Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology
Decision-making Support Systems (DMSSs) have been traditionally designed and built by using mainly the Waterfall method, Prototyping-Evolutive, or Adaptive approach in the last three decades. In this paper, the authors argue that while such approaches have guided to DMSS developers, they have been also demanded for adding ad-hoc, non-standardized activities and extra techniques based on their own expertise due to the scarcity of open-access available information of them. Additionally, from a Software Systems Engineering (SSE) viewpoint, such approaches cannot be considered as well-defined methodologies. This article contributes to the research stream of SSE-based DMSS development methodologies by reporting an initial empirical evaluation of IDSSE-M, a free-access methodology for designing and building Intelligent Decision Support Systems. IDSSE-M extends and adapts Turban and Aronson’s DSS Building Paradigm (open access), and Saxena’s Decision Support Engineering Methodology (propri...
Recently, agile software development methodologies have got considerable attention from practitioners. One of the reasons seems that agile methods, to some degree, can be adaptable to different situations. However, little research has been conducted on this subject especially for some kinds of systems such as DSS. As DSS has more specific nature than any other software, we need a suitable development methodology that cope with the significant characteristics of such kinds of systems. In this paper we will preview the software development methodologies used in building DSS, present the characteristics of DSS development methodology and discuss the suitability of agile methodologies for building these kinds of information systems.
International Conference on Information Systems, 1984
Decisionsupport systems are one of the latest developments incomputer-based information systems. There are a variety of indications that their development differs in important ways from othertypes of information systems. This article reports the findings of an investigation of how 18 decision support systems were developed. Six major areas were explored: (1) the nature of the developmental approach; (2) user involvement in system development; (3) the time required for system development; (4) the incorporation of the decision maker's style in the system; (5) the role of information systems and operations research/management science personnel in the developmental effort; and (6) specific procedures and techniques used in system development
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003
The construction of an intelligent decision support system borrows concepts from two fields: software engineering and knowledge engineering. Yet the development processes of the purely technical components of the system and of the knowledge base of t he DSS are very different in terms of development time, paradigms, tools, technical evolutions and the expertise required by the developer. In this paper, we propose an innovative approach taking these fundamental differences into consideration. The novelty of this bipartite approach lies in the clear and generic separation between the container of the DSS (responsible for the software engineering part) and the contents of the DSS (responsible for the knowledge engineering part). 1 A complete study of the limitations of these DSS development processes is beyond the scope of this article and would have to be the subject of a different paper.
This paper presents a contemporary literature review of design science research (DSR) studies in the domain of decision support systems (DSS) development. The latest studies in the DSS design domain claim that DSR methodologies are the most popular design approach, but many details are still yet to be revealed for supporting this claim. In particular, it is important to thoroughly investigate the trends in either the form or deeper insights in use of DSR in this field. The aim of this study is to analyse the existing DSS design science studies to reveal insights into the use of DSR, so that we can outline research agenda for a special issue, based on findings of analysis. We selected articles (from 2005 to 2014) that were published in seven selected premier IS journals (ranked as A* in the ABDC journal ranking). The selected 57 sample articles are representative of DSS design studies that used DSR in theorising, designing, implementing, and evaluating DSS solutions. We discuss the theoretical positions of DSR for DSS development through six categories: DSS artefacts, DSR methods, DSR views, user involvement, DSS design innovations and problem domains. The findings indicate that new studies are needed to fill the knowledge gap in DSS design science, for more solid theoretical basis in near future.
Decision Engineering, 2006
Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2012
Design science has been an important strategy in decision support systems (DSS) research since the field's inception in the early 1970s. Recent reviews of DSS research have indicated a need to improve its quality and relevance. DSS design-science research has an important role in this improvement because design-science research can engage industry and the profession in intellectually important projects. The Hevner, March, Park, and Ram's (HMPR) guidelines for the conduct and assessment of information systems design-science research, published in MIS Quarterly in 2004, provides a vehicle for assessing DSS design-science research. This paper presents research that used bibliometric content analysis to apply the HMPR guidelines to a representative sample of 362 DSS design-science research papers in 14 journals. The analysis highlights major issues in DSS research that need attention: research design, evaluation, relevance, strategic focus, and theorizing.
