. Total mortality was 8.7% and nonfatal infarctions occurred in 4.3% of the cases. Target vessel revascularization occurred in 12.4% of the cases, and target lesion revascularization occurred in 8% of the cases. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.1%. There were no new episodes of stent thrombosis after the fifth year of follow-up. Comparative subanalysis showed no outcome differences between the different types of stents used, including Cypher®, Taxus®, and Endeavor®. Conclusion: These findings indicate that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective at very long-term follow-up. Patients in the "real world" may benefit from drug-eluting stenting with excellent, long-term results. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006

This study examined human drug-eluting stents (DES) to determine the long-term effects of these stents on coronary arterial healing and identified mechanisms underlying late stent thrombosis (LST). Although DES reduce the need for repeat revascularization compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), data suggest the window of thrombotic risk for Cypher (Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, Florida) and Taxus (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) DES extends far beyond that for BMS. From a registry of 40 autopsies of DES (68 stents), 23 DES cases of >30 days duration were compared with 25 matched autopsies of BMS implantation. Late stent thrombosis was defined as an acute thrombus within a stent >30 days old. Of 23 patients with DES >30 days old, 14 had evidence of LST. Cypher and Taxus DES showed greater delayed healing characterized by persistent fibrin deposition (fibrin score 2.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.8, p = 0.0001) and poorer endothelialization (55.8 +/- 26.5%) compared with...

International Journal of Cardiology

Background/Objective: Despite the effectiveness of first generation drug eluting stent, DES-1 (Taxus and Cypher) in avoiding restenosis and the need for new revascularizations, a slightly increase in stent thrombosis, ST have been published. Second generation drug eluting stent, DES-2 has been developed to optimize the results of percutaneous coronary intervention in terms of efficacy and safety, for avoiding early and late ST. Our objective was to compare the risk of ST between DES-1 and DES-2. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials. Overall 16,924 patients; 7294 were allocated to DES-1 and 9630 were allocated to DES-2. The primary endpoint was to compare the risk of overall ST during the first year. Other clinical outcomes of interest were to compare the incidence of early (b 1 month) and late ST . Results: The incidence of overall ST was not increased in patients receiving DES-1 (1.13% DES-1 vs 0.75% DES-2, OR 0.79, 95% CI:0.45-1.40, p 0.43). There were no significant differences in the incidence of; early ST (0.85% DES-1 vs 0.53% DES-2, OR 0.68, 95% CI:0.31-1.51, p 0.35) and late ST (0.40% DES-1 vs 0.25% DES-2, OR 0.69, 95% CI:0.39-1.24, p 0.22). Conclusions: During the first year after stent implantation, we didn't found differences in ST between DES-1 and DES-2. Most of ST was produced under appropriate anti-platelet therapy so it is possible that many other factors such as; clopidogrel resistance, procedural complications or stent malapposition were implicated. Safety after longer follow-up (N 1 year) remains unclear.

European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2010

Over the past decade, the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES) has revolutionised the field of interventional cardiology by having a major impact on patient care through their efficacy in reducing the need for repeat revascularisation. A number of stents capable of delivering an antiproliferative agent designed to prevent neointimal hyperplasia, the principal mechanism of restenosis after stenting, have been evaluated; four of these devices are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Bare metal stent (BMS) and first-generation DES, such as sirolimus-eluting (SES-Cypher ®) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES-Taxus ®), have further improved results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by improving early results and reducing the risk of restenosis. However, there is currently debate on the safety of these firstgeneration DES, given the potential for late stent thrombosis (LST), especially after discontinuation of dual anti-platelet therapy. Second-generation DES, such as zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-Endeavor ®) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES-Xience V ®), are become available in the USA and/or Europe. Recently, long-term results comparing DES with BMS in patients with STsegment-elevation MI (STEMI) have raised some questions about the long-term risks of the drugeluting devices. It may be useful to pause, reflect for a moment, and consider some recent pertinent results regarding their wider use. This systematic review tries to provide a concise and critical appraisal of the data available to compare first and second generation stents especially to assess risk of stent thrombosis (ST) with second-generation DES.