Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Abstract

It is observed that relatively little has been published in the field of Indo-European cosmology in relation to the output of comparative mythology as a whole. Lyle’s comprehensive scheme of cosmological structure is reviewed in the light of Georges Dumézil’s work, and sources are examined. On the basis of comparisons from Indic, Iranian, Greek, Anatolian, Celtic and Germanic traditions an alternative triad is suggested for the visible world. Both systems are examined and compared in terms of explanatory power; issues of geographical distribution; the likelihood of cultural contact with neighbouring ancient civilizations, e.g., Mesopotamia; change and development in Indo-European over the millennia before written texts; comparisons across the Indo-European linguistic area; and applications to other aspects of the cultures studied. On the basis of what has survived in the various language groups, an attempt is made to explain the differences between Lyle’s system and the one outlined below. The proposed model is extended to include Allen’s “fourth function” that deals with what is beyond or outside of the tripartite cosmos, providing a system intended to outline an earlier Indo-European vertical cosmic structure, as expressed in later literatures and iconography.