IGI Global eBooks, 2020
Thisarticlereviewsmethodstothedevelopmentofadecisionsupportsystem(DSS)solutionfor smallbusinessowners/managers.ThemainobjectiveofdesigningtheDSSartefactistosupportthe strategicdecision-makingforachievingcompetitiveadvantagesinthebusiness-to-consumer(B2C) e-commerceenvironment.ManyresearchersintheDSSdomainutilisedvariousmethodstodesign ofinformationsystems(IS)artefact,mostlyintendedforlargebusinesses.Researchershavepaid muchattentiontothebusinessenvironmentasaknowledgesourceforDSSdesignanddevelopment forthesmallbusinessstrategicdecisionsupportneeds.User-centreddesign(UCD)principleswere adoptedforDSSdevelopment.PrioranovelDSSdevelopment,multiplecasestudieswerecarried outforunderstandingtheuserneedsandsystemrequirements.Also,knowledgewassourcedfrom theexternalbusinessenvironmentviatheanalysisofsmallbusinesswebsitefeaturesagainsttheir overseascompetitors.ThefindingssuggesteddevelopingaDSSsolutionforsmallbusinessneeds.
Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2017
Decision Support Systems (DSS) is a mature field of study with an extensive conceptual and empirical literature. This research study provides a starting point for learning and reviewing the foundation literature of the field. Decision support and analytics researchers can benefit from revisiting the methodologies, identifying under-explored ideas, and hopefully identifying visionary concepts from thought leaders who established the DSS research stream. This article reports a systematic examination of the DSS foundational literature published in MIS Quarterly during its first fifteen years of publication-1977-1991. In addition to examining the relevance of these articles to current and future research, the findings of the study provide a reference point for DSS research categories. Articles were categorized in terms of theory, methods, concepts and perspectives about computerized decision support that enrich research and encourage future exploration.
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007
The primary purpose of decision support systems (DSS) is to improve the quality of decisions. This paper suggests that improvement in decision quality is a function of the creation of new data and information applicable to the decision domain and the understanding and learning of that new knowledge by the decision maker; i.e., the purpose of decision support is knowledge
As a subset of the Information systems (IS) discipline, Decision Support Systems (DSS) development research needs a broader conceptual lens in order to evaluate design qualities specific to DSS. This paper presents a development-oriented approach for evaluating DSS applications. Based on a design science mental model proposed by Peffers, Tuunanen, Rothenberger and Chatterjeea , our study outlines a new application area of this conceptual approach through a case demonstration of DSS development through various design checkpoints. To assess the proposed developmentoriented evaluation strategy the paper also describes a qualitative investigation that has been undertaken to assess the conceptual approach with target industry DSS users and developers. The findings suggest that this strategy is of use for improving the overall design qualities in every phase of DSS development, and could be useful for evaluating DSS design with target users and DSS designers within a socio-technical design context.
2004
This paper reports the preliminary results of a project that is investigating the theoretic foundations of decision support systems (DSS). The project is principally motivated by a concern for the direction and relevance of DSS research. The main areas of research focus are the decision and judgement theoretic base of the discipline, the research strategies used in published articles, and
Decision Support Systems, 2008
This paper integrates a number of strands of a long-term project that is critically analysing the academic field of decision support systems (DSS). The project is based on the content analysis of 1093 DSS articles published in 14 major journals from 1990 to 2004. An examination of the findings of each part of the project yields eight key issues that the DSS field should address for it to continue to play an important part in information systems scholarship. These eight issues are: the relevance of DSS research, DSS research methods and paradigms, the judgement and decision-making theoretical foundations of DSS research, the role of the IT artifact in DSS research, the funding of DSS research, inertia and conservatism of DSS research agendas, DSS exposure in general "A" journals, and discipline coherence. The discussion of each issue is based on the data derived from the article content analysis. A number of suggestions are made for the improvement of DSS research. These relate to case study research, design science, professional relevance, industry funding, theoretical foundations, data warehousing, and business intelligence. The suggestions should help DSS researchers construct high quality research agendas that are relevant and rigorous.
