Being itself: On German selbst in synthetic compounds
Livio Gaeta
Marco Angster
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
German synthetic compounds containing selbst have traditionally been treated as reflexive in nature. However, this view cannot cope on the one hand with the basic value of selbst as focus particle and not as pronoun and on the other with the non-reflexive value of many compounds whose meaning range from purely intensification of the understood agent of the activity as in Selbstbau 'do-it-yourself -construction' to anti-causativity like Selbstentzündung 'self-ignition'. In this paper, we will consider a different option, namely to interpret the focus particle selbst as a flag for signaling contrastive coreference. This option can be concretely operationalized in constructional terms as a case of constructional idiom.
Related papers
Synthetic compounds: syntax or semantics?
Linguistics, 1986
This paper deals with the structure of so-called synthetic compounds in Dutch of the type blauwogig. Different structures are discussed for this kind of word. The general claim is that the notion of (adjectival) synthetic compound is not a morphosyntactic one but should rather be interpreted as a semantic property of the relevant category of compounds.
Between VP and NN: On the Constructional Types of German -er Compounds
This paper is concerned with the classification and analysis of different types of German synthetic compounds headed by deverbal agent nouns in-er, such as Romanleser 'novel reader' or Gedankenleser 'mind reader', where the non-head is seen to saturate an argument of the head lexeme while adhering to the semantic interpretation found in corresponding VPs (e.g. the distinct senses of read in the previous examples). In contrast to several previous approaches which attempt to explain the relationship between VPs and compounds using a unified mechanism of incorporation or derivation, we argue that different compounding patterns require different analyses and that the respective constructions are to some extent independent of each other. While some such compounds are modelled after frequent, familiar VPs and take account of the usage profile of syntactic phrases, other productive sets of compounds extend independently lexicalized schemas with fixed compound heads. To support our analysis we undertake the largest empirical survey of these formations to date, using a broad coverage Web corpus. We suggest several categories of verb-object lexeme pairs to account for our data and formulate an analysis of the facts within the framework of Construction Morphology.
Expression and Intentionality as guidelines for semiotic studies concerning Structural Representations in Chemistry
International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry Annual Meeting Proceedings
The article deals with a unique aspect of structural representation in chemistry, known as stereoformulas, according to IUPAC, a formal two - dimensional representation of a three - dimensional molecular structure obtained by projection of bonds (symbolized as lines) onto a plane with the designation of the positions of relevant atoms by their chemical symbols. The study takes two arguments, respectively: (i) from Cassirer ́s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1) – the notion of Expression, and from Husserl ́s phenomenology (2) – the notion of Intentionality, composing a semiotic study on the use of stereoformulas towards working as “ representations of representations ”. Considering any simple exercise with a representative form, for example, a Newman projection, gathers only a part of the whole set of knowledge that is available about a particular chemical entity. However, despite being incomplete under the criteria of possible relations with his representative, the Newman Projection is a powerful semiotic tool in solving problems concerning the chemical structure. This refers to the understanding that the graphical tool to use in a given situation of structural representation is the result of an intentional process. Intention and incompleteness are somewhat intertwined, because the choice of using a particular tool stems from the recognition of the different features that can be supplied by it, or from those not available, in the sense of an evaluation of the extent of incompleteness. By way of a conclusion, it appears that the recognition of the intentional character of representative activity is a certificate of humanity of this process, which is bound to the necessary recognition of its expressive function, in the sense proposed by Cassirer. (1) Cassirer, E. (1996) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. v. 4. New York: Yale University Press. (2) Husserl, E. (2000) Logical Investigations. New York: Humanity Books.
The constructionalization of antonymous compounds
Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 2022
In modern Chinese, the adverb chi-zao is regarded as an adjective-adjective compound, with morphemes chi 'late' and zao 'early' as extreme poles in a gradable temporality. The formation of chi-zao as an antonymous compound has not received much attention from a diachronic construction grammar perspective. This study reports on the historical change of chi-zao as evidence showing the interplay of antonymous compounds and constructionalization in modern Chinese. Based on corpus analysis, I found that the formation of chi-zao as a lexical construction inherits from previous changes but emerges instantaneously in Pre-Modern Chinese, where its form has been condensed and its meaning has been bleached to indicate subjectivity. Three arguments shed light on the model of constructionalization: (1) constructionalization at the compound level can be associated with three motivations: subjectivity, frequency, and metaphor; and (2) the operation of constructionalization is at work not only at the sentential and phrasal level but also at the morphological level of compound word formation in Chinese; (3) rhetoric as an output of language use plays a part in the development of constructionalization in relation to antonymous compounds.
