Bjarne Oldrup
Forum Replies Created
-
Thank you for this very sensible clarification. I wasn’t aware that so many installations still are on PHP 7. According to WordPress own stats, 22% on PHP 7.4 alone.
https://wordpress.org/about/stats/
With PHP 8.3 being given security updates for another two years, and apparently no noticeable performance gains to updating, I’ll just stick with PHP 8.3 for now.
All the best
BjarneThank you for taking accessibility into consideration 🙏
I think your suggestion is solid. It would give is the control we need to disable excessive animation that could cause nausea to some visitors, while still allowing small micro-interactions, which admittedly can be pretty useful.
I’ve been playing around with Interactions a bit. To me, a logical location for that “Disable if reduced motion” options, would be under the Interaction > Settings, below Smoothness. That would even leave room for a short description of why you might want to disable interactions in some cases. But that is just an idea.
To test it on Windows, you can disable Animation effects in Accessibility > Visual Effects, and I assume a similar setting is available on MacOS as well.
From here, also just an appreciation for looking into this. Sometimes ideas are quick and easy to implement, this was not one of them. Moving on. 🏃♂️➡️
Once again, thank you for Independent Analytics ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
This option is solely relevant for us nerds aiming to shave a mere 8kb of uncompressed code off an already lean website; a constant in wp-config is an appropriate way to offer that feature. That said, it can mean the little difference when pursuing that A+ carbon rating or a perfect score in Checkbot, so thank you for considering it 😁
That’s right, sorry for not being clear on what I meant.
The inline script is cached for the current page, for sure. As most of it’s content, except for the signature parameter, appears the same for all pages, I just saw an opportunity to make the HTML output for all the pages a little leaner. Everything counts 🙂 🚀
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [EWWW Image Optimizer] Any known issues with WordPress 6.8 and PHP 8.3?Perfect! Thank you for the feedback 😄
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Include Mastodon Feed] Would it be possible to lazy load images?Oh… that’s a pretty fast response ⚡😄
Updated and verified working in Ecosia (chromium) and Firefox.
Great improvement! Thank you 👏👏👏
I can confirm this error or warning if you like, created havoc across the board with most plugins since WP 6.7 (albeit with WP_DEBUG enabled). If I remember correctly, there is a good chance this initialization of the language isn’t needed at all anyway, so potentially the “fix” can be as simple as deleting a line of code. There are plenty of questions, and answers, on that topic, also here in the WordPress forums and on github.
A good check on WP 6.8 and PHP 8.3 compatibility would be splendid. The time invested should be good for a whole year now 😉
I’d be happy to pitch in testing in multi-language environment.
Hej Nikaline 🙂
Close enough. I’m Danish, and we have been dealing with the same requirements as it appears you have to deal with now, since 2018. In short, Yes, Independent Analytics works without cookies, so assuming you don’t have other stuff setting cookies, you can avoid a cookie banner.
Hope that helps.
Bjarne
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Noted!] Weird “Add note” field at the bottom of MailPoet screensHi Kyle.
I can no longer provoke that noted link on my MailPoet screens, and MailPoet has seen some updates lately. Let’s call it fixed. 🙂
Bjarne
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Pods - Custom Content Types and Fields] Translation errorFound a reference to this issue in the changelog for version 3.2.8 saying
Fixed: Move load_plugin_textdomain usage into init and make it optional with the constant
PODS_LOAD_TEXTDOMAINset totrue. It is no longer needed for WordPress.org plugins but may be needed in the future for testing. (@sc0ttkclark)I tried setting PODS_LOAD_TEXTDOMAIN to FALSE in my WP_CONFIG but that didn’t help.
Please share any solution you might find.
Great! Thank you for keeping me posted. Will tjek out the new version 🙂
Well, I was confused by the section with the following heading and subheadings:
Password Protect Entire WordPress Site With These Features:
- Complete Site Protection
- Passwordless Admin Access’
- Add Google Recaptcha
- IP Address Whitelisting
- Specific Post/Page Protection
- User Role Whitelisting
- WP-Admin Protection
- Password Attempt Activity Report (Weekly)
- Custom Post Type Protection
- Category/Taxonomy Protection
- Certain Page/Posts Exclusions
- Limit Login Attempts
- Password Expiration and Usage Limit
- Bypass URL
- Detailed Activity Logs
- Lock Screen Customization
- Multiple Password Management
It’s not clear, at least to me, that some of these features are not free, especially when the entire section, is followed by this headline:
5 Key Reasons Why You Should Opt for Password Protected Pro
— I was assuming that PRO features are listed here
It’s not unusual to see separate lists of free and pro features. Many plugin descriptions do that. Some are very distinct about labeling PRO features, like this example:
- Specific Post/Page Protection [PRO]
- User Role Whitelisting [PRO]
- WP-Admin Protection [PRO]
That would make it more clear, to me, what is free and what is pro. Just a suggestion.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Noted!] Notes seems stored as a CPT and logged; link to view and edit failsHi Kyle. I don’t think this “issue” needs fixing. Maybe there is some kind of parameter to the creation of the post type, that disables the option to “edit” the post. In any case, it does not affect the functionality of Notes!, and I’ll close the topic for now.
Thank you again, for sharing this fine little plugin with the community 🙂
/Bjarne
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Noted!] [Feature request] Specific notes on specific dashboard pages+1 to that. Maybe some sort of storing the context of the note. Were I on the settings page when typing in this note? A particular plugin page? If it could be kept super simple, it would be a nice addition to the plugin.