Springer Handbook of Automation, 2002
Today, at the turn of the 21st century, many managers are using computers, business databases, and models to help make decisions. This is a positive change in behavior, and some evidence indicates the use of computers to support management decision making is entering a new and more sophisticated stage. The novelty of managers using computers is wearing off, and, more importantly, the capabilities of our support systems are beginning to match the expectations of managers. Decision Support Systems (DSS) are now both a business necessity and an opportunity to gain competitive advantage. This book tries to build on these positive changes and provide an updated exploration of computerized decision support systems. Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers is only one part of an innovative knowledge resource for people interested in learning more about DSS. It is an extension and integration of materials at DSSResources.COM. The idea is to develop a book that is strong on concepts and theory with timely and up-to-date application examples, integrated with Web-based materials. MISSION, AUDIENCE AND OBJECTIVES The mission of both the book and DSSResources.COM is to help people increase their knowledge of how to use information technologies and software to improve decision making. The primary target audience is managers interested in investigating innovative Decision Support Systems. My perspective at DSSResources.COM and in this book is both managerial and technical. In writing the chapters and collecting resources, my overriding concern has been to help people gain capabilities, knowledge, and skills that they can apply as they use and manage information systems and technologies. Some readers can apply the knowledge in this book to help build a DSS. Some xii Preface readers may want to read additional, specialized books and work as decision support analysts; some may be assigned to DSS project teams; and others may help in managing a DSS or in training DSS users. The primary focus of this book is helping people develop intellectual capabilities related to the design and development of DSS. The book also explores how DSS can support organization goals a nd how DSS impact organizations and managers. Throughout the book, DSS are defined broadly as interactive computer-based systems that help people use computer communications, data, documents, knowledge, and models to solve problems and make decisions. DSS are ancillary or auxiliary systems; they are not intended to replace skilled decision makers. This book examines the design, development, and implementation of systems that support management decision making. The focus is on technologybased systems. After completing Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers, readers should: • Have a more sophisticated understanding of how a DSS can help a company meet its objectives, including gaining a competitive advantage, increasing revenues and profits, decreasing expenses, providing better customer service, and improving decision making; • Be better informed consumers of DSS and information technology resources, especially for end-user development of DSS applications; • Know more about the Internet, the World Wide Web, its potential uses to support decision making, and its impact on decision behavior; • Have more capabilities related to DSS design and development; and, • Understand that Decision Support Systems are intended to support rather than replace decision makers. The emphasis throughout the book is on making sense of a rapidly changing computing applications area. Both descriptive and prescriptive ideas are linked to an expanded component-driven DSS framework. The focus is heavily oriented to practice and applications, but, when possible, empirical results and theory are referred to in an attempt to create a more enduring context for the conclusions. Also, every effort has been made to find examples that are current and understandable. In general, this is an "applications" book more than a "theory" book. It provides enough concrete detail to help people understand their experiences using DSS, and it has suggestions for people involved with DSS projects. Also, the book provides the knowledge and framework needed by people who want a general familiarity with current developments and with "what is possible." OVERVIEW OF THE CONTENTS Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers has 12 chapters. Chapter 1, titled "Supporting Business Decis ion Making," provides a rationale for studying about and understanding DSS and presents an expanded Preface xiii framework for categorizing DSS. Also, the chapter explains the differences between transaction processing systems and DSS. "Gaining Competitive Advantage with Decision Support Systems" is the focus of Chapter 2. After reviewing some technology trends that provide new opportunities for building DSS, the chapter discusses how DSS can create a competitive advantage. A few classic examples of DSS that provided companies with a competitive advantage are summarized in the chapter. Understanding business decision making and business decision processes is the key to building an effective DSS. Chapter 3, titled "Analyzing Business Decision Processes," explains fundamental concepts related to business decision making. Chapter 4, "Designing and Developing Decision Support Systems," is a pivotal chapter that changes the focus of the book to more technical issues. Once the topic of building and buying DSS is raised and discussed in Chapter 4, the next chapter addresses the topic of greatest importance to DSS success, the user interface. In Chapter 5, "Designing and Evaluating DSS User Interfaces," various types of user interfaces are briefly reviewed. The goal is to examine guidelines for DSS user interfaces. Chapter 6 is titled "Understanding DSS Architecture, Networking, and Security Issues," and it attempts to present a simplified introduction to extremely complex technical topics. The topics in this chapter are important for management-oriented and more technically savvy readers. Chapters 7 through 11 provide more details and examples related to the categories in the expanded DSS framework. Each chapter provides a survey of what is possible and an introduction to technical issues for making an innovative DSS a reality. Chapter 7 focuses on "Implementing Communications-Driven and Group Decision Support Systems;" Chapter 8 is titled "Building Data and Document-Driven Decision Support Systems;" Chapter 9, "Building Knowledge-Driven DSS and Mining Data," examines two related technologies, management expert systems and data mining. Chapter 10 discusses "Building Model-Driven Decision Support Systems;" Chapter 11, titled "Building Web-Based and Interorganizational Decision Support Systems," examines the latest developments in decision support. The concluding chapter of Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers is titled "Evaluating Decision Support System Projects." After reading the prior chapters, managers and aspiring managers may have some novel or interesting ideas for DSS. So, this chapter reviews and discusses tools and issues associated with evaluating proposed DSS projects. This book also includes a decision support readiness audit and a glossary of key decision support system terms.