German compounds in the texts of technical science
Glottometrics, 2016
The present investigation is engaged with a quantitative study of German compounds in the text of technical science. We have analyzed word classes for German compounds in Book “Wirtschaftsinformatik” by H. R. Hansen et al (2015). In such a way, 20 pages of the above-mentioned book have been studied with a sample of 221 German compounds. The data have been processed statistically. The results can be of great use for typological studies of compounds.
Valence Creation and the German Applicative: the Inherent Semantics of Linking Patterns
Journal of Semantics, 2000
W e provide a unified account o f semantic effects observable in attested examples o f the Germ an applicative ('be-') construction, e.g. Rollstuhlfahrer Poul Sehachsen aus Kopenhagen will den 1997 erschienenen Wegweiser Handiguide Europa fortführen und zusammen mit Movado Berlin berollen ('W heelchair user Poul Schacksen from Copenhagen wants to continue the guide 'H andiguide Europe', w hich came out in 1997, and roll B erlin together with M ovado.'). W e argue that these effects do not come from lexico-sem antic operations on 'input' verbs, but are instead the products o f a reconciliation procedure in w hich the m eaning o f the verb is integrated into the event-structure schema denoted by the applicative construction. W e analyze the applicative pattern as an a r g u m e n ts t r u c t u r e c o n s t r u c t i o n , in terms o f Goldberg (1995). W e contrast this approach w ith that o f Brinkm ann (1997), in w hich properties associated w ith the applicative pattern (e.g. om issibility o f the theme argument, holistic interpretation o f the goal argum ent, and planar construal o f the location argument) are attributed to general sem antico-pragm atic principles. W e underm ine the generality o f the principles as stated, and assert that these properties are instead construction-particular. W e further argue that the constructional account provides an elegant model o f the valence-creation and valence-augm entation functions o f the prefix. W e describe the constructional semantics as prototype-based: diverse implications o f fee-predications, including iteration, transfer, affectedness, intensity and saturation, derive via regular patterns o f semantic extension from the topological concept o f c o v e r a g e .
Constituent order in compounds and syntax: typology and diachrony
The paper addresses the question of the correspondence between constituent order in compounds and in syntax. While a strictly synchronic perspective does not lead us to any significant generalization as ascertained by Bauer (Language typology and language universals, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 2001), adopting a diachronic point of view allows us to formulate the question in general terms by making reference to the logical problem of what is the transition permitted from a certain synchronic stage to another. On the basis of a large language sample, it is shown that constituent order in compounds heavily relies on syntax. This must be understood in the terms of a diachronic universal reflecting Hawkins’ (Word order universals, Academic Press, New York 1983) Double Acquisition Hypothesis. For this specific property of compounds, morphology does not seem to be autonomous from syntax, albeit the relation between morphology and syntax must be thought of as a multi-faceted one.
Chemical Kinds: Modal Conventionalists Can't Have Their Cake and Eat It Too
One consequence of Alan Sidelle's (1989, 2009) conventionalism is that our linguistic conventions not only carve nature at the joints, but determine the joints at which we do the carving. This consequence comes from a metaphysical commitment that he holds. According to Sidelle, our linguistic conventions allow us to " rope off " portions of reality. While this might seem harmless on the face of it, this commitment is problematic, especially for kinds in science. In this paper, I discuss Sidelle's view and criticize it using Hendry's (2004) historical and semantic argument that Lavoisier was able to determinately refer to oxygen prior to the IUPAC setting the definition of the elements as the number of protons in the nucleus. Conventions may be useful, but there are limits.
Intensifying self in Germanic: A Reanalysis
Regine Eckardt (2001) has proposed an analysis of "intensifying" selbst which can account for many of the relevant facts. As it stands, however, it cannot quite cope with adverbal cases where the "associate" is apparently itself in focus, and it does not answer the question what makes intensifying selbst necessary in many cases. In this paper, I elaborate on that analysis to say that the associate can be a type e variable and that the selbst focus presupposition can be interpreted at the level of the VP. I show that in this way, intensifying selbst enables one and the same argument to be both a continu- ing theme and a contrastive theme or both a theme focus and a rheme focus, and that it allows for focus presuppositions involving alternatives to alternatives.
