Makes itself pointless

  • andde2

    (@andde2)


    2 days, 11 hours ago

    Waste of time, any AI browser plugin can do what this does. Greed made the developer disable the option to let the AI edit the post/text directly. This effectively makes configuring the plugin a waste of time, compared to “just working” browser plugin.

    Of course, the paywall is NOT a payment, it is another stinking subscription, expensive version.
    Such display of greed for basic functionality, makes me even wonder if the API keys are going to be abused too, after all, it would be in line with the pricing, price model, and the general impresion.

    • This topic was modified 2 days, 11 hours ago by andde2.
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Plugin Author Jordy Meow

    (@tigroumeow)

    2 days, 4 hours ago

    I always welcome constructive criticism, but I need to address the baseless accusations in this review.

    First, regarding your speculation about API keys: this is entirely false. The plugin processes API keys securely and locally. Accusing a developer of malicious intent without evidence crosses a line.

    Second, regarding the Post Assistant and direct edits: taking automated actions requires Function Calling. Ensuring Function Calling remains stable and compatible across constantly updating LLM models is incredibly difficut. It requires continuous maintenance, testing, and dedicated support.

    Because of the massive amount of work required to keep Function Calling operational, it is entirely unsustainable to offer it for free. That is why it is a Pro feature. It is not greed; it is the reality of maintaining complex software.

    I work hard to provide a functional free tier, but I cannot give away everything neither, otherwise this plugin wouldn’t survive.

    I wish you the best in finding a browser extension that better fits your workflow.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this review.

Tags