2000
Integrated Decision-Making Support Systems (IDMSS), are specialized Computer Based Information Systems designed to support all phases of the DecisionMaking Process. Full integration of stand-alone components was proposed in the early 90 s and, despite substantial reported benefits above less integrated systems, few of the fully integrated systems have been implemented in practice. We believe that this “implementation paradox” is caused by the lack of a process-oriented perspective to guide the implementation of IDMSS. This tutorial has the goal of offering such a process-oriented approach.
Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Since their creation in the early 1960's, decision support systems (DSSs) have evolved over the past 4 decades and continue to do so today. Although DSSs have grown substantially since its inception, improvements still need to be made. New technology has emerged and will continue to do so and, consequently, DSSs need to keep pace with it. Also, knowledge needs to play a bigger role in the form of decision making. We first discuss design and analysis methods/techniques/issues related to DSSs. Then, the three possible ways to enhance DSSs will be explored.
Systemic Practice and Action Research, 1992
A study of the DSS implementation area reveals an increased emphasis on methodologies for DSS development. As the DSS field matures, a larger number of methodological options are becoming available to the DSS developer. Existing methodologies have adopted various methods for performing the important task of DSS requirements analysis and specification. In envisaging a hierarchy of requirements analysis methods, a method for improved requirements analysis is proposed to remedy observed deficiencies within it. This method is based on a view of generic types of inquiries or solicitations made by the DSS user during decision-making. This formalism constitutes the basis of a proposed DSS development methodology that offers several benefits to DSS development. The intended benefits include a sharper and more focused requirements analysis to improve the DSS development process. This paper describes the model and methodology, alongside details of a real-world example of their use in developing a Marketing Decision Support System (MKDSS) for the support of marketing decision-making.
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 02827581 2013 837950, 2014
Decision support systems (DSSs) are important in decision-making environments with conflicting interests. Many DSSs developed have not been used in practice. Experts argue that these tools do not respond to real user needs and that the inclusion of stakeholders in the development process is the solution. However, it is not clear which features of participatory development of DSSs result in improved uptake and better outcomes. A review of papers, reporting on case studies where DSSs and other decision tools (information systems, software and scenario tools) were developed with elements of participation, was carried out. The cases were analysed according to a framework created as part of this research; it includes criteria to evaluate the development process and the outcomes. Relevant aspects to consider in the participatory development processes include establishing clear objectives, timing and location of the process; keeping discussions on track; favouring participation and interaction of individuals and groups; and challenging creative thinking of the tool and future scenarios. The case studies that address these issues show better outcomes; however, there is a large degree of uncertainty concerning them because developers have typically neither asked participants about their perceptions of the processes and resultant tools nor have they monitored the use and legacy of the tools over the long term.
2016
Despite a well-established research tradition, the field of Decision Support Systems (DSS) suffers from a lack of practitioner relevance. DSS researchers have comprehended the emergence of Design Science Research (DSR) for the issue as it provides support to improve the behavioral aspect of design. However, conceptualizations for DSR as the common approach to conducting DSS research have not been materialized to address the relevance issues. In the paper extending an existing conceptualization, we introduce a new DSR view for DSS development. The view incorporates design dimensions related to DSS design, such as professional value, interaction, intentions, practices, and problem-solving. We developed the DSR view from an action design research approach conducted through a well-defined framework for developing a generic DSS solution. The view represents the importance of practitioner’s centric DSR to better address practitioner’s relevance issues in DSS design.
Journal of Information Technology, 2005
This paper critically analyses the nature and state of decision support systems (DSS) research. To provide context for the analysis, a history of DSS is presented which focuses on the evolution of a number of sub-groupings of research and practice: personal DSS, group support systems, negotiation support systems, intelligent DSS, knowledge management-based DSS, executive information systems/business intelligence, and data warehousing. To understand the state of DSS research an empirical investigation of published DSS research is presented. This investigation is based on the detailed analysis of 1,020 DSS articles published in 14 major journals from 1990 to 2003. The analysis found that DSS publication has been falling steadily since its peak in 1994 and the current publication rate is at early 1990s levels. Other findings include that personal DSS and group support systems dominate research activity and data warehousing is the least published type of DSS. The journal DSS is the majo...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.