The semantics of primary NN compounds: from form to meaning, and from meaning to form
The semantics of compounding, 2016
Within the heterogeneous family of word formation, Noun+Noun (NN) compounds have attracted a good deal of attention, in particular when it comes to their meaning, and their reading and interpretation has sparked considerable debate. In spite of the many efforts directed at the topic, an accurate reconstruction of the semantic bond between N1 and N2 remains unresolved today (see Grzega 2009; Olsen 2012; Smith et al. 2014). In the onomasiological theory of word formation (Štekauer 2001, 2005b, this volume), a morphological process is classified into one of five possible onomasiological types (OTs) depending on the presence or absence of linguistic elements in the structure of a unit. Primary NN compounds fall under OT3, which is characterized by the absence of a linguistically marked actional element and is regarded as a rather ambiguous OT from the point of view of the listener. Parallel Architecture (PA; see Jackendoff 2009, 2010, this volume), however, is logically non-directional in that it is not specifically aimed at perception or production and describes “the logic of processing in terms isomorphic to the rule types in the parallel grammar” (Jackendoff 2002: 199). In this system, the multiple simultaneous interpretations of NN compounds are explained by a so-called promiscuous conception of compound semantics. Despite a number of notional discrepancies, both frameworks share a heavy emphasis on a cognitive-semantic description of compound relations and an effort to formally account for the lack of an explicit action in these constructions. In this chapter, I focus on a selection of subordinate non-lexicalized NN compounds carrying the semantic roles Agent and Instrument with the aim of spotting similarities and differences between Štekauer's and Jackendoff's views. The chapter is structured as follows: section 8.1 is a synopsis of past approaches to the semantics of NN compounds, while section 8.2 tries to capture the essence of the onomasiological model and the PA separately. Section 8.3 delves into a comparison of the two aforementioned models, and some considerations and conclusions are included under 8.4.
Related topics
Related papers
Dualism and superposition in the analysis of English synthetic compounds ending in -er
Linguistics, 2022
This article studies the role of synthetic-compound families, both formal families and their semantic (or rather conceptual) subfamilies, in the analysis of synthetic compounds (SCs). For this purpose, four formal families of English non-Latinate synthetic compounds sharing their second base and three Latinate families have been investigated. Unlike previous approaches ranging from a purely syntactic treatment of SCs to a more lexical treatment, this study aims at providing a novel explanation for these complex formations. First, it argues that SCs have an ambiguous nature, hovering between (a) morphological suffixation of a verb/word group and (b) morphological derivation and subsequent compounding. Second, it emphasizes the importance of compound families and subfamilies in SCs’ formation and interpretation. By combining a corpus-based analysis with a qualitative synchronic and diachronic investigation of seven compound families – namely X-breaker, X-holder, X-killer, X-maker, X-m...
Byproducts and side effects = Nebenprodukte und Nebeneffekte
2020
The papers collected in this volume have very diverse topics – such as prosodic peculiarities (Meinunger and Hamlaoui & Roussarie), morphological items (McFadden and Steriopolo), or phenomena concerning syntax and its interfaces, such as syntax-morphology (Kamali), syntax-parsing (Winkler), or syntax-pragmatics (Bittner & Dery). The languages considered range from quite prominent German and French via Turkish to very exotic Nuuchahnulth or no longer spoken Old and Middle English. However, all contributions center around structural phenomena and provide analyses in terms of grammatical theory.
Synthetic compounds
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 2010
This chapter focuses on a traditional issue of word formation, namely synthetic compounds. The three basic approaches to the question will be reviewed and analyzed with the help of a large text corpus. The latter is of paramount importance for the analysis because dictionaries usually are not reliable for investigating highly productive word formation patterns and especially German compounding. It is shown that purely syntactic approaches do not cope well with the data, whereas a lexical approach like Construction Morphology is able to grasp the fine-grained distributional properties displayed by compounds. Furthermore, the corpus-based analysis allows us to shed some light on the complex network of semantic properties guiding the selective solidarity between deverbal head and nominal modifier by representing argument structure as a bundle of Dowty's base-roles. * This chapter results from a research developed within the PRIN-project COMPONET coordinated by Sergio Scalise (2005-07). I am deeply indebted with the editors and with an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. Needless to say, opinions expressed and remaining mistakes are of my own responsability. Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 219-235.
The verbal structure in English synthetic compounds
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2022
The question whether synthetic compounds should be analyzed as including a verbal core or as root compounds has issued a long theoretical debate in the linguistic literature since the '70s. It is precisely their mixed properties that make this debate so difficult to settle. We investigate compounds headed by suffix-based deverbal nouns and propose that they are ambiguous between true synthetic compounds, which include verbal structure, and root compounds. We trace this ambiguity back to Grimshaw's (1990) distinction between argument structure nominals (realizing verbal arguments) and result or simple event nominals (which do not realize verbal arguments). The true synthetic compounds are headed by argument structure nominals and realize the verb's internal argument as a non-head (e.g. book reading, book reader), but deverbal nouns may also head root compounds when interpreted as simple event or result nominals and realize a modifier as their non-head (e.g. police questioning). We account for the differences and similarities between synthetic compounds and argument structure nominals in the framework of Distributed Morphology and show how Voice-related properties account for further characteristics of synthetic compounds concerning event implication and accommodation of idioms.
Non-classifying compounds in German
2013
It is widely acknowledged in the literature that the common function of the modifier in nominal compounds is the classifying function. Classifying modifiers specify what kind of entity is being denoted by the head noun, that is, they specify subkinds; e.g. apple juice ‘a kind of juice made from apples’. While the classifying function can certainly be regarded as the default function of lexical modification, lexical modifiers in nominal compounds may also have functions other than classification. Drawing on functional types of noun phrase modification from the typological literature, the paper discusses lexical modifiers in German nominal compounds with an attitudinal or an identifying function, and the conditions under which they arise.
Editorial 19 Special Issue on Philosophical Problems of Chemical Kinds
Foundations of Chemistry, 2005
Forms and Functions of Reflexive Structures in German
Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, (JLLT), 2015
(english) Morpho-syntactic descriptions of reflexivisation processes in German are usually based on a grammatical approach that considers the individual elements in terms of categories, for example, as single words: substantives, verbs or adjectives, without contemplating the changeable paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations of interdependence which link the clause elements. However, in this article, we have adopted a functional approach in our analysis of reflexive structures, in order to make a in-depth study of the clauses as nexuses of grammatical relations. In this way, it is possible to provide a comprehensive description of the different constructions containing sich and attempt to provide systematic schemes of the complex sets of forms and functions. Abstract (italian) Dietro le descrizioni morfosintattiche dei processi di riflessivizzazione in tedesco sta solitamente una prospettiva grammaticale che osserva i singoli elementi dal punto di vista categoriale (per es., come singole parole: sostantivi, verbi, aggettivi), non considerando invece i mutevoli rapporti di interdipendenza paradigmatica e sintagmatica che correlano gli elementi proposizionali. Nel lavoro presente, invece, si procede ad un'analisi delle strutture riflessive adottando un punto di vista funzionale sotto il quale si esaminano le proposizioni in un modo complessivo e cioè come nessi di relazioni grammaticali. In questo modo è possibile fornire una descrizione unitaria di tutte le costruzioni marcate dalla presenza di sich e tentare sistemazioni organiche degli insiemi complessi di forme e funzioni.
Folia Linguistica Laurie Bauer Compounds and compounding
Over the last decades, compounding and the compounds of several languages have witnessed an increasing interest (see, for instance, the publication of The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, edited by Lieber and Štekauer 2009), and among the most renowned linguists who have been working on this topic for more than forty years is Laurie Bauer. The publication of his recent book Compounds and Compounding is very timely, not only for the prominence of the subject, but also because it shifts the focus towards a thorough deliberation of data and a valuable assessment of what has been said and been done in the field of compounds, particularly in that of English compounds. Bauer discusses most of the existing proposals and at the same time raises a lot of questions. Although he does not offer clear-cut answers, he encourages the debate on several issues and shows that there are "several avenues" for further developments in the study of compounding, even in that of one of the best investigated languages, that is, English. All scholars may not agree with some of the possible explanations put forward by the author (see, for instance, the delineation of headedness in exocentric compounds, pp. 64-70). However, a variety of alternative views are discussed, questions range from the most fundamental (e.g. what is a compound) to minor ones (the status of the internal-o-in neoclassical compounds), solid argumentation is provided in favor of one or the other solution, and doors are open to further investigation. There is no specific framework which explicitly governs the theoretical position that seems to be preferred by the author and he does not go into detailed formal analyses of the data. Nevertheless, it is obvious that he is influenced by cognitive theory and construction grammar in his attempt to raise questions and articulate theoretical views about compounding. The book consists of seven chapters and a big part of the comprised information has been obtained from already published literature by Bauer himself. The contents are illustrated by a number of figures and tables, an Appendix deals with the lexical nature of one, and the usual additional material is found, that is, a list of abbreviations and notational conventions, a rich section of references and two indexes, a language index and a general index.
Compounds: The view from hebrew
The Oxford Handbook of Compounds. Oxford: OUP
Section 2 of this note is devoted to reviewing, largely following Borer (1989), the grounds for assuming that the paradigm in (1) – but not in (2) – is associated with compounding. In section 3 I show that there are at least two distinct types of N+N constructs; one, labeled here an ...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.